Sunday, June 20, 2010

John Koster Rick Larsen's Anti-Palin Rant an Amazing Display of Hypocrisy

John KosterArlington, WA. - In an amazing display of hypocrisy and hyperbole, Rick Larsen's anti-Sarah Palin rant in a press release on Tuesday may have provided voters with a preview of how the 5 term incumbent intends to conduct his campaign against John Koster for Washington's 2nd Congressional district.
Larsen referred to Palin's supporters as "radicals" targeting Democrats across the country, and criticized Koster for "opening his campaign war chest to a potential landslide of out-of-state contributions that will fund his campaign to eliminate the help seniors are getting to pay for prescription drugs, privatize Social Security, and protect the lax regulations that led to the BP oil spill."

Larsen did not mention that 65% of his campaign war chest ($736,671 as of March 31) has come from political action committees (including $1000 from BP), nearly all of whom list addresses from out of state. In comparison, Koster raised $168,717 (as of March 31) with 97% coming from individual donors from Washington State.

"It appears to me that Rick Larsen is suffering from a case of Washington D.C. beltway hypocrisy and arrogance," said Larry Stickney, Koster's campaign manager. "The symptoms include condemning your opponent for doing something you are doing, and then expecting to get away with it because you're an entrenched incumbent with special privileges."

"If Rick Larsen has a problem with the Koster campaign picking up a few bucks from out of state, he should return the hundreds of thousands he has received from the Washington D.C. PAC's and special interests from around the country," Stickney continued.

"For Larsen to beat up on Sarah Palin for endorsing John Koster and call her supporters 'radicals' and insinuate that they want to mistreat senior citizens and protect polluters is laughable."

"This is the same Rick Larsen who ignores the will of his constituents and votes yes for government run health care, yes for the budget busting $787 billion stimulus package, yes for the economy stifling cap-and-trade legislation, yes to increase the national debt limit by $1.9 trillion, and yes on funding the anti-American disaster ACORN. All in all, he's voted 98% of the time with Nancy Pelosi, earned a "0% rating from the American Conservative Union , and received an "F" from the National Taxpayers Union. Who's the radical?"

TEXT and PHOTO CREDIT: Koster for Congress

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Kevin Costner Testifies Before Senate Small Business Committee VIDEO TEXT TRANSCRIPT


It looks like at D plus 2 months 1 or 2 of Kevin's machines have finally hit the waters of the gulf, the lack of urgency on the parts of the Obama Administration and BP borders on the unbelievable, interesting answer, american entrepreneurship.

Ocean Therapy Solutions Founding Partner Kevin Costner told lawmakers on capitol hill that now is the time to require safeguards, like OTS centrifuge machines, for a safe and clean oil industry. "I would ask this committee to consider the multi-dimensional role that this technology can play in safeguarding the water and putting people back to work," he told members of the Senate Small Business Committee. "When there is a spill anywhere, we suffer everywhere. Our machine represents a common ground. Common sense. And the absolute reality that we can and must protect those resources we share."

SMALL BUSINESS & ENTREPRENEURSHIP COMMITTEE UNITED STATES SENATE TESTIMONY

Kevin Costner Founder, CINC Co-Founder / Partner, Ocean Therapy Solutions, WestPac Resources.

RELATED:Madam Chairwoman, Members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me.

We're here today because there are now some 60,000 barrels of oil gushing into the Gulf.

We're here today because a carefully crafted plan designed by the oil industry and rubber stamped by MMS, claimed it could handle spills of up to 250,000 barrels a day, but turned out not to be a plan at all.

We're all here.

And now the whole world is watching as America fumbles its way through the greatest environmental disaster in history. And I find myself here because 17 years ago I thought I could play a part in this recurring nightmare. I have come here with a technology that was developed for this very moment we find ourselves in, as a people, as a nation, as a neighbor to every country that shares the precious Gulf of Mexico.

I am a private entrepreneur, a dreamer if you will, who saw a problem and committed to a big idea. I took a technology from the Department of Energy in 1993. It was about six inches tall. It was developed to separate metals but what if? What if we extrapolated that idea, took this little machine and scaled it up to separate large volumes of oil from water?

I believed that we could manufacture and deploy a rugged and portable machine under harsh conditions. We would create five different sizes with the largest able to handle up to 200 gallons per minute with both oil and water outputs at 99.9 percent purity.

In 2 years the dream moved from research and development to a commercially viable product ready to be deployed anywhere in the world. This was done without the help of outside investors, or government grants. The price tag would be over $20 million dollars. And I would pay it.

The need was clear. Any industry that would operate year round, 24 hours a day, in or near any body of water, at the depths and complexities that our modern oil industries are working in is going to experience spills, on a daily basis, large or small, accidental or otherwise, reported or not.

I started a business without a guaranteed market. Did I expect the oil industry to open its arms when I presented an oil-water separator, a solution to their single greatest liability? Yes. Did I expect thoughtful leaders here and abroad to recognize the importance of protection where we profit? Yes. I did.

But I was wrong. The list of government agencies, foreign and domestic oil companies who saw our technology more than a decade ago reads like a who's-who of those who needed it, those who should have been looking for it, and probably more to the point, those who should have been developing it themselves.

So what was the problem? Was it too small? Too portable? Was there already something like it in the big plan? I don't know. My big idea has been sitting quietly for ten years in a modest Nevada facility.

Then two days ago I got a call from Doug Suttles, COO of Exploration and Production for BP. He was pleased. He was excited. He told me that the machine worked. He told me it was working against the dispersants. That it was handling the variations of oil mixtures and thickness present in the Gulf. He ordered 32 machines and told me that this represented the beginning of us working together not only for this spill, but going forward so that we have a legitimate response in the future.

Am I proud that this technology can be part of the solution for the Gulf? Yes to a certain extent. To be completely honest, I feel vindicated. I think I'm gonna call my Mom. But this is not a Hollywood ending for me. The path to arrive at this moment was steep and formidable. That's why I've been called to testify before this committee. To explain why 21st century technology has sat idly on a shelf for ten years, when it could have been deployed as a first and most efficient responder to mitigate the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe.

The business of oil spill clean up is not pretty. It's not sexy. Safety never is. It's not a profit center. It's perfectly clear that oil companies have not invested in clean up technology to match their 21st century appetite and operations.

In the last two weeks, my company began an exciting collaboration with Edison Choest, the largest oil servicer in the Gulf. We are in the final stages of engineering emergency response ships that would be staged strategically throughout the Gulf with the ability to be on site within two hours of incident.

Together we are fashioning a more comprehensive plan that we would like to present before the lifting of the moratorium. It would fundamentally change the world's approach to oil spill recovery. But we haven't stopped there.

Ocean Therapy Solutions, continues to push the envelope of progress, once again footing the bill for R&D without help from industry or government.

I believe there are other small companies out there in the private sector just like us. How do we let them in? How do we create an environment that fosters and encourages investment in critical technologies? I leave that to this body. But you should know, that negotiating your way, as a small business, through the bureaucratic maze that presently exists is like playing a video game that no one can master. It's like trying to get to a next level that doesn't exist.

For me, advancing the technology for oil spill clean up was a dream, not a business. It wasn't about improving my margins. I wasn't even trying to stay in the black! We were trying to be about something more.

If we can find oil thousands of feet in the ground, at depths that boggle the mind, then surely we have the technology to clean up our own mess. To find through photo imaging, the giant black clouds of oil, hidden, ranging like death in the Gulf poised to land on our beaches or escape to the Atlantic. Without a doubt the oil industry has the resources to create ships to hunt these down and drain their killing capacity. They have the technology and intellect to take this head on. We can all be about something more.

I can see that these spills are our collective problem but they are not our collective responsibility. The economic burden falls squarely on the oil industry.

For them to get over the bar of safety, and pay the price is not too much to ask. It is not too much to have them put in place the safeguards, the redundancy, and muster the sheer will to throw an overwhelming response at the problem now and in the inevitable future. Anything less is dangerous, unacceptable and the American people deserve better.

We have a special moment in time. We have to get this right.

40,000 men and women in the oil industry are out of work through no fault of their own.

Fishermen have been sidelined.

Service industries are paralyzed.

Families that have survived on the plentiful resources of the Gulf do not now know the quality of life that awaits them.

I would ask this committee to consider the multi-dimensional role that this technology can play in safeguarding the water and putting people back to work.

The oil industry does not have time to evolve a plan. They have to act.

This is an absolute tool. It creates an efficiency where there are inefficiencies. It represents a legitimate response to accidents that are going to happen. And clears a path to lift the moratorium, if that's what the country wants.

We are in a fight to protect our jobs, our way of life and an ecosystem that cannot protect itself. We can put Americans back to work and bring an entire industry into the 21st Century of oil spill response.

It's important to remember that when there is a spill anywhere, we suffer everywhere. Our machine represents a common ground. Common sense. And the absolute reality that we can and must protect those resources we share.

Thank you.

Senator Roger Wicker Weekly Republican Address TEXT VIDEO 06/18/10


6/18/10 - Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) Delivers Weekly GOP Address On The Gulf Oil Spill.
Senator Roger Wicker

Sen. Wicker meets with members of Mississippi State University's "Challenge X" team to talk about the award-winning hybrid SUV they designed.
Hello, I am Senator Roger Wicker from Mississippi.

As we enter the third month of the Deepwater Horizon disaster, we continue to learn more and more disturbing information about gross negligence on the part of BP -- and about some proposals from the Obama Administration that will do more harm than good.
From the Oval Office Tuesday night, President Obama attempted to recover from a widespread perception that he has not made this crisis a priority.

The public outcry about the President’s inattention has been loud and it has been bi-partisan.

I’m glad President Obama is finally putting this catastrophe at the top of his agenda, but his response has been too slow. He was slow in listening to state and local leaders, slow in....

...getting skimmers to the Gulf, slow in understanding the seriousness of this crisis, and slow in taking ownership and responsibility for the recovery. Many of his actions have actually taken us in the wrong direction.

Earlier this week the President came to the Gulf Coast. After visiting with him in Mississippi, I was optimistic that he was removing politics from this disaster and focusing solely on fixing the problem.

Republicans in Congress and at the state level looked forward to participating in a bipartisan, non-political solution to the many challenges this disaster has brought.

Unfortunately, we were disappointed. In less than a day, we were reminded of Rahm Emanuel’s theory of never letting a good crisis go to waste.

In his speech Tuesday night, President Obama made it clear that he intends to exploit this crisis to push his liberal agenda for a cap-and-tax scheme. This is a disservice not only to the victims and their families but also to the millions of Gulf Coast residents who are struggling in the wake of the spill.

Americans increasingly reject the cap-and-tax proposal because it would drive up the cost of energy and force American jobs overseas.

The President spent more than a third of his address advocating this national energy tax, revealing his true priorities. Now is not the time to push a controversial, job-killing, partisan agenda through Congress.

In addition to devastating our economy, this proposal would do nothing to fix the disastrous leak or clean up our beaches, marshes, and waters.

Another idea that takes us in the wrong direction is the Democratic plan to increase oil cleanup fees and raid those funds to pay for unrelated programs. These funds are needed to clean up spills, not to satisfy Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi’s desire to raise federal spending.

In addition, the administration’s moratorium on deepwater drilling has the potential to become the third wave of this disaster. If left in place, the moratorium will permanently eliminate thousands of jobs and drive up the cost of energy for all Americans. You don’t have to take my word for it. Earlier this week democratic strategist James Carville said the moratorium was [quote] “wrecking the economy” of the Gulf Coast.

Along with the spill’s devastation to our fisheries and the administration’s decision to halt our drilling, one of the greatest threats to the economy of the Gulf Coast is the loss of tourism. Our hotels and restaurants have seen business decrease by as much as 70%.

At a brief press conference on Monday, President Obama pointed out that there are a lot of beaches that are not affected and will not be affected. I was hoping the President would make this important point to the larger audience Tuesday night, but since he didn’t, I’ll say it again. The vast majority of Gulf Coast beaches are clear, beautiful and safe.

BP CEO Tony Hayward recently said he wanted his life back and later correctly apologized. BP put dollars before safety, and we are all paying the price. We have been told that BP will be held accountable and pay all damages.

But what we in the Gulf states really need is to have our way of life back. We want our jobs back, our economy back, and we need our tourists back.

So please come and visit us. You deserve a vacation, and we could use the business. Thank you. ####

Friday, June 18, 2010

Governor Jan Brewer Learns of President’s Directive to Sue Arizona via Hillary Clinton Ecuadorean Television Interview VIDEO




Opps, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just cann't help herself as she upstages President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder by stating the obvious. Governor Jan Brewer denies the Emperor's New Clothes. "We Will Meet Them In Court, and We Will Win"

PHOENIX – Governor Jan Brewer said she was stunned and angered to learn during an Ecuadorean television interview with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the Obama Administration had decided to sue Arizona over its recently passed anti-illegal immigration law, SB1070. Video of the interview can be seen at Governor Brewer’s Arizona Border Security Information website: www.azgovernor.gov/AZBorderSecurity.asp

Secretary Clinton announced during the interview on June 8th that President Obama has directed the U.S. Justice Department to “bring a lawsuit against the Arizona law.”

“This is no way to treat the people of Arizona,” said Governor Brewer. “To learn of this lawsuit through an Ecuadorean interview with the Secretary of State is just outrageous. If our own government intends to sue our state to prevent illegal immigration enforcement, the least it can do is inform us before it informs the citizens of another nation.”

Governor Brewer said, “I just visited with the President in the Oval Office about our differences over immigration policy, and the one firm understanding we had was that within two weeks he would provide details of his commitment to deploy National Guard troops to the border. While I am grateful that communications have taken place about a possible visit by Administration staff before the end of the month, there is not yet a confirmed date. More importantly, no information about additional troop and border security enhancements has been provided by the Obama Administration to the citizens of Arizona.”

Governor Brewer recently announced the creation of a legal defense fund for private contributions in defense of Arizona’s illegal immigration enforcement measures – www.keepazsafe.com. Over $22,000 in contributions have been made to the border legal defense fund since its announcement yesterday evening. Over $26,000 had previously been sent unsolicited to the Governor for legal defense of Arizona, for an approximate total of $48,000 in the fund. ###

State of Arizona Janice K. Brewer Office of the Governor Main Phone: 602-542-4331 Governor 1700 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007 Facsimile: 602-542-7601 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: June 17, 2010 Paul Senseman (602) 542-1342 psenseman@az.gov

RAND PAUL How Not To Handle A Crisis

RAND PAULRand laying it all out like it is.

Recently, the President disturbingly noted he was studying the crisis in the Gulf in an attempt to find our “whose *ss to kick.” I’ll move past the obvious problem with the appropriateness of the comment to just say this: Look in the mirror Mr. President.
This crisis has been a case study in failure to lead, failure to act, and using a crisis to advance your own agenda rather than solve the problem.

Make no mistake, this is an environmental disaster of epic proportions, and should be treated as such. BP should be held responsible for whatever their negligence was. Congress and the Administration should examine how this happened, and what we can do to prevent this in the future. But it should be noted that offshore drilling of this kind has been in place for 40 years with few problems. It’s wrong for the Administration to use this crisis as a platform not for cleaning up the mess; but rather as one to threaten, bluster and seek to advance parts of their agenda.

If the Administration were serious, they’d be leading, much like Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana. Governor Jindal has had to wait weeks for federal waivers, assistance and supplies. He finally decided he’d had enough and is proceeding, in some cases without assistance or permission. He’s protecting his state while President Obama does photo ops.

That’s why for the people closest to the disaster, over 65% of his constituents approve of Governor Jindal’s handling of the spill, while only 30% approve of President Obama’s inaction.

But this isn’t the whole story. Part of their inaction has also been because of their special interest friends. You see, the Obama Administration could have waived something called the Jones Act, which is a party of a 1920 law that prohibits foreign ships from assisting in this type of crisis. The fact is many foreign countries have technology to clean up oil spills that exceed our own. We should be taking advantage of their offers to help. Now why would we not waive this Act, as was done just 3 days after Hurricane Katrina by President Bush? Because the single biggest proponent of the Jones Act is also the single biggest donors to President Obama and Democrats in Congress – Big Labor.

Then to add insult to injury, the President Obama announced two actions that, instead of helping clean up the mess, will lead to bigger problems.

First, he declared a moratorium on offshore drilling for wells more than 500 feet deep. According to a Senator from his own party, this could cost as many as 330,000 jobs and will surely cost hundreds of millions of dollars in increased costs to consumers and businesses.

According to the Minerals Management Service, Offshore drilling on the Outercontinental Shelf accounts for 27% of our domestic oil production. And that has been shut off, with no plan in mind to deal with the job loss and increased costs that will follow.

And now, he is using the crisis to revive his failed energy Tax/Cap and Trade scheme.

As the White House Chief of Staff said about another crisis “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste — and what I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.

So what we have here is inaction and failed leadership, coupled with political opportunism and special interest paybacks. That’s not the kind of leadership Americans need or deserve.

Published on 18 June 2010 by RyanH in Press Releases.

Governor Christie: Day of Reckoning VIDEO TEXT TRANSCRIPT


It sounds so simple when Governor Christie says it, you cann't give the government 2 dollars and then get 3 dollars back. More common sense from the New Jersey Governor.

Governor Christie: “Now is the time to not ignore the problems but to confront them.” Governor Christie held a Cap 2.5 Town Hall Meeting in Perth Amboy, N.J. on Tuesday, June 15, 2010. Contact: Michael Drewniak 609-777-2600

FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT GOVERNOR CHRISTIE:

A lot of the things that these difficult trying times are bringing into focus for all of us as citizens, as elected officials - that accountability is important now more than ever. And your point that when we appoint people, and I appoint lots of people, by the time I get done with four years I'll probably appoint thousands of people to different things - boards and commissions and authorities around the state, members of my cabinet, judges - a lot of people that I'm going to be responsible for that are going to have my name next to them, for better or for worse for the rest of my life. I understand accountability, and I think you're absolutely right, I think one of the things that that these times have brought into great focus for us is that we have to hold each other accountable. All of us understand, we were taught by our parents I suspect, that you don't get something for nothing in this world - ever. Yet government has tried to sell you over the course of time this idea that - We're not going to give you something for nothing but we're going to give you something and someone else is going to pay for it.

So it's not for nothing but it's for nothing to you. What has happened in our state and in our country over the last couple of years is that those chickens have come home to roost. And we now have a situation where we are in a deep hole and we've got two choices. We can continue to do what we've always been doing before and I don't think we should, because that's crazy, that's what got us here. But the new path and the bolder path is a path that will be lined with resistance from those who are benefiting from the current system and they will attempt to scare you. They'll attempt to scare you about change and they'll attempt to tell you that you're ox is the one that's going to get gored. The same people who are telling you to get something and someone else will pay for it are not going to tell you watch out, because when change comes they're going to take it away from you.

We all know that it's being taken away from us as we speak; our standard of living, our way of life is being challenged by an economy where we have too much debt, too big of government, too much spending and taxes being too high. We all know it in our hearts, depending upon where we are in the political spectrum we may want to admit it more or less but we all know it. We all know it to be true.

And I kind of want to end today where I started with Mayor Diaz. Now we might come at certain issues from different perspectives but we all understand - she and I understand that the day of reckoning is here. Whether you are a Republican, whether you are a Democrat, whether you are an independent; whether you are rich or whether you're poor; whether you're retired or still working; or if you're a young child who's trying to think about what is New Jersey and America going to be like for me? The day of reckoning is here. And there is no more solemn obligation, I believe, that we have as human beings and especially as Americans than to do everything we can to leave this place better for our children and grandchildren than it was left to us.

Now for all of you who are parents out there and grandparents, you know judgment day is coming. And by that I mean, our children and our grandchildren are going to judge us. At the moment where we have the ability to make decisions about how optimistic and hopeful and prosperous their future can be, are they going to look back and say we buried our head in the sand? Ignored the problems. Cared only about our own creature comforts and didn't care about tomorrow.

Or are they going to say that when this day of reckoning came, our generation stood up and said we're going to fix it. We're going to fix it, not just for ourselves but more importantly we're going to fix it for our kids, and for our grandchildren. So that they can live in New Jersey.

We've already had a great New Jersey life. Looking out at the most of us, there's a lot life that has been lived out in this audience. A lot of life. That's a very nice way of saying we're getting old. But there's a lot of life that's been lived out by this audience and we have already had a great New Jersey life. Most of us have, if not all of us in this room.

The question is: will our children have a great New Jersey life?

Or will they have to go to Florida, or Pennsylvania, or Connecticut, or some place even further away. To be able to get a life where they feel as if they can grow, and prosper, and be happy.

Well I'll tell you this, that's not the New Jersey I was born in. An that is not the New Jersey I care to die in.

And so, when people asked me last year why are you running for governor, why do you want to do this? That's why. Because I want my children around to take care of me when I get old. I want to be able to get in a car and drive to a grandson or granddaughter's little league game. I want to be there sitting around the kitchen table for that first birthday party. I don't want to have to see it over the internet. I want to be there. And the only way I'm going to be there is if they're here because I ain't leaving.

And I want them to be here with me. I want to them to experience the same great life that I have been blessed to experience. And I feel like for most of you, you want the very same thing.

And so if we want that, now is the time to get to work. Now is the time to not ignore the problems but to confront them. Now is the time for us to say, we are going to be the people who fix New Jersey's problems.

And then we put our head on the pillow at night, when we pass the torch off to our children and grandchildren, we're going to be able to say to them, we did our job, now it's your turn.

Thank you very much.

# # #

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Sarah Palin Says Marijuana Minimal Problem Ron Paul Just nullify all those laws VIDEO


Libertarian philosophy from the right: Sarah Palin "I think we need to prioritize our law enforcement efforts, and if somebody's gonna smoke a joint in their house and not do anybody else any harm, then perhaps there are other things our cops should be looking at to engage in and try to clean up some of the other problems that we have in society."

Dr. Ron Paul "Just nullify all those laws ... useless battle"

The discussion about marijuana starts at the 13:00 mark

Statement by Senate Republican Leader Dean Skelos

Dean SkelosSince the Governor proposed his Executive Budget five months ago, Senate Republicans have consistently said that we will not support a budget that includes more taxes, fees and borrowing because we are listening to the people of this state who have simply had enough and don’t want to pay any more.
Governor Paterson’s comments in radio interviews this morning regarding his preference for tax increases over borrowing to close the budget deficit confirms what I said earlier this week, that New York taxpayers should be prepared for yet another massive tax increase and this is totally unacceptable.

Democrat leaders estimate that as much as 60 percent of the budget has been passed, yet only about one billion dollars in spending has been cut, leaving little room for additional cuts to close the $9.5 billion state budget deficit.

At the leaders meeting yesterday, I warned Governor Paterson, Senator Sampson and Speaker Silver that they are headed towards a budget that relies on more taxes, more fees, more borrowing and more gimmicks to close the budget gap.

If the Governor sticks to the comments he made this morning that he would favor additional taxes but would veto borrowing, it’s makes it even more clear that taxpayers should hold onto their wallets because the Democrats are ready to hit them up for more money.

Last year Democrats approved a disastrous budget that increased taxes by $2400 a year for a family of four. They increased state spending by $13 billion, increased taxes by $8.5 billion and passed a devastating $1.5 billion payroll tax on downstate New Yorkers; all leading to the massive deficit the state faces today. ####

Posted by Dean G. Skelos on Thursday, June 17th, 2010

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Bush Crisis Response 14 Times (and counting) Faster than Obama's

Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling unit on fire 2010The Bush administration's crisis response was 14 times and counting faster than Obama's. No its not just your imagination, have a look at the timeline below, ALMOST beyond belief. Can you imagine the outcry from the lame stream media.
Un-like the Obama administration's claims regarding many other of their problems, the perception of a slow response to the Deepwater Horizon disaster is indeed certainly President Bush's fault.

The Bush response to waive the Jones Act and encourage international help, lets say 4 days.

August 29, 2005 Hurricane Katrina From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The storm weakened before making its second landfall as a Category 3 storm on the morning of Monday, August 29 in southeast Louisiana. Hurricane Katrina From Wikipedia

September 01, 2005 The JOURNAL of COMMERCE ONLINE BYLINE: R.G. Edmonson

WASHINGTON - President Bush has directed Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to waive the Jones Act requirement for the domestic transportation of petroleum products by sea. U.S. to waive Jones Act for petroleum shipments.(Merchant Marine Act of 1920)

The Obama response not to waive the Jones Act and discourage international help like that of the Dutch on day 3, lets say 56 days and counting.

April 20, 2010 Deepwater Horizon From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An explosion on the rig killed eleven crewmen. The resulting fire could not be extinguished and, on April 22, 2010, Deepwater Horizon sank, leaving its well gushing and causing the largest offshore oil spill in United States history. Deepwater Horizon From Wikipedia

June 16, 2010 Republicans ask President Obama to waive portions of the Jones Act

There are numerous reports that offers by foreign corporations or governments to send skimmer vessels to the Gulf have been refused as a result of concerns arising from the Jones Act, which, among other things, regulates the use of foreign-owned vessels between U.S. ports. However, your Administration has the authority to waive any bureaucratic barriers that may exist under the Jones Act.” LeMieux_Miller_(JonesActLetter) PDF

Bush Crisis Response 14 Times (and counting) Faster than Obama's. "Michael DeWayne Brown, you're doing a heck of a job,"

Senator George LeMieux Congressman Jeff Miller ask President Obama to waive portions of the Jones Act VIDEO


U.S. Senator George LeMieux (R-FL) and Congressman Jeff Miller (R-Chumuckla) today asked President Obama to waive portions of the Jones Act so as to allow more resources to take part in oil mitigation activities in the Gulf. The lawmakers also called on the president to press British Petroleum to expedite the payment of claims.

The letter states, in part:

“We remain concerned that inadequate resources are being dedicated to containing and removing oil from the Gulf before it reaches our fragile coastline.

“…there are numerous reports that offers by foreign corporations or governments to send skimmer vessels to the Gulf have been refused as a result of concerns arising from the Jones Act, which, among other things, regulates the use of foreign-owned vessels between U.S. ports. However, your Administration has the authority to waive any bureaucratic barriers that may exist under the Jones Act.”

LeMieux and Miller also called attention to the need for BP to expedite their claims process.

“In our conversations with local officials and impacted business-owners and families in the Panhandle of Florida, the issues are clear: BP must fix and enhance its claims process to better address the severe economic stress this spill has caused…”

Senator LeMieux and Congressman Miller will be among the principals meeting with President Obama in Pensacola on Tuesday, to discuss the status of the Gulf disaster and efforts to improve the ongoing operation.

BACKGROUND: The Jones Act provides a federal framework for maritime labor relations and contains provisions requiring ships working in U.S. waters to be U.S. built, owned and operated. Jones Act waivers are administrative decisions that allow the use of vessels and shipping situations that wouldn't normally be legal under the Merchant Marine Act of 1920. One recent example of a waiver of the act occurred in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

Related Documents: LeMieux_Miller_(JonesActLetter) in PDF Format.

Charles Djou urging President Obama to waive the Jones Act VIDEO

Washington, DC —Congressman Charles Djou (HI-01) released the following statement today urging President Obama to waive the Jones Act so that foreign ships will be able to assist in cleaning up the oil spill:


“I agree with the President that our nation’s top priority in addressing the Gulf accident is to stop the leak, clean up the mess and hold BP accountable.

“I am disappointed, however, that the President has failed to waive the Jones Act for foreign ships, who want to assist in the clean-up efforts. There is no good
reason to turn away international help in responding to this environmental
catastrophe.

“Nevertheless, I look forward to working with President Obama to temper the House energy bill and craft a sensible long-term energy strategy for America that makes sense for
our economy.”

The 90-year old Jones Act blocks foreign vessels from operating in U.S. waters. Multiple foreign nations including Mexico, Canada, and Belgium have offered to assist the U.S. in cleaning up the BP oil spill disaster, but have been prevented from doing so because of the Jones Act. European companies with advanced environmental clean-up technologies could dramatically speed the Gulf coast clean up. The prior administration had waived the Jones Act to help with Hurricane Katrina relief efforts. For Hawai‘i residents, the Jones Act has resulted in increased costs for goods.

TEXT CREDIT: Congressman Charles Djou

VIDEO CREDIT: RepCharlesDjou

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

You never want a serious crisis to go to waste VIDEO


The President continued to follow the advice of his chief of staff Rahm "dead fish" Emanuel as his speech tonignt sought to exploit the gulf oil disaster to advance more taxes and governmental control.

Boehner Statement on President Obama’s Oval Office Address “President Obama should not exploit this crisis to impose a job-killing national energy tax on struggling families and small businesses.”

Congressman John Boehner (R-West Chester) issued the following statement in advance of tonight’s Oval Office address on the Gulf oil spill:

“While President Obama is speaking tonight, oil will continue to leak from the well and extend its stranglehold on the lives and livelihoods of the people in the affected areas. Even now, nearly two months after disaster first struck, the federal response remains inadequate and disorganized. Americans are rightly angry about this failure of government, and they want to know that their president is focused squarely on stopping this leak, cleaning up this mess, and finding out what went wrong.

“President Obama should not exploit this crisis to impose a job-killing national energy tax on struggling families and small businesses. Both parties should be working together to craft responsible solutions in response to this disaster. There’s nothing responsible or reasonable about a job-killing national energy tax that will raise energy costs and destroy more American jobs.

“President Obama will also reportedly address some of the financial issues surrounding the crisis, including the establishment of an escrow fund. These resources should be used to help the victims of this disaster, and not as a slush fund for trial lawyers or Administration officials seeking to paper over their own misguided decisions. BP should be held accountable for the full cost of this disaster – the taxpayers shouldn’t pay one dime - but that money must be directed to where it can be most effective in stopping this leak and aiding the recovery effort.

“I sincerely hope that the Obama Administration will not try to use a crisis made worse by its own failings to score political points on the backs of American living and working on the Gulf Coast. This is a moment that demands a call to action based on our shared interest in stopping this leak, cleaning up this mess, and finding out what went wrong.”

President Obama Addresses the Nation FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT 06/15/10

President Obama Addresses the Nation FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT 06/15/10

The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release June 15, 2010 Remarks by the President to the Nation on the BP Oil Spill Oval Office 8:01 P.M. EDT

President Obama Addresses the Nation LIVE STREAMING VIDEO PODCAST MP3 and MP4 06/15/10

Presidential Podium

THE PRESIDENT: Good evening. As we speak, our nation faces a multitude of challenges. At home, our top priority is to recover and rebuild from a recession that has touched the lives of nearly every American. Abroad, our brave men and women in uniform are taking the fight to al Qaeda wherever it exists. And tonight, I’ve returned from a trip to the Gulf Coast to speak with you about the battle we’re waging against an oil spill that is assaulting our shores and our citizens.

On April 20th, an explosion ripped through BP Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, about 40 miles off the coast of Louisiana. Eleven workers lost their lives. Seventeen others were injured. And soon, nearly a mile beneath the surface of the ocean, oil began spewing into the water.

Because there has never been a leak this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology. That’s why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our nation’s best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge -- a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation’s Secretary of Energy. Scientists at our national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice.

As a result of these efforts, we’ve directed BP to mobilize additional equipment and technology. And in the coming weeks and days, these efforts should capture up to 90 percent of the oil leaking out of the well. This is until the company finishes drilling a relief well later in the summer that’s expected to stop the leak completely.

Already, this oil spill is the worst environmental disaster America has ever faced. And unlike an earthquake or a hurricane, it’s not a single event that does its damage in a matter of minutes or days. The millions of gallons of oil that have spilled into the Gulf of Mexico are more like an epidemic, one that we will be fighting for months and even years.

But make no mistake: We will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long as it takes. We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused. And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy.

Tonight I’d like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward: what we’re doing to clean up the oil, what we’re doing to help our neighbors in the Gulf, and what we’re doing to make sure that a catastrophe like this never happens again.

First, the cleanup. From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been in charge of the largest environmental cleanup effort in our nation’s history -- an effort led by Admiral Thad Allen, who has almost 40 years of experience responding to disasters. We now have nearly 30,000 personnel who are working across four states to contain and clean up the oil. Thousands of ships and other vessels are responding in the Gulf. And I’ve authorized the deployment of over 17,000 National Guard members along the coast. These servicemen and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore, they’re ready to help clean the beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims -- and I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible.

Because of our efforts, millions of gallons of oil have already been removed from the water through burning, skimming and other collection methods. Over five and a half million feet of boom has been laid across the water to block and absorb the approaching oil. We’ve approved the construction of new barrier islands in Louisiana to try to stop the oil before it reaches the shore, and we’re working with Alabama, Mississippi and Florida to implement creative approaches to their unique coastlines.

As the cleanup continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our coastal states may need. Now, a mobilization of this speed and magnitude will never be perfect, and new challenges will always arise. I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip. So if something isn’t working, we want to hear about it. If there are problems in the operation, we will fix them.

But we have to recognize that despite our best efforts, oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife. And sadly, no matter how effective our response is, there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done. That’s why the second thing we’re focused on is the recovery and restoration of the Gulf Coast.

You know, for generations, men and women who call this region home have made their living from the water. That living is now in jeopardy. I’ve talked to shrimpers and fishermen who don’t know how they’re going to support their families this year. I’ve seen empty docks and restaurants with fewer customers -– even in areas where the beaches are not yet affected. I’ve talked to owners of shops and hotels who wonder when the tourists might start coming back. The sadness and the anger they feel is not just about the money they’ve lost. It’s about a wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost.

I refuse to let that happen. Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness. And this fund will not be controlled by BP. In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent third party.

Beyond compensating the people of the Gulf in the short term, it’s also clear we need a long-term plan to restore the unique beauty and bounty of this region. The oil spill represents just the latest blow to a place that’s already suffered multiple economic disasters and decades of environmental degradation that has led to disappearing wetlands and habitats. And the region still hasn’t recovered from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. That’s why we must make a commitment to the Gulf Coast that goes beyond responding to the crisis of the moment.

I make that commitment tonight. Earlier, I asked Ray Mabus, the Secretary of the Navy, who is also a former governor of Mississippi and a son of the Gulf Coast, to develop a long-term Gulf Coast Restoration Plan as soon as possible. The plan will be designed by states, local communities, tribes, fishermen, businesses, conservationists and other Gulf residents. And BP will pay for the impact this spill has had on the region.

The third part of our response plan is the steps we’re taking to ensure that a disaster like this does not happen again. A few months ago, I approved a proposal to consider new, limited offshore drilling under the assurance that it would be absolutely safe –- that the proper technology would be in place and the necessary precautions would be taken.

That obviously was not the case in the Deepwater Horizon rig, and I want to know why. The American people deserve to know why. The families I met with last week who lost their loved ones in the explosion -- these families deserve to know why. And so I’ve established a National Commission to understand the causes of this disaster and offer recommendations on what additional safety and environmental standards we need to put in place. Already, I’ve issued a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling. I know this creates difficulty for the people who work on these rigs, but for the sake of their safety, and for the sake of the entire region, we need to know the facts before we allow deepwater drilling to continue. And while I urge the Commission to complete its work as quickly as possible, I expect them to do that work thoroughly and impartially.

One place we’ve already begun to take action is at the agency in charge of regulating drilling and issuing permits, known as the Minerals Management Service. Over the last decade, this agency has become emblematic of a failed philosophy that views all regulation with hostility -- a philosophy that says corporations should be allowed to play by their own rules and police themselves. At this agency, industry insiders were put in charge of industry oversight. Oil companies showered regulators with gifts and favors, and were essentially allowed to conduct their own safety inspections and write their own regulations.

When Ken Salazar became my Secretary of the Interior, one of his very first acts was to clean up the worst of the corruption at this agency. But it’s now clear that the problem there ran much deeper, and the pace of reform was just too slow. And so Secretary Salazar and I are bringing in new leadership at the agency -- Michael Bromwich, who was a tough federal prosecutor and Inspector General. And his charge over the next few months is to build an organization that acts as the oil industry’s watchdog -- not its partner.

So one of the lessons we’ve learned from this spill is that we need better regulations, better safety standards, and better enforcement when it comes to offshore drilling. But a larger lesson is that no matter how much we improve our regulation of the industry, drilling for oil these days entails greater risk. After all, oil is a finite resource. We consume more than 20 percent of the world’s oil, but have less than 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves. And that’s part of the reason oil companies are drilling a mile beneath the surface of the ocean -- because we’re running out of places to drill on land and in shallow water.

For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. For decades, we’ve talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked -- not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.

The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight. Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be right here in America. Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil. And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.

We cannot consign our children to this future. The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash America’s innovation and seize control of our own destiny.

This is not some distant vision for America. The transition away from fossil fuels is going to take some time, but over the last year and a half, we’ve already taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy industry. As we speak, old factories are reopening to produce wind turbines, people are going back to work installing energy-efficient windows, and small businesses are making solar panels. Consumers are buying more efficient cars and trucks, and families are making their homes more energy-efficient. Scientists and researchers are discovering clean energy technologies that someday will lead to entire new industries.

Each of us has a part to play in a new future that will benefit all of us. As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of jobs -– but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment. And only if we rally together and act as one nation –- workers and entrepreneurs; scientists and citizens; the public and private sectors.
When I was a candidate for this office, I laid out a set of principles that would move our country towards energy independence. Last year, the House of Representatives acted on these principles by passing a strong and comprehensive energy and climate bill –- a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America’s businesses.

Now, there are costs associated with this transition. And there are some who believe that we can’t afford those costs right now. I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy -– because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.

So I’m happy to look at other ideas and approaches from either party -– as long they seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels. Some have suggested raising efficiency standards in our buildings like we did in our cars and trucks. Some believe we should set standards to ensure that more of our electricity comes from wind and solar power. Others wonder why the energy industry only spends a fraction of what the high-tech industry does on research and development -– and want to rapidly boost our investments in such research and development.

All of these approaches have merit, and deserve a fair hearing in the months ahead. But the one approach I will not accept is inaction. The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is somehow too big and too difficult to meet. You know, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II. The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon. And yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom. Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is the capacity to shape our destiny -– our determination to fight for the America we want for our children. Even if we’re unsure exactly what that looks like. Even if we don’t yet know precisely how we’re going to get there. We know we’ll get there.

It’s a faith in the future that sustains us as a people. It is that same faith that sustains our neighbors in the Gulf right now.

Each year, at the beginning of shrimping season, the region’s fishermen take part in a tradition that was brought to America long ago by fishing immigrants from Europe. It’s called “The Blessing of the Fleet,” and today it’s a celebration where clergy from different religions gather to say a prayer for the safety and success of the men and women who will soon head out to sea -– some for weeks at a time.
The ceremony goes on in good times and in bad. It took place after Katrina, and it took place a few weeks ago –- at the beginning of the most difficult season these fishermen have ever faced.

And still, they came and they prayed. For as a priest and former fisherman once said of the tradition, “The blessing is not that God has promised to remove all obstacles and dangers. The blessing is that He is with us always,” a blessing that’s granted “even in the midst of the storm.”

The oil spill is not the last crisis America will face. This nation has known hard times before and we will surely know them again. What sees us through -– what has always seen us through –- is our strength, our resilience, and our unyielding faith that something better awaits us if we summon the courage to reach for it.

Tonight, we pray for that courage. We pray for the people of the Gulf. And we pray that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

END 8:18 P.M. EDT

BP's live stream of Oil Leak LIVE STREAMING VIDEO


BP's live stream LIVE VIDEO: This stream is provided by BP and could be interrupted at any time.

President Obama Addresses the Nation LIVE STREAMING VIDEO PODCAST TEXT TRANSCRIPT 06/15/10

White House Live Next Up...June 15, 2010 8:00 PM EDT President Obama Addresses the Nation, Speech of 06/15/10

President Obama Addresses the Nation FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT 06/15/10

Download Video and MP3 for Podcast: mp4 (477MB) | mp3 (16MB)



LIVE C-SPAN FEED Windows Media Format || LIVE C-SPAN FEED Real Media Format. || LIVE C-SPAN 2 FEED Windows Media Format. || LIVE C-SPAN 3 FEED Windows Media Format. LIVE White House Feed below

As soon as FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT of President Obama’s Address, Downloadable mp3 for PODCAST Downloadable and embeded Video are available thet will be posted here

Presidential Podium

President Obama’s speech a bad moon rising Energy Tax

Tom Pricei have a very bad feeling about the President's speech tonight, a bad moon rising. Our guess is that the President will double down and go all in to deal with the gulf oil leak by more tax and adding to the federal bureaucracy.
Washington, Jun 15 - Republican Study Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) issued the following statement in advance of President Obama’s Oval Office address on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

“Lives have already been lost, livelihoods are in danger, and our coastlines face terrible long-term damage,” said Chairman Price. “The people and policies responsible for this tragedy must be held to account, but our focus must first be on stopping this spill and cleaning up the oil as quickly as possible.

“Tonight, we will learn if President Obama is capable of addressing the problem in front of him without reaching for a partisan agenda. We have already heard that Democrats see this tragedy as an opportunity to push an economically disastrous national energy tax. That would be remarkably irresponsible, and the White House should not use this type of environmental catastrophe for political purposes as it used the economic crisis to push through a bloated and ineffective stimulus package last year.

“The direct result of a national energy tax would be higher energy prices that will burden American consumers and diminish America’s global competitiveness. This is no time for a partisan agenda, or even worse, cheap fundraising appeals. Tonight, President Obama needs to finally take charge of this disaster and show some real leadership. Two months is too long to wait.” ###

United States Representative Tom Price FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 6.15.2010 Price: “Two Months Is Too Long to Wait” Washington, DC Office | 424 Cannon House Office Building | Washington DC 20515 phone: 202-225-4501 | fax: 202-225-4656

Governor Schwarzenegger Issues Statement after Senate Committee Kills Pension Reform Legislation

Governor Arnold SchwarzeneggerGovernor Arnold Schwarzenegger today issued the following statement after the Senate Committee on Public Employment and Retirement killed SB 919 by Senate Republican Leader Dennis Hollingsworth (R-Murrieta), legislation that would have implemented much-needed reform to California’s unsustainable pension system:
“I am disappointed that the Legislature failed to step up and pass this legislation that is so vital for the future of California. Every year we are diverting more and more money away from higher education, health and human services, public safety, parks and environmental protection to pay for unsustainable retiree costs, and without action, those costs will keep skyrocketing. The numbers don’t lie. This is a classic example of Sacramento promising more than it can afford, which is why I will not sign a budget without pension reform.”

06/14/2010 GAAS:364:10 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, June 14, 2010

Jerry Brown's remarks comparing Meg Whitman to Nazi Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels

Meg Whitman
Uploaded on June 10, 2010 Some rights reserved by megwhitman2010

Joseph Goebbels

Reichsminister Joseph Goebbels delivers a speech to a crowd in the Berlin Lustgarten urging Germans to boycott Jewish-owned businesses. He defends the boycott as a legitimate response to the anti-German "atrocity propaganda" being spread by "international Jewry." (April 1, 1933)
Response to Nazi reference by Gov. Jerry Brown.

Please see the following statement from Meg Whitman Campaign Manager Jillian Hasner in response to Jerry Brown's remarks comparing Meg Whitman to Nazi Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels:

"Just last week, Governor Brown promised he wasn't going to engage in mudslinging, but now he is comparing Meg Whitman to Hitler's Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels. Jerry Brown's statements comparing our campaign to a propagator of the Holocaust is deeply offensive and entirely unacceptable."

--Meg Whitman 2010 Campaign Manager Jillian Hasner

Jerry Brown's Statements About Nazi Minister Of Propaganda: "'It's like Goebbels,' referring to Hitler's notorious Minister of Propaganda. 'Goebbels invented this kind of propaganda. He took control of the whole world. She wants to be president. That's her ambition, the first woman president. That's what this is all about.'" (Doug Sovern, "Run Jerry Run," KCBS' Blog, http://www.kcbs.com/pages/2567788.php, 6/9/10)
Click Here To Read Full Post: www.kcbs.com/pages/2567788.php

MEDIA CONTACT Sarah Pompei 408.457.1369 Communications@MegWhitman.com

Renee Ellmers Let's Stop the Obama Rubber Stamp Congress VIDEO



This is the Bob Etheridge North Carolina 2nd District seat. Let's Stop the Obama Rubber Stamp Congress VIDEO.

Renee Ellmers for Congress Committee. P. O. Box 904 Dunn, NC 28335-0904 and phone 252-220-0181

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Bob McConnell 2nd Amendment rights RED MEAT VIDEO


This is the type of candidate we like, someone who has done something other than be a "career" politician, experienced life and maybe some success, have friends and neighbors who admire and respect your example then bring those proven virtues to public service.

Bob McConnell is a former infantry company commanders in Viet Nam. He has led men in combat, and environmental expeditions on Mount Everest.

I am a strong supporter of our 2nd Amendment rights.

The Second Amendment guarantees our right as individual citizens to defend ourselves and protect our way of life. I am a life member of the NRA. My father taught me to use and respect firearms. I have taught my sons the same things. I have hunted and fished all my life. I support the Thune-Vitter Senate Bill which, when passed, will create national Right-to-Carry reciprocity. I support The Amtrak Secure Transportation of Firearms Act that will allow gun owners to transport firearms on trains, just as we do on planes. I support legislation allowing residents of public housing to keep firearms in their homes. I will fight every effort to curtail our right to keep and bear arms.

TEXT CREDIT: Bob McConnell for Congress

VIDEO CREDIT: mcconnellforcongress