Wednesday, July 22, 2009

President Barack Obama news conference 07/22/09 LIVE VIDEO

President Barak Obama and Robert GibbsTonight, President Obama held a primetime press conference to address the nation about health insurance reform. He laid out where he believes we are, where we're going, and why health insurance reform matters.
Find FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT of tonight's address below. And at 8pm ET, tune in to watch the press conference live on C-SPAN2 in Windows Media Format.

As soon as mp3 for podcast is available it will be posted here.


President Obama's opening speech and Q and A at press conference 07/22/09 FULL VIDEO
Text: Obama’s Remarks on Health Care

Following is a text of the prepared remarks by President Obama before his White House news conference on Wednesday, as released by the White House.

Good evening. Before I take your questions, I want to talk for a few minutes about the progress we're making on health insurance reform and where it fits into our broader economic strategy.

Six months ago, I took office amid the worst recession in half a century. We were losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month and our financial system was on the verge of collapse.

As a result of the action we took in those first weeks, we have been able to pull our economy back from the brink. We took steps to stabilize our financial institutions and our housing market. And we passed a Recovery Act that has already saved jobs and created new ones; delivered billions in tax relief to families and small businesses; and extended unemployment insurance and health insurance to those who have been laid off.

Of course, we still have a long way to go. And the Recovery Act will continue to save and create more jobs over the next two years – just like it was designed to do. I realize this is little comfort to those Americans who are currently out of work, and I'll be honest with you – new hiring is always one of the last things to bounce back after a recession.

And the fact is, even before this crisis hit, we had an economy that was creating a good deal of wealth for folks at the very top, but not a lot of good-paying jobs for the rest of America. It's an economy that simply wasn't ready to compete in the 21st century – one where we've been slow to invest in the clean energy technologies that have created new jobs and industries in other countries; where we've watched our graduation rates lag behind too much of the world; and where we spend much more on health care than any other nation but aren't any healthier for it.

That is why I've said that even as we rescue this economy from a full-blown crisis, we must rebuild it stronger than before. And health insurance reform is central to that effort.

This is not just about the 47 million Americans who have no health insurance. Reform is about every American who has ever feared that they may lose their coverage if they become too sick, or lose their job, or change their job. It's about every small business that has been forced to lay off employees or cut back on their coverage because it became too expensive. And it's about the fact that the biggest driving force behind our federal deficit is the skyrocketing cost of Medicare and Medicaid.

So let me be clear: if we do not control these costs, we will not be able to control our deficit. If we do not reform health care, your premiums and out-of-pocket costs will continue to skyrocket. If we do not act, 14,000 Americans will continue to lose their health insurance every single day. These are the consequences of inaction. These are the stakes of the debate we're having right now.

I realize that with all the charges and criticisms being thrown around in Washington, many Americans may be wondering, "What's in this for me? How does my family stand to benefit from health insurance reform?"

Tonight I want to answer those questions. Because even though Congress is still working through a few key issues, we already have agreement on the following areas:

If you already have health insurance, the reform we're proposing will provide you with more security and more stability. It will keep government out of health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your insurance if you're happy with it. It will prevent insurance companies from dropping your coverage if you get too sick. It will give you the security of knowing that if you lose your job, move, or change your job, you will still be able to have coverage. It will limit the amount your insurance company can force you to pay for your medical costs out of your own pocket. And it will cover preventive care like check-ups and mammograms that save lives and money.

If you don't have health insurance, or are a small business looking to cover your employees, you'll be able to choose a quality, affordable health plan through a health insurance exchange – a marketplace that promotes choice and competition Finally, no insurance company will be allowed to deny you coverage because of a pre-existing medical condition.

I have also pledged that health insurance reform will not add to our deficit over the next decade – and I mean it. In the past eight years, we saw the enactment of two tax cuts, primarily for the wealthiest Americans, and a Medicare prescription program, none of which were paid for. This is partly why I inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit.

That will not happen with health insurance reform. It will be paid for. Already, we have estimated that two-thirds of the cost of reform can be paid for by reallocating money that is simply being wasted in federal health care programs. This includes over one hundred billion dollars in unwarranted subsidies that go to insurance companies as part of Medicare – subsidies that do nothing to improve care for our seniors. And I'm pleased that Congress has already embraced these proposals. While they are currently working through proposals to finance the remaining costs, I continue to insist that health reform not be paid for on the backs of middle-class families.

In addition to making sure that this plan doesn't add to the deficit in the short-term, the bill I sign must also slow the growth of health care costs in the long run. Our proposals would change incentives so that doctors and nurses are free to give patients the best care, not just the most expensive care. That's why the nation's largest organizations representing doctors and nurses have embraced our plan.

We also want to create an independent group of doctors and medical experts who are empowered to eliminate waste and inefficiency in Medicare on an annual basis – a proposal that could save even more money and ensure the long-term financial health of Medicare. Overall, our proposals will improve the quality of care for our seniors and save them thousands of dollars on prescription drugs, which is why the AARP has endorsed our reform efforts.

Not all of the cost savings measures I just mentioned were contained in Congress's draft legislation, but we are now seeing broad agreement thanks to the work that was done over the last few days. So even though we still have a few issues to work out, what's remarkable at this point is not how far we have left to go – it's how far we have already come.

I understand how easy it is for this town to become consumed in the game of politics – to turn every issue into running tally of who's up and who's down. I've heard that one Republican strategist told his party that even though they may want to compromise, it's better politics to "go for the kill." Another Republican Senator said that defeating health reform is about "breaking" me.

So let me be clear: This isn't about me. I have great health insurance, and so does every Member of Congress. This debate is about the letters I read when I sit in the Oval Office every day, and the stories I hear at town hall meetings. This is about the woman in Colorado who paid $700 a month to her insurance company only to find out that they wouldn't pay a dime for her cancer treatment – who had to use up her retirement funds to save her own life. This is about the middle-class college graduate from Maryland whose health insurance expired when he changed jobs, and woke up from emergency surgery with $10,000 in debt. This is about every family, every business, and every taxpayer who continues to shoulder the burden of a problem that Washington has failed to solve for decades.

This debate is not a game for these Americans, and they cannot afford to wait for reform any longer. They are counting on us to get this done. They are looking to us for leadership. And we must not let them down. We will pass reform that lowers cost, promotes choice, and provides coverage that every American can count on. And we will do it this year. And with that, I'll take your questions. FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT of President Obama’s fifth news conference, the fourth given in prime-time, as provided by Federal News Service.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Michael Steele National Press Club Republican Health Care VIDEO


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. CONTACT: Press Office. July 20, 2009. 202-863-8614
RNC TV AD TO AIR IN TARGETED STATES STARTING MONDAY

WASHINGTON -> Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele today announced a new television ad opposing President Obama's plan for a government-run health care system during a speech at the National Press Club. The ad, entitled "Grand Experiment," can be viewed below:


Starting today, this large, targeted television ad campaign will run in select markets in Arkansas, Nevada and North Dakota.

"Once again President Obama and Congressional Democrats are rushing through a grand experiment that will have serious consequences for future generations of Americans. It started with their failed stimulus bill and has now moved on to a trillion-dollar government-run health care plan that is simply wrong for America. Republicans know we need health care reform ?costs are too high and families are struggling to afford quality care. But the Democrats' plan would raise taxes on small businesses and lead to higher costs and rationed care," said Chairman Michael Steele.

TEXT TRANSCRIPT:

Time: 00:30

Voice: "They've loaned Barack Obama their future, without even knowing it."

Voice: "Trillions for rushed government bailouts and takeovers, banks, the auto industry."

Chyron: Trillions for government bailouts and takeovers

Voice: "The biggest spending spree in our nation's history."

Chyron: The biggest spending spree in history

Voice: "And they'll have to pay."

Voice: "The next big ticket item? A risky experiment with our health care."

Chyron: A risky experiment with health care

Voice: "Barack Obama's massive spending experiment hasn't healed our economy."

Chyron: Barack Obama's massive spending experiment

Voice: "His new experiment risks their future and our health."

Chyron: BarackObamaExperiment.com

Chyron: Risking everything.

Voice: "The Republican National Committee is responsible for the content of this advertising."

ONSCREEN Disclaimer: The Republican National Committee is responsible for the content of this advertising. Paid for by the Republican National Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. www.gop.com

AD FACTS
The Ad

VOICE: "They've loaned Barack Obama their future, without even knowing it. Trillions for rushed government bailouts and takeovers, banks, the auto industry."

CHYRON: Trillions for government bailouts and takeovers
The Facts

Obama's Bank Bailout Plan Costs $2.5 Trillion. "The White House plan to rescue the nation's financial system, announced on Tuesday by Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, is far bigger than anyone predicted and envisions a far greater government role in markets and banks than at any time since the 1930s. Administration officials committed to flood the financial system with as much as $2.5 trillion ?$350 billion of that coming from the bailout fund and the rest from private investors and the Federal Reserve, making use of its ability to print money." (Edmund L. Andrews And Stephen Labaton, "Bailout Plan: $2.5 Trillion And A Strong Hand," The New York Times, 02/11/09)

Federal Government 60 Percent Shareholder Of GM. "By preparing to take a 60 percent stake in a reorganized GM, the Obama administration is gambling that the automaker can compete with the likes of Toyota Motor Corp after its debt is cut by half and its labor costs are slashed under a new contract with the United Auto Workers union." (Kevin Krolicki and John Crawley, "GM To File For Bankruptcy, Chrysler Sale Cleared," Reuters, 6/1/09)

"As part of the revised plan, the U.S. would provide GM with at least $30 billion in financing to carry it through and out of bankruptcy, on top of the $20 billion in loans the government already has given the company." (Neil King Jr., John D. Stoll, and Kevin Helliker, "GM In Last Lap To Chapter 11," The Wall Street Journal, 5/29/09)
The Ad

VOICE: "The biggest spending spree in our nation's history."

CHYRON: The biggest spending spree in history
The Facts

Obama's "Spending Spree" Twice As Costly As Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Historic "New Deal." "In sheer size, the economic measures announced by President Barack Obama to address ? crisis unlike we've ever known' are remarkable, rivaling and in many cases dwarfing the New Deal programs that Franklin D. Roosevelt famously created to battle the Great Depression ŠSo far in his month-old presidency: Congress passed and Obama signed into law a record $787 billion mix of tax cuts, job-creating projects and aid to struggling states; The president pledged up to $275 billion in federal aid to help stem a tidal wave of home foreclosures; The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve announced financial-rescue steps that could send up to $2 trillion coursing through the economy. In all, the plans would raise the federal portion of the U.S. economy to some 31 percent, more than twice the level after eight years of FDR's historic New Deal spending." ("Obama's Spending Spree To Eclipse FDR's New Deal," The Associated Press, 02/20/09)

Obama's Budget Would Create Historic Deficits. "Since the 1960s, deficits largely by increased levels of spending have been the norm, while surpluses were an exception. The 2009 Congressional Budget Office deficit projection under President Obama's plan is far above the 45-year historical average of 2.2 percent of GDP." [Graph shows average federal deficit as percentage of GDP by administration: Kennedy 1.0%, Johnson 0.9%, Nixon 1.6%, Ford 3.5%, Carter 4.3%, Reagan 4.3%, Bush 4.3%, Clinton 0.1%, Bush 3.2%, Obama 7.3%.] (Page 24, "2009 Federal Revenue And Spending Book Of Charts," Heritage Foundation, May 2009)
The Ad

VOICE: "And they'll have to pay. The next big ticket item? A risky experiment with our health care."

CHYRON: A risky experiment with health care
The Facts

Obama's Government-Run Health Care Plan Will Cost Over $1 Trillion. "On a preliminary basis, CBO and the JCT staff estimate that the proposal's provisions affecting health insurance coverage would result in a net increase in federal deficits of $1,042 billion for fiscal years 2010 through 2019." (Congressional Budget Office, "A Summary of the Specifications for Health Insurance Coverage Provided by the House Tri-Committee Group," CBO Report, 7/14/09)

Plan Creates New Czar That Will Push Government-Run Health Insurance. "The health choices commissioner would head an independent agency, as envisioned in the 800-page draft bill released by House Democratic leaders. The Health Choices Administration would regulate a revamped insurance marketplace and be expected to deliver Obama's promise of affordable coverage for all ... The commissioner and the new agency would run a kind of national purchasing pool through which individuals and small businesses could pick medical coverage from private plans and a government-sponsored alternative." (Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, "Need For Federal Insurance Czar Is Questioned," The Associated Press, 7/7/09)

Plan Could Lead To Estimated 113 Million People Losing Private Health Insurance. "We estimated the effect on coverage in the third year of the program assuming the public plan is opened to individuals and all firms, the public plan would enroll about 122.9 million people ... The number of people with private health insurance would decline by about 113.5 million people. This is equal to about 66 percent of all people currently covered under private health insurance ...." (John Shelis, Vice President, Lewin Group, "The Impact of the House Health Reform Legislation on Coverage and Provider Incomes," Testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee, 6/25/09)

Government-Run Health Care Pays Much Less Than Private Insurance, Which Makes Doctors Refuse Patients. "Despite more Michiganians piling onto the Medicaid rolls, fewer doctors are treating or accepting new patients insured by this state-run medical program for low-income residents ... Doctors say the state-set reimbursement rates are already too low, in some cases covering only one-third of the actual costs of patient visits." (Christina Rogers, "Doctors Balk At Medicaid Program," The Associated Press, 6/7/09)
The Ad

VOICE: "Barack Obama's massive spending experiment hasn't healed our economy."

CHYRON: Barack Obama's massive spending experiment
The Facts

Obama's Stimulus Fails To Create Jobs Despite Obama Administration's Predictions Of "Boom In Job Creation". "[T]wo of [Obama's] chief economic advisers, and leading proponents of a stimulus bill, predicted that the passage of a large economic-aid package would boost the economy and keep the unemployment rate below 8%. It hasn't quite worked out that way. Last month, the jobless rate in America hit 9.5%, the highest level it has reached since 1983 ... What has not come to pass, however, is the boom in job creation that Romer and Bernstein predicted. A little over a month ago, the Administration said the stimulus bill had created or saved 150,000 jobs. That's a far cry from the 3 million to 4 million jobs that Romer and Bernstein foresaw back in January." (Stephen Gandel, "Obama's Stimulus Plan: Failing by Its Own Measure," Time, 7/14/09)

Under Obama, Job Losses Now At Historic Highs. "The cumulative job losses over the last six months have been greater than for any other half year period since World War II, including the military demobilization after the war. The job losses are also now equal to the net job gains over the previous nine years, making this the only recession since the Great Depression to wipe out all job growth from the previous expansion." (Mortimer Zuckerman, Op-Ed, "The Economy is Even Worse Than You Think," The Wall Street Journal, 7/14/09)
The Ad

VOICE: "His new experiment risks their future and our health."

CHYRON: BarackObamaExperiment.com

CHYRON: Risking everything.
The Facts

CBO Director Says Plans For Government-Run Health Care Would Worsen Budget Outlook. "President Obama's plan to expand health coverage to the uninsured is likely to dig the nation deeper into debt unless policymakers adopt politically painful controls on spending, such as sharp reductions in payments to doctors, hospitals and other providers, congressional budget analysts said yesterday. While popular measures such as increasing preventive care, expanding the use of electronic medical records and rewarding doctors for choosing more effective treatments have the potential to lower costs, 'little reliable evidence exists about exactly how to implement those types of changes,' Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas W. Elmendorf said in a letter to Senate budget leaders. 'Without meaningful reforms, the substantial costs of many current proposals . . . would be much more likely to worsen the long-run budget outlook than to improve it,' he said. ..." (Lori Montgomery, Shailagh Murray & Ceci Connolly, "Obama's Health Plan Needs Spending Controls, CBO Says," The Washington Post, 6/17/09)

CBO Concludes Obama's Plan Increases Number Of Uninsured Americans In 2011 And 2012. (Page 13, "A Summary of the Specifications for Health Insurance Coverage Provided by the House Tri-Committee Group," CBO Report, 7/14/09)

After Spending Over $1 Trillion, 17 Million Residents Will Still Be Uninsured. "According to that assessment, enacting legislation that embodied those specifications would result in a net increase in federal budget deficits of $1,042 billion over the 2010-2019 period. By 2019, CBO and the JCT staff estimate, the number of nonelderly people without health insurance would be reduced by about 37 million, leaving about 17 million nonelderly residents uninsured (nearly half of whom would be unauthorized immigrants) ..." (Douglas W. Elmendorf, CBO Director, Letter To Rep. Charles Rangel, 7/14/09)

CBO Director Criticizes Plan For Not Making Necessary "Fundamental Changes" To Reduce Costs. "Under questioning by members of the Senate Budget Committee, CBO director Douglas Elmendorf said bills crafted by House leaders and the Senate health committee do not propose 'the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount.' 'On the contrary,' Elmendorf said, 'the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility for health care costs.'" (Lori Montgomery, "CBO Chief Criticizes Democrats' Health Reform Measures," The Washington Post, 7/16/09)

Government-Run Health Care Could Drive Doctors Out Of Business, Especially In Rural Areas. "According to Dr. Scott Nelson, a family practice physician in Cleveland, Mississippi ... 'There is an unprecedented level of frustration with the government and Medicare in Mississippi,' Nelson explained. 'I have not heard of any doctors in my area opting out of Medicare, because there are not enough patients with private insurance in the rural Mississippi Delta ... we have no choice but to see them, and we are literally at the mercy of the government. I foresee some small practices closing altogether.' For states that are made up of larger numbers of Medicare patients, this latest round of cuts hits particularly hard. Florida, for instance, stands to lose $1.25 billion for physician payments by January 2009." (Audrey Grayson, "Docs Bailing Out Of Medicare, Medicaid," ABC News Medical Unit, 7/8/08)

Plans For "Comparative Effectiveness Research" Leads To Government Boards Deciding What Treatments Would Or Wouldn't Be Funded. "Skeptics, however, say Obama's decision to invest heavily in such research will lead to European-style rationing in which patients are denied lifesaving therapies to save money. It also has alarmed some drug companies and medical device manufacturers, which fear that a system of winners and losers is bound to reduce their bottom lines." (Ceci Connolly, "Comparison Shopping For Medicine," The Washington Post, 3/17/09)

Health Care Will Be Subject To Political Priorities. "The limits of single-payer insurance are a consequence of a common political reality: if governments fund it, governments wear it. Once the so-called single-payer system is in place, government insurers are obliged to manage costs politically, making decisions about capital investments, technology, and even the supply of licensed medical professionals based on short-term budgetary or political priorities." (Dr. David Gratzer, Committee on Education and Labor's Subcommittee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, U.S. House of Representatives, Testimony, 6/10/09, p. 4)

"Cost-Cutting Measures" Will Eventually Fail, Leading To Less Access For Patients. "What Mr. Obama is describing is his preferred health-care future. If or when the Administration's speculative cost-cutting measures under universal health care fail to produce savings, government will start explicitly limiting patient access to treatments and services regarded as too expensive. Democrats deny this eventuality, but health planners will have no choice, given that the current entitlement system is already barreling toward insolvency without adding millions of new people to the federal balance sheet." (Editorial, "Obama's Health Future," The Wall Street Journal, 6/26/09) ###