Friday, May 13, 2011

Ron Paul Statement Introducing the Industrial Hemp Farming Act, HR 1831

Ron Paul Industrial Hemp Farming Act

Statement Introducing the Industrial Hemp Farming Act, HR 1831

Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Industrial Hemp Farming Act. The Industrial Hemp Farming Act requires the federal government to respect state laws allowing the growing of industrial hemp.

Nine States--Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Vermont, and West Virginia--allow industrial hemp production or research in accord with state laws. However, federal law is standing in the way of farmers in these states growing what may be a very profitable crop. Because of current federal law, all hemp included in products sold in the United States must be imported instead of being grown by American farmers.

Since 1970, the federal Controlled Substances Act's inclusion of industrial hemp in the schedule one definition of marijuana has prohibited American farmers from growing industrial hemp despite the fact that industrial hemp has such a low content of THC (the psychoactive chemical in the related marijuana plant) that nobody can be psychologically affected by consuming hemp. Federal law concedes the safety of industrial hemp by allowing it to be legally imported for use as food.

The United States is the only industrialized nation that prohibits industrial hemp cultivation. The Congressional Research Service has noted that hemp is grown as an established agricultural commodity in approximately 30 nations in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America. The Industrial Hemp Farming Act will relieve this unique restriction on American farmers and allow them to grow industrial hemp in accord with state law.

Industrial hemp is a crop that was grown legally throughout the United States for most of our nation's history. In fact, during World War II, the federal government actively encouraged American farmers to grow industrial hemp to help the war effort. The Department of Agriculture even produced a film "Hemp for Victory'' encouraging the plant's cultivation.

In recent years, the hemp plant has been put to many popular uses in foods and in industry. Grocery stores sell hemp seeds and oil as well as food products containing oil and seeds from the hemp plant. Industrial hemp is also included in consumer products such as paper, cloths, cosmetics, carpet, and door frames of cars. Hemp has even been used in alternative automobile fuel.

It is unfortunate that the federal government has stood in the way of American farmers competing in the global industrial hemp market. Indeed, the founders of our nation, some of whom grew hemp, would surely find that federal restrictions on farmers growing a safe and profitable crop on their own land are inconsistent with the constitutional guarantee of a limited, restrained federal government. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to stand up for American farmers and cosponsor the Industrial Hemp Farming Act.

TEXT CREDIT: Congressman Ron Paul Washington, DC 203 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone Number: (202) 225-2831

IMAGE CREDIT: libertyactivist

Ron Paul officially announces bid for President 2012 VIDEO

Congressman Ron Paul from Texas's 14th district officially announces his bid for the 2012 Presidential race on Good Morning America, 7AM 5/13/2011.



Ron Paul Exeter town hall, New Hampshire. Presidential Campaign kickoff rally and speech at 10:00 am ET 5/13/11.


VIDEO CREDIT: libertyactivist and jberecz

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Mike Johanns to Oppose Diamond Nomination to Federal Reserve

Mike JohannsWASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mike Johanns (R-Neb.) today announced his opposition to the nomination of Peter Diamond to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Johanns is a member of the Senate Banking Committee, which will vote Thursday on whether to advance Diamond's nomination to the Senator floor.

"With our country spending its way into a crisis, I can no longer support a nominee so vocally in favor of more spending, more stimulus, and more quantitative easing," Johanns said.

"We must be increasingly wary of the threat of inflation, yet the Fed continues to print money with reckless abandon. Because this nominee's recent comments in support of more stimulus and quantitative easing have demonstrated such an alarming lack of concern over our spending and fiscal realities, I cannot support his nomination."

TEXT CREDIT: U.S. Senator Mike Johanns for the State of Nebraska: Washington, D.C. Office: 404 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Tel: (202) 224-4224 Fax: (202) 228-0436 Hours: 8:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. ET

IMAGE CREDIT: All rights reserved by Senator Mike Johanns

House Passes Putting the Gulf Back to Work Act H.R. 1229 FULL TEXT VIDEO


House Passes Bipartisan Bill to Put the Gulf Back to Work, Increase American Energy Production. H.R. 1229 Ends Obama Administration’s De Facto Offshore Drilling Moratorium in Gulf of Mexico.

H.R.1229 -- Putting the Gulf of Mexico Back to Work Act FULL TEXT in PDF FORMAT

Doug Lamborn
WASHINGTON, D.C., May 11, 2011 - Today, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1229, the Putting the Gulf Back to Work Act, with a bipartisan vote of 263 to 163. Introduced by Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings, H.R. 1229 will end the Obama Administration’s de facto drilling moratorium in a safe, responsible, transparent manner – putting thousands of Americans back to work and increasing American energy production to help address rising gasoline prices.

“This bill will provide relief to the people of the Gulf of Mexico by allowing them to finally return to work following the Obama Administration’s intentional slow-walking of drilling permits,” said Chairman Hastings. “With passage of this bill, House Republicans are sending a strong signal that we will not sit idly by while the Obama Administration sidelines American workers, sends American jobs overseas and continues to lock-up our American energy resources at a time of rising gasoline prices. I applaud the House for passing the Putting the Gulf back to Work Act and hope the Senate follows our lead to ease the economic pain in the Gulf of Mexico and help reduce gasoline prices across the country.”

This week, the House will also vote on Chairman Hastings’ third offshore drilling bill, H.R. 1231, the Reversing President Obama’s Offshore Moratorium Act.

H.R. 1229, the Putting the Gulf Back to Work Act:

Improves safety by reforming current law to 1) require lease holders to receive an approved permit to drill before drilling an offshore well and 2) require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a safety review.

Sets a firm 30 day timeline (with two 15 day extensions) for the Secretary to act on a permit to drill. This simply requires the Secretary to act within the set period of time – it is not a requirement that permits be approved. This firm timeline will make certain that the Obama Administration cannot impose a moratorium through deliberate inaction.

Provides 30 days, with no extension, for the Secretary to restart Gulf permits that were approved before the Administration’s moratorium was imposed on May 27, 2010. If the Secretary fails to act, the leases will be put into suspension (the clock stops ticking on the time-limited lease) until a decision is made.

Establishes an expedited judicial review process for resolving lawsuits relating to Gulf permits. This reform ensures that ending the de facto moratorium imposed by the Obama Administration isn’t replaced by paralyzing, frivolous lawsuits that could take years to resolve.

###

Contact: Jill Strait, Spencer Pederson or Crystal Feldman 202-226-9019

TEXT CREDIT: Committee on Natural Resources United States House of Representatives 1324 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515, Phone: (202) 225-2761, Fax: (202) 225-5929. Please direct all press inquiries to the Communications Office at: (202) 226-9019.

VIDEO CREDIT: CongressmanLamborn

Paul Ryan statement on Senate Democratics' budget Failure

Paul Ryan GOP Response to President Obama's 2012 Budget RequestWashington – Yesterday, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan called upon Democratic leaders to join Congressional Republicans’ efforts to advance serious solutions to America’s most pressing fiscal and economic challenges. In response to another solution put forward by Congressional Republicans, Ryan issued the following statement:

“I appreciate the hard work of my friend Senator Pat Toomey in putting forward specific proposals to address our nation’s fiscal and economic challenges.

His proposed FY2012 budget incorporates many of the reforms advanced in the House-passed FY2012 Budget Resolution, which puts the budget on the path to balance and the economy on the path to prosperity. I remain grateful to all Senate Republicans for their leadership in changing Washington’s culture of spending, and for their steadfast commitment to fiscal discipline.

“It is unfortunate that Senate Democratic leaders – along with President Obama – remain unwilling to put forward credible solutions to avert the debt-fueled economic crisis before us. Senate Democrats failed to pass a budget last year, and have already missed the deadline for passing a budget this year. Will they continue to push false attacks and use scare tactics on our solutions, or will they work with Congressional Republicans and the American people to advance a budget that meets the challenges of today?”

###

Contact: Conor Sweeney 202-226-7270

TEXT CREDIT: Committee on the Budget: U.S. House of Representatives 207 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

IMAGE CREDIT: c-span.org

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Jon Stewart The Daily Show introduces a few of the lesser-known candidates at the first Republican presidential debate VIDEO


Daily Show: Indecision 2012 - Good Luck Motherf@*kers Edition - Blather for Elephants.

Fox News introduces a few of the lesser-known candidates at the first Republican presidential debate.

Tags: Republicans, Ron Paul, Tim Pawlenty, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, John McCain, Fox News, Google, drugs, legalization, waterboarding, stem cells, government, media, mongering, candidates, debates, elections, Indecision, Indecision 2012, photos.

TEXT and VIDEO CREDIT: The Daily Show

Todd Young Our national debt as a national security concern VIDEO


At a recent town hall forum, Rep. Todd Young explains who owns our debt and how it could be a national security concern.

TEXT and VIDEO CREDIT: RepToddYoung

Howard P. “Buck” McKeon Releases Details about National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 FULL TEXT

Howard P. 'Buck' McKeon (R-Calif.)Committee Chairman Charges: “We Can’t Keep Doing Things the Same Old Way and Expect Better Results” NDAA - National Defense Authorization Act / Full Committee Mark in PDF FORMAT 5.4 mb.

Washington D.C.—In releasing his version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee today cautioned that the Administration should not repeat the mistakes of the past while expecting better results. U.S. Rep. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R-Calif.), the defense panel’s chairman, detailed how the annual defense authorization bill provides an alternative path forward, proposing significant savings while also meeting the needs of our nation’s warfighters.

“The Department of Defense cannot continue to conduct business as usual and expect better results. Proposing to cut defense spending by nearly $500 billion in the coming decade without first conducting the necessary due diligence to determine what our nation’s basic defense requirements will be is an invitation to other countries to challenge America’s supremacy,” stated McKeon.

“When tapped to lead the Armed Services Committee, I committed—and instructed all Members of the Committee—to scrutinize the Department of Defense’s budget and identify inefficiencies so we may invest those savings into higher national security priorities. Up until now, the Pentagon has taken a band-aid approach to acquisition and management problems and has done little to identify the root causes of the inefficiencies that exist within the defense enterprise,” continued McKeon.

“The 2012 defense bill reflects the fact that members of the Armed Services Committee, the broader Congress—and the nation—must make tough choices in order to provide for America’s common defense. We must examine every aspect of the defense enterprise—not as a target for arbitrary funding reductions as the current Administration has proposed—but to find ways that we can accomplish the mission of providing for the common defense more effectively,” concluded McKeon.

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, which will be marked up by the Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, achieves Chairman McKeon’s goals by working to:

Ensure our troops deployed in Afghanistan, Iraq and around the world have the equipment, resources, authorities, training, and time they need to successfully complete their missions and return home;

Provide our warfighters and their families with the resources and support they need, deserve, and have earned;

Invest in the capabilities and force structure needed to protect the United States from current and future threats;

Mandate fiscal responsibility, transparency and accountability within the Department of Defense; and

Incentivize competition for every tax-payer dollar associated with funding Department of Defense requirements.

Of note, Chairman McKeon addresses the following in his “mark” of the annual defense authorization bill:

Oversight of Financial Management and Reliability of Department of Defense Financial Statements. The Armed Services Committee continues to be concerned that more than 60 percent of the Department of Defense financial community exists outside the auditing, accounting and financial management job classifications. Members of the committee are also concerned that the Department of Defense lacks financial managers who understand the fiscal concepts necessary to manage defense resources. Therefore, Chairman McKeon’s mark:

Establishes a financial management certification program for the Department of Defense;

Requires the Chief Management Officer to conduct a financial management personnel competency assessment in order to identify the personnel requirements needed to effectively perform financial, budgetary and accounting processes and to maintain professional certification standards;

Directs the Comptroller General to annually assess the extent to which the Department of Defense is realizing the savings proposed by Secretary’s efficiencies initiatives, and requires the Comptroller General to assess the extent to which components of the Department of Defense conducted business case analysis prior to recommending or implementing these efficiencies initiatives;

Requires increased oversight of the Department of Defense’s execution of the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) plan by requiring specific funding lines in the budget, development of metrics for identifying progress, and mitigation strategies for failure to meet required deadlines.

Chairmen McKeon will continue to rely upon on Representative Mike Conaway (R-Tex.) and Representative Rob Andrews (D-N.J.) as they and the committee work to reform the Pentagon’s acquisition and management practices.

Roles and Missions of the Department of Defense. In the 2008 version of the defense authorization bill, Congress required the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of roles and missions every four years with the intent of identifying capability gaps and areas of unnecessary duplication. In the report delivered to Congress in January 2009, it was clear that the Department of Defense failed to use the first review as an opportunity to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the roles and missions of the Armed Forces—choosing instead to simply endorse the status quo.

When the President announced his intent to cut the Department of Defense’s budget by an additional $400 billion—above the $78 billion which had already been announced—he also announced that the Department of Defense would conduct a review of the Department’s roles and missions in order to determine where those cuts should be made. Chairman McKeon and the members of the committee support this effort and strongly believe that harvesting arbitrary “savings” prior to determining the capabilities needed to protect the United States is putting the cart before the horse.

The 2012 defense authorization act would strengthen the 2011 Quarterly Roles and Missions Review in order to provide a solid basis for reducing waste while also improving the joint warfighting capability of the Department.

Sustainment of Equipment and Weapon Systems. American taxpayers cut a check every year for more than $80 billion in order to maintain defense material and equipment. Chairman McKeon believes this could be provided more efficiently. To achieve this goal, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012:

Strengthens and improves the military’s depots and arsenals. These critical, organic industrial base assets provide the nation with a ready and controlled source of repair for our military equipment, and they provide jobs for more than 77,000 hard working, highly skilled Americans.

Requires competition throughout the life-cycle of weapon systems for components and subcomponents. Air Force estimates indicated that this type of competition could render up to $2 billion in savings annually when applied to sustainment of Air Force commercial derivative aircraft engines alone, yet the Department has not embraced this competitive approach.

Provides increased stability in workload planning for private industry and the depots by requiring the Department of Defense to plan for sustainment earlier in weapon system development.

Aligns Centers of Industrial and Technical Excellence with Pentagon workload assignments to enhance capability, efficiency and effectiveness of the depots.

Enhances the capability of Army industrial facilities by making permanent the authority for them to enter into cooperative agreements with private sector contractors.

Focuses on the Pentagon’s efforts to do more to reduce the impact of corrosion. The Department of Defense’s own estimates show corrosion costs American taxpayers nearly $23 billion annually. Despite that fact—and the awareness that $37 is avoided for every $1 invested for corrosion mitigation and control actions—the Department Defense continues to fail to invest adequate resources to achieve these savings.

Total Workforce Management. Workforce costs are the greatest cost drivers in the Department of Defense. Just as with the sustainment of the industrial base, the Department of Defense must be held accountable for managing its workforce in the most efficient manner possible. Instead of a stove-piped approach to managing the Pentagon’s military, civilian and contractor workforce, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 requires the Department of Defense to review its manpower needs holistically, which includes addressing: What work needs to be done; does a military member or a government civilian need to do it; and, if not, can a contractor do it more efficiently and effectively?

As a result, the annual defense authorization bill requires the Department of Defense to project the annual civilian personnel and contractor requirements for support services to facilitate an improved awareness of the Pentagon’s manpower requirements.

The bill includes a provision that requires the Pentagon to develop a Total Force Management Plan that would determine the appropriate mix of military (active and reserve component), civilian and contractor personnel to meet the projected requirements.

The legislation also requires the Department of Defense to manage civilian personnel on the basis of the workload requirements and not on arbitrary cost targets.

Finally, the annual defense authorization act requires the Pentagon to enhance its accounting of contractors to include reporting of contractors in the annual report to Congress on the expenditures, work and accomplishments of the Department of Defense.

Reforming Department of Defense Reporting Requirements. The Department of Defense spends hundreds of millions of dollars every year producing and disseminating reports internally and to the Congress. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 would repeal a large number of these reports if they are redundant or no longer relevant. The legislation would also require the Department of Defense to transmit reports required by law to Congress electronically, which would dramatically reduce the printing and reproduction costs of the Department of Defense.

The annual defense bill would also mandate that the Secretary of Defense conduct a biennial review of Department of Defense reports required to be submitted to Congress. In doing so, the Secretary would have to evaluate the content, quality, cost and timeliness of the Department’s compliance with the reporting requirements. The legislation, while requiring this review, would allow the Secretary of Defense to recommend reports that could be amended or repealed.

The 2012 defense bill would also require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a biennial review of internal Department of Defense reports and take the necessary steps to eliminate or modify reports which are redundant, overly burdensome, of limited value, unjustifiably costly or otherwise determined to unduly reduce the efficiency of the Department of Defense.

###

PHOTO CREDIT: Congressman Howard P. Buck McKeon: Washington, D.C. Office U.S. House of Representatives 2184 Rayburn HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 ph: (202) 225-1956 fax: (202) 226-0683

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: House Armed Services Committee 2340 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 226-8980 Fax: (202) 225-0858

Monday, May 09, 2011

John Boehner’s address to The Economic Club of New York LIVE VIDEO FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

John Boehner’s address to The Economic Club of New York LIVE STREAMING VIDEO online. WATCH LIVE VIDEO: Speaker John Boehner Address on Jobs, Debt, Gas Prices

Tune in to watch LIVE STREAM Speaker Boehner’s address to The Economic Club of New York live online 05/09/11 7:00 PM ET


Speaker Boehner will highlight efforts to create a better environment for private sector job growth by cutting government spending, preventing job-crushing tax hikes, eliminating excessive federal regulations, and opening new markets for American goods.

He’ll address skyrocketing gas prices, and discuss the importance of expanding American energy production to create jobs and stopping government policies that are driving up the cost of energy.

And he’ll describe the importance of lifting our crushing burden of debt while preserving and protecting critical programs like Medicare for current and future retirees. And he’ll note that there will be no increase in the national debt limit without serious spending cuts and meaningful budget reforms.

Here are the details of tonight’s live stream of Speaker Boehner’s remarks:

WHAT: WATCH LIVE Speech by Speaker John Boehner to The Economic Club of New York

WHEN: Monday, May 9, at 7:00 PM ET

WHERE: Online HERE

We hope you’ll log on, tune in, and interact with others watching Boehner’s address. See you !

- Speaker Boehner’s Press Office

FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT Remarks by House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) Economic Club of New York, New York, NY As Prepared for Delivery May 9, 2011

“Chairman Tisch, thank you for that introduction. And thank you for the chance to be here.

“Let me start by expressing my admiration for what you do. You come from many different backgrounds. But you're united by a common interest in the prosperity and security of our nation.

“Last night marked one week since the operation against Osama bin Laden, the man who orchestrated the horrific attack upon this city nearly 10 years ago.

“Bringing justice to Bin Laden was an important moment for America and all of the free world. But the challenges that lie ahead here at home remain formidable.

“I'm grateful for the opportunity to share my thoughts tonight on how we need to address those challenges together, as a nation.

“I came to be Speaker of the House by way of small business.

“Before I ran for Congress, I was president of a small business in West Chester, Ohio -- Nucite Sales. We were manufacturers representatives in the packaging and plastics industry.

“But Nucite wasn't my first life experience with small business. That came earlier, when my brothers and I grew up mopping the floors of Andy's Cafe, a tavern outside of Cincinnati established in the 1930s by my grandpa, Andrew, and run for decades by my dad, Earl.

“It would be fair to say I'm not from around here. I come from a working class family of what you'd call Kennedy Democrats. I have 11 brothers and sisters.

“These experiences taught me a lot, long before I entered government service.

“They taught me our economy is a product of our people. Our economy does best when government respects our people enough to give them the freedom to do what they do best.

“I believe our mission as legislators is to liberate our economy from the things that impede growth. . .to provide clear policies, so that innovators and entrepreneurs have the green light to move forward and create jobs, without having to worry about second-guessing from Washington.

“My message to you tonight is that we will not succeed in balancing the federal budget and overcoming the challenges of our debt until we commit ourselves to government policies that will let our economy achieve long-term growth. Our economy won't grow as long as we continue to trip it up with short-term gimmicks from Washington.

“Many of our problems can be traced to a misguided belief by politicians that the American economy is something that can be controlled or micromanaged or influenced positively by government intervention and borrowing.

“All too often, rather than providing long-term policies that will help our economy expand, government offers short-term fixes that do little right away, and end up making things worse over time.

“When things aren't going well in our economy, the impulse in Washington is usually to respond with something big...something quote-unquote ‘comprehensive.’ The assumption is that this will provide reassurance to job creators. But it usually has the opposite effect in practice.

“We saw this with Dodd-Frank. There was a financial meltdown in our country, and millions of Americans were hit hard. But Washington's response was all wrong.

“We got a banking system that is less competitive, pitting the small community banks like the ones in my district against giant banks that the federal government deems ‘too big to fail.’

“We got a consolidated banking system with a small number of large firms operating as public utilities.

“We got a lot of new rules that make job creation and investment more difficult.

“And the government mortgage companies that triggered the whole meltdown went untouched.

“For job creators, the ‘promise’ of a large new initiative coming out of Washington is more like a threat. It freezes them. Instead of investing in new employees or new equipment, they make the logical decision to stand pat.

“The American economy is the sum total of the hard work and ingenuity of our people.

“When the economy grows, it's not because of a new government program or spending initiative. It's because a lot of people in the private sector worked hard, and were successful in overcoming the obstacles thrown in their path.

“The rash of ‘stimulus’ legislation passed by Congress in recent years has been one of those obstacles.

“The recent stimulus spending binge hurt our economy and hampered private sector job creation in America.

“The effect of adding nearly a trillion dollars to our national debt -- money borrowed mostly from foreign investors -- caused a further erosion of economic confidence in America, and increased uncertainty for millions of private-sector job creators.

“The massive borrowing and spending by the Treasury Department crowded out private investment by American businesses of all sizes.

“Americans were told the stimulus would create millions of new jobs, and that most of them would be private sector jobs. It didn't happen.

“Job creators were looking for certainty. You don't get long-term certainty from short-term government programs.

“The lesson of the stimulus era is that short-term government intervention is no substitute for long-term economic investment, private initiative, and freedom.

“I believe it's time to leave that era behind.

“We've also seen the arrogance of government recently in the skyrocketing gas prices our citizens and businesses are dealing with.

“There's a clear connection between high gas prices and the weak dollar that some in Washington have quietly welcomed over the past couple of years.

“It's well known that when you print tons of money, the dollar sinks, and the price of food and energy rises -- significantly. Yet the American people are told there is nothing that can be done about it. This is simply untrue.

“Washington has also kept most of our nation's vast energy resources under lock and key for decades, over the clear objections of the American people -- the people who own those resources.

“If we had listened to the people decades ago -- or even a few years ago -- many of these resources would be available to us right now to lower the price of energy. And we would probably have about a million private-sector jobs in America that we don't currently have.

“Instead what Washington has done is raise the specter of higher taxes, creating more uncertainty for those in America who create jobs.

“Washington's arrogance has triggered a political rebellion in our country.

“I don't think ‘rebellion’ is too strong of a word. The revolt we have seen by ordinary citizens over the past few years is like nothing we've seen in our lifetime. And it's happening in part because the arrogant habits of Washington are having real economic consequences.

“The debt limit debate presents our nation's leaders with the opportunity to reverse these habits and prove that we're starting to get the message. It's a chance to change course and admit that reactionary, short-term Washington solutions aren't always best.

“Creating a sustainable fiscal structure for the federal government is essential for long-term economic growth. Particularly when it comes to entitlements.

“We have a chance to provide certainty to job creators by signaling that our government is finally set to take a new approach when it comes to the spending and borrowing that has put us so deeply in debt.

“As you know, the president has asked Congress to increase the debt limit, and to do so without preconditions.

“There are those who insist we shouldn't ‘play games’ with it.

“Others have gone further. One prominent figure even went so far as to say ‘the people who are threatening not to pass the debt ceiling are our version of Al-Qaeda terrorists.’

“With all due respect, this is the arrogance of power -- and the American people won’t stand for it.

“This is the time to end the spending binge and prioritize and modernize what we spend.

“There's a reason the debt limit can't be increased without a vote of Congress. The debt limit is set in statute specifically so that the executive and legislative branches of our government have to deal with the difficult fiscal choices we face.

“I know there are many in this room who are uneasy with this debate. I understand your concerns.

“It's true that allowing America to default would be irresponsible. But it would be more irresponsible to raise the debt ceiling without simultaneously taking dramatic steps to reduce spending and reform the budget process.

“To increase the debt limit without simultaneously addressing the drivers of our debt -- in defiance of the will of our people -- would be monumentally arrogant and massively irresponsible.

“It would send a signal to investors and entrepreneurs everywhere that America still is not serious about dealing with our spending addiction.

“It would erode confidence in our economy and reduce certainty for small businesses. And this would destroy even more American jobs.

“So let me be as clear as I can be. Without significant spending cuts and reforms to reduce our debt, there will be no debt limit increase. And the cuts should be greater than the accompanying increase in debt authority the president is given.

“We should be talking about cuts of trillions, not just billions.

“They should be actual cuts and program reforms, not broad deficit or debt targets that punt the tough questions to the future.

“And with the exception of tax hikes -- which will destroy jobs -- everything is on the table. That includes honest conversations about how best to preserve Medicare, because we all know, with millions of Baby Boomers beginning to retire, the status quo is unsustainable.

“If we don’t act boldly now, the markets will act for us very soon. That's the warning we got from Standard & Poor's a few weeks ago.

“If we fail to use this as a moment to demonstrate that we're getting serious about fixing the debt, the result will be fewer jobs, less confidence, and more uncertainty.

“The debt limit debate is critical because it's forcing us to make a choice right now as a nation. It's a choice between the policies of the past, and a new vision that acknowledges we can't tax, borrow and spend our way back to prosperity.

“The big myth of the current budget debate is the notion that in order to balance the budget, we have to raise taxes.

“The truth is we will never balance the budget and rid our children of debt unless we cut spending and have real economic growth. And we will never have real economic growth if we raise taxes on those in America who create jobs.

“I ran for Congress in 1990, the year our nation's leaders struck a so-called bargain that raised taxes as part of a bipartisan plan to balance the budget.

“The result of that so-called bargain was the recession of the early 1990s. It wasn't until the economy picked back up toward the end of that decade that we achieved a balanced budget.

“Today some seem intent on recycling the 1990 budget deal, only this time with much larger tax increases.

“That's not going to happen, and I've told that to the president. A tax hike would wreak havoc not only on our economy's ability to create private-sector jobs, but also on our ability to tackle the national debt.

“Balancing the budget requires spending cuts and economic growth. We won't have economic growth if we raise taxes and fail to address the drivers of our debt.

“The mere threat of tax hikes causes uncertainty for job creators -- uncertainty that results in less risk-taking and fewer jobs.

“If we're serious about balancing the budget and getting our economy back to creating jobs, tax hikes should be off the table.

“I mentioned I was raised in a family of Kennedy Democrats. It was before this very club in 1962 that President John F. Kennedy said the following: ‘Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one hand, and the avoidance of large federal deficits on the other. It is increasingly clear that no matter what party is in power, so long as our [needs] keep rising, an economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget — just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits.’

“Rather than increase government spending, President Kennedy told the New York Economic Club, we should cut taxes significantly, and take steps to ‘increase incentives and the availability of investment capital’ for employers.

“I would note that my colleagues and I are not calling for tax cuts in our budget. Rather, we're calling for an end to the threat of tax hikes -- and a fundamental reform of the tax code -- to provide certainty to those in our country who create jobs. We're calling for an end to the government spending binge that is crowding out private investment and threatening the availability of capital needed for job creation.

“There's another myth I need to address, and that is the myth that addressing our debt challenges requires ‘pain.’

“Addressing our debt requires action. ‘Pain’ comes only from inaction.

“Suffering comes from standing pat and waiting for investors, job creators, and capital markets to impose a solution before elected leaders cannot.

“Root-canal economics has a name, and its name is Doing Nothing. The greatest threat to our economy and our future is doing nothing.

“We urgently need to enact reforms that will protect and preserve critical programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

“If we do nothing, as some propose, that guarantees benefit cuts for seniors.

“Let me repeat that, because it’s a crucial point that is too often overlooked.

“If we do nothing, seniors’ benefits will be cut.

“And to those who contend that the economy is too weak to take on the challenge of entitlement reform -- I would simply say, you've got it backwards.

“The truth is that making fundamental reforms to these programs would be good for the economy -- and good for the next generation.

“It's possible to make changes in a way that will ensure future beneficiaries will have access to the same kinds of options as Members of Congress currently have.

“The budget put forth by our Budget Committee Chairman, Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, accomplishes this.

“And instead of raising taxes, it calls for fundamental reform of the tax code -- a priority for us that will be led by Dave Camp of Michigan, the chairman of the House Committee on Ways & Means.

“There are also other steps that can be taken immediately to help free our economy and support private-sector job creation. Many of them are outlined in the Pledge to America, the governing agenda we put forth last year by listening to the people.

“We can stop the Environmental Protection Agency from proceeding with a backdoor energy tax that will further increase gas prices and destroy jobs.

“We can pass the REINS Act, authored by my colleague Geoff Davis of Kentucky. It requires congressional approval of any new government rule with an estimated economic cost of $100 million or more.

“We can use trade agreements with Panama, Colombia, and South Korea to create jobs and boost our economy by opening new markets to American exports.

“Coupled with the fundamental spending reforms and tax reforms I've described, these policies will clear a path for long-term, sustained economic growth.

“With such policies in place, the federal budget can be balanced.

“In closing, let me say I'm humbled by the opportunity to serve our country.

“We owe it to the people of our country to ensure that the opportunities our generation had are there for current and future generations.

“We owe them a humbler government that lives within its means and values the entrepreneurial drive of our people, with policies that unleash the awesome potential of our economy.

“For those of us in Washington, this has to be our focus.

“Until our economy is back on track and the American Dream has been restored, there can be no rest.

“It starts with freedom. In America, it always has.

“Thanks for the opportunity to be with you tonight.”

TEXT CREDIT: Speaker of the House John Boehner Contact: H-232 The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 P (202) 225-0600 F (202) 225-5117

VIDEO CREDIT: SpeakerBoehner

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Jack's Story: Government "All About Regulations" VIDEO


The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released Jack's Story: Government "All about Regulations," the first in a three part video series detailing how government regulations impact Ohio small business owner Jack Buschur and his company, Buschur Electric Incorporated. Founded in 1978, Buschur Electric grew to support 30 jobs in Minster, OH until the down economy and costly compliance with byzantine government regulations forced the company to lay off 12 workers beginning in 2009. This is Jack's story of how rules written by bureaucrats in Washington affect real communities, job creators and their families across America.

"The regulations and the paperwork problems government throws at small business today is just becoming tremendously overwhelming," Buschur says in the video. "So much of it has nothing to do with safety or creating business. It's all about regulations."

Earlier this year, Buschur testified before the Oversight Committee that government safety and environmental regulations -- imposed by Washington with little meaningful consultation with regulated job creators -- create an uncertain business environment, require time-consuming and costly compliance, and unleash unintended consequences undermining the purported benefits of regulation.

VIDEO and TEXT CREDIT: oversightandreform

Newt Gingrich announces he will seek Republican nomination for president in 2012 via Twitter and Facebook

Newt GingrichNewt Gingrich announces he will seek Republican nomination for president in 2012 via Twitter and Facebook.

I have been humbled by all the encouragement you have given me to run. Thank you for your support. Be sure to watch Hannity this Wednesday at 9pm ET/8pm CT. I will be on to talk about my run for President of the United States. 05/09/11 11:15 AM ET. via web

Newt Gingrich

Be sure to watch Hannity this Wednesday at 9pm ET/8pm CT. I will be on to talk about my run for President of the United States. 05/09/11 11:15 AM ET.

Sunday, May 08, 2011

Condoleezza Rice This Week with Christiane Amanpour the death of Osama bin Laden VIDEO

Interview with Condoleezza Rice. Amanpour discusses the death of Osama bin Laden with the fmr sec of state.

VIDEO and TEXT CREDIT: This Week with Christiane Amanpour

Meet The Press Michael Chertoff Michael Hayden Rudy Giuliani post Osama bin Laden world VIDEO TEXT


Meet The Press, Former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Former CIA Director General Michael Hayden, and Former Mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani on the post Osama bin Laden world.

>>> we turn live now to three men who have worked on the front lines in the war on terror, former secretary of homeland security, michael chertoff, former director of the cia, michael hayden, who now both work as principals of the chertoff group, a strategic advisory risk management security firm. and from new york, the mayor of new york city, of course, during the 9/11 attacks, rudy giuliani, now head of giuliani partners. welcome to all of you. general hayden, i want to start with you. the news that mr. donilon talked about -- this is the largest trove of data from any single terrorist that the government has found. what are you learning now that we didn't know before?

>> well, i think they're going after -- several things, david. the first thing you want to find out is imminent threat information. the second layer of detail you want to find out is locational information and al qaeda leadership. and then the third, and this is the long-term effort, you're essentially creating an encyclopedia of how al qaeda operates, what their system is, their tactics, their techniques, their procedures. this is wonderful not just in its size, but we have not gotten what we call sse, sensitive site exploitation, going in and getting materials on al qaeda leadership for several years. so, it's big and it's new.

>> it was the understanding of the intelligence community, secretary chertoff, that after 9/11, he no longer became operationally involved. now, we're seeing these videos -- difficult to know, bit you heard donilon say, no, we think he was more directly in control. what do you think that means?

>> well, i think it's going to cause us to evaluate a little bit more about what the leadership structure is and what his role was, and particularly, look at the material that's being exploiting to see whether there are, in fact, leads that can take us to protect against future attacks. that being said, we always knew, and i think it's still clear that there was a cadre of very experienced leaders below bin laden, people like al libi or al lackey in yemen, and those are still in place. so, part of what we need to do is understand where their tactics and strategy are based upon the material that we find in this treasure trove.

>> mayor giuliani, the question of what this represents against al qaeda, a death blow or something else. this is certainly a significant development.

>> very significant development. removing a leader of the significance of this man is extraordinary. i mean, this is like removing a hitler or a stalin in the middle of those conflicts. he's going to be very hard to replace. and it's a symbolic blow for an organization that feeds a lot on emotion. this is a decentralized organization that's tied together by their feelings and emotions. so, removing this man will help a lot, but it's not a death blow by any means. i mean, this is a pretty decentralized organization. over the last couple of years they've been operating in yemen, other places, so they're not operating in just one place. and i think they're particularly angry at us right now. so, long term, this is a fabulous, terrific development, making us safer. short term, it presents some very substantial risks which i think the administration is aware of.

>> secretary chertoff, i want to play a piece of an interview i did this week as part of our "press pass" conversation, something we do weekly on our website, with steve cole, author of " ghost wars," who knows al qaeda so well. asked about what al qaeda's still capable of, and this is what he said about it.

>> al qaeda is a resilient organization, but it is not spreading or growing. so, it has the capability to carry out attacks such as the one we saw christmas before last, where an al qaeda affiliate tried to blow up and almost did blow up an american airliner with several hundred people aboard. now, that is, i think, a fair approximation of its capacity. once in a while, it could kill hundreds of people. that ought to get our attention, but it need not be the basis for organizing every aspect of our national life or our national defense.

>> do you agree with that or no?

>> i don't know if i would agree that it's not spreading. i think if you look over the last few years, you've seen a greater presence of al qaeda or an affiliation with al qaeda in north africa, obviously in yemen and somalia, and even in parts of central africa. i think what's interesting is this, we don't know to what extent the strategy of going for the big attack, which we've always presumed was a core element of the strategy, was driven by bin laden personally. now that he's gone, there may be an opportunity for some others who have different views about his style of tacks to begin to shape the strategy. for example, does that mean more mumbai attacks, where instead of blowing up an airliner, you're bringing simultaneous armed attacks on a number of different facilities? so, while this is on one hand a great advantage of eliminating bin laden, on the other hand, we have to be more careful than ever to look at what may be tactical changes in how they move forward.

>> general hayden, are you concerned that they didn't capture him alive?

>> no. i mean, it might have provided some intelligence advantages, but i doubt very much more than we're going to get from the documents and the hard drives and the discs and so on. no, i understand quite well. and then you would have had somebody in our custody, and that would have been in the news every day and motivating people. perhaps people now will be less interested in coming to kill us because of some of the videos that we've been able to show.

>> let me follow up with all of you on this other ongoing debate i asked mr. donilon about, interrogations, the counterterror policies after 9/11, specifically waterboarding. general hayden, isn't it something of an open question as to whether you can tie that moment to this moment? in other words, harsh interrogation, waterboarding of suspected terrorists ultimately led us to bin laden? can we make that declaring statement?

>> i wouldn't describe it that way. i describe it the way director panetta has done in some public commentaries, that one of the key threads we began this from about four years ago came from information from cia detainees. and all of those particular detainees did indeed have enhanced interrogation techniques used against them. so you can't deny that we got valuable information from these folks. now, director panetta went on to say it's just an open question whether we may have gotten them from other means, but the fact of the matter is, we did it this way and this way worked.

>> mayor giuliani, but you heard a declaretive statement from secretary rumsfeld who said that anybody who questions whether waterboarding worked is simply denying facts. how can you make that assertion with such certainty?

>> obviously, you can't make it with certainty unless the administration reveals all the data, which they're not. but i thought mr. donilon's failure to answer your question spoke very loudly about the fact that waterboarding, enhanced interrogation techniques, played a significant role in this. maybe not a critical role, but certainly a significant role. and it just makes sense. these kinds of materials are not obtained easily, and many of the material -- [ everyone talking at once ]

>> isn't the point, secretary chertoff, that look, khalid shaikh mohammed was water-boarded 183 times, and according to news this week on nbc news, he never gave up the truth about the courier that led to bin laden. so, there is still this debate that doesn't get settled through killing bin laden, would you agree with that?

>> for people who will never be persuaded one way or the other about this, and i don't think i can add anything to it --

>> but is it objectively knowable?

>> i'll tell you what's knowable. go back ten years. i was head of the commission on 9/11, and at that point in time, we had a national security apparatus that was stove-piped, that didn't have the ability to integrate information and to act on it in a timely way. both presidents deserve a lot of credit for maturing the apparatus over ten years to the point that, as tom donilon said, the president could have confidence that this apparatus would work, taking the intelligence, operationalizing it, moving it in realtime. all the pieces of that are part of the puzzle. some of them some people will like, some of them people won't like, but it's the totality that gave this president the tools that he was able to use to kill bin laden.

>> general, let me ask you about pakistan.

>> sure.

>> was pakistan specifically helpful to the united states with information that ultimately i.d.'d the couriers that led to bin laden?

>> there is nothing in my personal experience that would prompt me to say yes. pakistan has helped in some other areas. we've captured terrorists in sedentary areas of pakistan, by and large years ago, not more recently by and large, but i'm not aware of any pakistani help that led to the events of last weekend.

>> did pakistan harbor a terrorist?

>> well there was a terrorist in pakistan that seemed to feel that he was very safe. and as mr. donilon said, they've got a lot of questions to answer and the burden of proof is on them.

>> mayor giuliani, you heard donilon say that it's pakistan that's going to investigate this and this is a big deal in pakistan. what are the ramifications for this as more becomes clear about what they knew and when?

>> ramifications are huge because pakistan is a critical country, it's a country with nuclear weapons. if bin laden could have this kind of access to the government and get this kind of protection -- if that's the case -- we don't know that it is -- what does that say about the security of nuclear weapons and what's it say about the military force there and how secure it really is? so, this has huge implications. and before we all comment on it, we'd better be right about it.

>> i want to ask quickly about afghanistan as well, general hayden. there are going to be people who say, hey, wait a minute, let's focus narrowly on counterterror, as this president did, let's accelerate that withdrawal from afghanistan.

>> i think we need to see how this plays out, david. this is not a singular event that then has us making a sharp break left or right. we'll see what the impact of this is. there are lots of reasons for what it is we're doing in pakistan, going after bin laden--

>> in afghanistan.

>> i'm sorry in afghanistan. going after bin laden is but one of them. let's see what happens to this network now. let's see what they do. as secretary chertoff said, we could get a lot more biodiversity, so to speak, in the kinds of threats coming after us, if bin laden did have such a controlling hand. now you'll have more independent actor and perhaps more agile actors.

>> what happens now? are these guys on the run? from an operational point of view, does our tempo increase as these guys are on the move?

>> it should increase. this could be the pursuit phase and we should press the fight.

>> mayor giuliani, i want to take you back to the end of this week. this president, nearly a decade after president bush visited ground zero after 9/11, returns. and of course, you were there with him as he met with firefighters and family members of the victims. and there was another image that was so poignant this week from sunday night of firefighters looking at the ticker tape in -- i don't know if that was lower manhattan or times square-- " osama bin laden is dead." describe what that's like and is there an emotional symmetry ten years later to have him visit?

>> there sure was. i had lunch with the president and the firefighters who we met with, and it was a very emotional and a very satisfying experience. i think they felt a burden lifted from them. hard for them to describe. i mean, it doesn't bring back our loved ones. it doesn't bring back those tremendous heroes that saved this country on september 11th. but there is no mistaking the fact that there's a burden that's been lifted from them. they can look at this somewhat differently now. and i think all of them, whatever their political persuasions, had great admirations for the president's courage to make this decision. this was a risky decision to make. the president made it, he made it correctly, including the decision, i think, to dispose of bin laden's body so that wouldn't become a cause celeb. i think these men, these firefighters and police officers he met with who exercise bravery every day in their lives, i think they admire that in the president.

>> does it impact at all, mayor giuliani, your thinking about running for president next year?

>> not in the slightest. i separate the two things. this was an american achievement. two presidents get great credit for it. i also thank president bush this week because no matter what about the debate, no matter what you come out on the debate about waterboarding, no doubt, all of the work he did and the changes he made in intelligence brought this about. and president obama's improving that and his decision-making brought it about. it's a great achievement for both presidents, both political parties, all americans.

>> and you're still considering a run for the presidency?

>> not right this minute, but yes, i am.

>> all right. we'll leave it there. thanks to all of you very much.

TEXT and VIDEO CREDIT: Meet The Press

Donald Rumsfeld Face The Nation enhanced interrogation techniques aided in finding Osama bin Laden VIDEO


Donald Rumsfeld Face The Nation enhanced interrogation techniques aided in finding Osama bin Laden VIDEO. Rumsfeld: Waterboarding aided in finding OBL

Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld spoke with Bob Schieffer on the efforts that lead to the killing of Osama bin Laden citing the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" on terror suspects likely produced "a major fraction" of U.S. knowledge on al Qaeda.

TEXT and VIDEO CREDIT: cbsnews.com

Saturday, May 07, 2011

Pentagon releases 5 videotape clips obtained during the raid of Osama bin Laden's compound VIDEO

Today the Pentagon released videos of Osama bin Laden in his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, where he had reportedly lived for the past five years while actively collaborating with al Qaeda on terrorist plans.



This video shows him rehearsing his remarks in front of a wrinkled blue background. (no audio)



This video shows bin Laden preparing for a propaganda video in front of a wooden background. (No audio)



This video shows Osama bin Laden missing his cue. (No audio)



This video shows the al Qaeda leader delivering a message to the American people that was never released. (No audio)



This video shows bin Laden watching himself on television. (No audio)


VIDEO and TEXT CREDIT: CNET TV

Scott Brown Weekly Republican Address TEXT PODCAST VIDEO 05/07/11


Podcast of the address: Download MP3 for PODCAST || FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT BELOW.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) released the following weekly Republican address. The address is available in both audio and video format and is embargoed until 6:00 a.m. ET, Saturday, May 7, 2011.

Scott Brown Weekly Republican Address“Hello, I’m Scott Brown, and I have the honor of representing Massachusetts in the United States Senate.

“Last Sunday night, we heard President Obama deliver the message that Americans have been waiting for since September 11, 2001. It’s a very rare thing when so many people across the world observe the loss of life with something other than regret. But this man, the late Osama bin Laden, had chosen his fate long before in a life filled with cruelty. If he expected mercy when our forces found him that was asking much more than he was ever known to give.

“This was a man who rejoiced in the suffering and death of others, who set in motion all the horror and grief of 9/11 and considered it just a start. He was a teacher of evil, and now, for him, the lesson is over. It ends not in the fulfillment of some fanatical vision, but in the depths of the Arabian Sea.

“None of this can compensate for the murder of bin Laden’s victims. Nor will it ease the sorrow of those who still mourn. But it sure counts for something, and it’s always a victory when Justice has the final word.

“Bin Laden’s killing was the result of coordinated efforts going back many years. It was the dramatic conclusion of patient intelligence gathering begun long before, and the work of a military that is second to none. The operation was a model of sustained, concentrated military action, and the example will not be lost on other terrorists. Any escape they make will be temporary. Any sanctuary they find will be uncovered. Those who harm or threaten the American people will be dealt with, on our terms, however long it takes.

“This was the pledge of President George W. Bush in the days after 9/11, and he kept it in seven years of relentless, decisive action against the al-Qaeda network. In the case of bin Laden, it fell to President Obama to give the final order. He did so calmly, swiftly, and decisively. It was a fine moment for our commander-in-chief and for our country.

“Above all, this past week has reminded us of the skill and special courage of those who choose to take on the toughest missions in service to America. Our combat forces are the ones we call when the need is the greatest. They give their all, and seek no special praise for what they do. They’re the best we have, and what great news it was on Sunday night that the mission to kill bin Laden succeeded, and every man came back safely.

“The men and women of the armed services have sacrificed so much already in the war on terror. And as much as we all wish it could be ended as suddenly and as permanently as the career of bin Laden, the war goes on, and it still demands our attention and our commitment to victory.

“The troop surge of last year has made a difference in Afghanistan, and we can’t surrender those gains to what’s left of the Taliban. Early in the conflict, America and our allies devastated the al-Qaeda network in Afghanistan. Yet Al-Qaeda is still at work, and that is why we need to prepare the Afghan security forces to protect their own people. We must ensure that Afghanistan does not once again become a sanctuary for terrorists.

“After so many years, there’s a temptation to despair of ever gaining a final victory against our enemies. But if we’ve learned anything this past week, it’s that our patient commitment to even the hardest objectives will be rewarded.

“We all heard it said that bin Laden was beyond our reach, in some remote corner of the earth, and after almost a decade we could surely never find him. Let me tell you it’s always a mistake to bet against American resourcefulness and determination. These qualities led us to the man who started this war. They will lead us to victory in that war. And as always, the credit will belong to the skill and raw courage of the armed forces of the United States of America. May God bless them all, and may He always watch over the country they serve.

“This is Senator Scott Brown – thank you for listening.“

###

VIDEO and IMAGE CREDIT: gopweeklyaddress

TEXT and AUDIO CREDIT: www.gop.com

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Greenville South Carolina Tea Party Republican Presidential Debate 05/05/11 FULL LIVE VIDEO


Greenville South Carolina Tea Party Republican Presidential Debate 05/05/11 LIVE VIDEO

South Carolina Greenville Tea Party 1st Presidential Debate Freedom Rally May 5th, Thursday 9p ET: at the Hyatt Regency Grand Ballroom 220 N Main Street, Greenville, SC 29601-2160 · +1 (864) 235-1234.

The Candidates: Gary Johnson, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul and Tim Pawlenty.

VIDEO CREDIT: MoxNewsDotCom

TEXT CREDIT: The South Carolina Greenville Tea Party Proudly Presents

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

South Carolina Greenville Tea Party hosts 1st Republican Presidential Debate and Freedom Rally featuring Governor Nikki Haley

South Carolina Greenville Tea Party Debate LogoGovernor Nikki Haley to be Keynote Speaker at 1st Presidential Debate Freedom Rally

(Greenville) – The South Carolina Greenville Tea Party, a grassroots conservative organization promoting fiscal responsibility, limited government and free markets. We are extremely proud to host the "1st Presidential Debate Freedom Rally" featuring South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley.

Governor Nikki Haley, became the first Indian American woman sworn into the Office of the Governor of the State of South Carolina on January 12th, 2011. Former Governor of Minnesota and potential presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty, S.C. Congressmen Jeff Duncan and Trey Gowdy, former and potential presidential candidate and Texas Congressman Ron Paul, State Senators Lee Bright, Tom Davis and David Thomas and many other notable speakers will join Governor Haley at the rally.

The South Carolina Greenville Tea Party 1st Presidential Debate Freedom Rally will be on May 5th, Thursday from 2 to 11PM at the Hyatt Regency Grand Ballroom 220 N Main Street, Greenville, SC 29601-2160 · +1 (864) 235-1234 - Join thousands of patriots for the 1st “Presidential Debate Freedom Rally" Get ready to be motivated by speakers, music and information.

###

Confirmed Speakers:

Elected Officials

The Honorable Nikki Haley, Governor of the State of South Carolina

Karen Floyd, State Chairman SC GOP | Rep. Ron Paul, Presidential Candidate | Rep. Trey Gowdy, Dist. 4 Gvl. & Spartanburg | Rep. Jeff Duncan, SC District 3 | State Sen. Tom Davis | State Sen. Lee Bright | State Sen. David Thomas | Garry Smith, State Rep. Dist. 27 | Dan Herren, State Executive Committeeman | Judge Roy Moore, Chief Justice - Alabama

All Three Candidates for SC Republican State Chairman: Steven Brown, Esq., State Chairman candidate | Mr. Chad Connally, State Chairman candidate | Lt. Col. Bill Connor, State Chairman candidate

Community Leaders: Pastor Stan Craig, Choice Hills Baptist Church | Lt. Col. E. Ray Moore, Exodus Mandate | Dr. Christina Jeffrey, Lecturer on the Constitution | Mr. Butch Taylor, Greenville Taxpayers Assoc.

Freedom Movement Personalities & Entertainers: Dr. Steve Isom, SC Sound Money Committee | Dr. Nicky Chavers, Director, Academy of Arts | Dr. Mike Vasovski, former Cong. candidate SC-3 | Mr. Jack Hunter - The Southern Avenger | Mr. John McManus, John Birch Society | Mr. Ray McBerry States Rights Advocate | Mr. Chris Panos, ABATE Horry County | Mr. Doug Tjaden, Director Honest Money Center | Noah & Nicole Stratton - Patriotic Re-enactor | Mr. Jordan Page - Musician | Steven Hurst | Pastor Frank Raddich, Ministry to Congress | Billy Blaze, Musician | Michael Boldin, 10th Amendment Center.

Contact: Chris Lawton. South Carolina, Greenville Tea Party (SCGTP) chris@chrislawton.com 864-325-6400

TEXT CREDIT: The South Carolina Greenville Tea Party Proudly Presents

IMAGE CREDIT: Greenville Tea Party

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Peter King Osama bin Ladin information came from Waterboarding and rendition VIDEO


Rep. Pete King recently appeared on the O'Reilly Factor to discuss the death of Osama bin Laden. Peter King Osama bin Ladin information came from Waterboarding and rendition VIDEO

King Statement on Killing of Osama bin Laden May 1, 2011

Today, the American people have seen justice

Washington, D.C. (May 1, 2011) – U.S. Rep. Peter T. King (R-NY), Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, issued the following statement on the killing of Osama bin Laden:

“I commend President Obama on the announcement of the killing of Osama bin Laden.

“Today, the American people have seen justice. The leader of the United States’ top enemy has gotten what he deserves for orchestrating the deaths of nearly 3,000 innocent Americans on September 11, 2001.

“In 2001, President Bush said ‘we will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.’ President Bush deserves great credit for putting action behind those words. President Obama deserves equal credit for his resolve in this long war against al-Qaeda.

“This great success would not have been possible without the tireless work of countless brave men and women who have served around the world in this War on Terror.”

VIDEO CREDIT: RepPeterKing

YEXT CREDIT: PeteKing:

Death of Osama bin Ladin, Geospatial-Intelligence Agency provides imagery, geospatial and targeting analysis, image sciences and modeling.

Letitia A. LongStatement from the NGA Director on the death of Osama bin Ladin - May 2, 2011

We at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency are honored to be public servants during this singularly profound moment in our nation’s history – delivering Osama bin Ladin to his just end.

NGA applied a range of geospatial intelligence (GEOINT) capabilities including imagery, geospatial and targeting analysis, along with image sciences and modeling that, supplemented with work from the CIA and NSA, allowed the United States to carry out this operation, making bin Ladin pay for the crimes that he committed and the hatred he inflamed within al-Qa’ida.

The employees of NGA have worked behind the scenes for more than a decade – committed to finding bin Ladin – providing crucial geospatial intelligence for our war fighters and nation’s decision makers.

I am extremely proud of the work that NGA men and women have done that led directly to this outcome. Their GEOINT was critical to helping the intelligence community pinpoint bin Ladin’s compound.

We still have work to do. To our partners in the fight, we will continue to provide our geospatial intelligence for the nation’s most pressing security threats. To the American people, know that we will never stop looking for actors who seek to harm our people and our way of life. In the days that follow, we need to prepare for a possible response from our enemies. We must remain vigilant – knowing that this victory, while monumental, is but one among many that must be made in the fight that we will continue to wage against radical extremists.

Letitia A. Long

RESOURCES: Statement from the NGA Director on the death of Osama bin Ladin , original release in PDF FORMAT

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

Monday, May 02, 2011

Osama bin Laden received a Muslim ceremony as he was buried at sea

USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70

(Jan. 22, 2011) The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) and Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 17. Image: 110122-N-7981E-215.jpg (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class James R. Evans/Released)
5/2/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Osama bin Laden received a Muslim ceremony as he was buried at sea, a senior defense official said here May 2.

The religious rites were performed aboard the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson in the North Arabian Sea, the official said, and occurred within 24 hours of the terrorist leader's death.

"Preparations for at-sea (burial) began at 1:10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time and were completed at 2 a.m.," the official said.

The burial followed traditional Muslim burial customs, the official said, and bin Laden's body was washed and placed in a white sheet.

"The body was placed in a weighted bag. A military officer read prepared religious remarks, which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker," the official added.

Afterward, bin Laden's body was placed onto a flat board, which was then elevated upward on one side and the body slid off into the sea.

The deceased terrorist was buried at sea because no country would accept bin Laden's remains, a senior defense official said.

CIA and Defense Department officials are sure it was the body of bin Laden. CIA specialists compared photos of the body with known photos of bin Laden and said with 95-percent certainty it was the terrorist leader, a senior intelligence official said.

In addition, the intelligence official said, bin Laden's wife identified the al-Qaida leader by name while the strike team was still in the compound.

CIA and other specialists in the intelligence community "performed the initial DNA analysis matching a virtually 100-percent DNA match of the body against the DNA of several of bin Laden's family members," the official added.

TEXT CREDIT: AF.mil - News: by Jim Garamone American Forces Press Service

IMAGE CREDIT: Navy News Service - Eye on the Fleet Current Collection

Tim Huelskamp, issued the following statement upon hearing that Osama bin Laden had been killed by American forces:

"Justice Has Been Served" - Statement on Death of Osama Bin Laden

Congressman Tim Huelskamp, who represents the First District of Kansas, issued the following statement upon hearing that Osama bin Laden had been killed by American forces:

"Almost ten years ago, America was attacked by those who despise liberty and freedom. Last night, we received word that the mastermind of the horror perpetuated on America is dead. This victory is a testament to the skill and persistence of American military and intelligence operations."

"While we have much to celebrate, it is important to keep in mind that there are still those who want to see America weakened or destroyed. America must remain steadfast in Her resolve and committed to defending Her freedom both at home and abroad."

"The events of September 11 will be forever etched in the minds and hearts of all Americans. Today, justice has been served. May it be a step toward healing the wounds of families of patriots who have sacrificed their lives in pursuit of freedom."

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT Congressman Tim Huelskamp: Washington, DC 126 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-2715 Fax: (202) 225-5124 Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00AM-5:00PM Eastern time.

IMAGE CREDIT: This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor tonight issued the following statement regarding the news that Osama Bin Laden has been killed:

Eric CantorLeader Cantor Statement On Death Of Osama Bin Laden

WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) tonight issued the following statement regarding the news that Osama Bin Laden has been killed:

“Nearly a decade ago, in the days after 9/11, President Bush said, 'Whether we bring our enemies to justice or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.' Tonight, we've learned that justice has been done. The man with the blood of more than 3,000 Americans on his hands, the man who forced us to begin to think the unthinkable - is now dead.

"Families who lost loved ones at the hands of Bin Laden and his terrorist organization have grieved for far too long and this sends a signal that America will not tolerate terrorism in any form.

The men and women of our armed forces and intelligence community have fought valiantly for the last decade and this is a major victory and testament to their dedication. I commend President Obama who has followed the vigilance of President Bush in bringing Bin Laden to justice. While this is no doubt a major event in our battle against terrorism, we will not relent in our fight against terror and our efforts to keep America safe and secure.”

TEXT CREDIT: Eric Cantor Majority Leader Office of the Majority Leader H-329, The Capitol House of Representatives P: 202.225.4000

IMAGE CREDIT: This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.

Ed Royce Chairman of the Terrorism, Nonproliferation and Trade Subcommittee, issued the following statement in reaction to Osama bin Laden's death

Ed RoyceRoyce, Terrorism Chairman, Reacts to Bin Laden Death Washington, May 1 -

Tonight, Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA), Chairman of the Terrorism, Nonproliferation and Trade Subcommittee, issued the following statement in reaction to Osama bin Laden's death:

"This is a victory for our intelligence and military professionals and a victory for the American people. It also brings a sense of relief to all of those who lost loved ones on 9/11.

"The face of al-Qaeda is dead. But the organization and its adherents live on. While we can rejoice, we can't let our guard down."

"President Obama reported that Pakistani President Zardari was pleased. The concern is that many Pakistanis won't feel that way.

"We've killed a lot of terrorists. This is the big one. His killing has great symbolic value worldwide."

###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: U.S. Congressman Ed Royce: WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE 2185 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 T (202) 225-4111

Sunday, May 01, 2011

Americans for Prosperity Presidential Summit on Spending and Job Creation Manchester New Hampshire VIDEO


On April 29th, 2011 Americans for Prosperity Foundation hosted a Presidential Summit on Spending and Job Creation live from Manchester, NH.

Americans for Prosperity Foundation hosted the Presidential Summit on Spending and Job Creation in New Hampshire. Speakers included former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum, and businessman Herman Cain. Watch the video above to see the full broadcast!

This is the first opportunity the presidential candidates will have to detail their plans on reining in government spending, ending budget deficits, and eliminating the national debt.

We’ve seen clearly where the current administration stands. Simply put, when it comes to budget deficits and debt, President Obama’s policies have been bankrupting America.

President Obama has increased discretionary spending by almost 25% during his first two years and over 55% when you include the failed $814 billion “stimulus” boondoggle passed in 2009.

His health care takeover legislation, if not overturned by the courts or Congress, will mean trillions more in big government waste and bureaucracy along with higher taxes and health care costs for American families and businesses.

Meanwhile, on his watch, Medicare has slipped still further down the road toward failure.



VIDEO IMAGE and TEXT CREDIT: Americans for Prosperity