Saturday, February 19, 2011

Statement by Tim Pawlenty in Support of Governor Scott Walker

Tim Pawlenty

Tim Pawlenty
"Governor Scott Walker is making tough choices needed to avoid financial ruin. The nation's governors don't need a lecture from a President who has never balanced a budget. All levels of government need to bring public employee compensation in line with the private sector. The gig is up for public employee groups who demand better benefits than the taxpayers who are paying the bill. I'm confident Governor Walker's reforms will succeed in Wisconsin. Stand strong, Scott -- average taxpayers everywhere are rooting for you."

TEXT CREDIT: Tim Pawlenty's Freedom First PAC PO Box 9190 St. Paul, MN 55109

IMAGE CREDIT: Official photo of Governor Tim Pawlenty (R-MN).

Governor Rick Scott Rejects Federal High Speed Rail VIDEO TEXT


Tallahassee, Fla. – After thoughtful consideration, Governor Rick Scott informed U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood of the state’s decision to reject President Obama’s Tampa to Orlando high-speed rail project.

Below are Governor Scott’s Remarks as Prepared:

Governor Rick Scott* As you know, I was elected to get Floridians back to work and to change the way government does business in our state.

* I am committed to making good on those promises.

* Recently, I sent a budget proposal to the legislature that reduces the size and scope of government; reduces the costs of that government and passes those cost savings on to taxpayers so that we can create new jobs and turn Florida’s economy around.

* I believe when you reduce government’s reach and hold that government accountable, you create an environment where the economy can flourish.

* When you reduce taxes and put that money back in the hands of hardworking Floridians and Florida businesses, that money will be spent on creating private sector jobs

* As you know, my background is in business, not politics. But you don’t have to be an economics expert to understand that if you spend more money than you take in, your business will fail.

* Unfortunately, politicians haven’t always seemed to grasp that same principle.

* In fact, the Obama administration just announced a $3.73 trillion budget that includes the largest budget deficit in our nation’s history ($1.65 trillion).

* The president’s budget includes $1.6 trillion in higher taxes.

* Those higher taxes will impact Floridians and our competitiveness worldwide. We cannot expect individuals to build businesses in America if our taxes are higher than other countries.

* Higher taxes and more government spending is a recipe for disaster. Government has become addicted to spending beyond its means and we cannot continue this flawed policy.

* Let us never forget, whether it is Washington or Tallahassee, government has no resources of its own. Government can only give to us what it has previously taken from us.

* That is why today I am announcing my decision to reject the Obama administration’s plan to partially-fund the costly Tampa to Orlando high-speed rail project.

* Moments ago I spoke with U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to inform him of my decision. I appreciate the Secretary’s efforts to work with us and I look forward to working with him in the future.

* My decision to reject the project comes down to three main economic realities:

o First – capital cost overruns from the project could put Florida taxpayers on the hook for an additional $3 billion.

o Second – ridership and revenue projections are historically overly-optimistic and would likely result in ongoing subsidies that state taxpayers would have to incur. (from $300 million – $575 million over 10 years) – Note: The state subsidizes Tri-Rail $34.6 million a year while passenger revenues covers only $10.4 million of the $64 million annual operating budget.

o Finally – if the project becomes too costly for taxpayers and is shut down, the state would have to return the $2.4 billion in federal funds to D.C.

* The truth is that this project would be far too costly to taxpayers and I believe the risk far outweighs the benefits.

* Historical data shows capital cost overruns are pervasive in 9 out of 10 high speed rail projects and that 2/3 of those projects inflated ridership projections by an average of 65 percent of actual patronage.

* It is projected that 3.07 million people will use the train annually. Keep in mind that Amtrak’s Acela train in Washington, D.C., Boston, Philadelphia, New York and Baltimore only had 3.2 million riders in 2010. And that market’s population is 8 times the size of the Tampa/Orlando market.

* President Obama’s high-speed rail program is not the answer to Florida’s economic recovery.

* We must make investments in areas where we will get a return for the shareholders – Florida’s taxpayers.

* Rather than investing in a high-risk rail project, we should be focusing on improving our ports, rail and highway infrastructure to be in a position to attract the increased shipping that will result when the Panama Canal is expanded when the free trade agreements with Colombia and Panama are ratified and with the expansion of the economies of Central and South America.

* By capturing a larger share of containerized imports entering our seaports, expanding export markets for Florida businesses and emerging as a global hub for trade and investment we can create up to an additional 143,000 jobs according to a recent chamber of commerce study.

* It is absolutely critical that we make smart investments with taxpayer dollars, whether state or federal, and I believe our state will be better served by spending these funds on projects that will benefit Florida and not turn into a spending boondoggle.

* The answer is to reduce government spending, cut government’s leash on our state’s job creators and then hold that government accountable for the investments it makes.

* That is what I was elected to do and that is how I plan to govern. Let’s get to work! # # #

View Governor Rick Scott’s Letter to USDOT Secretary Ray LaHood in PDF FORMAT

VIDEO CREDIT: newsserviceflorida

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Office of Governor Rick Scott State of Florida The Capitol 400 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001 (850) 488-7146

Ann Coulter, Chris Christie most viable 2012 Republican presidential contender VIDEO


Ann Coulter MSNBC interview with Last Word host Lawrence O’ Donnell.

If we don't run christie, romney will be the nominee.

>> here's the truth nobody's talking about. you'll have to raise the retirement age for social security. oh, i just said it. and i'm still standing here. i did not vaporize into the carpeting. and i said it.

>> in the spotlight tonight, new jersey governor chris christie's blunt speech yesterday in washington has more republicans calling for him to run for president. the leading cheerleader of the christie for president movement is ann coulter, who made news at cpac last weekend by saying christie is the only republican who can beat barack obama. and tuesday she continued her draft christie campaign by comparing him to the most admired republican of the 20th century, ronald reagan.

>> i don't care if he wants to run. his country needs him.

>> social issues and some --

>> he's pro-life. a lot of false rumors about him.

>> health care, immigration, some other issues he's --

>> there are a few things he's a little soft on, but by the way, our whitewash memories of reagan, he was soft on a few thing, too.

>> joining me now, my former msnbc colleague, ann coulter. ann, thank you for being here tonight.

>> thank you for having me.

>> does msnbc still appear on your resume anywhere or has that been whitewashed soviet style?

>> it's the only network i've ever worked for. started with you.

>> there you go. here's the idea for tonight.

>> yes.

>> we're going to try, for a change of pace for you --

>> yes.

>> we're going to try to find areas of agreement. going to reach across the aisle for areas of agreement.

>> can i play, too?

>> yes, yes, indeed. so, for example, an area of agreement we seem to have, mitt romney is a loser. please expound.

>> well, i wouldn't say that. i mean, he may well be the best candidate if it's not my love, chris christie. and when it came down to three candidates, huckaby, mccain, or romney, i was totally for romney if that's what my choice is. maybe i'm wrong about my predictions saying he would run.

>> you're right. you said romney would lose. totally right.

TEXT and VIDEO CREDIT: msnbc video: Ann Coulter talks GOP winners and losers

Tom Price Weekly Republican Address TEXT PODCAST VIDEO 02/19/11


Washington (Feb 18) Delivering the Weekly Republican Address, House Republican Policy Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) highlights the new majority’s effort to free our economy from the shackles of big government and skyrocketing debt that are creating the economic uncertainty that economists say makes it harder to create jobs. Chairman Price reaffirms the new majority’s commitment to lead where the President has punted on addressing our most significant fiscal challenges, including entitlement reform. Chairman Price is in his fourth term serving the people of Georgia’s Sixth Congressional District. In addition to being a member of the House GOP leadership team, he is a member of the House Budget and Ways & Means Committees and a former Chairman of the Republican Study Committee.

Podcast of the address: Download MP3 for PODCAST || FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT BELOW. || VIDEO DOWNLOAD MPEG File || MP4 File ||

Tom Price“Hello, I’m Congressman Tom Price and I have the privilege of working for the people of Georgia’s Sixth Congressional District. In addition to serving as the Chairman of the House Policy Committee, I’m a member of the House Budget Committee.
“And by now you’ve probably heard a lot of talk coming out of Washington about a so-called budget battle. We’ve even got some Democrats who run Washington threatening to shut down the government instead of listening to the American people and cutting spending. Right now, our focus should be creating jobs and getting our economy moving again.

“After all, the President promised that this would be the year that he got serious about the deficits and the debt hurting our economy. Instead, he started out by asking Congress to raise the debt limit, without any commitment to cutting spending at the same time. In his State of the Union address, he called for more ineffective ‘stimulus’ spending. And this week he submitted a budget for the next fiscal year that destroys jobs by spending too much, and borrowing too much, and taxing too much.

“Listen to economists, listen to the folks who create jobs in this country, and you’ll hear that we need to end Washington’s spending binge to reduce uncertainty, to boost confidence, and to encourage private investment in our economy. To help create a better environment for job creation in America, the spending binge has got to stop. Now with the support of Republican governors and our reform-minded colleagues in the Senate, the new House majority is working hard toward that goal.

“That’s why the House spent this past week working on a bill to cut discretionary spending by $100 billion over the last seven months of the current fiscal year. We’re not only living up to our Pledge to America, we’re exceeding it. And more cuts and more reforms are on the way.

“Now as part of our focus on job growth, committees in the House are combing through job-crushing government regulations, and conducting rigorous oversight of how the government spends the people’s time and your money. We’ll soon begin work on legislation to cut wasteful mandatory spending.

“In the spring, under the leadership of our Budget Chairman, Paul Ryan, we’ll put forth a budget for the next fiscal year that confronts the fiscal challenges facing our nation instead of ducking them. It’ll offer ideas for real entitlement reform so we can have a conversation with the American people about the challenges we face and the need to chart a new path to prosperity.

“Now as a doctor and as a parent, I find it astounding that the President has submitted a budget that ignores the recommendations of his own fiscal commission and it punts on all of the tough choices – including entitlement reform. Instead, he’s expanded entitlements through ObamaCare – a government takeover that will destroy 800,000 jobs, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, and will accelerate our path to fiscal ruin.

“This issue demands presidential leadership – something that the President so far just seems unwilling to offer.

“Now if we can find an upside, it’s that the President admitted that his budget fails to address our fiscal crisis. You see, some Members of Congress still won’t even acknowledge that there’s a crisis. One in particular, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said not too long ago, and I quote, “Social Security is fine.” But you know it’s not fine. This year, for the first time, it will pay out more money than it takes in.

“And, with the wave of Baby Boomers starting to retire, there’s no way that we can protect programs like Social Security for the future and get our debt under control unless we begin to honestly address entitlements. Now for the President, leadership requires telling friends like Harry Reid the truth, even if it’s politically difficult.

“Now, our reforms will focus both on saving these programs for current and future generations of Americans and on getting our debt under control and our economy growing. By taking critical steps forward now, we can fulfill the mission of health and retirement security for all Americans without making changes for those in or near retirement.

“The new Republican majority will lead even as the Democrats who run Washington ignore their responsibilities.

“And if Senator Reid and President Obama change their minds, we’ll be ready to work with them. In the meantime, Republicans are focused on listening to the people, confronting our nation’s challenges, and helping our economy get back to creating jobs.

“Thanks for listening.”

TEXT CREDIT: Speaker of the House John Boehner Contact H-232 The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 P (202) 225-0600 F (202) 225-5117

VIDEO and IMAGE CREDIT: HouseConference

AUDIO/VIDEO CREDIT: The House Republican Conference - Digital Communications visual.media@mail.house.gov 202-225-5439

Friday, February 18, 2011

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker press conference VIDEO


Amid protests over the state's budget dispute, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker held a press conference 02/18/11, stating that "like nearly every state across the country, we don't have any more money."
Wisconsin Governor Scott WalkerWalker also said Wisconsin has been broke for years, and that the previous governor "delayed the pain" of making tough decisions with federal stimulus money.

Walker Calls Democrat Legislators Back Into State, Madison–Today Governor Walker released the following statement:
Out of respect for the institution of the Legislature and the democratic process, I am calling on Senate Democrats to show up to work today, debate legislation and cast their vote. Their actions by leaving the state and hiding from voting are disrespectful to the hundreds of thousands of public employees who showed up to work today and the millions of taxpayers they represent.


press conference 02/17/11

VIDEO CREDIT: FoxNewsInsider

TEXT CREDIT: Office of Governor Scott Walker 115 East Capitol Madison WI 53702 Phone (608) 266-1212 Email: govgeneral@wisconsin.gov

IMAGE CREDIT: Governor Scott Walker

Governor Bob McDonnell speaks out in support of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker VIDEO


Governor Bob McDonnell speaks out in support of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's efforts to trim a $3billion budget deficit by cutting spending, not raising taxes.

TEXT and VIDEO CREDIT: mcdonnellforgovernor

Republican Study Committee will offer an amendment to reduce spending in H.R. 1, the FY 2011 continuing resolution, by an additional $22 billion

Republican Study Committee LogoRSC Members Offer Amendment to Cut More from 2011 Spending Bill Looking to Make a Good Bill Better Washington, Feb 18 -

Today, members of the Republican Study Committee (RSC) will offer an amendment to reduce spending in H.R. 1, the FY 2011 continuing resolution, by an additional $22 billion. The amendment would return total non-security spending in 2011 to just below its pre-stimulus 2008 level, which represents a savings of more than $100 billion from President Obama’s non-security discretionary budget request for this year.

“After years of endless increases, Congress is finally talking about how to reduce spending and get Washington out of the way,” said RSC Chairman Jim Jordan. “In the last four years, federal spending rose by nearly 36% while Americans’ median family income fell by 4.2%. At the same time, the national debt spiked by a staggering $5.4 trillion.

“Families and businesses have had to cut back, and they’re demanding that Washington do the same. This week, Republicans are taking the first step to getting the country’s finances in order. This is already a good bill, but I believe we can make it even better.”

The amendment, which will be formally offered by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, makes across-the-board cuts of 11% to Legislative Branch accounts and 5.5% to all other non-security accounts, excluding aid to Israel.

In addition to Chairman Jordan and Rep. Blackburn, other sponsors of the amendment include Reps. Jeff Flake, Scott Garrett, Mike Pence, John Campbell, Jeff Duncan, Frank Guinta, Tim Huelskamp, Steve Southerland, and Joe Walsh.

###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Republican Study Committee (RSC) - The Caucus of House Conservatives FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2.18.2011

Thursday, February 17, 2011

House approves amendment to block funds for implementation of Internet regulation FCC overstepped its authority H.J.RES.37

House Energy and Commerce Committee LogoHouse sends clear message: FCC overstepped its authority, House approves amendment to block funds for implementation of Internet regulation.
WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. House of Representatives today sent a clear signal to the FCC that it overstepped its authorities granted by Congress by strongly rebuking the commission’s attempts to regulate the Internet.

The House passed an amendment, offered by Rep. Greg Walden, chair of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, to the Continuing Resolution to prohibit the FCC from using funds to implement the controversial Internet regulations that the commission adopted in December. The amendment was crafted with leaders from the Appropriations Committee, including Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Jo Ann Emerson, and Tom Graves, to give time for Congress to permanently overturn the misguided rules.

“We all want an open and thriving Internet. That Internet exists today. Consumers can access anything they want with the click of a mouse thanks to our historical hands-off approach,” said Walden. “I am pleased that my colleagues in the House accepted my amendment to ensure the FCC does not have the funds to implement the controversial Internet regulations.”

“However, the amendment is simply a stop gap measure while we work towards passing a more permanent solution,” Rep. Walden said. “I would encourage everybody who cares about keeping the government out of the business of running the internet to cosponsor the Resolution of Disapproval, H.J.Res. 37, which would nullify the rules themselves.”

###

Bill Summary & Status 112th Congress (2011 - 2012) H.AMDT.80

Bill Summary & Status 112th Congress (2011 - 2012) H.J.RES.37

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: House Energy and Commerce Committee January 11, 2011 By Alexa Marrero, (202) 225-3641 or Sean Bonyun, (202) 225-3761 2125 Rayburn House Office Building | Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 225-2927

Tim Huelskamp Cosponsors Amendment to Defund Presidential Czars VIDEO


Congressman Huelskamp Cosponsors Amendment to Defund Presidential Czars

(WASHINGTON) – Kansas Congressman Tim Huelskamp cosponsored the “Scalise-Huelskamp” amendment to the Continuing Resolution that will defund the salaries and staff expenses of nine czars appointed by the President without Congressional consent.

“This administration has ignored the necessary role of ‘Advice and Consent’ in the hiring of more than 30 czars without the approval of Congress. It’s by far one of the most egregious examples of the Obama White House’s overreach,” Congressman Huelskamp said. “The unchecked power given to these czars shows an obvious disregard for the rule of law.”

“The policy priorities of these czars should be subject to Congressional oversight,” Congressman Huelskamp said. “I fought for government transparency when I was a state legislator, and I’ll do the same here in Washington. The President should not be allowed to manipulate our system of government when he wants it to serve his personal agenda.”

Some of the positions that will be defunded include:

* The Director of the White House Office of Health Reform;
* The Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change;
* The Special Envoy for Climate Change;
* The Special Envoy to oversee the closure of the Detention Center at Guantanamo Bay; and
* The Senior Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury assigned to the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry and Senior Counselor for Manufacturing Policy.

###

TEXT CREDIT: Congressman Tim Huelskamp Washington, DC 126 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-2715 Fax: (202) 225-5124 Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00AM-5:00PM Eastern time

VIDEO CREDIT: CongressmanHuelskamp

Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

Transcript of Governor Chris Christie’s Speech at the American Enterprise Institute
Thank you very much for the introduction and for the invitation to be here today. I came today because I really think it’s extraordinarily important for those of us who believe that our country is off on the wrong track, to begin the conversation and for New Jersey’s sake to continue the conversation about how we fix the problems that ail our states and our country in a direct and blunt way. And I fear that after watching how things have been going over the last month or two, that we’re missing a historic opportunity. And I will not be someone who will participate in silently missing that opportunity. A month ago, I gave my State of the State speech in New Jersey, and what I said during that speech was that I was not going to do the normal State of the State or State of the Union speech that you see. George Will put it better than I ever could, he said these speeches have become every politician’s attempt to stroke the erogenous zones of every constituency in their jurisdiction. They become these laundry list things that you do for your cabinet so that as they’re sitting up in the balcony, and you mention the Department of Labor, that Commissioner can sit up straight and smile, because at the time his mother is going to see him on TV. I didn’t think it was a good enough of a reason, as much as I love my Commissioner of Labor, to give a speech like that, especially during these times. During these times, as I said in that speech, it’s time to do the big things, the really big things, and I don’t think they’re will be much disagreement in this room and I don’t think there should be much disagreement across the country about what those things are - what they are for New Jersey and what they are for America. For us in New Jersey, it’s three things: it’s restoring and maintaining fiscal sanity; it’s getting our pension and health benefits under control, reformed and have the cost lowered; and it’s reforming an education system that costs too much and produces too little for our society today and for our children’s future. Now if you look at those three issues, these are not in and of themselves Democratic or Republican issues. Each governor across America is confronting the same things that I’m confronting in New Jersey: a decade or more of out of control spending in many if not most states; state taxes that have been raised to new levels; debt loads that are out of control, both for state entitlements and for just general borrowing. Every governor, Republican or Democrat, is facing this problem. If you look at it, just look at our little area of the world. You have me in New Jersey, elected in 2009 as a conservative Republican in one of the bluest states in America, and across the river you have the son of a liberal icon who is saying the exact same things that I’m saying. I defy you to look at the first six weeks of the Cuomo Administration in Albany and discern much of a difference between what Governor Andrew Cuomo is saying and what Governor Chris Christie is saying on these big issues. And it’s not because all of a sudden Governor Cuomo and I have decided that we’re members of the same party, we’re no. But we are confronted with the same problems and these problems and issues are not partisan. They are obvious and long overdue to be solved and so that’s why you see Andrew Cuomo, or for God’s sake, even Jerry Brown in California talking about reducing salaries of state workers by 8-10%. Saying the same things that Scott Walker is fighting in Wisconsin, that John Kasich is fighting in Ohio, that Rick Snyder is fighting in Michigan, that Susana Martinez is fighting in New Mexico.


Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 VIDEO

I said to the people of New Jersey when I ran for governor in 2009, that if they gave me the opportunity to be their governor, that not only would the state go on a path towards fiscal recovery, but we would also lead the nation because we would have a one year head start on everybody because of our odd election year. We would have a one year head start on a huge new class of governors that would come in the election of 2010. Now you can imagine how that was received in New Jersey. Now this was a state that during my time as a United States Attorney, was known predominantly for a few things: political corruption, “The Sopranos,” “The Real Housewives of New Jersey,” and now most regrettably “The Jersey Shore.” Not a place that thought of itself as a national leader in something that would matter for our children’s future. But I believe part of that leadership is understanding, articulating and believing in that which is special and unique about the people that you serve. And having been born in New Jersey and raised there and lived there all my life, I know that if presented with a challenge directly, without any sugar coating, that the people of New Jersey would step up to the plate and answer the call. And after 13 months now as governor, I think we have plenty of evidence that we were right in 2009.

When I came into office we confronted a $2.2 billion budget deficit for fiscal year ’10. The one that had five months left. The one that Governor Corzine told me was just fine, cruise path into the end of the fiscal year; Governor, don’t worry about it, everything is fine. $2.2 billion. My chief of staff, in my first week as governor, brought me a sheet of paper that showed me that if I did not act immediately to stop the planned spending, that New Jersey would not meet its payroll for the second pay period in March. Imagine that. The state that has the second highest per capita income in America had so over-spent, over-borrowed, and over-taxed – that it would not meet payroll in March of 2010. So we acted immediately to use the executive authority of the governorship to impound $2.2 billion in projected spending. Without the permission of the legislature. Without compromise because it was not the time for compromise. And without raising taxes on the people of the state who had had their taxes raised and fees 115 times in the eight years preceding my governorship. 115 tax and fee increases in eight years. So we impounded spending and we balanced the budget. And we turned immediately towards this fiscal year that we’re in now. And were confronted with an $11 billion budget deficit on a $29 billion budget. The highest budget deficit by percentage of any state in America. And believe me: the partisan Democrats in my state believed they had me right where they wanted me - he would have to raise taxes. And they put it right down on the table and said they wanted to increase the tax that they love the most – the income tax and specifically they called it the millionaires’ tax. Now of course this leads me to have to give you an aside about New Jersey math. See, when Democrats in New Jersey call it a millionaires’ tax, that’s for anyone who makes $400,000 or over – that’s called New Jersey math. So for businesses or individuals who have $400,000 in income or more, they wanted to raise their taxes, again, from a 9% top marginal rate to nearly 11%. And they told me that if I did not agree they would close down the government. There would be no budget in 2011 without an income tax increase. Now you know, this had happened 4 years earlier in New Jersey under Governor Corzine. They were arguing how much to raise taxes. And the Democrat controlled legislature closed down the government on the Democratic governor because they couldn’t agree on how much to raise the sales tax. And Governor Corzine very famously invited the press into his office, now my office, and there was a cot in the office. I can tell you it’s not normally there. And he said to them, “I’m going to be sleeping in this cot, right over here, until this crisis is averted.” So I knew that these were the same fellows who had been in the legislature when he was there, now threatening to do the same thing. So I decided to call them down early on and advise them that the place was under new management. And what I said to them was listen, if you guys want to pass an income tax increase, you can. That’s fine, I’m going to veto it. And if you want to close down the government because of that, that’s fine. But I want to tell you something – I’m not moving any cot into this office to sleep in here. If you close down the government I’m getting into those black SUVs with the troopers and going to the governor’s residence. I’m going to go upstairs, I’m going to open a beer, I’m going to order a pizza, I’m going to watch the Mets. And when you decide to reopen the government, give me a call and I’ll come back. But don’t think I’m sleeping on some cot. Take a look at me, you think I’m sleeping on a cot? Not happening.

So we stood up, we stood for our principles. We submitted a budget that cut real spending nine percent, year over year. Not projected growth – real spending, nine percent, every department of state government was cut. And we balanced the budget without any new or increased taxes on the people of the state of New Jersey for the first time in eight years. And the budget they called “dead on arrival without an income tax increase” was passed two days early with 99.8% of the line items exactly as they were when I submitted them back in March. With a Democratic legislature. Why? Because we stood up for what we believed in and we made it very clear that we would not compromise on our principles. We’d compromise on things that were not core principle items, but we were not going to compromise on raising taxes on the people of New Jersey. That leads us now to today. And that’s why fiscal discipline is so important. Because just because we went through that once or one and a half if you count fiscal year ‘10 - doesn’t mean we should be self congratulatory, patting ourselves on the back, and take our eye off the ball. This is a problem that took a decade to develop and it’s going to take longer than a year for us to fix it. Fiscal discipline is extraordinarily important not only for New Jersey but for America.

Now we have a whole new way of budgeting in New Jersey. We don’t assume every program will be funded any longer. We don’t assume a certain increase in every budget. The Democratic legislature will come out and say I have some $10 billion or so deficit for this year. That’s because they’re playing in the old playbook, which says that everything I did last year, of course, the next year I’d want to reverse and go right back. That is not going to happen. And it can’t happen if states are going to progress and get out of this crisis. We now have to stick to a new type of approach to budgeting - budgeting from the bottom up. Requiring as I do now of everyone one of my cabinet officers, that they come to me and not tell me what each one of their programs cost and how much they’re willing to cut it. But to say to me which one of your programs are absolutely necessary and how much do you need to fund them - this is how much money you’re getting and whatever doesn’t fit in your equation is out. We have to fund that which we really need, and to do that we have to cut that which is just what we’d like, rather than what we need.

And you’ll hear this debate going on down here now. You’ll have folks tell you that every bit of federal spending is absolutely necessary and laudatory. It’s not. And in fact some of it’s not even laudatory, let alone necessary. But we have to bring a new approach and new discipline to this. And when people say that you can’t tackle these big problems, look at what we’re doing on pensions and benefits. Pensions and benefits are the equivalent of federal entitlements at the state level. They are no different. They have no more vocal constituency at the federal level than they do at the state level. Take my word for it. I rolled out my pension and benefit reform in September on a Tuesday, and then that Friday I went to the firefighters’ convention in Wildwood, New Jersey. 7,500 firefighters at 2:00 on a Friday afternoon - I think you know what they had for lunch. And I rolled out a very specific pension and benefit reform proposal. On pensions: raise the retirement age, eliminate COLAs, increase the amount employees have to contribute to their pension every year. And roll back a nine percent increase that was given to them by a Republican governor and a Republican legislature and they had no way to pay for it. Those four reforms would take our current pension system which is underfunded by $54 billion dollars and in thirty years cut it in half to $28 billion dollars. Real reform getting us on the glide path to solvency. You can imagine how that was received by 7,500 firefighters. As I walked into the room and was introduced. I was booed lustily. I made my way up to the stage, they booed some more. I got to the microphone, they booed some more. So I said, come on you can do better than that, and they did! They did. And then I said to them - I took away the prepared notes I had for the speech – I actually took them off of the podium, crumpled them up and threw them on the ground, so they could see that I would. And I said, here’s the deal: I understand you’re angry, and I understand you’re frustrated, and I understand you feel deceived and betrayed. And the reason you feel all the things is because you have been deceived and you have been betrayed. And for twenty years, governors have come into this room and lied to you. Promised you benefits that they had no way of paying for, making promises they knew they couldn’t keep, and just hoping that they wouldn’t be the man or women left holding the bag. I understand why you feel angry and betrayed and deceived by those people. Here’s what I don’t understand. Why are you booing the first guy who came in here and told you the truth? See, there is no political advantage to me coming into that room and telling the truth. The way we used to think about politics and unfortunately the way I fear they’re thinking about politics still in Washington DC. See, the old playbook says lie, deceive, obfuscate and make it to the next election. You know, there’s a study that says by 2020, New Jersey is one of eleven states whose pension could be bankrupt. And when I told a friend of mine about that study, he said to me, well wait. By 2020, you won’t be governor. What the hell do you care? That’s the way politics has been practiced in our country for too long and practiced in New Jersey for too long. So I said to those firefighters, you may hate me now. But fifteen years from now, when you have a pension to collect because of what I did, you’ll be looking for my address on the internet so you can send me a thank you note.

Leadership, today in America, has to be about doing the big things and being courageous. That’s what it has to be about. Same thing with health benefit reform, which is an analogy to Medicaid and Medicare here in Washington. And if you think that the public workers in New Jersey hold on any less strongly to the benefits that they get through the government - teachers in New Jersey who pay nothing for their health insurance, nothing, from the day they are hired until the day they die, for full family medical coverage that costs the state of New Jersey $24,000 per family. If you don’t think they’re holding on to that tight, you’re not paying attention. The battles are similar. And here’s the problem. You can’t fix these problems if you don’t talk about them. You cannot fix these problems without talking about them. And I look at what’s happening in Washington DC right now and I’m worried. I’m worried. And I think, you know, I heard the President’s State of the Union speech, and it was two weeks after mine, and he said America was about doing the big things. Now I’m not saying he copied me. I’ve seen some writing about that, that’s not what I’m saying. But I think it’s important to note it because of what he says the big things are. He says the big things are high speed rail. The big things are high speed internet access for almost eighty percent of America or something by some date. One million electric cars on the road by some date. Ladies and gentlemen, that is the candy of American politics. Those are not the big things. Because let me guarantee you something, if we don’t fix the real big things, there are going to be no electric cars on the road. There is going to be no high speed internet access, or if there is you’re not going to be able to afford to get on it. We are not going to be able to care about the niceties of life, the investments that Washington wants to continue to make. That’s not what we need to be talking about. No one is talking about it. And now what this has become, I read, is a political strategy. The President is not talking about it because he is waiting for the Republicans to talk about it. And our new bold Republicans that we just sent to the House of Representatives aren’t talking about it because they are waiting for him to talk about it. Let me suggest to you, that my children’s future and your children’s future is more important than some political strategy. Let me suggest to you that what game is being played down here is irresponsible and it’s dangerous. We need to say these things and we need to say them out loud. When we say were cutting spending, when we say everything is on the table, when we say we mean entitlement programs, we should be specific. And let me tell you what is the truth. What’s the truth that no one is talking about? Here is the truth that no one is talking about: you’re going to have to raise the retirement age for social security. Oh I just said it and I’m still standing here! I did not vaporize into the carpeting and I said it. We have to reform Medicare because it costs too much and it is going to bankrupt us. Once again lightning did not come through the windows and strike me dead. And we have to fix Medicaid because it’s not only bankrupting the federal government, it’s bankrupting every state government. There you go. If we’re not honest about these things, on the state level about pensions and benefits and on the federal level about Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, we are on the path to ruin.

And you know now - I hear people saying - we’re going too fast, we’re going too fast. We need to slow down a little bit. I hear the same thing in New Jersey. In New Jersey, all the time the Legislature says, the legislature is a deliberative body, we need to study the governor’s proposals. You know, I never worked in Trenton before I became Governor and they do speak a different language in state capitals and in this capital. They speak different languages. So you need to get - when you become governor, and no one tells you this - but you need to get your English to Trenton dictionary. Because the language in Trenton is just much different. See, when a legislature - and I don’t care whether this is the Congress or whether this is the state legislature in New Jersey. When they say we need to study the executive’s proposal, you think because you speak English, that means they’re really going to take some time, consider it and then act. No, no. What that means in Trenton, and what I suspect it means in Washington also, is this: it means we are going to drag our feet for as long as we can until we hope it dies a natural death because God knows we don’t want our fingerprints on it for murdering it, but we also don’t have the guts to do it. That’s what ‘study’ means in government parlance. So in New Jersey they call me impatient, they call me lots of other things too. But they call me impatient among other things. Ladies and gentlemen, I think it’s time for some impatience. I think it’s time for some impatience in America. Because if you think we’re moving too slow, think about these statistics. The deficit stands at $1.6 trillion dollars, the Social Security system is going to be insolvent in 2037, and the Medicare system is expected to run out of money in 2017. So I’m impatient? Because I want them to act now. Because I want our healthcare system to be secure for the future. Because I want our retirement system to be secure for the future.

See, one of the things that the public sector unions don’t understand about my approach in New Jersey is that they think I’m attacking them. I’m attacking the leadership of the union. Because they’re greedy and they’re selfish and self-interested. The members of that union are being ill-served by the leadership of that union. And so what I say, what I’m doing, is to save your pension, to save your healthcare for the rest of your life, and yeah, you’re going to have to take a little less. That’s the way it goes, we’re in difficult times and there were promises made that couldn’t be kept. But it’s no longer time to wait. And leadership in my opinion is not about waiting. You know, I get four years as governor of New Jersey and I don’t have time to wait. And anybody who leads a government, whether it’s in another state or in America, has a defined period of time to act. And now I understand that this political strategy in Washington is all about waiting out until 2012. That’s five years away from Medicare insolvency. What’s the excuse going to be then? You know, these are hard things to do. They are hard things to do, but they’re not impossible to do and here’s what politicians fear. What politicians fear is you do these things, like say what I just said, and you’ll be vaporized into the carpet politically. That’s what they’re afraid of.

But look at what’s happened again in New Jersey and New York. I was elected with forty-nine percent of the vote, in a three way race in November of 2009. The first Republican elected to statewide office in twelve years in New Jersey, but not with a majority. Forty-nine percent of the vote, and when I started to say we were going to cut K-12 education funding by more than a billion dollars, we’re going to cut municipal aid by more than half a billion dollars, we’re going to cut every program that we can find in government and balance without raising taxes - I had everybody telling me, Governor you can’t do it. Your approval ratings will go in the toilet. People love these programs. And what I said to people was, you know what, I’m going to try an experiment here. Let’s start treating the people of New Jersey like adults. Because if you think they don’t know that we are in deep trouble, than these are not the people I knew growing up. These are tough, smart, self aware people who understand that we’ve dug ourselves a hole for more than a decade and we’re only going to get out by climbing, and climbing is hard, really hard. But it’s time to do it. And what’s happened? After thirteen months of fighting and arguing and pushing and impatience, my approval rating is at fifty-four percent. No disaster - in fact - more popular today than I was the day I was elected, and that’s in a state that is as Democratic as any state in America for a Republican governor. But if you really want to see eye-popping numbers, look across the river. At the person who was recently characterized as my soul mate –I wonder how he feels about that. Governor Andrew Cuomo - in a poll that just came out two days ago - his job approval is at seventy-seven percent. Seventy-seven percent. And all he’s talked about is cutting spending, not raising taxes, addressing entitlement programs, Medicaid, pensions, taking on public sector unions, capping school superintendent pay, the hard things. The things that people tell you will lead to political ruin, they don’t. Politicians make this mistake all the time. They run last election next time. They think that what happened before will happen again. And they don’t look around them to see that the times have changed. Our country and our states are weighed down by an albatross of irresponsibility. That we have hoisted upon ourselves as leaders, and that you as citizens have permitted us to get away with.

The last example of that is education reform and all I’ll say about this is that in my state, where we spend $17,620 per pupil per year - the highest in America, $24,000 dollars per pupil in city of Newark, $28,000 dollars in Asbury Park - and we have 104,000 students trapped in two hundred failing schools across New Jersey. And the education establishment says , don’t worry help is on the way. And the help that’s on the way is more money, more money. Well more money is not going to solve this problem until we take on the issues that are really causing the problem. And until we as Americans are willing to do that final tough thing, which is to look the teachers’ union across America in the eye and say to them, you do not represent the best the teachers have to offer, you often represent the worst. And it’s time for us to honestly say that we can separate the teachers from the union. We have great teachers in New Jersey, working hard and making a huge difference in the lives of many children, but we don’t have enough of them. And one of the reason why we don’t have enough of them is because the bad teachers who remain with lifetime tenure are crowding out opportunity for the good ones, and then when you have reductions, the last ones in are the first ones out because all that matters is seniority and not talent. And so we send a new generation of teachers, good enthusiastic teachers, away because we have built a system - as Michelle Rhee put better than I could - that cares more about the feelings of adults than it cares about the future of our children. I will not take responsibility for that approach. I will not take responsibility for leaving a generation of children behind in America. I won’t do it. And we need to speak out and say it’s time to fix that system. Tell me where else in America - well really there’s two places - left in America where there’s a profession where there is no reward for excellence and no consequence for failure. Of course we all know the first one is weathermen. It doesn’t matter, it’s going to snow six inches, it snows eighteen. Well I said it was going to snow, what’s the difference? And they’re right back on TV the next night. Unfortunately, the second one is teaching. Because the great teacher, the only reward they get is the psychic reward of knowing that they’ve done a great job for the children in their classroom. And the teacher next door, who’s a lousy teacher who doesn’t care, gets paid the same as the teacher who stays late and comes early, the same as the teacher who communicates with parents, the same as the teacher who feels it’s his or her personal responsibility to lift each child up to the next grade. That’s not what America is. America is built on rewarding excellence and having consequence for failure. So we need to deal with that issue as well, not only in every state but in America.

You know there’s a lot of talk now about partisanship and the negative angry tone in some of our political debates. And there is a time and a place for partisanship, I absolutely believe in that. And so did our founding fathers, they believed in partisanship. They believed in vigorous debate and so do I. You know, it’s the nature of our country, based on our founding, to have principal disagreements among people of good will, and I’m not disagreeing with folks just for the sake of disagreeing. And I’m not fighting for the sake of fighting. I fight for the things that matter. I save my energy for the fights of consequence. And as a result, some people say I’m too combative. Some people say I’m too much of a fighter. Well, I’ll tell you I’m fighting now because now is the time that matters most for New Jersey’s future and for America’s future. We are teetering on the edge of disaster. And I love when people talk about American exceptionalism, but American exceptionalism has to include the courage to do the right thing. It cannot just be a belief that, because we are exceptional, everything will work out ok. Part of truly being exceptional is being willing to do the difficult things, is to stop playing the political games, stop looking at the bumper pool of politics and to step up and start doing the right thing. This is the new era that we newly elected officials have inherited. Whether we like it or not, that’s the story and we have two choices: to either stand up and do the right thing, to speak the truth and speak it bluntly and directly, or to join the long parade of leaders who have come before us and failed. And maybe people won’t remember us, maybe they won’t pin the responsibility for failure on us because there’s been so much failure around us, but I did not run for this job for failure. I ran for this job for success. For success, not just for me personally and my children, but success for my state. And hopefully, to provide an example for the rest of the country that you can do the difficult things. See, it seems to me that what America is really all about is about a group of people who came from every corner of this earth because they wanted a chance for greatness. That’s what has made us the greatest country on Earth. Our calling for greatness at this time is to confront these issues, to say them out loud, and to stop playing around and to not waste another minute.

You know, the World War II generation was called ‘the greatest generation’ and they were because they put their lives on the line to protect our way of life. And they’re called the greatest generation because we judged them. We judged them in the aftermath and we found them to be great, by any objective measure. Let me guarantee you one thing: we will be judged too. We will be judged by our children and our grandchildren - that at this moment of crisis, what did we do? Did we bury our heads in the sand? Did we surround ourselves with our creature comforts and believe that just because we’re America everything’s going to be ok? Or will our children and grandchildren be able to say that at this moment of crisis, we stood up and did the hard things that made a future of greatness possible for them. Believe me, we will be judged. I know the way I want that judgment to turn out for me, and I know in the hearts and the minds of most New Jerseyans and Americans, I know how they want that judgment to turn out for them. So it’s time for us to get to work, to find our greatness again. And I believe we will find our greatness through doing the big things, the really big things that will lead America to another century of exceptionalism and not a century of settling for second best. That’s what this fight is about. If you’re willing to join me, I’m willing to join you and that’s what I came down here today to talk to you. Thank you all very much. Thank you.

# # #

TEXT CREDIT: Office of the Governor PO Box 001 Trenton, NJ 08625 609-292-6000

For Immediate Release: Date: Thursday, February 17, 2011 Contact: Michael Drewniak
Kevin Roberts 609-777-2600

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 VIDEO

UPDATE: Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT


Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 VIDEO

Governor Chris Christie will discuss the reform issues that will serve as the foundation for his February budget. Christie believes reductions in spending are the key to restoring fiscal health and fueling long-term growth and that Republican and Democratic leaders must be prepared to tackle the toughest issues.

VIDEO and TEXT CREDIT: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research | 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20036

Darrell Issa Oversight Committee Mission Statement VIDEO


WASHINGTON, DC – House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) today issued a video release of the Committee Mission Statement:

We exist to secure two fundamental principles. First, Americans have a right to know that the money Washington takes from them is well spent. And second, Americans deserve an efficient, effective government that works for them. Our duty on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee is to protect these rights.

Our solemn responsibility is to hold government accountable to taxpayers, because taxpayers have a right to know what they get from their government. We will work tirelessly, in partnership with citizen-watchdogs, to deliver the facts to the American people and bring genuine reform to the federal bureaucracy.

This is the mission of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

VIDEO CREDIT: oversightandreform

TEXT CREDIT: House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC 20515 PHONE: (202) 225-5074 FAX: (202) 225-3974

Monday, February 14, 2011

Chairman Rogers: President’s Budget Long on Rhetoric, Lean on Spending Cuts

Hal RogersHouse Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers commented on the President’s fiscal year 2012 Budget request, which was released today – one week after the annual deadline:

“I appreciate the President’s attempt to address the need for cuts in this fiscal year 2012 budget request, finally reflecting a realization that our country must reduce spending and drastically scale back our deficits and debt in order to get our economy moving again.
“However, the President’s budget appears to be long on rhetoric and lean on spending cuts. We must go much further than this anemic effort of symbolic reductions and additional spending proposed under the guise of funding “freezes” if we are truly to get our nation’s finances on a sustainable course.

“The Continuing Resolution (CR) that will be on the floor of the House this week contains the largest set of spending reductions in the history of the nation – more than $100 billion in cuts from last year’s Presidential budget request. This legislation represents a real, substantive effort that will help steer a better path for our nation’s budget and economy, starting a trend of spending reductions that will carry forward in Appropriations bills in the coming year. I would welcome the President’s engagement in and support of this historic and critical legislation, and encourage him to join us in our goal of immediately and dramatically reducing government spending.”

###

TEXT CREDIT: Committee on Appropriations H-307, The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Main Number: (202) 225-2771

IMAGE CREDIT: Congressman Hal Rogers Washington, DC Office 2406 Rayburn House Office Bldg Washington, DC 20515 T (202) 225-4601 F (202) 225-0940

Paul Ryan GOP Response to President Obama's 2012 Budget Request FULL VIDEO

Paul Ryan GOP Response to President Obama's 2012 Budget RequestPaul Ryan GOP Response to President Obama's 2012 Budget Request VIDEO House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan issued the following statement in response to the release of President Obama’s FY2012 Budget STREAMING VIDEO Running time 28:51
Paul Ryan: President Fails Leadership Test, President’s Budget Destroys Jobs with Record Taxes, Spending & Debt.

WASHINGTON – House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan issued the following statement in response to the release of President Obama’s FY2012 Budget:

“The President’s budget spends too much, taxes too much, and borrows too much – stifling job growth today and leaving our children with a diminished future. In this critical test of leadership, the President has failed to tackle the urgent fiscal and economic threats before us.”

“Failing to heed the warnings of economists and the demands of the American people, the President’s budget accelerates our country down the path to bankruptcy. Far from ‘living within its means,’ the President’s budget puts the government on track to nearly double in size since the day he took office – a direct result of his party’s reckless spending spree. His budget destroys jobs by imposing a $1.6 trillion tax hike, adding $13 trillion to the national debt and fueling uncertainty in the private sector.

“We cannot tax, spend and borrow our way to prosperity. Where the President has fallen short, Republicans will work to chart a new course – advancing a path to prosperity by cutting spending, keeping taxes low, reforming government, and rising to meet the challenges of our time.”

Key facts from President Obama’s Fiscal Year 2012 Budget:

* Spends Too Much
o $3.8 trillion in spending this year; 25.3% of GDP (highest since WWII)
o $46 trillion in spending over the decade; $8.7 trillion in new spending
* Taxes Too Much
o $1.6 trillion tax hike on families, small businesses, and job creators
o Revenues as a percent of GDP climb to 20%
* Borrows Too Much
o $1.6 trillion deficit for FY2012; a record third straight trillion dollar deficit
o Doubles and then triples debt held by the public since President took office
o $13 trillion added to the debt over the decade

VIDEO and IMAGE CREDIT: c-span.org

TEXT CREDIT: U.S. Congressman Paul Ryan Washington, DC Office 1233 Longworth House Office Bldg Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-3031 Fax: (202) 225-3393

Sunday, February 13, 2011

The House Appropriations Committee Continuing Resolution (H.R. 1) FULL TEXT

Committee on Appropriations LogoHouse Appropriations Committee Introduces CR Containing Largest Spending Cuts in History.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Appropriations Committee has introduced a Continuing Resolution (H.R. 1) to fund the federal government for the last seven months of the fiscal year while cutting spending by over $100 billion from the President’s fiscal year 2011 request. This CR legislation represents the largest single discretionary spending reduction in the history of Congress.

Chairman Hal Rogers gave the following statement on the introduction of the CR:

“This year, our nation is spending 1.5 trillion dollars more than we have, running our debt to $14 trillion. The taxpayers have told us loud and clear that this is simply unacceptable, and have demanded that we get our nation’s fiscal house in order.

“This CR responds to this call. The legislation includes the largest reduction in discretionary spending in the history of our nation – over five times larger than any other discretionary cut package ever considered by the House.

“The CR contains over $100 billion in cuts compared to the President’s request - fully meeting the spending reduction goal outlined in the Republican ‘Pledge to America’ while providing common sense exceptions for our troops and veterans. These cuts go far and wide, and will affect every community in the nation. These were hard decisions, and I know many people will not be happy with everything we’ve proposed in this package. That’s understandable and not unexpected, but I believe these reductions are necessary to show that we are serious about returning our nation to a sustainable financial path.

“The cuts in this CR are the result of difficult work by our subcommittees who have weeded out excessive, unnecessary, and wasteful spending, making tough choices to prioritize programs based on their effectiveness and benefit to the American people. My committee has taken a thoughtful look at each and every one of the programs we intend to cut, and have made determinations based on this careful analysis.

“It is my intent – and that of my Committee – that this CR legislation will be the first of many Appropriations bills this year that will significantly reduce federal spending. It is important that we complete the legislative process on this bill before March 4th -- when the current funding measure expires – to avoid a government-wide shut down and so that we can begin our regular budgetary work for this year.”

NOTE: The CR will be considered on the House floor next week.

A copy of the legislation: www.rules.house.gov/Media/file/PDF_112_1/legislativetext/2011crapprops/AppropCRFinal_xml.pdf

A summary of the bill: republicans.appropriations.house.gov/_files/SummaryFiscalYear2011ContinutingResolutionCR.doc

A list of program cuts: republicans.appropriations.house.gov/_files/ProgramCutsFY2011ContinuingResolution.pdf

Subcommittee savings tables: republicans.appropriations.house.gov/_files/FY2011CRSpendingTablesbySubcommittee.doc>

Contact: Jennifer Hing, 202-226-7007 ###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Committee on Appropriations H-307, The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Main Number: (202) 225-2771

Armed Services Committee 2012 Budget Request for the Department of Defense

House Armed Services CommitteeFeb 16 2011 10:00 AM Rayburn House Office Building - 2118

The committee will meet to receive testimony on the fiscal year 2012 national defense authorization budget request from the Department of Defense.

Witness Panel 1

* The Honorable Robert M. Gates
Secretary of Defense
U.S. Department of Defense

* Admiral Michael G. Mullen, USN
Chairman
Joint Chiefs of Staff

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: House Armed Services Committee 2340 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 226-8980 Fax: (202) 225-0858

Committee On The Budget Meetings Hearings & Markups 02/15/11 02/16/11 LIVE VIDEO

Committee On The Budget Logo
All Committee meetings are available LIVE on the Internet; web cast links do NOT go live until approximately 10 minutes before the scheduled start time High Bandwidth | Low Bandwidth (Audio Only)

Department of the Treasury Fiscal Year 2012 Budget
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Time: 2:00pm
Location: 210 Cannon House Office Building

Witness:

The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner
Secretary
Department of the Treasury

The President's Fiscal Year 2012 Budget
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Time:10:00am
Location: 210 Cannon House Office Building

Witness:

The Honorable Jacob J. Lew
Director
Office of Management and Budget

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Committee On The Budget U.S. House of Representatives 207 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: 202.226.7270

Education & the Workforce Committee:Investigating OSHA's Regulatory Agenda and Its Impact on Job Creation

House Committee on Education and the WorkforceSubcommittee on Workforce Protections February 15, 2011 "Investigating OSHA's Regulatory Agenda and Its Impact on Job Creation"
The hearing will begin at 10:00 a.m. in room 2175 Rayburn House Office Building.

Witness List:

Jacqueline M. Holmes, Esq.
Jones Day
On behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Washington, D.C.

Stuart Sessions
President
Environomics
On behalf of the Coalition for Workplace Safety
Washington, D.C.

The Honorable Thomas M. Sullivan, Esq.
Nelson Mullins
Washington, D.C.

Tammy Miser
Executive Director
United Support and Memorial for Workplace Fatalities
Lexington, KY

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce 2181 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Tel: 202-225-4527 Fax: 202-225-9571

A Look Ahead: Energy and Commerce Hearings on Regulations and Job Creation for Week of Feb 14

House Energy and Commerce Committee LogoWASHINGTON, DC – The House Energy and Commerce Committee, chaired by Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI),
today announced additional hearings and a markup for the week of February 14, 2011, to further explore recent federal regulations and how they affect job creation, health care access, and innovation.

On Tuesday, February 15, the full committee will vote on the Energy and Commerce Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress along with several pieces of health care legislation.

On Tuesday, February 15, the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy will hold a hearing on “Environmental Regulations, the Economy, and Jobs.” The hearing will examine how and whether federal regulatory agencies are conducting the type of economic analysis necessary for policymakers to understand how regulations affect employers’ ability to retain workers and hire new ones, and avoid unnecessary cost burdens.

On Wednesday, February 16, the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology will hold a hearing on “Network Neutrality and Internet Regulation: Warranted or More Economic Harm than Good?” The five commissioners of the Federal Communications Commission will be called to testify about the controversial network neutrality rules that put the commission in charge of how networks are managed, how technology partnerships are formed, and how the private sector invests in communications to provide new services and options to consumers.

Also on Wednesday, the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee will hold a hearing on “Health Care Issues Involving the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight.” On January 20, 2011, the committee sent a letter to the CCIIO seeking information about the office’s authority, structure, and recent decisions to grant widespread waivers of the health care law’s requirements.

On Thursday, February 17, the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade will hold a hearing on “A Review of CPSIA and CPSC Resources.” The hearing will examine the unintended consequences of recent consumer product safety laws on American job creators including small businesses and thrift stores. It will review the impact of the recent legislation on CPSC resources and its ability to protect consumers.

Also on Thursday, February 17, the Subcommittee on Health will hold a hearing to examine the “Impact of Medical Device Regulations on Jobs and Patients.” The hearing will examine the state of the medical device industry and the impact of regulations on job creation and patient access.

Markup Details
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
10:00 a.m.
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Full Committee

Hearing Details

Tuesday, February 15, 2011
1:00 p.m.
2322 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy
Hearing on “Environmental Regulations, the Economy, and Jobs”

Wednesday, February 16, 2011
9:30 a.m.
2322 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
Hearing on “Health Care Issues Involving the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight”

Wednesday, February 16, 2011
10:00 a.m.
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology
Hearing on “Network Neutrality and Internet Regulation: Warranted or More Economic Harm than Good?”

Thursday, February 17, 2011
9:30 a.m.
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Health
Hearing on “Impact of Medical Device Regulation on Jobs and Patients”

Thursday, February 17, 2011
10:00 a.m.
2322 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade
Hearing on “A Review of CPSIA and CPSC Resources”

###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: House Energy and Commerce Committee January 11, 2011 By Alexa Marrero, (202) 225-3641 or Sean Bonyun, (202) 225-3761 2125 Rayburn House Office Building | Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 225-2927

Saturday, February 12, 2011

CPAC Strraw Poll Results

CPAC Strraw Poll Results: Key Points About Straw Poll, • Ballots collected from Thursday morning, through Friday afternoon • Only registrants could vote, • 50 States plus DC represented in the balloting.

Straw Poll Rep. Ron Paul (TX) wins CPAC 2011 Straw Poll, Former Gov. Mitt Romney Second.

CPAC Strraw Poll Results

CPAC Strraw Poll Results Full 14 pages of Poll Results in PDF Format.

RELATED: TEXT IMAGE and PDF CREDIT: conservative.org

Orrin Hatch Weekly Republican Address TEXT VIDEO 02/12/11


In the Weekly Republican Address, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah discusses "the agenda of trillion dollar deficits and an out of control debt" President Obama has chosen.

He says, "The President's proposal for a freeze in government spending might give the White House a nice talking point. But it is a totally inadequate solution to our nation's spending problems...if the President's new budget simply freezes his last budget, he'll stifle job growth by continuing to spend too much, tax too much, and borrow too much."

"It is beyond irresponsible to saddle the next generation of American citizens with the responsibility for paying back our debt," Sen. Hatch warns. "By itself, the President's takeover of the nation's health care system will cost $2.6 trillion. And if this new entitlement is like every entitlement before it, the price tag is just going to grow. Our total debt is over $14 trillion. At over 90 percent of the size of our economy, this is the highest level since 1950."

Sen. Hatch concludes, "Next week, a great debate will begin. The President will send his budget to Congress. And once more Americans will face a time for choosing. Do we accept a future where our children and grandchildren are left holding trillions in IOUs? Or do we get our fiscal house in order, cut spending, and reduce tax burdens on all Americans?"

FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT:
Orrin HatchGood morning. I’m Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah.

Last week, the nation, and the world, celebrated the centennial of President Ronald Reagan’s birth.

Ronald Reagan once told Americans that they faced a time for choosing. The choice then was between the constitutional liberty of free men and women, and a future of higher taxes, bigger government and less opportunity for families and businesses.
Last fall, American citizens again had a choice to make. Would they ratify the agenda of trillion-dollar deficits and an out-of-control debt that the president imposed on the nation? Or would they reaffirm constitutional principles of limited government and free enterprise unhindered by excessive taxation and burdensome regulation?

The American people made their choice in electing historic numbers of conservative Republicans to Congress and in sweeping victories at the state and local level.

Now it is a time for President Obama to choose.

Will he listen to the people, reduce the size of government, and get our spiraling spending and debt under control, or will he become the guardian of an unsustainable status quo?

Next week we will find out what choice President Obama makes, when he releases his budget.

Unfortunately, early indications are that he and his Capitol Hill allies are not taking the nation’s spending-fueled debt crisis -- the most critical challenge facing our nation today -- with the seriousness it deserves.

Our massive debt must be confronted immediately. America cannot afford to kick this can down the road any longer. And this challenge cannot be solved with higher taxes that will only result in lower economic growth and less opportunity for our children and grandchildren.

The president’s proposal for a freeze in government spending might give the White House a nice talking point. But it is a totally inadequate solution to our nation’s spending problems.

Over the past two years, the administration increased discretionary spending by 24%. If you count the so-called stimulus package, spending is up nearly 84%.

These levels cannot continue. Business as usual is unsustainable, and job creators know that higher debt today means higher taxes tomorrow.

And if the president's new budget simply freezes his last budget, he’ll stifle job growth by continuing to spend too much, tax too much, and borrow too much.

It is beyond irresponsible to saddle the next generation of American citizens with the responsibility for paying back our debt.

By itself, the president’s takeover of the nation’s healthcare system will cost $2.6 trillion. And if this new entitlement is like every entitlement before it, the price tag is just going to grow.

Our total debt is over $14 trillion. At over 90% of the size of our economy, this is the highest level since 1950.

Think about that. We are spending at a level not seen since the Second World War. By 2021, our public debt is expected to hit $22 trillion with the federal government paying nearly $1.6 trillion every year in interest payments alone on this debt. We are approaching a real crisis.

Not only does the President want to set these spending levels in stone, he’s now talking about new so-called investments -- saying it 10 times in a speech on Thursday -- which is just code for billions in new Washington spending.

This week, the vice president, advocating for massive new federal expenditures, told Americans to get a grip and get on board with this new spending spree.

With due respect to the vice president, the American people’s grip on this situation is just fine. They know we cannot afford these so-called investments that are financed with taxpayer dollars.

Decisions to reduce spending are not easy ones.

But with leadership, big things can be done. Look at what Gov. McDonnell has done in Virginia, and Gov. Christie in New Jersey. They have taken on big spending, and they are winning.

The bottom line is we are a nation working on borrowed time -- we have to make some significant changes in order to compete.

We need to reform our tax code. We need to roll back regulations that hinder businesses large and small.

We need to begin a debate about reforming Social Security and Medicare, so they will be there for our children to depend on when they retire.

We need to ratify free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama that will open markets for American innovators and spur job creation in Utah and around our country.

And we need to stop imposing unaffordable financial burdens on our states, like the ever-increasing federal expansion of Medicaid.

Yet all of these things will take presidential leadership, and so far the president and the Democrats are missing in action. Indeed, the White House is floating a proposal that could increase the cost of hiring and retaining workers.

Next week, a great debate will begin. The president will send his budget to Congress. And once more Americans will face a time for choosing. Do we accept a future where our children and grandchildren are left holding trillions in IOUs? Or do we get our fiscal house in order, cut spending, and reduce tax burdens on all Americans?

I expect that Americans will choose the course of greater freedom and more opportunity.

The question is whether the administration will choose to listen to the American people or continue our current spending crisis. Thank you for listening and God bless America.

###

VIDEO IMAGE and TEXT CREDIT: gopweeklyaddress