The letter reads, “Both programs have had substantial problems since their inception. The high-risk pools were, according to the Chief Actuary of Medicare and Medicaid, intended to enroll 375,000 individuals in 2010. According to your testimony, only approximately 12,000 individuals are enrolled in that program.
“Unlike the high-risk pools, demand for the resources of the ERRP has been intense. We are deeply troubled that this program has apparently served as a vehicle to simply hand out taxpayer funds to various corporations and unions that lined up at the trough. It does not appear that HHS instituted any meaningful controls on this program, leading to an incredible waste of taxpayer money.”
The letter continued, “The committee is also interested in learning why your office has not imposed some basic administrative requirements on the ERRP that would prevent the wholesale waste of billions of dollars of taxpayer funds.”
In the letter, the members requested CCIIO to provide the following information on a biweekly basis:
• Enrollment and expenditures in the high risk pools, including enrollment numbers for each state running their own high risk pools and the enrollment in the federal high risk pool; updated information about the amount of funding utilized by each state and the federal program, and whether this represents a deviation from the spending patterns as originally estimated.
• Expenditures in the ERRP, including a list of expenditures for the ERRP that includes the total amount given to each plan sponsor and the total amount spent by the ERRP.
###
TEXT CREDIT: House Energy and Commerce Committee January 11, 2011 By Alexa Marrero, (202) 225-3641 or Sean Bonyun, (202) 225-3761 2125 Rayburn House Office Building | Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 225-2927
IMAGE CREDIT: This United States Congress image is in the public domain. This may be because it is an official Congressional portrait, because it was taken by an official employee of the Congress, or because it has been released into the public domain and posted on the official websites of a member of Congress. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the image is in the public domain.
No comments:
Post a Comment