Thursday, January 25, 2007

State Department Daily Press Briefing, 01/25/07 (VIDEO, PODCAST)

Daily Press Briefing, Spokesman Sean McCormack, FULL STREAMING VIDEO, file is windows media format, running time is 43:25, PODCAST of Briefing mp3 format for download. Streaming Audio of briefing mp3 in m3u format for online listening.

Department Spokesman Sean McCormack (shown during the  Daily Press Briefing) was sworn in as Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and Department Spokesman on June 2, 2005. Immediately prior to returning to the State Department, Mr. McCormack served as Special Assistant to the President, Spokesman for the National Security Council, and Deputy White House Press Secretary for Foreign Policy. State Department Photo by Michael Gross.Department Spokesman Sean McCormack (shown during the Daily Press Briefing) was sworn in as Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and Department Spokesman on June 2, 2005.
Immediately prior to returning to the State Department, Mr. McCormack served as Special Assistant to the President, Spokesman for the National Security Council, and Deputy White House Press Secretary for Foreign Policy. State Department Photo by Michael Gross. FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT:, 12:40 p.m. EST.

INDEX: ECUADOR, Helicopter Collision / Death of Defense Minister

GEORGIA / RUSSIA, Attempted Nuclear Material Smuggling, Cooperation from Russian Government

GREECE, Reports of Organization Claiming Responsibility for Attack on U.S. Embassy

LEBANON, Violence at Beirut Arab University / Political Tensions, U.S. Stands with Siniora Government and Lebanese People, Positive Effects of Monetary Assistance, Businesses Investing in Lebanon, Outside Forces Such as Syria & Iran and Hezbollah Created Tense Atmosphere, Forces Working to Undermine Government and Democratic Progress, U.S. Welcomes Positive Efforts of Regional Actors

IRAN, No Sign Iran will Play a Positive Role in Lebanon’s Future / Support Hezbollah, Internal Debate Within Iranian Political System on Nuclear Issue

UNITED NATIONS / NORTH KOREA, UNDP Funding

AFGHANISTAN, Secretary Rice will Propose Substantial Amount of U.S. Assistance, U.S. Assistance will Target Reconstruction and Security / Reinforces Successes, Reports that Pakistani Intelligence Assisting the Taliban, Roots of Poppy Cultivation and Opium Production / Counter-Narcotics Efforts, Cementing the Democratic System at Regional and Local Levels.

DEPARTMENT, Under Secretary Robert Joseph’s Resignation, Senior Position Vacancies in Department / Robert Novak’s Critical Comments

TURKEY/IRAQ, Turkish Concerns Regarding Terrorism from PKK

IRAQ, Status of Kirkuk

Technorati Tags: and or and , or and or , or and ,, or , and , or , and , or , and , or , and

Somalia, Horn of Africa, al Qaeda

A starboard view of the Arleigh Burke Class Guided Missile Destroyer, USS OKANE (DDG 77) underway in the Indian Ocean (IOC) conducting Maritime Security Operations (MSO)
off the coast of Somalia in support of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). (Released to Public)

DoD photo by: PH1 (SW) AARON ANSAROV, USN Date Shot: 27 Apr 2005 High Resolution Image

U.S. Working With Countries in Horn of Africa to Go After al Qaeda, By Kathleen T. Rhem. American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Jan. 24, 2007 – The United States will track down al Qaeda operatives wherever they try to find safe haven, including in the Horn of Africa, a senior Defense Department official said today.

“We have, for some time, been concerned about al Qaeda operating in that region, and that’s why we’re working with countries throughout that (area of responsibility) to identify track, seek, capture and, if necessary, kill al Qaeda working, taking safe haven, operating in that region,” Bryan Whitman, deputy assistant defense secretary for media relations, told reporters today.
He did not, however, confirm media reports that the United States this week carried out an air strike on an al Qaeda target in Somalia, on Africa’s eastern coast.

“The nature of some of our operations are such that I just won’t be able to provide you much information (on every occasion),” he said.

A strike by a U.S. AC-130 gunship on Jan. 7 targeted a senior terrorist leader in Somalia. Officials have not yet released information on that mission’s success.

A senior defense official, speaking on background, stressed that some operations are better left unpublicized. “There are operations that we conduct that are of the nature that don’t lend themselves to public discourse,” the official said. “But I think we all understand that the success of some of these operations is predicated on our ability to conduct them in the ways in which we have to.”

The official noted that many military operations are never discussed in public. “The very nature of our special operations, for example, when we do special operations, are not something that lend themselves to being able to be discussed in a public kind of way, because their success is predicated on their ability to be carried out in a fashion that is not on the front page of every newspaper,” he said.

The official also stressed that operations in the Horn of Africa are conducted in cooperation with governments in the region. “We are working very closely with countries in the region because of the fact that there are known terrorists that are seeking to try to take harbor, to plan, and to conduct operations in that region,” he said.

Technorati Tags: and or and ,

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Schwarzenegger Signs Greenhouse Gas Standard (VIDEO)

Gov. Schwarzenegger Signs Executive Order Establishing World's First Low Carbon Standard for Transportation Fuels, FULL STREAMING VIDEO

World's first Greenhouse Gas Standard for transportation fuels will reduce dependence on oil, boost clean technology industry in California and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Continuing his historic leadership to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and lower California's reliance on foreign oil, Governor Schwarzenegger signed an Executive Order
establishing a groundbreaking Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) for transportation fuels sold in California. By 2020 the standard will reduce the carbon intensity of California's passenger vehicle fuels by at least 10 percent. This first-of-its kind standard will support AB 32 emissions targets as part of California's overall strategy to fight global warming.

"Like the rest of the nation, California relies excessively on oil to meet its transportation needs. In fact, 96 percent of our transportation fuel is oil. And that means our transportation fuels are responsible for more than 40 percent of California's greenhouse gas emissions," said Governor Schwarzenegger. "Being dependent on one source of fuel leaves our economy and our national security vulnerable to price shocks and global events beyond our control. Reducing the carbon content of transportation fuels sold in California by just 10 percent means we will replace 20 percent of our gasoline consumption with lower-carbon fuels, more than triple the size of the state's renewable fuels market, and add 7 million alternative fuel vehicles to our roads.

"Right now, entrepreneurs from around the world are investing billions of dollars in clean technologies and alternative fuels. With this initiative, we are saying invest in California.

"We continue to set the example for the nation and the world on how to ensure a clean, healthy and secure future for our children and grandchildren."

The LCFS requires fuel providers to ensure that the mix of fuel they sell into the California market meets, on average, a declining standard for GHG emissions measured in CO2-equivalent gram per unit of fuel energy sold. By 2020, the LCFS will produce a 10 percent reduction in the carbon content of all passenger vehicle fuels sold in California. This is expected to replace 20 percent of our on-road gasoline consumption with lower-carbon fuels, more than triple the size of the state's renewable fuels market, and place more than 7 million alternative fuel or hybrid vehicles on California's roads (20 times more than on our roads today).

The LCFS will use market-based mechanisms that allow providers to choose how they reduce emissions while responding to consumer demand. For example, providers may purchase and blend more low-carbon ethanol into gasoline products, purchase credits from electric utilities supplying low carbon electrons to electric passenger vehicles, diversify into low carbon hydrogen as a product and more, including new strategies yet to be developed.

The University of California estimates that the Governor's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions goals can increase Gross State Product by about $60 billion and create over 20,000 new jobs. As a result of AB 32 and other initiatives, including the Million Solar Roofs and Hydrogen Highway projects, the Bioenergy Action Plan and the Strategic Innovation and Research Initiative, California drives clean technology research, investment and development nationally. California leads the nation in clean tech investment, attracting $484 million in venture capital to California in 2005 alone-40 percent to startups in energy generation and efficiency sectors. The Low Carbon Fuel Standard further expands the state's clean tech market by creating more sustainable demand for cleaner fuels.

The Governor's Executive Order directs the Secretary for Environmental Protection to coordinate the actions of the California Energy Commission (CEC), the University of California and other agencies to develop a draft compliance schedule to meet the 2020 goals for carbon intensity reductions in transportation fuels. This analysis will become part of the State Implementation Plan for alternative fuels as required by AB 1007 (Pavley, Chapter 371, 2005) and will be submitted to the California Air Resources Board for consideration as an "early action" item under AB 32. The ARB will complete its review of the LCFS protocols for adoption as an early action no later than June, 2007. The ARB will also begin a regulatory process in the summer of 2007 to implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. It is expected that the regulatory process at ARB to implement the new standard will be completed no later than December, 2008.

In 2005, there were more than 24 million vehicles registered in California which is more than one per licensed driver. Statewide gasoline consumption was almost 16 billion gallons in 2005 which is second only to the entire United States and slightly more than that of Japan (a country with four times the population). Currently, there are only 80,000 hybrids and 240,000 flex-fuel vehicles on our roads today, together composing only 1.3% of all cars in California.

Last September, Gov. Schwarzenegger signed AB 32 by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez (D-Los Angeles), California's landmark bill that established a first-in-the-world comprehensive program of regulatory and market mechanisms to achieve real, quantifiable, cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gases.

01/18/2007 GAAS:039:07 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE State of California

Technorati Tags: and or and , or and , or , and , or , and , or

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

State of the Union Address 2007 LIVE VIDEO

State of the Union Address 2007 FULL STREAMING VIDEO, PODCAST of Speech mp3 format for download. Streaming Audio of speech mp3 in m3u format for online listening.



2007 State of the Union Address Policy Initiatives, Full PDF Document (138KB)

State of the Union Address 2007 Review and Preview


Technorati Tags: and or and , or and , or , and , or , and ,

State of the Union 2007 LIVE VIDEO

State of the Union Address 2007 FULL STREAMING VIDEO, PODCAST of Speech mp3 format for download. Streaming Audio of speech mp3 in m3u format for online listening.



2007 State of the Union Address Policy Initiatives, Full PDF Document (138KB)

State of the Union Address 2007 Review and Preview


Technorati Tags: and or and , or and , or , and , or , and ,

State of the Union 2007 Review and Preview

UPDATE: 01/23/07 10:30 P.M. EST. State of the Union Address 2007 FULL STREAMING VIDEO, PODCAST of Speech mp3 format for download. Streaming Audio of speech mp3 in m3u format for online listening. FULL TEXT of Speech and a Photo Gallery of Speech



2007 State of the Union Address Policy Initiatives, Full PDF Document (138KB)
State of the Union Address Outlines President’s Agenda, 2007 State of the Union Policy Initiatives (POINT by POINT PREVIEW), Bush’s address to Congress and the nation. Traslations of this Article: Русский, Russian. Español, Spanish. Français, French. this article in Arabic, Arabic, PODCAST FOR THIS ARTICLE.

Washington -- President Bush is scheduled to deliver his State of the Union address this evening to Congress, the nation and a worldwide television and Internet audience.

The U.S. Constitution requires that the president report to Congress "from time to time" on the "State of the Union." This constitutional requirement has evolved into the president's annual State of the Union address, which now serves several purposes. The speech reports on the condition of the United States both domestically and internationally, recommends a legislative agenda for the coming year and gives the president the opportunity to convey personally his vision for the nation.

In his 2006 speech, Bush urged the United States to engage the international community as a means of building prosperity, security, freedom and hope around the world. (VIDEO, PODCAST and TEXT of 2006 State of the Union Speech)
President George W. Bush reads over a draft of his State of the Union speech in the Oval Office Tuesday morning, Jan. 31, 2006, in preparation for the annual address to the nation scheduled for this evening. White House photo by Eric Draper.President George W. Bush reacts to applause during his State of the Union Address at the Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2006. White House photo by Eric Draper.President George W. Bush delivers his State of the Union Address at the Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2006. White House photo by Eric Draper.President George W. Bush greets members of Congress after his State of the Union Address at the Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2006. White House photo by Eric Draper.
The tradition of the State of the Union address dates back to 1790 when George Washington, the first U.S. president, delivered his "Annual Message" to Congress in New York City, then the provisional capital of the United States. His successor, John Adams, followed suit.

But the nation's third president, Thomas Jefferson, felt that such elaborate displays were not suitable for the new democratic republic. He delivered a written message rather than appearing in person. Jefferson's influence was such that for more than a century thereafter presidents delivered written Annual Messages to Congress.

In the early decades of the republic, most of these messages were lists of bills the president wanted the Congress to enact -- reflecting the tenor of the times and the practical problems involved in building the young American nation. The speeches also dealt with the international situation and America's place in the world.

During the crisis that, more than any other, threatened the very existence of the American union -- the Civil War -- Abraham Lincoln wrote perhaps the most eloquent and memorable of all presidential messages sent to Congress.

"In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free -- honorable alike in what we give and what we preserve," wrote Lincoln in 1862.

In 1913, Woodrow Wilson revived the practice of delivering the Annual Message in person. This was a timely decision because the United States was on the eve of a mass media revolution that soon would bring presidents into the homes of Americans, first through radio, then by television.

With the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932, Americans became accustomed to hearing their presidents on radio as well as to seeing and hearing them on the newsreels at the movies.

In 1945, the Annual Message formally became known as the State of the Union address. It also became a television, as well as radio, staple as sales of television sets skyrocketed in the 1950s. In recognition of the power of television to deliver the president's words to a huge audience, President Lyndon Johnson shifted the time of the address from the traditional midday to evening when more viewers could watch.

The tradition of the opposition response began in 1966 when two Republican congressmen, including future President Gerald Ford, delivered a televised Republican response to President Johnson's State of the Union address.

The broadcast of the State of the Union address on television and the wide national and international audience it attracts -- an estimated 38 million viewers watched Bush's 2005 address -- have changed the fundamental nature of the message, according to political observers.

The 2007 address will mark the 218th Annual Message or State of the Union address and the 74th such address delivered in person. Although there will be a major focus on domestic issues, both American and overseas observers will be listening closely to the president's words as he outlines his vision for the nation in the upcoming year and beyond.

USINFO will publish both the full text of the address and a summary of its key elements related to U.S. foreign policy.

(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: usinfo.state.gov )

Traslations of this Article: Русский, Russian. Español, Spanish. Français, French. this article in Arabic, Arabic

Technorati Tags: and or and , or and , or , and , or , and ,

Monday, January 22, 2007

Press Briefing Tony Snow 01/22/07 (VIDEO)

White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, Tuesday, May 16, 2006, fields questions during his first briefing after replacing Scott McClellan. White House photo by Paul Morse.Press Briefing by Tony Snow, FULL STREAMING VIDEO. file is windows media format, running time is 26:09. White House Conference Center Briefing Room.
White House Press Secretary Tony Snow briefs the press and answers questions. 01/22/2007: WASHINGTON, DC: 10:20 A.M. EST.

MR. SNOW: Good morning, hope you all had a good weekend. Here is a quick run-through on the President's schedule. He is at Camp David right now; he's had normal briefings through the morning. At 12:05 p.m. there will be a phone call to the March for Life participants. At about 1:15 p.m. he will return to the White House and he will continue speech preparation and do some practicing today at the White House, in anticipation and preparation for State of the Union.

Questions.

Q So it's all done?

MR. SNOW: No, still working on it. I know that he's done some edits this morning, and still working through it. My guess is that there will be some revisions today and probably some tomorrow. But at this point, it's more in the form of polishing up.

Q Length?

MR. SNOW: Better wait until we finish doing the tweaks.

Q Ballpark?

MR. SNOW: Forty-plus.

Q Have you seen it?

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q Is it any good?

MR. SNOW: Yes, of course it's good. (Laughter.)

Q Does it have anything new in it?

MR. SNOW: Yes, it does.

Q What's the best part?

Q Really? I mean --

MR. SNOW: You know, it's difficult to say. It's like looking in a drawer full of diamonds. (Laughter.)

Q Has anything changed drastically in the version that you saw before the weekend, or after the weekend?

MR. SNOW: "Drastically"? No.

Q In terms of emphasis? I mean, is there --

MR. SNOW: No.

Q -- increased emphasis on Iraq? Is there --

MR. SNOW: No, it's really, kind of, the portions -- the way in which the subject matter is laid out has been pretty consistent through the drafts.

Q There's a number of CEOs who are in town pushing for mandatory caps on carbon emissions. Is the President willing to talk to them? Does he feel out of step with this prevailing opinion?

MR. SNOW: No, I think it's important to let the President go ahead and have his say at the State of the Union. As we have said, there are no -- there has been some talk about, sort of, binding economy-wide carbon caps in the speech, but they are not part of the President's proposal. I'm not going to go and announce to you what the President's proposal is, but it's worth saying that the President has always believed, when it comes to climate change, that the best way to achieve reductions is through innovation and to figure out ways to come up with energy sources that are going to meet our economy's constant demand for energy, and at the same time, do it in a way that's going to be friendly for the environment.

Jim.

Q With the President's approval ratings as low as they are, with so much attention focused on Iraq, how concerned are you that most of the other stuff will be background noise, white noise, nobody is really going to pay much attention?

MR. SNOW: Well, if you take a look at what Americans care about -- things like health care -- they care about it. Americans want a system that's going to be more patient-friendly and that's going to meet their needs. The President will talk about that. When you ask about health care, that's clearly important. You ask about education, always important -- you're a parent and you know. Immigration has been an issue of considerable concern within this country.

In other words, the President is going to address the areas that are foremost concern for Americans -- energy and energy security.

Q I don't doubt that he's going to address them and I don't doubt that they're important to Americans. What I'm wondering about is, is he compromised at this point to an extent to which he can do anything about them?

MR. SNOW: What's interesting is the President is going to offer some bold proposals that Congress could, in fact, enact, and in the process make itself look good and, more importantly, do the people 's business. So George W. Bush as a President is not somebody who is going to cease to be bold because there has been -- because right now people are concerned about the progress of the war. Instead he understands his obligation as Commander-in-Chief is to go ahead forthrightly big problems and come up with solutions that not only are going to have political appeal, but they're also going to be effective in making life better for Americans.

When you have a Democratic Congress that came in two weeks ago saying, we want to get things done, we've got some offers that they're going to be pretty good for them.

Q Over the weekend we just had the third worst day in the war in terms of U.S. casualties, and then today I think there were 70 people killed in Baghdad. Is the President going to talk about the extent, the increase in violence and what can be done about it?

MR. SNOW: Well, he has talked about it. And the President also noted the other day that what's really going on is that you can expect as there is push-back that there is going to be some increase in violence. But on the other hand, what's been going on, on the ground -- and you've seen the Prime Minister being more assertive when it comes to dealing with militias; you've seen the Prime Minister being more assertive when it comes to political reconciliation -- the benchmarks and the kinds of things that people have identified as absolutely necessary to the long-term progress of democracy in Iraq the Maliki government has been addressing.

We do not yet have the Iraqi brigades into Baghdad, but they are on the move. We do not have the U.S. battalions deployed, but they will be ready to support when the Iraqis get there. So I think what you're seeing is a clear signal that the Maliki government is very serious about addressing, on a non-sectarian basis, the problem of those who are trying to operate outside the law.

You also understand, Terry, that they know that the media will focus on body counts and will focus on large acts of violence because that for the terrorists is a victory. But what is a defeat are some of the things going on behind the scenes right now in terms of the political reconciliation efforts, in terms of you saw Muqtada al Sadr saying to the members of his party and the council representatives, get back to doing business. It's one of the reasons why they had a quorum yesterday in the meeting of council representatives.

So we're at the beginning stages now of this new way forward. And, certainly, what we have seen on the part of the Iraqi government are affirmative actions in terms of security and in terms of political reconciliation that I think satisfy conditions that members of both parties wanted to see.

Q Will he urge Congress to support the troop increase and his policies, rather than vote against him, as is being --

MR. SNOW: I think I'll let -- we'll let the President have his say tomorrow night.

Q Tony, is Iraq the most important issue facing the U.S.?

MR. SNOW: Bret, it's hard to say. Iraq certainly is the central front in the war on terror. If you take a look at the country that's bracketed by Iran and Syria, a nation where a successful democracy would send a very powerful signal, including to people in Iran and Syria who would love to see democracies in their own countries, that's -- it's a vital concern. But Americans also have a lot of other domestic concerns. And as a President one tries, or the President is trying to go ahead and to take a good, thoughtful, tough look at problems that aren't going to go away, no matter who is President, and say, as President, it is the obligation of the Chief Executive to take a look at all the business before the American people and address it.

Q So after the speech on Iraq, will the President -- talking about the balance that Jim mentioned -- spend less time dealing with this major issue of Iraq and more time on domestic issues?

MR. SNOW: There will be a significant amount of time -- again, you guys can get out the stopwatches tomorrow night. There will be a significant amount of time devoted not just to Iraq, but to the war on terror and to the way in which we plan to move forward in addressing it.

Q Change of topic real quick. Any comment on the Chinese situation with the shoot-down of that satellite? And what's the latest as far as hearing from China about that?

MR. SNOW: No, nothing. Nothing more than what we've had.

Q What does the President think of Hillary Clinton's announcing that she's running for President?

MR. SNOW: He's not commenting on it. We'll let Democrats go ahead and proceed with their business.

Q Do you think that -- you know, she may be the first one to say that she'll go through both the general and primary season without using federal funding. Is it time for, perhaps, the government to end federal financing of campaigns?

MR. SNOW: Well, that's not something that will be addressed in the State of the Union address. If members of Congress wish to take it up, they may.

Q On State of the Union, then, a lot of what you're talking about, bold proposals, all of these are issues that the President has talked about many, many times before. Is he coming up with ideas that he's never thought of before?

MR. SNOW: Well, again, you'll have to wait and see. We've already shown you a bit of what we're talking about with health care. And I think -- that is a proposal that is really bold and offers an opportunity to open up the health care system in a way that it's never had before to Americans to have programs that are going to meet their individual needs, and also to people who are not presently insured, to get them access to the system.

Q At its final day of meeting, the Republican National Committee passed a resolution denouncing the campaign, the bipartisan campaign, the Finance Reform Act, and called on Congress to completely deregulate the funding of political campaigns. Is the President aware of the resolution? And what does he --

MR. SNOW: I don't know if he's aware of it, and I've had no conversation with it, and I don't even want to fake it. Again, that's something that is not going to appear in the State of the Union address, and if members want to be taking it up on both parties, they can do so.

Q One other question, Tony. Yesterday, Serbia had its election and it appears as though the radical party was the top vote-getter and may well be in the government. This, of course, is the party, the nationalist, headed by followers of the late Slobadan Milosevic, its leader is awaiting the War Crimes Tribunal right now. How does the U.S. feel about this party being in the government of Serbia?

MR. SNOW: Well, that's a very good question. That now becomes the -- that is asterisk material because, believe it or not, I had not prepared for the Serbian election today. So we'll put it -- we'll attach an answer as an asterisk to the transcript.(*)

Q In her announcement on Saturday, Senator Clinton talked about finding the right end, as she called it, to the war in Iraq. Does the administration feel like it knows what she thinks the right end is?

MR. SNOW: Again, I'm not going to comment -- we're just not going to engage on Senator Clinton's discussions of a potential campaign.

Q Are we building the largest embassy in the world in Baghdad, and also permanent military bases?

MR. SNOW: "The largest embassy"? Again, Gordon --

Q In the world.

MR. SNOW: -- I'm unaware of embassy construction plans, so I'm afraid you've got me totally off balance on that one. I'll try to find out. And as we've always said when it comes to military, we will work with the Iraqis and respond to their requests.

Q Tony, on the attacks over the weekend, what --

Q Have they asked us to have a --

MR. SNOW: I'm not going to get into that. Go ahead.

Q What? That's a nonsense answer.

MR. SNOW: Well, it's -- I won't characterize the question. Go ahead.

Q On the attacks over the weekend, the attack in Karbula, which was complex, killed five American soldiers, wounded three, and they attacked one of these outposts, which is exactly the kind of thing you're trying to set more up. Are you concerned about that, because it seems the forces are far more vulnerable in places like that? Are you concerned about the force protection since that's the major part of your plan?

MR. SNOW: I think if you want to talk about specifics on force protection and that kind of thing, if you want a technical answer --

Q I don't want a technical answer. I don't want a technical answer. Is there concern because what happened over the weekend was directed at something that's very much central to the plan?

MR. SNOW: As the President has said all along, first, you know you're going to engaging people and there's going to be violence because they're not going to go quietly into the night. Secondly, force protection is a key element, as he has described -- he described in the speech to the nation a week ago, so absolutely right. We want to do everything we can to -- number one, to develop the capability of the Iraqis so they take the lead; number two, to provide proper and appropriate support to hasten the time when the Iraqis can stand on their own; third, to make sure that we have adequate protection for our forces and continue to do what we can to provide for force protection; and number four, send a very clear signal to those trying to act outside the law, you're not going to win.

And therefore in many cases -- and we're seeing some evidence of this, people will have to make the calculation -- it would be better for me to operate within the political process rather than to operate violently on the margins.

April.

Q Tony, on the State of the Union, you said the President is breaking tradition in doing themes more so than following the budget. Is he going to break tradition in other aspects as it relates to tomorrow's night's speech? And, also, what traditionally will he hold onto?

MR. SNOW: My goodness. Let me -- rather than -- that is one of those where it's vague enough where I'm not sure exactly what boxes you want me to check. Let me just put it this way --

Q Let's talk about celebrities in the box. Will he have celebrities in the box, people in the box --

MR. SNOW: Just sit back and wait and you will see the speech. What he will be doing is concentrating primarily on key issue areas. We've outlined those before. And he will go in depth, and there will be other opportunities at other dates to talk about other elements within the President's budget that are going to be of interest to people.

But it is important, when you have these big issues -- health care is a big issue, energy is a big issue, education is a big issue, immigration is a big issue -- all of which are kind of top of mind for Americans, it's worth spending a little more time to walk through how the President analyzes the problem and how he proposes to try to address them, and to reach out to members of Congress and say, we can do this. We can work together on these things. So there's going to be a lot of that. And of course, he will be talking about Iraq and the war on terror.

Q Tony, do you honestly think now that with the bickering back and forth, and Friday, the word "poisonous" used, do you think that there is now an air of unity in this -- inside the Beltway?

MR. SNOW: I think what we're having is a period of adjustment where a party that has been in opposition for a dozen years now finds itself in a position of leadership and the responsibilities are different. And we are offering an opportunity for leaders on the Democratic side, as well as on the Republican side, to step up to the plate and to deal responsibly and creatively with real problems that Americans care about. So we'll have to see how people respond. Again, as you know, we're still in the early stages, and I think it is -- we continue to reach out to Democrats because we think it's good policy and good politics.

Paula.

Q The President, in the State of the Union -- I mean, in the radio address, mentioned health care. He did it in the context of tax reform. So does that mean his proposal will be revenue-neutral?

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q And if that's the case, how does that differ in any way to the congressional approach to pay-as-you-go, where any additional revenue cost --

MR. SNOW: Well, this is not -- it fits within pay-go guidelines.

Q Really? If there is no --

MR. SNOW: Yes, if it's revenue-neutral.

Q So there is -- so it's tax increase to pay for the revenue increase for the other --

MR. SNOW: Well, again, we will let you analyze how this whole thing works, but it is revenue-neutral.

Q One other question. On this event later today, with respect to CEOs and global warming, one of the arguments being made by them is that unless you have a mandatory cap that everyone follows and there's a level playing field, then it would be difficult to achieve greenhouse gas emissions, and it would basically put them at a competitive disadvantage.

MR. SNOW: Well, again, we will certainly be here to see what they have to say and to propose. And at the same time, the President's proposals, I think, address in a comprehensive and realistic way concerns about greenhouse emissions, and also their primary sources.

Q Tony, thank you. Two questions. Section 220 of the Senate Bill 1 would require grassroots causes, even bloggers, who communicate to 500 or more members of the public on policy matters to register and report quarterly to Congress, as lobbyists are required, with an amendment to require one year in jail if someone knowingly or willingly fails to file a report. And my question: Since Republican Senators McConnell, Kyl, Cornyn and Bennett have co-sponsored a bill to remove this section, will the President veto this if their amendment is defeated?

MR. SNOW: Well, Les, why don't we wait and see what comes before the President. We will issue veto threats when bills become ripe enough. There's a vigorous debate about this. And there are some reports also that that language has been mooted.

So I think let's wait and see what Congress has to propose, and then we'll get back to you with a statement of administration policy.

Q Thank you. With regard to today's March for Life, does the President believe that the positions of Catholic Senators Kennedy, Collins, Dodd, Biden, Kerry, Mikulski and Leahy and Speaker Pelosi on this issue, and their not being ex-communicated, means that Catholic Church opposition to all but partial-birth abortion is now as absent as the one-time voluble church opposition to contraception? (Laughter.) Do you want me to repeat it?

MR. SNOW: No. The President is not going to sit around and engage in the chin-pulling exercise of trying to determine how people may, in fact, interpret Catholic dogma. His belief on the sanctity of life is well known.

Q Does he think that the senators, though -- I mean, all of these Catholic senators have refused to support this right-to-life thing.

MR. SNOW: Les, I will permit you to stand in judgment of their Catholicism. The President has already made his views known.

Q Tony, you say that the health care plan is revenue-neutral, but he is proposing raising taxes on some Americans. And isn't that what he blasted Democrats for wanting to do all during the mid-term election campaign?

MR. SNOW: Take a look at the proposal. Once you've been fully briefed on the proposal, we'll be happy to talk about the characterizations.

Q Maybe you can explain this to me. If you tax company-provided health insurance as taxable income, even with the standard deduction, isn't that going to raise more than just 20 percent of people's taxes?

MR. SNOW: Again, there's the prospect that under the President's plan, more than 100 million people are going to pay less for health insurance, and millions more who are not presently insured will have access to it. So as we march through this, we feel pretty confident. And, frankly, we've taken a very conservative approach to the impacts of this.

You also have to keep in mind that when you get market forces at work, you get surprises -- and they're pleasant surprises. For instance, with the prescription drug benefit, I believe the original projections were fairly high. I think the Democrats were talking about -- I may be wrong on this, I mean, precisely -- but a $37-a-month premium. And now it's down in the low $20s.

Q Twenty-five.

MR. SNOW: What's now happening is that there's vigorous competition. You have major retailers talking about how they can provide prescriptions for less. You have suddenly a concern about what patients want. People are saying, hey, my pharmacy is more friendly than your old pharmacy, come here.

You're seeing a patient-oriented system that is less costly, more responsive and more effective than the old one, and cheaper -- cheaper than people had anticipated. Once you get market forces at work, you always have this -- think about consumer electronics, when is the last time a new generation of consumer electronics was more expensive and of worse quality, or was able to do less? The answer is, they always get better. They also provide more and people assume that that is going to be the case.

Why not have the same incentives at work when it comes to making us healthier?

Q Tony, I believe it's been estimated that this proposal could increase coverage for approximately 5 million people. But there are 47 million uninsured people, so the argument is that --

MR. SNOW: Again, Paula, we will --

Q -- (inaudible) 42 million others still uninsured?

MR. SNOW: It's addressed in there, and I'll wait until we get the full speech out.

Q Does the President believe in this day and age that a woman can be elected President of the United States?

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q Tony, Iran decided to block IAEA inspectors from entering the country. How concerned are you about this? And does this require further action from the U.N. Security Council?

MR. SNOW: Well, we have seen the press reports. We still don't have confirmation. We're taking a look at the reports. We've made it very clear what we think the Iranians need to do. And, furthermore, we're not only -- there's a Chapter 7 Resolution that's been adopted by the U.N. Security Council, but more importantly, what the United States has said to the Iranians is we can do a lot of things that are really going to make life better for your people. And we continue also to offer that as something that if the Iranians want peaceful civil nuclear power, we are perfectly happy to be able to provide it and in the process also to provide some of the other things that the Iranian people want and deserve in terms of economic, cultural and other cooperation.

Q Tony, can you just scratch just below the surface of this health care thing and just lay it out just a little bit? The tax deduction --

MR. SNOW: Rather than trying to do that -- we're going to get you briefings on this. And we're going to get you detailed briefings if not later today, early tomorrow. Rather than getting into the weeds, I'm giving you a general prospectus on it. But you'll get all the details.

Q But, Tony, your early fact sheet says health insurance would be considered taxable income.

MR. SNOW: That is correct.

Q And that means some people who are over the line would be paying more taxes for their health insurance.

MR. SNOW: They might be -- some people would be paying more for health insurance.

Q And that's a raise in income tax.

MR. SNOW: Well, on the other hand, what you also have -- that's a static way of looking at a situation where you're going to have dynamic effects. So people will be able to make choices. You will have the opportunity to make choices about what you get in terms of health care. There will be market forces for people to provide, within certain barriers, programs that are tailored to individual needs. So, again, I would suggest taking a look at it. But, yes, some people would pay more.

Q Tony, I'm going to ask you to step outside of your Republican boundaries for a moment and give your guesstimation or estimation as to why there's so much hype right now for these Democratic presidential candidates.

MR. SNOW: Well, I'll tell you, April, you and I can have that as a private conversation. But as the President's spokesman, I'm not going to get into it.

Q No, no, no, but it comes at a time when the nation showed -- the midterm elections, they were voting against the war in Iraq, against -- changing the course. And now you have people who are talking about changing the course, and I just wanted to get your understanding --

MR. SNOW: It's the early stages of a presidential campaign -- that's all. If you take -- go back again, April, and look at the things that were top of mind, and it was things like corruption and domestic issues that still ranked higher. The war was clearly a concern, but there were other matters that were of co-equal concern to voters. And now we're approaching that time where people in both parties are trying to assemble their organizations, raise money and get some press. And some are being quite effective at it.

Q Does the President think that -- to follow up this brilliant question over here -- does the President think a woman may be elected within the next 22 years?

MR. SNOW: I don't think the President is the type to pull out the crystal ball. I was asked a question, do we think a woman could be elected President: the answer is, yes.

Q Do you have any comment from the White House regarding the extradition of about 15 drug smugglers from Mexico (inaudible), and could you tell us if you expect any more extraditions?

MR. SNOW: No, I can't. That I would send over to the Department of Justice. That's the appropriate venue for asking about that.

Q Is Katrina going to be mentioned at all, Katrina recovery in the State of the Union?

MR. SNOW: Again, I'll fend off questions about particular items. We've given you large, general areas the President will discuss.

Q Is he satisfied with the pace of the rebuilding?

MR. SNOW: The President, I think is -- look, we want all of the areas struck by Katrina to be rebuilt as quickly and effectively as possible, and we continue to do what we can to assist local officials as they pursue that goal.

Q So briefings -- the briefings you said, we might have one today, might have one tomorrow, about the content --

MR. SNOW: We're working out a briefing schedule. We'll get back to you later today.

Q Would there be a couple, or on a couple different topics, or will there be --

MR. SNOW: Well, we're working on a health care one specifically, but there will be others.

Q Travel Wednesday?

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q News conference Thursday?

MR. SNOW: No. There will be one soon, but not Thursday.

Q Where he is going?

MR. SNOW: Where is he going? Have we announced for Thursday?

Q Delaware.

MR. SNOW: Yes, I think Delaware.

Q Delaware, and Missouri on Thursday.

MR. SNOW: Yes, thank you. Delaware Wednesday, Missouri Thursday.

Q You were asked what draft number?

MR. SNOW: Let me just say we're in double digits.

Q That's a pretty wide range.

MR. SNOW: That gives you --

Q Fifty?

MR. SNOW: It's not high double-digits.

Q Thank you.

MR. SNOW: Thank you.

END 10:47 A.M. EST

* We congratulate the people of Serbia on a well-run democratic election. The preliminary outcome reflects the fact that the parties dedicated to democratic reform and a modern European future for Serbia outpolled the so-called ultranationalist party. Obviously, results have to be finalized and then the various Serbian political parties need to form a governing coalition. So we're hopeful and we'll see what the political landscape looks like over the next several weeks.

For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, January 22, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and , or and , or , and , or and or and or and or and or , or , or ,

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Ultra-Dense Optical Storage — on One Photon

New Technique Stores and Retrieves Entire Image from a Single Photon

First image stored and retrieved from a single photon (Credit University of Rochester)
High Resolution Image, Phton Image. High Resolution Image, Diagram of the encoding device. High Resolution Image, John Howell in the lab.

Researchers at the University of Rochester have made an optics breakthrough that allows them to encode an entire image's worth of data into a photon, slow the image down for storage, and then retrieve the image intact.

While the initial test image consists of only a few hundred pixels, a tremendous amount of information can be stored with the new technique.

The image, a "UR" for the University of Rochester, was made using a single pulse of light and the team can fit as many as a hundred of these pulses at once into a tiny, four-inch cell. Squeezing that much information into so small a space and retrieving it intact opens the door to optical buffering—storing information as light.

"It sort of sounds impossible, but instead of storing just ones and zeros, we're storing an entire image," says John Howell, associate professor of physics and leader of the team that created the device, which is revealed in today's online issue of the journal Physical Review Letters. "It's analogous to the difference between snapping a picture with a single pixel and doing it with a camera—this is like a 6-megapixel camera."

"You can have a tremendous amount of information in a pulse of light, but normally if you try to buffer it, you can lose much of that information," says Ryan Camacho, Howell's graduate student and lead author on the article. "We're showing it's possible to pull out an enormous amount of information with an extremely high signal-to-noise ratio even with very low light levels."

Optical buffering is a particularly hot field right now because engineers are trying to speed up computer processing and network speeds using light, but their systems bog down when they have to convert light signals to electronic signals to store information, even for a short while.

Howell's group used a completely new approach that preserves all the properties of the pulse. The buffered pulse is essentially a perfect original; there is almost no distortion, no additional diffraction, and the phase and amplitude of the original signal are all preserved. Howell is even working to demonstrate that quantum entanglement remains unscathed.

To produce the UR image, Howell simply shone a beam of light through a stencil with the U and R etched out. Anyone who has made shadow puppets knows how this works, but Howell turned down the light so much that a single photon was all that passed through the stencil.

Quantum mechanics dictates some strange things at that scale, so that bit of light could be thought of as both a particle and a wave. As a wave, it passed through all parts of the stencil at once, carrying the "shadow" of the UR with it. The pulse of light then entered a four-inch cell of cesium gas at a warm 100 degrees Celsius, where it was slowed and compressed, allowing many pulses to fit inside the small tube at the same time.

"The parallel amount of information John has sent all at once in an image is enormous in comparison to what anyone else has done before," says Alan Willner, professor of electrical engineering at the University of Southern California and president of the IEEE Lasers and Optical Society. "To do that and be able to maintain the integrity of the signal—it's a wonderful achievement."

Howell has so far been able to delay light pulses 100 nanoseconds and compress them to 1 percent of their original length. He is now working toward delaying dozens of pulses for as long as several milliseconds, and as many as 10,000 pulses for up to a nanosecond.

"Now I want to see if we can delay something almost permanently, even at the single photon level," says Howell. "If we can do that, we're looking at storing incredible amounts of information in just a few photons."

About the University of Rochester: The University of Rochester (www.rochester.edu) is one of the nation's leading private universities. Located in Rochester, N.Y., the University gives students exceptional opportunities for interdisciplinary study and close collaboration with faculty through its unique cluster-based curriculum. Its College of Arts, Sciences, and Engineering is complemented by the Eastman School of Music, Simon School of Business, Warner School of Education, Laboratory for Laser Energetics, and Schools of Medicine and Nursing.

MEDIA CONTACT: Jonathan Sherwood (585) 273-4726, jonathan.sherwood@rochester.edu January 19, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and or and

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Silent Majority

Silent Majority

The editors of this blog rarely do editorial pieces---it has been a conscious choice to provide information and avoid addressing our personal viewpoint unless the topic compelled. i think of all our posts, we have done 3 that would fall into the category "editorial". Coming home this evening i saw something that caught my attention. A bumper sticker that proclaimed LUVYADUBYA. Now you might be thinking, big deal, a bumper sticker. It wasn't so much the what as the where. 79th Street and Broadway, NYC, Upper West Side Manhattan.

In NYC most often cited statistics show there is a 5-1 percent differential between Democrats and Republicans [Sources: NY Young Republican Club, Inc and Urban Elephants]. The 64th Assembly District in the East Village and 66th Assembly District in the West Village currently has that ratio at 6-1 and 6.1-1 respectively.[Source: East Village Red Man] So you can imagine how rare it is in this town to see a show of support of the current commander in chief. More unique still, the vehicle that was sporting the sticker had NY plates. Also noteworthy is that the ride was a slammin' '06 black Dodge Ram pickup. Strong messages of support for the US economy and George W. Bush on Manhattan's Upper West Side. Silence is golden.

Freedom Calendar 01/20/07 - 01/27/07

January 20, 2001, Mississippi Republican Rod Paige is confirmed as first African-American U.S. Secretary of Education; calls for school choice to allow poor and minority children to “throw off their chains”.

January 21, 1813, Birth in Georgia of John C. Fremont – abolitionist, western explorer, U.S. Senator from California, U.S. Army general, Arizona Governor, and first Republican presidential candidate.

January 22, 2001, Republican Condoleezza Rice becomes first woman and second African-American to serve as U.S. National Security Advisor.

January 23. 1993, Death of Judge John Robert Brown, leader in fight for Southern desegregation; appointed by President Eisenhower to U.S. Court of Appeals.

January 24, 2001, Republican Mel Martínez, appointed by President George W. Bush as U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, becomes first Cuban-American in Cabinet.

January 25, 2001, U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee declares school choice to be “Educational Emancipation”.

January 26, 1922, House passes bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate Democrats block it with filibuster.

January 27, 1964, U.S. Senator Margaret Chase Smith (R-ME), first woman to be considered for nomination by a major party, announces candidacy for President; she finishes 2nd at Republican National Convention.

I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free; and that the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.”

Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United States

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and or and or or and or

Presidential Podcast 01/20/07

Presidential Podcast 01/20/07 en Español
Click here to Subscribe to Our Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Channel with Odeo Subscribe to Our Odeo or Click here to Subscribe to Our Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Channel with Podnova podnova Podcast Channel and receive the weekly Presidential Radio Address in English and Spanish with select State Department Briefings. Featuring real audio and full text transcripts, More content Sources added often so stay tuned.

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and or and

Bush radio address 01/20/07 full audio, text transcript

President George W. Bush calls troops from his ranch in Crawford, Texas, Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, Nov. 24, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper.bush radio address 01/20/07 full audio, text transcript. PODCAST and, President's Radio Address en Español. In Focus: Health Care
Click here to Subscribe to Our Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Channel with Odeo Subscribe to Our Odeo or Click here to Subscribe to Republican National Convention Blog's PODCAST with podnova podnova Podcast Channel and receive the weekly Presidential Radio Address in English and Spanish with select State Department Briefings. Featuring real audio and full text transcripts, More content Sources added often so stay tuned.

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. For many Americans, the new year began with a resolution to live a better and healthier life. Whatever goals you have set for yourself this year, one goal we can all share is reforming our Nation's health care system.

Americans are fortunate to have the best health care system in the world. The government has an important role to play in our system. We have an obligation to provide care for the most vulnerable members of our society -- the elderly, the disabled, and poor children and their parents. We are meeting this responsibility through Medicare, Medicaid, and the State Children's Health Insurance Program. We must strengthen these vital programs so that they are around when future generations need them.

For all other Americans, private health insurance is the best way to meet their needs. But rising health care costs are making insurance too expensive for millions of our citizens. Health care costs are growing more than two times faster than wages, and this is making it harder for working families to buy insurance on their own. Rising costs are also making it harder for small businesses to offer health coverage to their employees. Our challenge is clear: We must address these rising costs, so that more Americans can afford basic health insurance. And we need to do it without creating a new Federal entitlement program or raising taxes.

Our Nation is making progress toward this goal. We created Health Savings Accounts, which empower patients and can reduce the cost of coverage. We are working to pass Association Health Plans, so that small businesses can insure their workers at the favorable discounts that big businesses get. We must pass medical liability reform, so we can stop the junk lawsuits that drive costs through the roof and good doctors out of practice. We've taken important steps to increase transparency in health care pricing, and give patients more information about the quality of their doctors and hospitals.

One of the most promising ways to make private health insurance more affordable is by reforming the Federal tax code. Today, the tax code unfairly penalizes people who do not get health insurance through their job. It unwisely encourages workers to choose overly expensive, gold-plated plans. The result is that insurance premiums rise, and many Americans cannot afford the coverage they need.

We need to fix these problems, and one way to do so is to treat health insurance more like home ownership. The current tax code encourages home ownership by allowing you to deduct the interest on your mortgage from your taxes. We can reform the tax code, so that it provides a similar incentive for you to buy health insurance. So in my State of the Union Address next Tuesday, I will propose a tax reform designed to help make basic private health insurance more affordable -- whether you get it through your job or on your own.

As we reform the Federal tax code, we will also support the innovative measures that states are taking to address the problem of the uninsured. Governors across the Nation have put forward plans to make basic private health insurance more accessible for their citizens. When I go before Congress next week, I will announce a new effort -- led by Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt -- to help governors reduce the number of people in their states without private health insurance.

All of these changes are based on a clear principle: Health insurance should be available, it should be affordable, and it should put you and your doctor in charge of your medical decisions. I look forward to working with Congress to pass the initiatives that I lay out next week, so we can help millions more Americans enjoy better care, new choices, and healthier lives.

Thank you for listening.

For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, January 20, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and or and

Discurso Radial del Presidente a la Nación 01/20/07

Presidente George W. Bush llama a tropas de su rancho en Crawford, Tejas, día de Thanksgiving, jueves, de noviembre el 24 de 2005.  Foto blanca de la casa de Eric Draper.forre el audio de la dirección de radio 01/20/07 por completo, transcripción del texto. (nota de los redactores: ninguna lengua española mp3 lanzó esta semana, apesadumbrada) PODCAST

Discurso Radial del Presidente. en Español
Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Odeo Suscribir a nuestro canal de Podcast de Odeo o del podnova Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Podnova y recibir la dirección de radio presidencial semanal en inglés y español con informes selectos del departamento del estado. Ofreciendo transcripciones audio y con texto completo verdaderas, más fuentes contentas agregaron a menudo así que la estancia templó.

Buenos Días. Para muchos estadounidenses, el Año Nuevo comenzó con una resolución para vivir una vida mejor y más saludable. Cualesquiera que hayan sido las metas que usted se fijó para este año, una meta que todos podemos compartir es la de reformar el sistema de cuidado de la salud de nuestra Nación.

Los estadounidenses son afortunados en tener el mejor sistema en el mundo de cuidado de la salud. El gobierno tiene un papel importante que desempeñar en nuestro sistema. Tenemos una obligación de proporcionar cuidado para los miembros más vulnerables de nuestra sociedad – las personas de edad avanzada, los incapacitados y los niños pobres y sus padres. Estamos cumpliendo con esta responsabilidad a través de Medicare, Medicaid y el Programa Estatal de Seguro de Salud Infantil. Debemos fortalecer estos programas vitales de modo que estén presentes cuando las generaciones futuras los necesiten.

Para todos los demás estadounidenses, el seguro de salud privado es la mejor manera de satisfacer sus necesidades. Pero los costos crecientes del cuidado de la salud están haciendo que el seguro sea demasiado costoso para millones de nuestros ciudadanos. Los costos del cuidado de la salud están creciendo más de dos veces más rápido que los salarios – y esto está haciendo que sea más difícil para las familias que trabajan comprar seguro por su cuenta. Los costos crecientes también están haciendo más difícil para las pequeñas empresas ofrecer cobertura de salud a sus empleados. Nuestro reto está claro: debemos enfrentar estos costos crecientes de modo que el seguro de salud básico esté al alcance de más estadounidenses. Y debemos hacerlo sin crear un nuevo programa reglamentario o aumentar los impuestos.

Nuestra Nación está logrando progreso hacia esta meta. Hemos creado las Cuentas de Ahorros para la Salud, que dan fuerza a los pacientes y pueden reducir el costo de la cobertura. Estamos trabajando para aprobar Planes de Salud para Asociaciones, de modo que las pequeñas empresas puedan asegurar a sus trabajadores con los descuentos favorables que obtienen los grandes negocios. Necesitamos aprobar la reforma de la responsabilidad médica, a fin de eliminar las demandas frívolas que hacen subir los costos de forma astronómica y hacen que buenos médicos abandonen su práctica. Hemos tomado pasos importantes para aumentar la transparencia en los precios del cuidado de la salud – y dar a los pacientes más información sobre la calidad de sus médicos y hospitales.

Una de las maneras más prometedoras de hacer más económico el seguro de salud privado es reformando el código tributario federal. Hoy en día el código tributario castiga de forma injusta a las personas que no obtienen seguro de salud a través de sus empleos. De manera desaconsejable estimula a los trabajadores a optar por planes costosos y enchapados en oro. El resultado es que las primas de seguro se elevan – y la cobertura que necesitan queda fuera del alcance de muchos estadounidenses.

Necesitamos arreglar estos problemas, y una manera de hacerlo es la de tratar al seguro de la salud más como ser dueño de casa. El actual código tributario estimula el ser dueño de casa al permitir que usted deduzca de sus impuestos el interés que paga sobre su hipoteca. Podemos reformar el código tributario de modo que ofrezca un incentivo similar para que usted compre seguro de salud. De modo que en mi Discurso del Estado de la Nación el próximo martes, propondré una reforma tributaria diseñada a que el seguro de salud privado básico esté más a su alcance – ya sea que lo obtenga a través de su empleo o por su propia cuenta.

Al reformar el código tributario federal, también apoyaremos las medidas innovadoras que están tomando los estados para tratar con el problema de las personas sin seguro. Los gobernadores en todo el país han propuesto planes para que el seguro de salud privado básico esté más al alcance de sus ciudadanos. Cuando yo hable ante el Congreso la semana próxima anunciaré un nuevo esfuerzo – encabezado por Michael Leavitt, Secretario de Salud y Servicios Humanos – para ayudar a los gobernadores a reducir el número de personas en sus estados que no tienen seguro de salud privado.

Todos estos cambios están basados en un principio claro: El seguro de salud debe estar disponible, debe ser económico y debe poner a usted y a su médico a cargo de sus decisiones médicas. Yo espero trabajar con el Congreso para aprobar las iniciativas que presentaré la próxima semana – de modo que podamos ayudar a millones más de estadounidenses a disfrutar de mejor cuidado, nuevas opciones y vidas más saludables.

Gracias por escuchar

Para su publicación inmediata, Oficina del Secretario de Prensa, 20 de enero de 2007

Etiquetas De Technorati: , y , o y , o , o y o

Friday, January 19, 2007

Oceans, Environment and Science Claudia A. McMurray

Assistant Secretary for Oceans, Environment and Science Claudia A. McMurray Leading, Delegation Visiting the U.S. Antarctic Program. PODCAST FOR THIS ARTICLE.

Assistant Secretary for Oceans, Environment and Science Claudia A. McMurray, State Department Photo.Claudia A. McMurray, Assistant Secretary for Oceans, Environment and Science; United States Ambassador to New Zealand, Bill McCormick; and Glyn Davies, Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, are visiting Antarctica January 18-26, 2007.
They will join a New Zealand delegation led by Prime Minister Helen Clark and including Sir Edmund Hillary, who led the New Zealand contingent of the Commonwealth Trans-Antarctic Expedition that established the Amundsen-Scott Base in 1957. The delegations will be hosted at U.S. facilities in Antarctica by Dr. Arden Bement, Director of the U.S. National Science Foundation.

The visit coincides with the 50th anniversary of United States-New Zealand cooperation in Antarctica and follows a series of bilateral meetings in Wellington January 15-17 that addressed a wide range of environmental issues of mutual interest to the United States and New Zealand.

During her visit to Antarctica, Assistant Secretary McMurray will review a range of scientific research activities conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Antarctic Program and to hold discussions with selected research scientists. Additionally, she will be briefed on logistic operations and familiarize herself with the infrastructure that supports Antarctic research, including the Crary Science and Engineering Laboratory at McMurdo Station and the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, currently under construction.

The Department of State coordinates U.S. policy on Antarctica. The National Science Foundation, as the manager of the U.S. Antarctic Program, coordinates all federally funded research on the continent and operates year-round U.S. facilities at McMurdo, Amundsen-Scott South Pole and Palmer stations. The U.S. Antarctic Program supports scientific research in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean and advances the United States goals of supporting the Antarctic Treaty, fostering cooperative research with other nations, protecting the Antarctic environment, and conserving living resources.

Additional information about U.S. Antarctic policy is available at hstate.gov/g/oes/ocns/. Information about the U.S. Antarctic Program is available at husap.gov/

2007/040 Released on January 18, 2007, Media Note, Office of the Spokesman, Washington, DC. January 18, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and

President to Welcome President Adamkus of Lithuania

President Bush to Welcome President Adamkus of Lithuania to the White House

This image comes from the website of President of the Republic of Poland and is copyrighted. President of the Republic of Poland allows it to be used for any purpose, if the source of the picture is given.President Bush will welcome President Valdas Adamkus of Lithuania to the White House on February 12, 2007. Under the leadership of President Adamkus, Lithuania has been a close partner of the United States in advancing freedom in Belarus and elsewhere in Eastern Europe. PODCAST FOR THIS ARTICLE.
As one of the newest members of NATO, Lithuania has made substantial contributions to the security and reconstruction of Afghanistan through its leadership of a Provincial Reconstruction Team and participation in other Alliance activities. Lithuania continues as well to help secure freedom in Iraq. The President looks forward to discussing these and other shared global interests with President Adamkus.

# # # For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, January 19, 2007

This image comes from the website of President of the Republic of Poland and is copyrighted. President of the Republic of Poland allows it to be used for any purpose, if the source of the picture is given.

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and