Industry Advisory Panel

Industry Advisory Panel of the Overseas Building Operations Meeting April 12, 2005

The Industry Advisory Panel of the Overseas Buildings Operations will meet on Tuesday, April 12, 2005, from 9:45 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. (EST), at the U.S. Department of State, 220l C Street, NW, Room 1107 (access through the 23rd Street entrance), Washington, D.C.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss new technologies and successful management practices for design, construction, security, property management, emergency operations, the environment and planning and development. An agenda will be available before the meeting.

The meeting will be open to the public, however, due to limited seating, prior notification and a valid photo ID are mandatory for entry into the building. Register by e-mailing: IAPR@state.gov. Your e-mail should include date of birth, social security number and company affiliation.

For further information, please contact Gina Pinzino, Overseas Buildings Operations, (703) 875-6872 or Michael Sprague (703) 875-7173 no later than Friday, April 1, 2005.
2005/235 Released on February 24, 2005

Media Note Office of the Spokesman Washington, DC February 24, 2005

Bush, Putin, PRESS AVAILABILITY

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT BUSH AND PRESIDENT PUTIN IN A PRESS AVAILABILITY
Constitution Hall Bratislava Castle Bratislava, Slovakia 5:50 P.M. (Local

PRESIDENT BUSH: Thank you all. I've just had a very important and constructive dialogue with my friend. It's great to see -- I know Laura was pleased to see Lyudmila Putin, as well. We have had, over the past four years, very constructive relations, and that's the way I'm going to keep it for the next four years, as well.

We've had an open and candid exchange of views and positions. In our meeting earlier I said, "Vladimir, when we get in here I think people are going to be very interested in this press conference, for some reason, I'm not sure why." Perhaps it's because you're a leader of a great nation and I'm fortunate to be one, too. But you can see we've drawn quite a crowd here. So I'm looking forward to answering their questions.

We produced a lot of positive results at this meeting. We agreed to accelerate our work to protect nuclear weapons and material, both in our two nations and around the world. And I want to thank you for that. And I want to thank our Defense Ministers for working on the issue, as well -- Minister Ivanov is here; he and Secretary Rumsfeld have had a very constructive relationship. Our mil-to-mil exchanges are very positive, and I appreciate that. You and I talked about that a couple of years ago; I think they're coming to fruition, which is a very important way to make sure we understand each other better.

We agreed upon new efforts to fight the war on terror, to combat MANPADS and improvised explosive devices. And I want to thank you for that. Vladimir has been a -- ever since the -- September the 11th, he has clearly understood the stakes that we face. And every time we meet, he is -- we have an interesting and constructive strategy session about how to continue to protect our peoples from attack. He is -- he has confronted some serious attacks in his country. I know what that means as a fellow leader. I know the strain, I know the agony, I know the sadness, I know the emotion that comes with seeing innocent people lose their lives, and we have shared that. I hope we never have to share it again, that common -- that common situation.

We agreed that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. And I appreciate Vladimir's understanding on that issue. We had a very constructive dialogue about how to achieve that common goal. We agreed that North Korea should not have a nuclear weapon. And again, this is an area where we're working closely together as two nations of the five nations that are involved with North Korea.

We agreed to accelerate negotiations for Russia's entry into the WTO. I stated that the other day in Brussels. We talked about ways to move this process forward. We agreed to cooperate in the field of energy. I told Vladimir that Secretary Bodman would be our main representative on this issue, and I look forward to constructive -- hearing about constructive dialogue on energy.

We agreed to work together to find peace in the Middle East. Russia's a part of the Quartet, and they played a constructive role in establishing the road map, and now we look forward to working together to achieve peace.

This meeting also gave me an opportunity to share my belief that it's in my country's interest that Russia be a strong and viable partner with the United States. It's very important that we establish not only a working relationship, but that we understand that in the 21st century, strong countries are built by developing strong democracies. And so we talked about democracy. Democracies always reflect a country's customs and culture, and I know that. But democracies have certain things in common: They have a rule of law and protection of minorities, a free press and a viable political opposition.

Russia has made tremendous progress over the last 15 years. It's an amazing transformation of the nation. And I applaud President Putin for dealing with a country that is in transformation. And it's been hard work. I was able to share my concerns about Russia's commitment in fulfilling these universal principles. I did so in a constructive and friendly way. I reaffirmed my belief that it is democracy and freedom that bring true security and prosperity in every land.

We may not always agree with each other, and we haven't over the last four years -- that's for certain -- but we found a lot agreement, a lot of common ground, and the world is better for it. Even though we didn't agree on certain issues, if you really think about what we have done the last four years, and what we want to do during the next four years, the common ground is a lot more than those areas where we disagree. And by working together, this world will be a safer, freer and more prosperous place.

Mr. President, it's great to see you again. Thank you.

PRESIDENT PUTIN: (As translated.) First of all, I would like to say that my meeting with the President of the United States has been a friendly one, has taken place in a very trustful atmosphere. This has been a dialogue of interested partners, which became clear right away.

In the course of our meeting, starting from the first minutes of our dialogue, we had a substantive discussion of the entire international agenda. The President has mentioned the key items in our dialogue. We share a position on the status of the Russia-U.S. relationship. It is true that over the past few years, through joint efforts, we have been able to accumulate a unique cooperation. We are engaged in a constructive political dialogue, and we are discovering new opportunities for joint business, cultural, and scientific initiatives.

It is obvious that Russia and the U.S. share long-term interests, genuine strategic goals, and certainly, a great degree of responsibility before our own people and people of other countries. We talked about international security. This reality is not affected by the circumstances of the moment or the consolidation of political interests. Therefore, we can see no alternative to the consistent strengthening of the Russia-U.S. relationship.

In the course of this summit, we have agreed upon specific guidelines that will navigate us through the process of cooperation in the forthcoming three years. This has to do primarily with addressing the threats and challenges of today; first and foremost, fighting terrorism. We have agreed to better coordinate our efforts on these fronts, including through the Russia-U.S. working group on counterterrorism, which has existed five years. Among the highlighted priorities have been the neutralization of the systems of financing and recruiting of terrorists, and work on identifying terrorist cells, et cetera.

We are ready to jointly work on the pressing problem of stemming the illicit trade in MANPADS. Our colleagues today agreed upon this in very concrete terms. I'd like to note that on the sidelines of this summit, the Russian Minister of Defense, Sergei Ivanov and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice signed a Russian-U.S. arrangement on cooperation in enhancing control over MANPADS. It is important to neutralize the attempts to proliferate weapons of mass destruction.

We talked a lot about nonproliferation. We talked a lot about the situation in Iran, about the situation in Iran -- North Korea, and we share a common opinion in this regard, and we are taking a similar approach. We should put an end to the proliferation of missiles and missile technology. The proliferation of such weapons is not in the interest of specific countries, or the international community, in general.

We have also exchanged our views on the situation in Iraq, in the Middle East. Russia and the U.S. have at their disposal some solid opportunities for normalizing the situation in places where regional crises take place. We intend to actually use this potential. We have paid great attention to economic cooperation including, as has already been said, the possible accession of Russia to the WTO. We have reaffirmed our intention to continue our search for mutually acceptable solutions of the outstanding problems. Russia is ready for a reasonable compromise, but this compromise should not go beyond the usual responsibilities assumed by countries acceding to the WTO.

In the presence of the press, I would like to thank the President of the United States for the serious message that our negotiators noticed in the course of negotiations, a message aimed at resolving all the problems that stand in the way of Russia's accession to the WTO. I'm sure that not only Russian economy, but also the U.S. economy are interested in the positive outcome.

We also discussed the issues relating to Russia-U.S. energy dialogue. We've had some progress in this area, some good progress. We're going to continue this dialogue. Some issues have been positively resolved in terms of expanding the operation of U.S. companies in Russian energy markets. ConocoPhilips, as you know, has bought a stake in Lukoil, one of the major Russian oil companies. It bought a stake that used to belong to the Russia state. This happened recently, and I'm confident that this will be a success story, both for Russian and U.S. partners.

Another important and interesting opportunity is our cooperation in the supplies of liquified natural gas. In the year 2010, 2011, a large amount of liquified natural gas can be supplied from Russia to the United States. Our investment corporation is becoming generally bilateral. The first steps -- but constant steps are being made by Russian companies that are starting to invest their capital into American economy.

We have also discussed the status and prospects of Russia's cooperation in science, high-tech; in particular, in the exploration of outer space.

In conclusion, I would like to say that I highly appreciate the outcome of this summit. Later this year, we are going to meet a few more times within the framework of various international fora. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the President of the United States who has accepted the invitation to participate in the festivities on the occasion of the anniversary of the great victory on May 9th in Moscow. This is a natural manifestation of respect of historic memory and the memory of the alliance that bonded our two countries in the years of the second world war.

Thank you.

Q Mr. President, four years ago when you first met with President Putin, at a time some in the world were questioning his commitment to democracy, you reassured a lot of those critics by saying that you had looked into his soul and saw a man that you found trustworthy. You've just listed some concerns here today. I'm wondering if you could unequivocally and without reservation repeat that statement today?

And, Mr. Putin, I'd like to ask you to address critics in the United States and elsewhere who saw Mr. Gorbachev and Mr. Yeltsin as taking early steps on the path to democracy and worry that you have reversed course.

PRESIDENT BUSH: One thing I -- gave me comfort in making the statement I made in Slovenia was that Vladimir said, when I agree with you, I'll agree with -- I'll tell you, and when I disagree with you, I'll tell you. In other words, we'll have a very frank and candid and open relationship. And that's the way it's been. There was no doubt in my mind what his position was on Iraq. He didn't kind of hedge, he didn't try to cloud up the issue. He made it abundantly clear to me that he didn't agree with my decision. And that's an important part of having a trustworthy relationship, a relationship where, when a person tells you something, you know he means what he says, and, "yes" means yes, and "no" means no. Sometimes in politics yes means "maybe," and no means "if." This is the kind of fellow who, when he says, yes, he means, yes, and when he says, no, he means, no.

And we had a discussion about some decisions he's made. He's had some interest in the decisions I've made. And that's a very important dialogue. And as I said, I'll say it again, I think it's very important that all nations understand the great values inherent in democracy -- rule of law and protection of minorities, viable political debate. When I brought that -- I don't want to put words in -- Vladimir can speak for himself on this issue, but all I can tell you is, he said -- yes meant yes, when we talked about values that we share.

PRESIDENT PUTIN: First of all, I would like to say that we discussed these issues at length, face to face, just the two of us. Russia has made its choice in favor of democracy. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people -- of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.

As far as the questions that are being discussed among our partners in the media, I can only repeat what has been said by the President of the United States. First, we are not going to make up -- to invent any kind of special Russian democracy; we are going to remain committed to the fundamental principles of democracy that have been established in the world. But, of course, all the modern institutions of democracy -- the principles of democracy should be adequate to the current status of the development of Russia, to our history and our traditions.

There is nothing unusual here, either. In every country, these overall principles are embodied in this or that way. In electoral law, we can compare the United States and a number of European countries. In the operation of major democratic institutions, there may be some differences, but the main, fundamental principles are going to be implemented in the form in which they have been developed by the modern, civilized society.

As far as the preceding period in our development, no doubt the credit that can be given to that period in the development of the Russian Federation for the fact that the previous generation of politicians, despite all the difficulties that have arisen due to changes in Russia, they have given the main thing to the Russian people -- that is freedom. But I believe that a lot of people will agree with me, the implementation of the principles and norms of democracy should not be accompanied by the collapse of the state and the impoverishment of the people.

We believe, and I personally believe, that the implementation and the strengthening of democracy on the Russian soil should not jeopardize the concept of democracy. It should strengthen statehood and it should improve living standards for the people. It is in this direction that we're going to act.

Q First of all, I wanted to ask another question, but we have an interesting conversation now, therefore I'm going to ask about the following: It seems to me that you have nothing to disagree about. The regimes that are in place in Russia and the U.S. cannot be considered fuller democratic, especially when compared to some other countries of Europe, for example -- for example, The Netherlands. It seems to me, that as far as Russia is concerned, everything is clear, more or less. But as far as the U.S. is concerned, we could probably talk at length. I am referring to the great powers that have been assumed by the security services due to which the private lives of citizens are now being monitored by the state. This could be explained away by the consequences of September 11th, but this has nothing to do with democratic values. How could you comment on this? I suggest that you can probably agree -- you can probably shake hands and continue to be friends in future.

PRESIDENT BUSH: I live in a transparent country. I live in a country where decisions made by government are wide open, and people are able to call people to -- me to account, which many out here due on a regular basis. Our laws, and the reasons why we have laws on the books, are perfectly explained to people. Every decision we have made is within the Constitution of the United States. We have a Constitution that we uphold. And if there is a question as to whether or not a law meets that Constitution, we have an independent court system, through which that law is reviewed.

So I'm perfectly comfortable in telling you, our country is one that safeguards human rights and human dignity, and we resolve our disputes in a peaceful way.

PRESIDENT PUTIN: I would like to support my American counterpart. I'm absolutely confident that democracy is not anarchy. It is not a possibility to do anything you want. It is not the possibility for anyone to rob your own people. Democracy is, among other things, and first and foremost, the possibility to democratically make democratic laws and the capability of the state to enforce those laws.

You have cited a curious example -- The Netherlands. The Netherlands is a monarchy, after all. I have no doubts about the democratic nature of that country. That is certainly a democratic nation, but this is very different from the United States and Russia.

There are great differences between Russia and the U.S., as well. If we talk about where we have more or where we have less democracy is not the right thing to do. But if we talk about how the fundamental principles of democracy are implemented in this or that historic soil, in this or that country, is an option, it's possible. This does not compromise the dignity of The Netherlands or Russia or the U.S.

Q -- on some of the decisions he has made on his democratic institutions, or have you just agreed to disagree? And, President Putin, did anything President Bush say to you today prompt you to reconsider some of those decisions?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I think the most important statement that you heard, and I heard, was the President's statement, when he declared his absolute support for democracy in Russia, and they're not turning back. To me, that is the most important statement of my private meeting, and it's the most important statement of this public press conference. And I can tell you what it's like dealing with the man over the last four years: When he tells you something, he means it. He asked what some of my concerns were, and he explained answers. I told him that it was very important that capital see rule of law, that there be stability, there not be any doubt about whether or not -- if somebody invests, whether or not the laws change. And I think Vladimir heard me loud and clear, and he explained why he made decisions he made.

But we had very frank discussions about a variety of issues. And the operative -- again, the operative statement, the summary statement that I think is important for people to hear in our countries, precisely his opening statement to King's question -- speaking about monarchies. Anyway. Get it? (Laughter.) It's late in the trip. Which is, firm belief in democracy. And I appreciate that.

PRESIDENT PUTIN: I have already mentioned that we have paid a lot of attention to these issues. I get the impression that sometimes the public in the now partner countries do not have the full knowledge and, consequently, do not have the full understanding of what is taking place in the Russian Federation. Naturally, within our countries, there are people who are in favor and there are those who are opposed to the decisions that are being made -- for example, the decision on the new procedure for the election of regional leaders in the Russian Federation.

But those who are opposed are richer than those who are in favor -- they have the opportunity to spread their opinion in the media, and we often do not pay the attention to that. I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that the leaders of the regions of the Russian Federation will not be appointed by the President. Their canvases will be presented, will be submitted to regional parliaments that are elected through secret ballot by all the citizens. This is, in essence, a system of the electoral college, which is used, on the national level, in the United States, and it is not considered undemocratic, is it?

We discussed these issues at length and some of the ideas -- I wouldn't say, advice -- but some of the ideas that I heard from my partner I respect a lot. And I believe that some of his ideas could be taken into account in my work, and I will pay due attention to them, that's for sure. Some other ideas, I will not comment on. Thank you.

Q To follow up on the issue of democratic institutions, President Bush recently stated that the press in Russia is not free. What is this lack of freedom all about? Your aides probably mentioned to you that our media, both electronic and our printed media -- full coverage of the manifestations and protests in our country. Our regional and national media often criticize the government institution. What about you? Why don't you talk a lot about violations of the rights of journalists in the United States, about the fact that some journalists have been fired? Or do you prefer to discuss this in private with your American colleague?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I don't know what journalists you're referring to. Any of you all still have your jobs? No, I -- look, I think it's important any viable democracy has got a free and active press. Obviously, if you're a member of the Russian press, you feel like the press is free. And that's -- feel that way? Well, that's good. (Laughter.) But I -- I talked to Vladimir about that. And he -- he wanted to know about our press. I said, nice bunch of folks. And he wanted to know about, as you mentioned, the subject of somebody getting fired. People do get fired in American press. They don't get fired by government, however. They get fired by their editors or they get fired by their producers, or they get fired by the owners of a particular outlet or network.

But a free press is important. And it is -- it is an important part of any democracy. And if you're a member of the press corps and you feel comfortable with the press in Russia, I think that is a pretty interesting observation for those of us who don't live in Russia to listen to.

But no question, whether it be in America or anywhere else, the sign of a healthy and vibrant society is one in where there's an active press corps. Obviously, there has got to be constraints. There's got to be truth. People have got to tell the truth, and if somebody violates the truth, then those who own a particular newspaper or those who are in charge of particular electronic station need to hold people to account. The press -- the capacity of the press to hold people to account also depends on their willingness to self-examine at times when they're wrong. And that happens on occasion in America. And that's -- that's an important part of maintaining a proper relationship between government and press.

I can assure you that the folks here are constantly trying to hold me to account for decisions I make and how I make decisions. I'm comfortable with that. It's part of the checks and balances of a democracy.

And so I'm glad to hear you're editorial comment, so to speak, on your comfort with the situation of the press corps in the Federation of Russia.

PRESIDENT PUTIN: First of all, what do you mean when you say, I keep silent -- or we keep silent about this or that problem? First of all, I'm not the minister of propaganda. Second, we discuss all issues in absolute openness. As George said, today we discussed this issue, as well, with regard to Russia and the United States. But what is absolutely obvious is that in the United States, there are a lot of mechanisms to uphold the freedom of the press. And as far as the fact that there is some kind of friction between the media and the government, there is an ongoing debate, an ongoing critical debate going on. There is a lot of criticism coming from the media with respect to the government. This is an manifestation of democracy. What you mentioned about the comments in the media of the actions of the Russian government is testimony to the fact that we do have freedom of the press. Although we're being criticized often of that, this is not the case.

When we discuss these issues, absolutely frankly, we, and I, in particular, do not think that this has to be pushed to the foreground, that new problems should be created from nothing. And I do not think that we should jeopardize the Russian-American relationship, because we're interested in the development of this relationship. We are paying close attention to all the comments of the press or opposing forces, but our responsibility is to, in spite of all these problems of which there are plenty, our responsibility is to positively develop the Russian-American relationship.

I would like to thank the President of the United States for his constructive dialogue that we've had today. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

END 6:24 P.M. (Local) For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 24, 2005 Remarks by President Bush and President Putin in a Press Availability

Haqlaniyah Operation River Blitz Day 3

IRAQI, U.S. FORCES CLASH WITH TERRORISTS IN HAQLANIYAH

CAMP BLUE DIAMOND, Iraq – Iraqi and U.S. forces engaged terrorists throughout the day Feb. 23 in and around the city of Haqlaniyah, which included U.S. aircraft providing close air support to troops in contact with terrorists on two separate occasions.

At approximately 5 a.m., a U.S. Air Force AC-130 gunship expended 17 40 mm rounds in support of U.S. Marines from Regimental Combat Team 7, 1st Marine Division, who were engaged in combat with terrorists near the city.

At approximately 12:45 p.m., U.S. jets delivered two 500-pound bombs on insurgent fighting positions after terrorists ambushed a U.S. Marine patrol with small arms and heavy machine gun fire.

There were no U.S. casualties in either engagement.

Iraqi Soldiers from the Freedom Guards Battalion of the Iraqi National Guard, supported by U.S. Marines, detained three military-aged males at a mosque in Haqlaniyah at approximately 2:30 p.m.

U.S. forces detained 29 terrorists and seized several weapons caches during operations throughout Al Anbar province Feb. 23.

Those detained today bring to 87 the number of suspected terrorists detained since Operation River Blitz began Feb. 20.

The following weapons and munitions were seized today:

(14) AK-47 assault rifles, (15) RPG rounds, (3) RPG launchers, (4) Rifles (various types), (1) Shotgun, (4) RPK machine guns, (1) Sub-machine gun (unidentified), (1) Anti-aircraft gun, (1) Pistol, (300) 7.62 mm rounds, (94) 14.5 mm rounds, (161) 20 mm rounds, (5) 30 mm anti-aircraft rounds, (1) Complete 82 mm mortar system, (4) 120 mm mortar rounds, (2) 130 mm projectiles, (5) 155 mm artillery rounds, (11) Rockets (various types), 100 lbs. of rocket propellant, (96) Rifle grenades, (91) Hand grenades, (1) VBIED

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND 7115 South Boundary Boulevard MacDill AFB, Fla. 33621-5101 Phone: (813) 827-5894; FAX: (813) 827-2211; DSN 651-5894 February 23, 2005 Release Number: 05-02-14 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Australia: Decision To Increase Forces in Iraq

Australia: Decision To Increase Forces in Iraq

The United States welcomes Australia’s decision to send an additional 450 ground forces to Iraq to provide protection for multinational reconstruction efforts and to train Iraqi security forces. This Australian decision came as a result of requests by the governments of the United Kingdom and Japan.

The new Australian contribution, which adds to the positive momentum generated by Iraq’s national elections on January 30, will assist Iraq’s transition to a secure democracy.

Australia continues to demonstrate that it is willing to make difficult and courageous choices to promote democracy and combat terrorism around the world.

2005/231 Released on February 23, 2005 Press Statement Richard Boucher, Spokesman Washington, DC February 23, 2005

United States-Turkey Strategic Dialogue

United States-Turkey Strategic Dialogue

As part of the strategic dialogue between the United States and Turkey, the Department of State and an interagency team led by Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs, Ambasador Laura Kennedy, hosted today, February 23, the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Director General for Bilateral Affairs, Ambassador Halil Akinci, to discuss Eurasian issues. The bilateral meetings provided a forum for us to discuss common interests and explore ideas for greater collaboration on issues including, inter alia, the resolution of frozen conflicts in the region, energy, and political and economic reform.

The Turkish delegation invited the United States side to come to Turkey for the next session of what our two countries agree should become a permanent consultative forum.

2005/232 Media Note Office of the Spokesman Washington, DC February 23, 2005

Fact Sheets on U.S.-EU Cooperation

Release of Fact Sheets on U.S.-EU Cooperation

The Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs has released the following fact sheets on the United States and European Union cooperation on various issues, including human rights, Iraq, non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and HIV/AIDs. Please visit the following websites to view the respective fact sheets.

U.S.-EU Foreign Policy Cooperation, U.S.-EU Cooperation in the Broader Middle East, U.S.-EU Cooperation on the Middle East Peace Process , U.S.-EU Cooperation on Iraq , U.S.-EU Cooperation on African Crises , U.S.-EU Cooperation in Afghanistan , U.S.-EU Cooperation in the Balkans , U.S.-EU Cooperation on Reform in Eurasia , U.S.-EU Cooperation on Counterterrorism , U.S.-EU Cooperation on the Nonproliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction , U.S.-EU Cooperation on Human Rights , U.S.-EU Cooperation on Human Rights , Turning the Tide Against HIV/AIDS , U.S.-EU Regulatory Cooperation , U.S.-EU Cooperation on Information Technology, U.S.-EU Cooperation in Science and Technology , U.S.-EU Cooperation in Education: The Fulbright Program,

Media Note Office of the Spokesman Washington, DC February 23, 2005 2005/230 Released on February 23, 2005

Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada

Taken Question Office of the Spokesman Washington, DC February 23, 2005 Question Taken at Daily Briefing of Feb. 22, 2005

State Department Reaction to the Indictment of Former Bolivian President Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada

Question: Has the government of Bolivia contacted the United States regarding accusations against former President Sanchez de Lozada?

Answer: The Bolivian government has not contacted us concerning accusations against former president Sanchez de Lozada. However, in the past, US officials have raised with Bolivian officials our concern that the charges appear to be politically motivated. 2005/229

Bush Schröder Exchange Toasts

President and German Chancellor Schröder Exchange Toasts Grosser Saal Lobby Electoral Palace Mainz, Germany 11:58 A.M. (Local)

CHANCELLOR SCHRÖDER: (As translated.) Dear Mr. President, Mrs. Bush, ladies and gentlemen: Let me begin by sharing with you how very pleased, indeed, my wife, Doris, and I are about this opportunity of welcoming you, Mr. President, and your wife, Laura, not only to Germany, but here to Mainz, as well. Your visit is a strong sign of the true friendship -- and I emphasize friendship -- and trusting cooperation that has developed between Germany and the United States of America.

I still remember the days in May, '89, when your father, Mr. President, came here, and only a few months before the fall of what was then the Berlin Wall, he committed himself very strongly to the idea of a united Europe as a strong partner by the side of the United States of America.

Now here we stand today, 15 years later, and that target, I can only say, is downright achieved. Germany has gone in and reestablished the unity of its own state, and it has done so in freedom. This, all of this, would not have been possible without the United States of America, Mr. President. Here we stand, today, as equal partners, equal friends and real allies, where we get together for proper cooperation to muster the challenges we're all faced with today.

Our cooperation, be it in the fight against international terrorism, be it against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, be it the fight against underdevelopment or epidemics, such as HIV and AIDS, in all of those fields we stand united, and we're really fighting together; also in the field of creating a good climate for this one world we're all living in.

We jointly show military commitment, in the Balkans, for example, in Afghanistan. We show international cooperation when it is about dealing with crisis such as the one in the Middle East, for example. And all of this is done by the now reunited, sovereign Germany, which stands ready to take on all these international and grown responsibilities.

Not only Germany is taking on greater responsibility, ladies and gentlemen, also the enlarged European Union shows a lot more responsibility for international peace, for development and for the stability around the world. And we are certainly ready to take action in the field of foreign and security policy. We are trying to develop a joint foreign and security policy in Europe that very much serves this aforementioned purpose.

You, Mr. President, made the effort to visit the European Union and NATO yesterday. You delivered speeches there, and by saying what you said, you set a sign that the alliance and the partnership really rests on two strong pillars here.

Now, ladies and gentlemen, the unique ties that tie our two countries together especially rest upon things such as the civil societies on both sides of the Atlantic. We are tied together through strong economic exchange and through a lot of cultural ties, too. Now, it is apart from the political and cultural ties that there is also a real atmosphere, a spirit of a transatlantic relationship that reigns.

Now, that takes me to the end of my beginning words here to you. If I had a glass, which, unfortunately, I don't, I would raise it, and propose a toast to German-U.S. friendship and cooperation. Now, since I don't have that glass, it's a bit embarrassing, but it says it in my text, I need to say it anyway. And just, by the way, if the glass -- I just said, if I had a glass -- I would always say the glass were full. I always wanted to be a chef, and never wanted to be a waiter. (Laughter.) Thank you. (Applause.)

PRESIDENT BUSH: Gerhard, before I raise my imaginary glass -- (laughter) -- I do want to thank you for your hospitality. You and Doris have been very kind to Laura and me, and we appreciate that. I want to thank all the folks who have come to say, hello, from around this great country. It means a lot to both of us that you're here.

You know, in the course of my political career, I've often been accused of following in my father's footsteps. I don't know why people say that. (Laughter.) I'm proud to be here, 16 years after he was here. I hope he brought my mother -- because, like me, we both married above ourselves. (Laughter.) I'm proud to be traveling with Laura. (Applause.)

The first trip I took since my second inauguration was to Europe, because Europe is a vital relationship for the United States of America. It is in my nation's interest that Europe be strong. We want a strong partner for peace and freedom. We can't have good, strong relations with Europe if we don't have good relations with Germany. This great nation is the heart of Europe.

My trip today should say to the people of this good country and my country that past disagreements are behind us, and we're moving forward for the good of mankind. And that shouldn't be a surprise to people, because we believe in human rights and human dignity and the worth of every individual.

And so today I come to Germany to raise my imaginary glass to our friendship, our relationship, our ability to work together, and for freedom and peace. May God bless you all. (Applause.)

END 12:09 P.M. (Local) For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 23, 2005

RELATED:

• President Bush and Chancellor Schröder Discuss Partnership - CHANCELLOR SCHRÖDER: (As translated.) Thank you very much, indeed, ladies and gentlemen. I'm very pleased, indeed, about this opportunity of welcoming President Bush and his wife, Laura, here in Germany. I think Mainz is an excellent venue for this meeting. We had a very, very intense discussion and we basically covered each and every subject that is a high-ranking one on the international political agenda today.
• President Bush Speaks with Young Professionals in Germany - PRESIDENT BUSH: Gerhard, thank you very much for your hospitality. I want to thank you all for coming. This is a good opportunity for me to really listen to what you have to ask and tell me about a lot of things. I'm interested in economy, the entrepreneurial spirit. I'm interested in attitudes about freedom and peace. I'm interested to know, obviously, what you think about or answer questions about policies that I've decided. I, obviously, know there's a lot of disagreement about some of the decisions I've made, and I'm interested in sharing with you why I made the decisions I have made.
• President Thanks U.S. Troops at Wiesbaden Army Airfield Base - THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all. (Applause.) Thank you very much. Thank you for the warm welcome. Laura and I were in the neighborhood -- (laughter) -- and we thought we'd just drop by to say hello. Howdy. (Laughter and applause.) It's an honor to be here with so many outstanding soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines from this base and others in Germany. Laura and I are proud to be with you. I'm glad to be with the men and women of the Third Support Command, and the 421st Medical Evacuation Battalion. (Applause.) I see a lot of Big Red Ones here in the crowd -- (applause) -- I know you've just back from Iraq. I'm pleased to say, "Job well done." (Applause.)

Iran Earthquake Condolences

Statement on Iran Earthquake Condolences for the victims of the Earthquake in Iran

On behalf of the American people, the President expresses his sincere condolences for the loss of life and suffering caused by yesterday's earthquake in the Iranian province of Kerman. Our thoughts and prayers are with those families and individuals who lost loved ones. The United States stands ready to assist the people of Iran in responding to this tragedy, and we will be in contact with the Government of Iran to offer concrete help.

# # # For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 23, 2005

President Meets with E.U. Leaders Justus Lipsius Brussels

President Meets with E.U. Leaders Justus Lipsius Brussels, Belgium 6:58 P.M. (Local)

PHOTO GALLERY: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and President George W. Bush attend the NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium, Tuesday Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper. President George W. Bush meets with the NATO-Ukraine Commission at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium, Tuesday Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper. President George W. Bush hosts a bilateral meeting with Ukraine President Viktor Yushchenko in Brussels, Belgium, Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper. President George W. Bush meets with Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi of Italy at NATO Headquarters in Brussels Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper. President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom walk together after addressing the press at the Ambassador's Residence in Brussels, Belgium, Tuesday Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper. President George W. Bush is welcomed by NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer during a news conference Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005, at NATO Headquarters in Brussels. White House photo by Paul Morse. President George W. Bush and NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer take questions during a news conference Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005, at NATO Headquarters in Brussels. White House photo by Paul Morse. President George W. Bush speaks with Slovakian President Ivan Gasparovic as world leaders take their place for the official NATO photo at the NATO Headquarters in Brussels Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper. President George W. Bush meets with European Union President Jean-Claude Juncker while at the NATO Summit in Brussels Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Paul Morse. President George W. Bush laughs with, from left, European Union Council Secretariat Javier Solana, European Union President Jean-Claude Juncker and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso after a working dinner between the leaders in Brussels Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper. President George W. Bush speaks with European Union High Representative Javier Solana during a plenary session of the North Atlantic Council at NATO Headquarters in Brussels Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper.

PRESIDENT JUNCKER: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. As heads of state and government of the European Union, we've been very happy to welcome the U.S. President, Mr. George Bush, to the heart of the European institutions. And once again, I would like to thank him for this visit, and for the fact that he has taken the initiative of coming to Europe so soon after his inauguration for his second term as President of the United States.

In the course of our discussions, we have touched on a whole range of issues, which it is clearly impossible for me -- that wasn't me, that was the microphone -- a whole series of issues which we cannot summarize here. What I would say is that what we have established is that, as so often in our past, if we work together, if we pull our strengths, we as Europeans and Americans, can make the difference -- we have the strength, we have the legitimacy, and we have the means -- because we have the same ambitions for the world, ambition of democracy, of freedom, of fighting together against terrorism, ambition to end the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

On our flags, we have the words, "freedom" and "democracy." And we recognize the obligations that result from this -- the fight against poverty, the fight against under-development. And so, in a very studious, constructive and friendly atmosphere, we addressed a number of issues.

Middle East: We both do consider that peace prospects are better than they have been for a long time, and we are looking forward to cooperate in close partnership with the U.S. and with other Quartet members. It is of crucial importance, we do think, to go back to the implementation of the road map. In Gaza we do all hope and prospect for a negotiated, two-state solution, as defined in this road map. That means that we have to make sure for Israel that peace, security and recognition by all countries in the region are guaranteed. And that means for the Palestinians that they have the right to have a viable, democratic, independent and totally contiguous state.

As regards Iraq, we applauded the courage of the Iraqi people and the results of recent Iraqi elections, as far as the out-turn was concerned. We are pursuing our common engagement in Iraq. The United States and the U.S. [sic] stand together in support of the Iraqi people and the new Iraqi government, which will soon come into action. To that end, should the new Iraqi government request it, the United States and European Union are prepared to co-host an international conference to provide a forum to encourage and coordinate international support for Iraq.

We spoke at length about the Middle East, and in particular, about Lebanon -- Lebanon, this country which is lurching from misfortune to misfortune, from tragedy to tragedy. And we condemned vigorously the assassination of the former Prime Minister. We insisted on full compliance and immediate compliance with the Security Council resolution, and we, the U.S. and the European Union, have called for a joint committee of investigation.

I leave this to the President of the U.S.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Mr. Prime Minister, thanks. Jose, it's good to see you, sir, thank you. I'm looking forward to having dinner with you and Javier Solana and Jean-Claude tonight.

Listen, it's an honor to be here. I appreciate the invitation. You called an extraordinary meeting, and I'm honored you did so. My first trip after my inauguration was to Europe, and that's the way it should be, because Europe and the United States are close friends.

In my talk to the leaders in the room, I started by saying this: There should be no doubt in your mind that my government and the United States wants the European project to succeed. It's in our interests that Europe be strong. It's in our interests that the European Union work out whatever differences there are and become a continued, viable, strong partner. It's in our interests for commercial reasons; we trade a lot. And I talked about the need to continue trade and to work out our disputes in a sensible way.

It's in our interests because the values that caused the European Union to exist in the first place -- the values of human rights and human dignity and freedom -- are the same values we share. And we have an opportunity to work together to spread those values. We talked about Iraq, and I appreciate the contributions and the new suggestion. I appreciate your contributions in Afghanistan.

We talked about how hopeful the Middle Eastern peace situation looks. And I told the leaders that my government will be very much involved in the process. We believe peace is within reach. Therefore, I want to work with the European Union to achieve that objective.

We talked about aid, the need to work together to fight disease, like HIV/AIDS, which we are doing and will continue to do. I brought up global warming. I said that the Kyoto debate is beyond us, as far as I'm concerned; now is the time to focus on our abilities and research and capacity to develop technologies to make the air cleaner, so that our people can have the standard of living they expect, at the same time that we're good stewards of the Earth.

So it was a very optimistic, hopeful meeting. I appreciate so very much the hospitality of the leaders, and I'm anxious to continue our dialogue after this press conference.

PRESIDENT BARROSO: Thank you. I think that, on behalf of the European Commission, that the visit of President Bush is really a very, very important one. Europe and America have reconnected. This visit has highlighted all that unites Europe and America; it has focused the eyes of the world on all that we share. I believe that the relationship between the United States and Europe is the world's strongest, most comprehensive and strategically important partnership. The United States, a united Europe, this is really the indispensable partnership.

If you look at the scale of the challenges ahead -- like terrorism, poverty -- one thing is certain: These are not challenges that any nation can tackle alone. Europe knows that; the United States knows that. Even working together, it's not sure that we will solve these problems because of their magnitude. But we must try, and I believe that together we will prevail. The reality is that the world is safer and more prosperous when Europe and America work together as global partners.

Today, we have had opportunity to discuss many of the challenges on the transatlantic agenda: Middle East, on transatlantic trade. There is a common outlook on many fronts. I believe that European Union and America will be very strong partners in supporting the efforts of Israel and the Palestinian Authority to move towards a lasting peace in the Middle East. We know that President Bush and America are fully engaged. There is a unique opportunity for peace-making.

The European Union and the United States are committed to continue to bring prosperity and solidarity across the broader Middle East, building on the Europe Union's side on a decade of dialogue and assistance through the Barcelona process.

On Iraq, the Commission is, and will remain, committed to a stable and democratic country. We will continue to offer substantial political and financial support for the process of democratic transition. And we hope that if the new Iraqi government makes a concrete proposal for joint action, we'll be ready to assist.

We also have a shared commitment to development, and I would add that we must measure ourselves by results, helping countries to progress towards the Millennium goals. We must give urgent attention to Africa. We need a quantum leap in terms of resources and policy.

We'll talk later about how we can work together, also, to fight climate change. The United States and Europe, I think I can say this, agree that climate change constitutes a major challenge. Now we need to develop new methods of working together to get results that are effective over the long-term. President Bush mentioned, for instance, the prospects offered now by new technologies. We are very much wishing to work together with the United States in that field.

The United States and Europe are the two largest economies in the world. We are determined to deepen the transatlantic economic partnership. Trade and investment are the bedrock of transatlantic relations. We want to build on this. Our common objective must be to remove obstacles to transatlantic trade and investment, as well as making a success of Doha development round, which is a catalyst for global growth. Europe is committed to promote growth and jobs, through knowledge, innovation and opportunity. That is what the Lisbon agenda stands for.

This visit has given new life to the partnership between Europe and United States. I believe that transatlantic relations have turned a corner. A new listening partnership is emerging. The challenge now is to turn this new spirit into reality, and show the world we are able to translate it into concrete results. Thank you.

Q A question to U.S. President and to the Prime Minister of Luxembourg. This EU-U.S. summit fueled speculation that there will be now two transatlantic tracks on foreign and security policy. One is the good old NATO, and then the other one is the new one that's direct EU-U.S. strategic talk. So is this meeting between EU and U.S., this special summit, a kind of historic foundation of a new second track outside of NATO on EU-U.S. relations?

PRESIDENT JUNCKER: I always wanted to make history, but I don't think that this time -- (laughter) -- is the moment for doing so. We have an ongoing transatlantic dialogue inside NATO. It can be improved, and we discussed this, this morning together with the President. And we have an ongoing transatlantic dialogue inside the framework between U.S. and European Union. We'll have another summit by the end of the summer, so in June in Washington, where we are trying to deliver as concrete results as possible, on the basis of the good atmosphere we laid down in the course of this meeting. We shouldn't make a distinction between NATO and between the European Union. These are two different things, but to us, one family relation and links between the two. This is not a question, or is a question and --

PRESIDENT BUSH: I agree. I mean, I don't view these two meetings as mutually exclusive meetings. I think they're both important, they're both a part of an important dialogue with Europe. NATO was set up for security matters. The EU is set up as a way to make Europe function better, to be able to achieve objectives for her people. And the United States looks forward to working with Europe both within NATO and as the European Union.

I've been meeting with the European Union a lot since I've been the President. This isn't the first meeting -- your question kind of made it sound like, he finally showed up and met. This isn't the first time we've met with the European Union in my presidency. As a matter of fact, we do so on an annual basis. And I look forward to the meetings and they're constructive and they're important.

Plante.

Q Mr. President, the Russians seem to be pushing back against some of the things that you've said, Mr. President. Their ambassador to the U.S. wrote today that "there cannot be a sole standard for democracy." So what I'm asking is just how flexible you think the standards for democracy can be?

PRESIDENT BUSH: First, we've got a constructive relationship with Russia, and that's important. I've got a very good personal relationship with President Putin, and that's important. And it's important because it enables me and our country to remind President Putin that democracies are based upon rule of law and the respect for human rights and human dignity and a free press -- you'll be happy to hear -- and that a constructive relationship allows me to remind him that I believe Russia is a European country, and European countries embrace those very same values that America embraces. And I'm looking forward to continuing my dialogue with him.

Q A question for President Bush. President, you came to Europe with a very constructive speech. And, indeed, you said very few things the Europeans couldn't agree with. But actions speak louder, so do you actually commit to taking more into account the European position on international matters? And do you actually commit to, for instance, prevent from launching action, strikes against a sovereign member state, state like Iran, without a mandate from the United Nations Security Council?

PRESIDENT BUSH: You know, look, let me talk about Iran; that's a place where I'm getting good advice from European partners. After all, Great Britain, Germany and France are negotiating with the Ayatollahs to achieve a common objective, something that we all want, and that is for them not to have a nuclear weapon. It's in our interests for them not to have a nuclear weapon.

It's also in our interests for them not to continue funding terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, which has the desire to stop the Middle East peace process from going forward. And so these are great interlocutors on behalf of the position we share. So there's an example of concrete action.

I'm also looking forward to working with our European partners on the Middle Eastern peace process. Tony Blair is hosting a very important meeting in London, and that is a meeting at which President Abbas will hear that the United States and the EU is desirous of helping this good man set up a democracy in the Palestinian territories, so that Israel will have a democratic partner in peace.

I laid out a vision, the first U.S. President to do so, which said that our vision is two states, Israel and Palestine, living side-by-side in peace. That is the goal. And I look forward to working concretely with our European friends and allies to achieve that goal.

And finally, this notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table. (Laughter.)

Bob.

Q Mr. President, I wanted to follow up on Plante's question, if I could. I wanted to follow up on --

PRESIDENT BUSH: Is this a question on Russia?

Q Sir?

PRESIDENT BUSH: This is a question on Russia?

Q Yes, sir.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Okay.

Q Do you believe, sir, that Russia is backsliding in its march toward democracy? What troubles you the most about that, and how is that going to shape your conversation with President Putin two days from now?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I like a country with a free press -- an independent, free press. And there has been some moves where the Russian government, I guess for better use of the word, didn't license certain members of the press. I think it's very important that President Putin hear not only from me in a private way, which he will, but also hear some of the concerns I heard around the table today. There were some concerns from the Baltic nations. And I look forward to carrying their message that it's very important for President Putin to make very clear why he's made some of the decisions he's made, and as well as respect his neighbors.

And I'm confident that can be done in a cordial way. It's important for us to keep a constructive relationship with Russia. We've got a lot to do together. We've got a lot of common projects that will make people more secure around the world, one of which is to make sure that nuclear stockpiles are safeguarded. I look forward to talking to him about that. But I also will remind him that the United States believes strongly in democratic values.
Thank you.

PRESIDENT JUNCKER: That was it. Thank you.

END 7:15 P.M. (L)

"When The Spirit Moves" African American Dance

"When The Spirit Moves" Exhibition Highlights African American Dance

As part of the U.S. Department of State’s celebration of Black History Month, "When the Spirit Moves," an exhibition about African American dance, is on display February 22-23, 2005, in the Exhibit Hall of the Harry S Truman building in Washington, DC.

This paper show provides a history of African American dance, from its roots in Africa to today’s modern dance movements and reflects the gradual movement of African American dance from the fringes of popularity to mainstream acceptance by American audiences. Characteristics of African American dance — including improvisation, orientation toward the Earth, polyrhythms, and percussive music — are featured, as well as photographs of famous dancers including Bill "Bojangles" Robinson, Katherine Dunham, Gregory Hines, and Pearl Primus.

Adapted from the exhibition "When the Spirit Moves: African American Dance in History and Art," the paper show was developed by the Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of Citizen Exchanges, Cultural Programs Division, in partnership with the National African American Museum and Cultural Center in Wilberforce, Ohio.

Designed to promote awareness of African American artistic and cultural history, "When the Spirit Moves" has traveled to more than 75 embassies around the world, sparking interest in African American dance and history. In Tartu, Estonia, the paper show has steadily intrigued visitors.

Opening at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations on February 7, 2005, "When the Spirit Moves" drew accolades for its positive impact on audiences around the world. "When the Spirit Moves" is available online at: UN.int/usa.

For more information about this exhibition or other Cultural Programs of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, please contact Catherine Stearns at (202) 203-5107.

2005/228 Released on February 22, 2005Media Note Richard Boucher, Spokesman Washington, DC

Bush, Blair Discuss Iraq

President and Prime Minister Blair Discuss Iraq, NATO Meeting Chief of Mission Residence U.S. Embassy Belgium Brussels, Belgium 8:42 A.M. (Local)

PRESIDENT BUSH: I just had a good breakfast. I always enjoy being with my friend, Tony Blair. We talked about the progress being made in Iraq, and I want to congratulate you on your vision. The Iraqis are -- you know, have defied the terrorists and showed the world they want to live in a free society, and we're there to help them achieve that.

I'm looking forward to the NATO meeting today. NATO is a vital relationship for the United States and for Europe. And I'm looking forward to meeting with the EU, as well. As I said in my speech yesterday, a strong Europe is very important for the United States, and I really meant that. And the Prime Minister is one of the strong leaders in Europe, and I really enjoy my relationship with him.

PRIME MINISTER BLAIR: First of all, I'm pleased to come and talk to the President again and go through the range of different issues that we face in the world today. And I both welcome the President's speech yesterday very much and thanked him for it. And I think what it sets out is a very clear way forward for us now. Whatever the differences in the international community have been over the past couple of years, I think we have a really solid basis now for going forward in a unified way. And if we take that opportunity, it will be greatly for the benefit of the international community.

We can see this, obviously, with Iraq, where after the democratic elections that are held now, it's possible to see a way forward in which Iraq can become a stable and a prosperous and a democratic state. And after all the tragedies of the past and the dictatorship and the loss of life under Saddam, there's now real prospect for the Iraqi people. And that, joined to what has happened in Afghanistan, I think gives us real hope for the future.

In addition, the President set out very clearly a way forward on the Middle East peace process. There's a renewed sense of vigor and optimism in that process. And with the London conference coming up next week, I think we've got every possibility now of trying to reach a settlement, which I think would do so much for international relations worldwide.

Then, of course, we also went through many of the other issues, to the upcoming G8 later in the year and so on. So it was, as ever, a very constructive, very useful discussion across a whole range of issues. And as I say, I think that yesterday's speech and today's meeting at NATO gives us an opportunity to restate for people in Europe and in America the fundamental importance of this transatlantic alliance. It's been a cornerstone of our security for many, many years; it's based on shared values; it's absolutely the right thing for us to have at the center of our relations. And we'll do everything we can to make sure that that relationship is strong.

END 8:45 A.M. (Local) For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 22, 2005

U S and the E U Iraq Conference

JOINT STATEMENT BY THE UNITED STATES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION Announcement on Iraq Conference

The United States and Europe stand together in support of the Iraqi people and the new Iraqi government which will soon come into being. To that end, should the new Iraqi government request it, the United States and the European Union are prepared to co-host an international conference to provide a forum to encourage and coordinate international support for Iraq.

# # # For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 22, 2005 Joint Statement by the United States and the European Union

Ten Years of Democracy in South Africa

Statement on Ten Years of Democracy in South Africa

President Bush congratulates the people of South Africa on their achievements during their first ten years of democracy. President Mbeki's February 11 State of the Nation address made clear South Africa's commitment to progress at home and around the world. In this broader effort, we support President Mbeki's work to promote the advancement of democracy and regional stability in Cote d'Ivorie and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and urge a common effort to ensure that the parliamentary elections in Zimbabwe are free and fair.

The United States shares many of the goals and values expressed in the State of the Nation address, particularly South Africa's great concern over tuberculosis, AIDS, malaria, and other diseases. We will work closely within the framework of South Africa's national comprehensive plan to address the HIV/AIDS pandemic, and plan to continue and increase our cooperation via the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

The United States looks forward to working closely with South Africa to further our shared interest of building a world in which all peoples can live in peace, freedom, and dignity.

# # # For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 22, 2005

John C. Dugan Comptroller of the Currency

President George W. Bush today announced his intention to nominate one individual to serve in his administration:

The President intends to nominate John C. Dugan, of Maryland, to be Comptroller of the Currency at the Department of the Treasury for a five-year term. Mr. Dugan is a partner at Covington & Burling, specializing in banking and financial institution regulation. He previously served as Assistant Secretary for Domestic Finance at the Department of the Treasury. Earlier in his career, Mr. Dugan was Republican General Counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. He received his bachelor's degree from the University of Michigan and his J.D. from Harvard Law School. # # #

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 22, 2005 Personnel Announcement

Army's Black Corps of Engineers H.CON.RES.67.EH

Whereas the bombing of Pearl Harbor necessitated constructing an overland route between Alaska and the lower 48 States for military purposes;

Whereas on February 11, 1942, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt authorized the construction of the Alaska-Canada Highway (also known as the `Alcan Highway');

Whereas construction of the Alcan Highway, a 1,522-mile long road from Dawson Creek, Canada, to Fairbanks, Alaska, was an engineering feat of enormous challenge;

Whereas the Alcan Highway was constructed by approximately 10,000 United States troops through rugged, unmapped wilderness and extreme temperatures, ranging from 80-degrees-below to 90-degrees-above zero;

Whereas the Corps of Engineers units assigned to construct the Alcan Highway were segregated by race;

Whereas the 93rd, 95th, and 97th Regiments and 388th Battalion of the Corps of Engineers, part of a group known as the `Black Corps of Engineers', were African American units assigned to the Alcan Highway project, and these units comprised one-third of the total engineering workforce on the project;

Whereas despite severe discriminatory policies, and abominable living and social conditions, the soldiers of the Black Corps of Engineers performed notably and unselfishly on the project;
Whereas on November 20, 1942, the Alcan Highway was completed in an astonishing 8 months and 12 days, becoming one of the Nation's greatest public works projects in the 20th century;

Whereas the Alcan Highway became the only land route that strategically linked the northern territory to the remainder of the continental United States and facilitated the construction of airstrips for refueling planes and vital supply routes during World War II;

Whereas although considerable praise was bestowed upon soldiers for exemplary work in constructing the Alcan Highway, the soldiers of the Black Corps of Engineers were seldom recognized; and

Whereas despite enduring indignities and double standards, the soldiers of the Black Corps of Engineers contributed unselfishly to the western defense in World War II and these contributions helped lead to the subsequent integration of the military: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress honors the soldiers of the Army's Black Corps of Engineers for their contributions in constructing the Alaska-Canada highway during World War II and recognizes the importance of these contributions to the subsequent integration of the military.
Passed the House of Representatives February 17, 2005.

Attest: Clerk. 109th CONGRESS 1st Session H. CON. RES. 67

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Honoring the soldiers of the Army's Black Corps of Engineers for their contributions in constructing the Alaska-Canada highway during World War II and recognizing the importance of these contributions to the subsequent integration of the military.

There are 2 versions of Bill Number H.CON.RES.67 for the 109th Congress

1 . Honoring the soldiers of the Army's Black Corps of Engineers for their contributions in constructing the Alaska-Canada highway during World War II and recognizing the importance of... (Introduced in House)[H.CON.RES.67.IH]

2 . Whereas the bombing of Pearl Harbor necessitated constructing an overland route between Alaska and the lower 48 States for military purposes; (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House)[H.CON.RES.67.EH]

Bush, Chirac, Common Values, Vision

President and President Chirac Discuss Common Values, Vision

Ambassador's Residence United States Embassy Brussels, Belgium 7:13 P.M. (Local)

PRESIDENT BUSH: It's my honor to be joining Jacques Chirac for dinner. I thank you for coming, sir. I've really been looking forward to this moment.

Every time I meet with Jacques he's got good advice. And I'm looking forward to listening to you. We've got a lot of issues to talk about: Middle Eastern peace, Lebanon, Iran, helping to feed the hungry, working together to help spread medicines necessary to cure illness.

So, Mr. President, thank you very much for your -- coming back for dinner, and thank you for your time.

PRESIDENT CHIRAC: (As translated.) Thank you. It's, of course, a great pleasure, it always is great pleasure to meet with President Bush. And let me take this opportunity to thank him for his very warm welcome to me today, as always.

Now, President Bush and I have always shared very -- always had very warm relations, which, in fact, translate, to a certain extent, of relations -- of warm relations that have always been characterized -- the links between our countries and the relations, be they bilateral or transatlantic ones, which have always been excellent between France and the United States.

Indeed, we have struggled for some two centuries, 200 years now, to uphold and keep alive these values which we share, and which our people share and hold very dear to their hearts, and which we are very attached to.

We are present together, that is to say France and the United States, in some of the world's hot spots. I'm thinking of Afghanistan, I'm thinking of the Balkans, of course. But I'm thinking also of what we're doing in Haiti and in Africa. I'm thinking also of our excellent cooperation over the tragedy in Asia, from the tsunami here. And let me take this opportunity to thank the President for all the help that was extended to our military by the American military. For instance, the making available to our military of American helicopters, which made our work that much easier.

So we do share many, many ideals and values. We have many things in common. For instance, we, together, are struggling against the scourge of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. And we adopted -- we have the same approach to the situation which is prevailing in Lebanon, especially following the murder of former Prime Minister Hariri, who, of course, was a man who enshrined the ideals of democracy, independence and liberty of that country.

Therefore, I am looking forward to a very constructive discussion, and I welcome this new opportunity to meet with the President, and in a broader context, which is that of the continuing dialogue, ongoing dialogue between the United States and the rest of Europe.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Tom.

Q For both Presidents: You talked about Russia, Mr. President, in your speech. What practical things can you do to pressure Russia to go back to a path towards democracy? And should you, for instance, make membership in the WTO contingent on Russia renewing its commitment to democracy? For both Presidents, please.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Part of the WTO requirements are that there be an open market, that there be a liberal economy. And open markets and liberal economies tend to attract countries that are open to the voices of their people.

I look forward to seeing Vladimir Putin in two days. I've got a good relationship with Vladimir; I intend to keep it that way. But as well, I intend to remind him that if his interests lie West, that we share values, and that we -- and those values are important. They're not only important for people that live within Russia, they're important to have good relations with the West.

Q The first question to President Chirac. You have said, sir, yourself, that relations have always been excellent between France and the United States. We get the sense that in recent weeks they have become even better. They have become warmer and that there's a veritable new honeymoon, as it were, taking place.

And to you, President Bush, may I ask the following question: If, indeed, relations have improved, if certainly they are better between France and the United States, are they good enough as yet for that to warrant an invitation to President Chirac to go to the United States, or even to your ranch? (Laughter.)

PRESIDENT BUSH: I'm looking for a good cowboy. (Laughter.)

PRESIDENT CHIRAC: (As translated.) Let me say, repeat what I already said, namely, that our relations are, indeed, excellent. But they have been excellent for over 200 years now, because -- why do I say that? Because they are based upon common values, common values that we share. And these things don't change overnight, with the wave of a wand.

Now, of course, that doesn't mean that because we share common values we don't -- we necessarily agree on everything all the time. Of course, we can have our differences, our divergence of opinion. Recently, this was the case; we didn't share the same view over Iraq. But this in no way affects or in no way undermines the bedrock of our relations, namely, our common values and our common vision. And I repeat what I said earlier on, namely, that I feel it's so important that within the broader context of U.S.-EU relations, this relationship should continue to be cemented, broadened and strengthened.

PRESIDENT BUSH: This is my first dinner since I've been re-elected on European soil, and it's with Jacques Chirac -- and that ought to say something. It ought to say how important this relationship is for me, personally, and how important this relationship is for my country.

END 7:23 P.M. (Local)For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 21, 2005

Bush and Chirac on Lebanon

Joint Statement by President Bush and President Chirac on Lebanon

The United States and France join with the European Union and the international community in condemning the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, and in their support for a free, independent, and democratic Lebanon. We support the U.N. investigation into this terrorist act and urge the full cooperation of all parties in order to identify those responsible for this act.

We urge full and immediate implementation of UNSCR 1559 in all its aspects, including its call for a sovereign, independent, and democratic Lebanon as well as for the consolidation of security under the authority of a Lebanese government free from foreign domination.

Lebanon's forthcoming parliamentary elections can mark another milestone in Lebanon's return to independence and democracy if they are free and fair, conducted without outside interference, and guaranteed by international observers. The implementation of UNSCR 1559 is essential to the organization and success of these elections. The people of Lebanon deserve this opportunity, and we stand with them in their aspirations for freedom, sovereignty, and security. # # #

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary February 21, 2005

hunter s. thompson, 65 awol

"Strange memories on this nervous night. Years later? It seems like a life time, or at least a Main Era- the kind of peak that never comes again. A very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run...but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant...

History is hard to know, because of all the hired bullshit, but even without being sure of "history" it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time- and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened.

My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights- or very early mornings...being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was. No doubt at all about that...

There was madness in any direction, at any hour. You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right,that we were winning...

And that, I think was the handle- that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn't need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting- on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave...

So now, years later, you can go up on a steep hill and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark- that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back."

from falilv

S.256 Bankruptcy Reform Bill

Senate Committee on the Judiciary, mark-up of the S.256 Bankruptcy Reform Bill

PREPARED STATEMENT OF SEN. CHUCK GRASSLEY: I'm glad we're marking up S. 256, the bankruptcy reform bill, which I believe we all consider to be unfinished business. We've debated bankruptcy reform at great length and in excruciating detail over the past four Congresses. Both the House and Senate have held numerous hearings on all aspects of bankruptcy. In the 106th Congress, the Senate passed a bipartisan bankruptcy bill by a vote of 70 to 28. Unfortunately, President Clinton pocket-vetoed that bill, and the Senate didn't have the opportunity to override it, even though we had the votes to do so.

Then we took up the same bankruptcy bill in the 107th Congress. The Senate passed a bipartisan, compromise bankruptcy reform bill by a vote of 85 to 13, and we went to conference with the House. Unfortunately, the Schumer abortion provision contained in the conference committee report derailed passage of the bill because the House wouldn't take it.

In the 108th Congress, the House passed a bill which contained the exact same language of the 107th Congress bankruptcy conference committee report without the abortion language. In fact, the House passed that bill twice in the 108th Congress - the first time it passed the H.R. bill, but the Senate never took it up; and then it passed the bill a second time by amending a Senate bill with it and requesting a conference, but the Senate was denied going to conference by the Democrats.

I'm hopeful that we'll be able to move swiftly in this Congress and finally get the bankruptcy bill done. That's why Senators Hatch, Sessions, Shelby, Carper and Ben Nelson joined me in reintroducing S. 256, the exact same bankruptcy conference report that was approved by both the House and Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support, but without the poison pill abortion provision.

I repeat, this bill is unfinished business. We aren't covering any new ground. In fact, we don't even need to be in Committee. But in the interest of addressing procedural concerns, we're holding this markup today. I'd like to keep this markup short and sweet because I don't think that the bill should be changed at all. We already have a good bill that contains many provisions that have been negotiated meticulously on the floor and in conference. We had a lot of give and take on both sides of the aisle. So this language before us is a carefully crafted compromise that shouldn't be upset. That's why I'd like to keep the bill as clean as possible, and not reopen any matters that have been compromised on. I'm urging my colleagues to reject any amendments that will disrupt the negotiated compromise language reached in conference committee - the language that received bipartisan support, including that of the Judiciary Committee ranking member.

Let me say a few words about the bill before us today. The current bankruptcy system needs to be reformed. Presently, when individuals file for bankruptcy under Chapter 7, a court proceeding takes place, and their debts are simply erased. Every time a debt is wiped away through bankruptcy, someone loses money. When someone loses money in this way, he or she has to decide either to assume the loss as a cost of business, or raise prices for other customers to make up that loss.

When bankruptcy losses are infrequent, lenders can just swallow the loss. But when they are frequent, lenders need to raise prices to other consumers to offset their losses.

The result of the bankruptcy crisis is that hardworking, law abiding Americans have to pay higher prices for goods and services. S. 256 would make it harder for individuals who can repay their debts from filing bankruptcy under Chapter 7. It's only fair to require people who can repay their debts to pull their own weight. But under current bankruptcy law, one can get full debt cancellation in Chapter 7 with no questions asked. The bill asks the question of whether repayment is possible by an individual, and if it is, then he or she will be channeled into Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires people to repay a portion of their debt as a pre-condition for limited debt cancellation.

So I'm clear, S. 256 specifically provides that people of limited income can still use the bankruptcy system under Chapter 7. S. 256 contains a very flexible means test that will consider special circumstances for each debtor, and as such, keeps the safety net in place for those individuals who truly need to have a fresh start because of unexpected downturns in their lives. But the free ride is over for people who have higher incomes and who can repay their debts. We want to keep the bankruptcy safety net, but we want to fight the abuses with the current system. Bankruptcy shouldn't be accepted as a convenient financial planning tool for deadbeats, while honest Americans have to foot the bill.

The bankruptcy bill also contains tough new consumer protections, like new procedures to prevent companies from using threats to coerce debtors into paying debts which could be wiped away once they are in bankruptcy. The bill requires the Justice Department to concentrate law enforcement resources on enforcing consumer protection laws against abusive debt collection practices. It contains new disclosures for consumers by mandating that credit card companies provide key information about how much they owe and how long it will take to pay off their credit card debt by only making a minimum payment. Consumers will also be given a toll-free number to call where they can get information about how long it will take to pay off their own credit card balances if they make only the minimum payments. This will educate consumers and improve consumers' understanding of their financial situation.

Moreover, our bill makes changes to help particularly vulnerable segments of our society. For example, child support claimants are given a higher priority when the assets of a bankruptcy estate are distributed to creditors. Bankruptcy trustees and creditors of bankrupts will be required to give information about the location of deadbeat parents who owe child support.

S. 256 also makes Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code permanent. This means that America's family farms are guaranteed the ability to reorganize. But the bill goes further. It makes improvements to Chapter 12 so it will be more accessible and helpful for farmers.

I look forward to moving forward with this bill and enacting meaningful bankruptcy reform. -30-

IRAQI MEDIA NETWORK REPORTER KIDNAPPED BY TERRORISTS

IRAQI MEDIA NETWORK REPORTER KIDNAPPED BY TERRORISTS

MOSUL, Iraq – An Iraqi Media Network worker was kidnapped by terrorists in Mosul Feb. 20.

Iraqi Media Network reporter Raaeda Al-Wazan was abducted while on her way to work. Terrorists contacted the station and threatened to continue to target employees.

The Mosul IMN station has been targeted by terorrists several times in the past week because they have been broadcasting programs that highlighted the negative effects of terrorist activity. Those programs have had rapidly growing support from Iraqi citizens and therefore have caused the station to be targeted.

Terrorists continue to disregard their fellow citizens, as Iraqi Security Forces and Multi-National Forces continue to perform operations to ensure the safety of Iraqi citizens. -30-

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND 7115 South Boundary Boulevard MacDill AFB, Fla. 33621-5101 Phone: (813) 827-5894; FAX: (813) 827-2211; DSN 651-5894 February 21, 2005 Release Number: 05-02-13 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Turkish Cypriot Election Results

Turkish Cypriot Election Results

In their vote on Sunday, February 20, Turkish Cypriots exercised their right to participate in free, fair and democratic elections. We welcome the result as a reaffirmation of the Turkish Cypriot commitment to a comprehensive solution and reunification of the island with Greek Cypriots.

The United States will continue to work with the United Nations' Secretary General Kofi Annan to promote a just and durable solution to the long-standing division of the island, based on the Secretary General's settlement plan.

2005/224 Press Statement Richard Boucher, Spokesman Washington, DC Released on February 21, 2005