Friday, April 30, 2010

Cuba Day on Capitol Hill to Celebrate ‘Ladies in White,’ Cuban Human Rights Activists


Demonstrating Solidarity With the Cuban People

Photo: Maria Gabriela Zambrano
ADVISORY – May 12 – Cuba Day on Capitol Hill to Celebrate ‘Ladies in White,’ Cuban Human Rights Activists; Keynote Address by Human Rights Activist Janisset Rivero
(WASHINGTON) – U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, is proud to join her colleagues Congressmen Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL), Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), and Albio Sires (D-NJ) in sponsoring the 13th annual Cuba Day on Capitol Hill. This year’s event will be held on Wednesday, May 12th from 12:00 noon – 1:00 p.m. and will raise awareness about the plight of the Cuban people and honor the courage and sacrifices of Cuba’s “Ladies in White,” Orlando Zapata Tamayo, and Guillermo Fariñas. Statement by Ros-Lehtinen:

“This event is an important opportunity to honor the courage and sacrifice of those struggling in Cuba to be free from the atrocious brutality of the Havana regime. I am particularly excited that the courageous Janisset Rivero will join us to provide her insight on the state of human rights in Cuba.

“The life and death of Orlando Zapata Tamayo represents the dream of all who live and breathe for freedom in Cuba. His strength and perseverance resonates still today as courageous human rights activists like Guillermo Fariñas and the ‘Ladies in White’ carry on the struggle to bring freedom to Cuba’s shores.

“Because we will never give up hope, we will continue to spread this message for freedom and human rights until they emanate from all corners of Cuba once more.”

Note: Cuban human rights activist Janisset Rivero will speak about the current situation on the ground in Cuba, the brutal tactics employed by the Castro regime, and the state of Cuban civil society.

****Information on room location will follow**** #####

House Foreign Affairs Committee U.S. House of Representatives Republicans Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Ranking Republican For Immediate Release April 30, 2010 Contact: Brad Goehner, (202) 226-8467 Alex Cruz, (202) 225-8200

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Howard P. “Buck” McKeon Tapped for House Republican National Security Working Group

Howard P. 'Buck' McKeonWashington, D.C.—U.S. Rep. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R-Calif.), the Ranking Member of the House Armed Services Committee, was tapped today by House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) to join a new National Security Working Group. Led by Homeland Security Committee Ranking Member Peter T. King (R-N.Y.), the solutions group will take the lead in advocating and developing better solutions to the national security challenges facing America and hold the Administration accountable when it pursues misguided policies that make the American people less safe.
“The American people deserve and are demanding a stronger national defense,” opened McKeon. “While our citizens are skeptical of some of the decisions made by this Administration, they fundamentally want to trust the federal government to provide for the common defense. Our efforts, combined with those of Kevin McCarthy, will be focused on listening to the American people, including our brave troops and their families, and developing national security policies that are responsive to their needs and concerns.”

“Republicans joined in support with the President when he made responsible decisions, such as renewing the U.S. commitment to winning the war in Afghanistan. However, we opposed him when he made decisions that we believed could compromise our national security, including his efforts to import Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his terrorist cohorts into the United States,” continued McKeon.

“We are committed to providing our troops with the tools, time and support they need to do their jobs as safely as possible. This overarching goal will continue to drive our discussions and actions,” concluded the Ranking Member.

In addition to Rep. McKeon, the following members from the House Armed Services Committee were tapped as members of the National Security Working Group: Rep. Michael Conaway (R-Tex.), Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ari.), Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.), and Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Tex.). ###

News and Press Releases :: April 29, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Lindsey Mask

U.S. Congressman Buck McKeon Washington, D.C. Office Congressman Howard P. Buck McKeon U.S. House of Representatives 2184 Rayburn HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 ph: (202) 225-1956 fax: (202) 226-0683

Darrell Issa Jim Jordan Call on General Motors to End ‘Shameful’ Ad Campaign VIDEO


Issa & Jordan Assail General Motors’ Deceitful Tactics. Thursday, Call on GM to End ‘Shameful’ Ad Campaign.

WASHINGTON. D.C. – House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Domestic Policy Subcommittee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-OH) today sent a scathing letter to General Motors (GM) Chairman and CEO Edward Whitacre assailing GM’s “slick marketing campaign” built around statements that “constitute a lie to the American people.”

“We are concerned that GM, under your leadership, has come dangerously close to committing fraud, and that you might have colluded with the United States Treasury to deceive the American public,” Issa and Jordan wrote. “Your false statements may expose GM to millions of dollars in damages, further reducing the value of the taxpayer-owned company. The American people, as the majority shareholders of GM, have a right to know the truth behind the cost of the GM bailout and GM’s genuine financial condition.”

In exchange for the $49.5 billion committed to GM through Treasury’s Automotive Industry Financing Program, Treasury received a 60.8 percent common equity stake in GM, $2.1 billion in preferred stock, and $7.1 billion in GM debt. Treasury put $17.4 billion of the $49.5 billion bailout in an escrow account, which required GM to obtain Treasury’s permission to draw down. On November 16, 2009, GM disclosed that it intended to use the taxpayer money in the escrow account to finish paying back the original $7.1 billion loan by June 30, 2010, drawing on the taxpayer money in the escrow account to pay back the taxpayer loan.

“Although the motives behind your recent decision to advance this timetable are not clear, some have speculated that these actions were taken to increase the political palatability of GM’s application to the Department of Energy for $10 billion in low interest loans to retool its plants to meet the government’s tougher new Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards,” noted Issa and Jordan. “Regardless of your motive, however, the facts are clear: not one cent of your recent “repayment” came from GM’s operating revenue, and the American taxpayers are not one cent richer as a result.”

Issa and Jordan added, “Deceptive and dishonest advertisements and statements that attempt to disguise what is merely the exchange of one pool of taxpayer money for another pool of taxpayer money as “real progress” potentially expose GM to charges of fraud and further destroy the credibility of GM with the American public. These actions will inevitably hamper GM’s future ability to truly repay the taxpayer bailout. GM’s false advertisements are counterproductive and shameful, and they should stop.” ###

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 29 April 2010 12:36 B350A RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC 20515 PHONE: (202) 225-5074 FAX: (202) 225-3974

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Republican Whip Eric Cantor Congressman Peter Roskam Meet with Jerusalem Mayor Barkat VIDEO


WASHINGTON D.C. – House Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) and Congressman Peter Roskam (R-IL) today met with Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat to discuss U.S.-Israel relations. After their meeting this morning they made the following remarks:

Cantor Opening Statement:

“We’re here today listening to the Mayor’s vision for a Jerusalem that enjoys bipartisan support on Capitol Hill, a Jerusalem that not only will serve as the eternal capital of the Jewish state of Israel, but a city in which people of all religions can live, enjoy, and practice their faith.

“We have talked today about some of the land use complications in that city and as we operate in the larger context of what’s going on with the U.S-Israel relationship, it’s very important that we continue to build bipartisan support for a united Jerusalem, that we continue to focus on the bonds that this country has with Israel, and to make sure that we emphasize the continued threat that Israel faces as our ally and the fact that Israel’s security is synonymous with our own.”

Roskam Opening Statement:

“Israel does enjoy bipartisan support, particularly here on Capitol Hill. My sense is that the Mayor’s presence today in briefing members of the House Republican Israel Caucus is an opportunity to equip them with the details of some of the municipal drama that has been happening in Israel.

“I took my family over in November of 2006 and one of the things that my kids picked up on was the religious freedom that was on display in Israel – a real opportunity for people of many of the world’s faiths that hold Jerusalem in a very high view and to be able to worship freely there. That’s the history, that’s the heritage, and that’s the way the Israelis have governed Jerusalem since it was united in 1967.

“I appreciate hearing from the Mayor and hearing his plans as somebody who is trying to run a large municipality in the midst of a great deal of turmoil and conflict. As so often times happens, when you begin to hear the facts a lot of the drama recedes.”

April 28, 2010 Contact: Brad Dayspring 202-226-5249

VIDEO CREDIT: EricCantor

TEXT CREDIT: Eric Cantor Office of the Republican Whip

Marco Rubio views of the immigration law in Arizona. "VIDEO"


On Tuesday, April 28, Marco Rubio discussed his views of the immigration law recently passed in Arizona. Marco Rubio Talks With Fox 92.5 FM’s Trey Radel

"VIDEO" CREDIT: MarcoRubio

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Pat Toomey Sends Letter to Sen. Specter about his Negative TV Ads against Rep. Sestak

Allentown, PA – U.S. Senate candidate Pat Toomey sent the following letter to Senate Arlen Specter, urging him to remove his attack ad targeting Joe Sestak’s military service.

Senator Arlen Specter
711 Hart Bldg
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Specter:

It is a clear matter of record that I have very strong disagreements with Congressman Joe Sestak on many important issues affecting the economy, health care, taxes, and even national security. But I also have the utmost respect for his decades of military service to our country. It is highly regrettable that you have chosen to disparage an honorable man’s military service in order to promote your own political career.

Over the years, you have developed a reputation for political attacks ads. I had not even announced my candidacy last spring when you raced out of the blocks with an attack ad that was so wildly inaccurate it was quickly discredited by fact checkers and news organizations. You will recall that your ad was characterized by FactCheck.Org as a “scorched-earth slip-up” and you were forced to remove it from the airwaves.

But now you have stooped to a new low, attacking Congressman Sestak’s thirty-year military service. This is not only insulting to veterans across America who sacrifice so much to protect our nation, but to all Pennsylvanians. Is there no low to which you will not stoop in an attempt to win an election?

Our state’s Democratic primary voters will decide whether they prefer you or Congressman Sestak as their nominee, and that is their right. But it’s pretty clear that there will be two different races in the fall depending on their choice. Joe Sestak and I have already engaged in two spirited, yet civil debates. Pennsylvanians can rightly expect that we would continue in that manner, which is not only respectful to each other, but more importantly, respectful to voters. If you become your new party’s nominee, then it appears that Pennsylvanians will be in for one outrageous or blatantly false attack ad after another. Our state deserves better.

I hope you will do the right thing and remove your attack on Joe Sestak’s military service. And I hope you will pledge to the citizens of our state that should you make it to the general election, you will cease your brand of negative advertising that the Pittsburgh Tribune Review called “embarrassing.”

Sincerely,

Pat Toomey for Senate

Marco Rubio on Arizona immigration legislation 04.27.10

“Our legal immigration system must continue to welcome those who seek to embrace America’s blessings and abide by the legal and orderly system that is in place. The American people have every right to expect the federal government to secure our borders and prevent illegal immigration. It has become all too easy for some in Washington to ignore the desperation and urgency of those like the citizens of Arizona who are disproportionately wrestling with this problem as well as the violence, drug trafficking and lawlessness that spills over from across the border.

“States certainly have the right to enact policies to protect their citizens, but Arizona’s policy shows the difficulty and limitations of states trying to act piecemeal to solve what is a serious federal problem. From what I have read in news reports, I do have concerns about this legislation. While I don’t believe Arizona’s policy was based on anything other than trying to get a handle on our broken borders, I think aspects of the law, especially that dealing with ‘reasonable suspicion,’ are going to put our law enforcement officers in an incredibly difficult position. It could also unreasonably single out people who are here legally, including many American citizens. Throughout American history and throughout this administration we have seen that when government is given an inch it takes a mile.

“I hope Congress and the Obama Administration will use the Arizona legislation not as an excuse to try and jam through amnesty legislation, but to finally act on border states’ requests for help with security and fix the things about our immigration system that can be fixed right now – securing the border, reforming the visa and entry process, and cracking down on employers who exploit illegal immigrants.”

Marco Rubio for US Senate Contact by phone: (786) 953-6711

Democrats Vote for Bailouts Twice in 24 Hours

Washington, Apr 27 - Republican Study Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) issued the following statement after the Senate Democrat leadership chose to push for a second vote on their permanent bailout protection bill this afternoon.

“Senate Democrats remain wholly invested in Washington’s bailout mentality,” said Chairman Price. “The American people are tired of seeing their tax dollars used to rescue private companies from the consequences of their own bad decisions, yet the Democrats are trying to make bailouts and too-big-to-fail institutions a permanent part of this now political economy. Instead of holding another pointless vote on their fundamentally flawed bailout protection bill, the Democrat leadership should join Republicans in working to end the bailouts once and for all, streamline the financial regulatory system, protect consumers, and revitalize the dynamic power of our economy.

“House Republicans have already offered a strategy that will accomplish these goals, and our approach also does not ignore the role Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac played in the financial collapse. The Majority remains beholden to a taxpayer financed culture of bailouts that distorts the market at the expense of responsible private sector job creators on Main Street, and no amount of political gamesmanship by our Senate Democrat colleagues will change that fact.” ###

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4.27.2010 Congressman Tom Price is Chairman of the Republican Study Committee (RSC)

Documents Show Companies See Incentive in Dropping Health Coverage

Employers, unions warned months earlier that health bill would trigger losses.

WASHINGTON – U.S. Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, ranking member on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, today released a staff memo that indicates four large employers under investigation by committee Democrats see incentives in dropping employer health care coverage thanks to the new health care law.

“Turns out ObamaCare means if you like your health plan you can lose it. The president didn’t have to actually strong-arm companies into dumping their employee health insurance because his bill carried financial incentives to virtually guarantee that result,” Barton said. “But something’s very wrong when, like AT&T found out, paying $600 million in penalties will allow you to stop paying $2.4 billion for insurance, leaving both workers and taxpayers stuck. I suppose we can’t know for some years how many thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions of workers will lose their company insurance because of health care reform, but I know that it will be a breach of faith for most of them and a tragedy for some.”

The preliminary investigation by the Republican staff indicates:

1. “Each of the large employers under investigation warned that health care legislation would trigger reporting requirements (of pending losses) months before passage of the health care law.

2. “Internal company documents from each large employer under investigation reflect concerns over the health care legislation’s new taxes and effect on costs.

3. “Internal company documents indicate that there will be an incentive to drop employer health care coverage because the cost of providing coverage will be much larger than the penalty imposed by the health care legislation.”

For example, a presentation provided to investigators by AT&T shows that the company could save $1.8 billion annually by dropping coverage for current employees and paying the penalty imposed in the law.

A copy of the Republican staff memo can be found here.

Please note: We have redacted information in these updated files.

The documents from AT&T can be found here.

The documents from Caterpillar can be found here and here.

The documents from John Deere & Company can be found here.

The documents from Verizon can be found here.

Joe Barton's Web Site 2322A Rayburn House Office Building | Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 225-3641

Monday, April 26, 2010

Rassmussen Poll: Are you confident that policymakers know what they’re doing 64% Say, “No”

“How confident are you that the nation’s policymakers know what they’re doing when it comes to addressing the current economic problems on Wall Street?

64% Total not confident
24% Not at all confident
40% Not very confident

32% Total confident
9% Very confident
23% Somewhat confident

4% Not sure

Rassmussen; conducted April 19-20, 2010; National Survey of 1,000 Adults Republican Study Committee (RSC)

Second Gilbert Baker TV Ad VIDEO


The Time Is Now To Reform Washington: Our forefathers banded together to cast off a system that was broken. This time it's Washington that's broken! It's our time now!

Watch as Gilbert rallies Arkansans to fix Washington problems not with Washington people, and Washington solutions.

TEXT CREDIT: Gilbert Baker for U.S. Senate, 2010, PO Box 3471 • Little Rock, AR 72203 Contact: info@senatorgilbertbaker.com

VIDEO CREDIT: bakerforussenate

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Kay Bailey Hutchison Republican Weekly Address 04/24/10 VIDEO PODCAST TEXT TRANSCRIPT


Kay Bailey Hutchison Republican Weekly Address 04/24/10 VIDEO PODCAST TEXT TRANSCRIPT

Download MP3 for PODCAST I’m Kay Bailey Hutchison, United States Senator from Texas. For more than a year, Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill have been working to craft legislation that would prevent another catastrophic financial crisis like we saw in the fall of 2008.

Republicans are working to ensure the bill would forbid any future bailouts of Wall Street banks. The idea that a financial institution is ‘Too Big To Fail’ perverts free market capitalism. It suggests that large firms can privatize their profits, yet socialize their risks.

Or, put simply, these companies take their profits in good times - but when things go bad – they turn to the government to bail them out. This must end. The American people should not be forced to pay the risky gambling debts of the large financial institutions.

The Democrats pushed a bill through the Senate Banking Committee that does not stop future bailouts. Republicans have been attacked for speaking out against it and asking for....

...bipartisan negotiations before allowing the bill to be debated on the Senate floor. But to be clear, we will stand firm against a partisan bill that exposes ordinary taxpayers to future bailouts or favors big companies over community banks across America. The tactics the Democratic leadership used to pass the health care bill must not be repeated.
Thankfully, negotiations in the Senate continue. It's time for the name-calling to stop. Getting our economy back on track is too important to allow political games to sidetrack these efforts.

Both parties agree that any financial regulation should do one essential thing: no company should be considered ‘too big to fail.’

And never again should taxpayers be expected to bail out those who made risky financial bets with other peoples’ money.

Unfortunately, the White House is attacking Republican leaders to score political points. Americans are troubled by the way Democrats forced their health care bill on the public that overwhelmingly opposed it.

The Democrats are trying to do it again. But they underestimate Americans’ understanding.

The fact is a growing number of experts on both sides of the ideological spectrum are coming to see what Republicans have been saying all along: the Financial Regulation Bill contains serious flaws.

We believe this bill can be fixed, with a sincere bipartisan solution.

And, as the President said in his visit to Wall Street on Thursday, we are still working on a bipartisan bill ‘drawing on the ideas of Democrats and Republicans.’

It’s time for Democrats to put away the political playbook and simply say publicly what they’re suggesting privately: that this bill still needs some work, that both parties should come together to do that work on behalf of the American people. We can prevent future bailouts.

We can address the root causes of the economic downturn. But, first, we need to put politics aside. Thank you for your time. ####

Friday, April 23, 2010

The Democrats' Dirty Little Secret VIDEO


Cantor Launches Video News Release On Fannie And Freddie: "The Democrats' Dirty Little Secret"

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Office of House Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) today issued a video news release that sheds light upon the Democrats' "dirty little secret", mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Transcript For “The Democrats' Dirty Little Secret”

Voiceover: They call it “reform.”

But before the crisis hit, Democrats refused to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Among those who stood in the way of reform: then-Senator Barack Obama.

And now? The Fannie/Freddie bailout has already cost taxpayers $127 billion, and taxpayers are on the hook for hundreds of billions more.

And the Obama Administration continues to secretly bail out Fannie and Freddie using taxpayer dollars, which means that taxpayers guarantee more than $1.7 trillion of Fannie Freddie debt and more than $5 trillion in mortgages.

President Obama said, “Every day we don’t act, the same system that led to bailouts remains in place, with the same loopholes and the exact same liabilities.”

Why doesn’t the same standard apply to Fannie and Freddie?

Why?

Because it’s the Democrats’ dirty little secret: Fannie and Freddie.

April 22, 2010 Contact: Brad Dayspring 202-226-5249

Estimated Financial Effects of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

Estimated Financial Effects of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" as Amended April 22, 2010 FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT In PDF Format

SEC Inspector General to Launch Investigation on Timing of Goldman Sachs Filing VIDEO


WASHINGTON. D.C. – Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Inspector General (IG) David Kotz announced today that at the request of House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA), he would initiate an investigation examining the SEC’s decision to move forward with action against Goldman Sachs.

“I have received the letter and do intend to conduct an investigation at the request of Congressman Issa,” Kotz said while appearing today on Fox News’ Your World with Neil Cavuto. “We need to understand what led to the decision to announce or bring the case on that day. See if there was any undue influence involved and so we’ll look very carefully to investigate that and see what we determine.”

Earlier today, Issa sent a letter to the IG saying, “The circumstances of the filing and subsequent events fueled suspicion that the Commission, or one or more of its officials or employees, may have engaged in unauthorized disclosure or discussion of Commission proceedings in order to affect the debate over financial regulatory legislation currently pending before the United States Senate. Disclosure rules and procedures at the SEC are important to efforts to prevent insider trading and any violation would be deeply troubling.”

On April 20, eight Members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee wrote to Chairman Mary Schapiro to ask whether any prearrangement, coordination, or advance notice had existed between Commission officials or employees and supporters of the legislation, and to request documents and information to assist the Committee’s investigation of this matter.

In the April 20th letter to SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro, Issa and his Committee colleagues wrote, “As supported by the Commission’s canons of ethics and as frequently reiterated by you and other Commissioners, the unqualified independence of financial regulators is crucial to the health of the financial system and the U.S. economy. For this reason, doubts about whether the Commission has scrupulously guarded its independence from the Administration’s partisan political agenda and concerted efforts to manipulate Congressional action are very serious, and should be addressed with full transparency.” ###

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: B350A RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC 20515 PHONE: (202) 225-5074 FAX: (202) 225-3974

CMS Confirms ObamaCare Will Increase Spending

“And it [ObamaCare] will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government.” President Obama, September 10, 2009.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a new analysis of ObamaCare, confirming that our nation's health care costs will increase rather than decrease under ObamaCare and violating a pledge President Obama made repeatedly to the nation.

CMS concluded:

* Uninsured and those employers who don't offer coverage will pay $120 billion in taxes.
* National health care expenditures will increase by $311 billion.
* Health care increases to 21 percent of GDP by 2019.
* ObamaCare spends more than $828 billion for health care coverage. (CMS didn't analyze all the tax increases, such as HSAs, FSAs, increasing the AGI threshold, etc.)
* The government will spend $410 billion to expand Medicaid.
* Medicaid enrollment increases by 20 million new beneficiaries.
* 18 million people will be uninsured (excluding 5 million illegal immigrants).
* 50 percent of seniors will lose their Medicare Advantage plans.
* Some of the Medicare cost-control mechanisms may not be sustainable.
* Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) will run a deficit in 15 years.
* The $5 billion for High Risk Pools is not enough.
* Doctors may drop out of Medicare because of the changes in Medicare reimbursement rates.
* Medicare "savings" may be difficult to achieve.

Summary of CMS Report on ObamaCare


National Health Expenditures

* $311 billion increase in total health care spending
* Health care will be 21 percent of GDP in 2019 - up from 16 percent today and was projected to be 20.8 percent in 2019 pre-ObamaCare.

Cost for Coverage

* $828 billion total for health care coverage, including $410 billion for Medicaid and CHIP
* CMS did not score or analyze all the tax increases in H.R. 3590 and H.R. 4872.

Medicare

* $ 575.1 billion in Medicare changes, including:
o $145 billion in Medicare Advantage plan changes

Medicaid Expansion

* $410 billion in new Medicaid spending
* 20 million total new Medicaid and CHIP dependents:
o 18 million new dependents
o 2 million will supplement their employer plan with Medicaid coverage

Insurance Coverage

* 18 million people still uninsured
* $120 billion tax increase on the uninsured:
o $33 billion on individuals
o $87 billion on employers under "play or pay" penalties
* 14 million people would lose their employer coverage
* 13 million people will get coverage from their employer
* Net total of 1 million fewer people covered under employer-provided insurance by 2019

Seniors Dropping Coverage

* 50 percent would lose their Medicare Advantage plans
* Only 7.4 million seniors covered in 2017 (first full year of MA implementation)

Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS)

* No benefits during a five-year vesting period
* After 2025: benefits paid out exceed revenue paid in.

High Risk pools

* Only 375,000 people covered
* $5 billion will run out within two years

Excerpts from CMS report:

On National Health Expenditures (NHE):

"In aggregate, we estimate that for calendar years 2010 through 2019, NHE would increase by $311 billion..." Page 15

On the Financial Impact:

"...most of the coverage provisions would be in effect for only 6 of the 10 years of the budget period, the cost estimates shown in this memorandum do not represent a full 10-year cost for the new legislation." Page 2

On Medicare Payment Changes:

"Thus, providers for whom Medicare constitutes a substantive portion of their business could find it difficult to remain profitable and, absent legislative intervention, might end their participation in the program (possibly jeopardizing access to care for beneficiaries)." Page 10

"Simulations by the Office of the Actuary suggest that roughly 15 percent of Part A providers would become unprofitable within the 10-year projection period as a result of the productivity adjustments." Page 10

"...reductions in payment updates to health care providers...are unlikely to be sustainable on a permanent annual basis." Page 20

On Medicare's Independent Payment Advisory Board:

"The Board will be charged with recommending changes to certain Medicare payment categories in an effort to prevent per-beneficiary Medicare costs from increasing faster than the average of the CPI and the CPI-medical for ‘implementation years' 2015 through 2019." Page 10

"In general, limiting cost growth to a level below medical price inflation alone would represent an exceedingly difficult challenge." Page 10

"... further reductions in Medicare growth rates...may be difficult to achieve in practice." Page 20

On Medicare Advantage Coverage:

"We estimate that in 2017, when the MA provisions will be fully phased in, enrollment in MA plans will be lower by about 50 percent (from its projected level of 14.8 million under the prior law to 7.4 million under the new law)." Page 11

On Controlling Medicare Costs:

"...the growth rate reductions from productivity adjustments are unlikely to be sustainable on a permanent annual basis, and meeting the CPI-based target growth rates prior to 2010 will be very challenging as well." Page 12

On Prevention and Wellness:

"There is no consensus in the available literature or among experts that prevention and wellness efforts result in lower costs. Several prominent studies conclude that such provisions - while improving the quality of individuals' lives in important ways - generally increase costs overall." Page 13

On CLASS:

"...in 2025 and later, projected benefits exceed premiums revenues, resulting in a net Federal cost in the longer term." Page 14

"In general, voluntary, unsubsidized, and non-underwritten insurance programs such as CLASS face a significant risk of failure as a result of adverse selection by participants." Page 15

"As discussed in the section on the CLASS program, we believe that there is a very serious risk that the program, as currently specified, will not be sustainable because of adverse selection." Page 20

On High Risk Pools:

"By 2011 and 2012, the initial $5 billion in Federal funding for this program would be exhausted, resulting in substantial premium increases to sustain the program; we anticipate that such increase would limit further participation." Page 16

On Medical Device, Drug, and Insurance Company Taxes:

"We anticipate that these fees and the excise tax would generally be passed through to health consumers in the form of higher drug and device prices and higher insurance premiums..." Page 17

On Access to Care under Medicaid:

"Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that a significant portion of the increased demand for Medicaid would be difficult to meet, particularly over the first few years." Page 20

the House Republican Conferenc

Joe Barton on CMS Actuary’s Report

People can usually feel a storm coming and that’s why they turned against ObamaCare last summer. Now the storm is here.’

WASHINGTON – U.S. Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, today made the following statement on the release of a report by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service’s Office of the Actuary saying that the new ObamaCare law will not reduce costs.

“What’s extraordinary about the report is that the Democrats’ health care promises are evaporating so quickly,” Barton said. “Now Americans are finding that they’re stuck with some of the worst of the health care reform’s many unhappy consequences – higher costs instead of lower, and coverage that you’re going to lose no matter how much you like it. People can usually feel a storm coming and that’s why they turned against ObamaCare last summer. Now the storm is here.”

The new health care law:

• Cuts $575.1 from Medicare between now and September 30, 2019.
• ObamaCare spends more than $828 billion for health care coverage. (CMS didn’t analyze all the tax increases, such as HSAs, FSAs, increasing the AGI threshold, etc.)
• Imposes $87 billion in additional punitive taxes on employers over the 2014-2019 period alone.
• Imposes more than $33 billion in additional punitive taxes on uninsured individuals over the 2015-2019 period alone.
• Leaves 23 million individuals without health insurance coverage in 2019.
• Provides coverage for 34 million people in 2019, of which 18 million will be forced into Medicaid, known for its access problems and substandard payments to providers.
• Increases health care spending to 21 percent of GDP by 2019.
• Uninsured and those employers who don’t offer coverage will pay $120 billion in taxes.
• Causes half of seniors to lose their Medicare Advantage plans.
• Creates another trust fund that is destined for insolvency. Within the next 15 years, the new trust fund for the CLASS program will start to pay out more in benefits than it collects in premiums, causing yet another federal program to add billions of dollars to our national debt.

CMS Analysis Confirms Government Takeover of Health Care Will Increase Costs, Undermine Existing Coverage for Millions

14 Million Americans to Lose Current Employer-Provided Health Coverage

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Rep. John Kline (R-MN), the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee’s senior Republican member, issued the following statement in response to a new analysis from the Office of the Actuary for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS):

“The independent experts have confirmed what Democrats in Washington, D.C. don’t want you to know: Millions of Americans who like their current coverage are slated to lose it under ObamaCare. Whether it’s working families who receive health benefits at work or seniors who rely on the Medicare Advantage program, the government takeover of health care means millions will be forced out of their current plans.

“As early as December, CMS sounded the alarm over this massive spending binge and entitlement expansion. Unfortunately, Democrat leaders chose to ignore their warning, and now, the American people and future generations are paying the price. Instead of clamping down on runaway health care spending, we now know the new health care law will cause health care spending to increase even more quickly than it would have under the broken status quo.

“In March, I joined Republican leaders in the House and Senate to request this important study. It was our hope the report would be available in time to help inform members of Congress, and the public, before they cast their final votes on health care. It is now clear why Democrat leaders rushed their government-run scheme to a vote before this report could be completed: Their rhetoric simply does not match reality. Instead of lowering health care costs, ObamaCare increases prices, jeopardizes access by expanding the strains on entitlement programs, and leaves our children with the bill.

“It is not too late to spare the American people the devastating consequences of government-run health care. I urge my colleagues to heed this latest warning as evidence of the need to undo this flawed law so we can begin to right the wrong of the Democrats’ government takeover of health care.”

NOTE: The CMS study, which was requested by House and Senate Republicans in March, found that 14 million Americans will lose their employer-provided coverage as a result of the Democrats’ health care legislation, while 7 million seniors – approximately half of all participants – will no longer be covered by Medicare Advantage. The study also projected that health care spending will increase by $331 billion over the next 10 years. # # #

Press Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 23, 2010 CONTACT: Alexa Marrero or Brian Newell (202) 225-4527

Thursday, April 22, 2010

The Washington Post - Bringing Thunder-ous Change to New Jersey

For Immediate Release: Contact: Michael Drewniak Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010 609-777-2600

The Washington Post, George F. Will Thursday, April 22, 2010

The bridge spanning the Delaware River connects New Jersey's capital with this town where the nation's most interesting governor occasionally eats lunch at Cafe Antonio. It also connects New Jersey's government with reality.

The bridge is a tutorial on a subject this government has flunked -- economics, which is mostly about incentives. At the Pennsylvania end of the bridge, cigarette shops cluster: New Jersey's per-pack tax is double Pennsylvania's. In late afternoon, Gov. Chris Christie says, the bridge is congested with New Jersey government employees heading home to Pennsylvania, where the income tax rate is 3 percent, compared with New Jersey's top rate of 9 percent.

There are 700,000 more Democrats than Republicans in New Jersey, but in November Christie flattened the Democratic incumbent, Jon Corzine. Christie is built like a burly baseball catcher, and since his inauguration just 13 weeks ago, he has earned the name of the local minor-league team -- the Trenton Thunder.

He inherited a $2.2 billion deficit, and next year's projected deficit of $10.7 billion is, relative to the state's $29.3 billion budget, the nation's worst.

Instead, Christie noted that between 2004 and 2008 there was a net outflow of $70 billion in wealth as "the rich," including small businesses, fled. And he said previous administrations had "raised taxes 115 times in the last eight years alone." So he closed the $2.2 billion gap by accepting 375 of 378 suggested spending freezes and cuts. In two weeks. By executive actions. In eight weeks he cut $13 billion -- $232 million a day, $9 million an hour. Now comes the hard part. Government employees' health benefits are, he says, "41 percent more expensive" than those of the average Fortune 500 company.

Without changes in current law, "spending will have increased 322 percent in 20 years -- over 16 percent a year." There is, he says, a connection between the state's being No. 1 in total tax burden and being No. 1 in the proportion of college students who, after graduating, leave the state. Partly to pay for teachers' benefits -- most contribute nothing to pay for their health insurance -- property taxes have increased 70 percent in 10 years, to an average annual cost to homeowners of $7,281. Christie proposes a 2.5 percent cap on annual increases.

Challenging teachers unions to live up to their cloying "it's really about the kids" rhetoric, he has told them to choose between a pay freeze and job cuts. Validating his criticism by their response to it, some Bergen County teachers encouraged students to cut classes and go to the football field to protest his policies, and a Bridgewater high school teacher showed students a union-made video critical of him. Christie notes that the $550,000 salary of the executive director of the teachers union is larger than the total cuts proposed for 190 of the state's 605 school districts.

He has received some support from the Democratic president of the state Senate, Stephen Sweeney, a leader of a local ironworkers union. This suggests waning solidarity between unionized private-sector workers who are weary of paying ever-higher taxes to enrich unionized public employees.

Christie is using his power to remind New Jersey that wealth goes where it is welcome and stays where it is well-treated. Prosperous states are practicing, at the expense of slow learners like New Jersey, "entrepreneurial federalism" -- competing to have the most enticing business climate.

Saying "subtlety is not going to win this fight," Christie notes that New Jersey's police officers, the nation's highest paid, can retire after 25 years at 65 percent of their highest salary. In the state that has the nation's fourth-highest percentage (66) of public employees who are unionized, he has joined the struggle that will dominate the nation's domestic policymaking in this decade -- to break the ruinous collaboration between elected officials and unionized state and local workers whose affections the officials purchase with taxpayers' money.

View entire article here. Bringing Thunder-ous change to New Jersey

The Perfect Recipe for a Disastrous Political Economy

Washington, Apr 22 - Republican Study Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) issued the following statement after President Obama’s speech in New York City urging the passage of the Democrats’ financial legislation (a.k.a the Bailout Protection Act).

“Look past the President’s rhetoric, and you’ll find an ivory tower approach to regulating the economy being pushed by people with a startling lack of real world business experience,” said Chairman Price. “Officially labeling an institution as too-big-to-fail will give it an advantage over other companies when competing for investment capital and empower it to take bigger risks, just like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Too-big-to-fail will become even bigger and more likely to fail, and the inevitable bailout that the Democrats’ plan allows will hit the American taxpayer even harder.

“The Democrats’ plan should really be known as the Bailout Protection Act. It gives unelected bureaucrats enormous latitude to cover the debt of private companies and step in with bailouts for just about any reason at all. The bailout rules will allow unions and politically favored creditors to get a better deal than regular folks who invested their hard-earned money. It’s the perfect recipe for a destructive political economy.

“This plan is a corruption of the rules of free-enterprise. It will prevent entrepreneurs and small businesses from getting access to the capital they so desperately need to expand and create jobs. With Washington picking winners and losers in this political economy, the only real winners will be the well-connected special interests who benefit from bailouts.

“The real choice is not between this ivory tower Bailout Protection Act or the status quo. House Republicans have a better solution. It comes down to a choice between more bailouts with smothering restrictions that prevent job creation or an end to the bailouts with strong consumer protections that don’t hurt small businesses’ access to job-creating investment capital. We are at a crossroads where checks and balances are needed here in Washington to stop the government takeover of virtually every aspect of the lives of Americans.” ###

Congressman Tom Price is Chairman of the Republican Study Committee (RSC). FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4.22.2010

Paulsen Website Wins Gold Mouse Award

3rd District Congressman awarded for quality of his website, one of just 38 in Congress to capture the honor out of 620 evaluated websites.

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressman Erik Paulsen (MN-03) was presented with the Gold Mouse Award for his Congressional website last night during a ceremony honoring the top websites in Congress. The award, chosen by the independent Congressional Management Foundation (CMF), is given to the top websites in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, including both committee and official leadership websites.

Out of 620 total websites evaluated by CMF, Paulsen’s was one of 38 to receive the prestigious Gold Mouse Award. Only four websites were given a higher award, and Paulsen was the only freshman Republican given the Gold Mouse Award.

"My number one priority in Congress is constituent service and an important part of that effort is having an informative, effective and interactive website,” Paulsen said. “I consider my website to be my ‘online office’ and I was thrilled to accept this award for one of the best websites in Congress. I encourage my constituents to continue utilizing this important tool to stay engaged in the future."

The 111th Congress Gold Mouse Awards are part of CMF’s Partnership For A More Perfect Union, which seeks to improve the quality of communication between Members of Congress and their constituents. For this project CMF partnered with researchers from several universities to study how Members of Congress can use the Internet to improve communications with their constituents and to promote greater participation in the legislative process.

Websites were graded on how well they incorporate five core principles that CMF identified through research as critical for effectiveness: know your audience, provide timely and targeted content that meets their needs, make the site easy to use, foster interaction both on and offline, and add value through innovation.

For more information on 111th Congress Gold Mouse Project report, including a full listing of all winners, please visit www.pmpu.org. ###

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 22, 2010 CONTACT: Luke Friedrich (952) 405-8510 / Andrew Foxwell (202) 225-2871

“The American people want Congress to change the way we spend the people’s money.”

Washington, DC - U.S. Congressman Mike Pence, Chairman of the House Republican Conference, delivered the following remarks today in support of earmark reform legislation introduced by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA):

"The American people are tired of borrowing and spending and bailouts in Washington DC. They've gathered in town hall meetings, and tea parties, and rallies across this country for the last year-and-a-half to say "enough is enough." But it's not just runaway federal spending. The American people also want Congress to change the way we spend the people's money.

"And House Republicans took a historic step this year when we embraced a unilateral one-year ban on all earmarks. I commend Congressman Goodlatte, and stand with my other leaders in Congress to say that we should not only embrace a unilateral one-year ban on earmarks, but we should use the savings that the ban will impose to reduce the deficit. We should initiate a process to begin to literally change the way we spend the people's money going forward.

"But my focus today is simply to call on Speaker Pelosi to put the American people's money where her mouth is, to join us, Madame Speaker, in this unilateral one-year moratorium. And let's go to work in a bipartisan way to fundamentally restore public confidence in the budget process here in Washington, DC."

Background
The resolution introduced by Rep. Goodlatte would require that money saved from the Republican ban on earmarks be put toward deficit reduction. The resolution would also create a bipartisan and bicameral committee to review and overhaul the budgetary, spending, and earmark process. ###

Contact Matt Lloyd or Mary Vought at (202) 226-9000 or matt.lloyd@mail.house.gov

Peter Roskam Calls for Swift Action on Iran Sanctions VIDEO


“Thank you Mr. Speaker and I thank the Gentle Lady for yielding. You know, not long ago I was briefed by an official on Iran’s provocative action and he gave a challenge in that briefing.

He said, print out on your computer a red line. Print a big thick red bar on a white sheet of paper. And if you look at it from a distance you think it’s a solid red line, but if you look at it up close, what you’ll see is that it’s actually a series of tiny little pink lines all pushed together, but they’re individual little pink lines.

And he said that what Iran has figured out is they have figured out a way to break through one tiny little line at a time. Just one at a time, one at a time, one at a time. And that is why we’re here today, because we in the west, we in the United States, are on to what the Iranian leadership is doing.

They’re being incredibly provocative. There is no legitimate nuclear ambition for Iran, this is a regime that has said that Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East has no right to exist. They’ve said one provocative thing after another, and history is filled, Mr. Speaker, of examples of weakness and ambiguity in foreign affairs. What is the result? Largely, the result is calamity.

Now we have a chance to be united, for all of us to come together, to say we’re not going to stand for this, we’ve come up with a remedy, and it is time for the conferees to move forward, and to create these very tough and solid sanctions against the petroleum products going into Iran.

I urge the conferees to move quickly, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Washington, Apr 22 - Deputy Republican Whip Peter Roskam (R-IL) Iran Remarks Delivered On The House Floor April 22, 2010

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Military Officers Association of America Honors Sen. Burr

MOAA awards Senator Burr for work to relieve burden of relocations

Washington DC -- Last night, U.S. Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) received the 2010 Colonel Arthur T. Marix Congressional Leadership Award for his work in support of America’s men and women in uniform, their military families, and for his work in championing the Military Spouse Residency Relief Act. The award was sponsored by the Military Officers Association of America (MOAA), an organization of active duty, National Guard, Reserve, former and retired military officers and surviving spouses with over 370,000 members nationwide.

"The strength of our nation’s military force depends on the strength of military families,” Senator Burr said. “Military families provide the support our men and women in uniform need to do their job, and it is incumbent on us to make their lives easier as they undergo frequent relocations and deployments. Allowing military spouses to have equal residency rights and to help them advance their careers and find employment opportunities despite frequent relocations are just small ways that we can make their lives just a little bit easier. I’m deeply appreciative of this award and humbled to be a part of creating policy that benefits families who sacrifice every day for our nation’s well-being."

“The top award that MOAA presented to Senator Burr recognizes the highest caliber of leadership, dedication, and love of country,” said Retired U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Richard I. Neal, Chairman of MOAA’s Board of Directors. “It also recognizes the desire for a strong national defense, and—most importantly—steadfast support for the uniformed men and women who make that strong defense a reality.”

Last year, Senator Burr introduced the Military Spouse Residency Relief Act, which was signed into law on Veterans Day in 2009. This bill allows military spouses to maintain or change residency when their family relocates due to military orders. Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE), Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and Representative John Carter (R-TX) were honored alongside Senator Burr as co-recipients for their work on behalf of the veteran community.

U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs • 412 Russell Senate Bldg. • Washington D.C. 20510 Republican Staff: (202) 224-2074 • (202) 224-9126

Bailouts of Omission Democrats’ Plans Ignore Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Washington, Apr 21 - Republican Study Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) issued the following statement regarding the complete lack of reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in both Senator Chris Dodd’s (D-CT) financial regulatory reform legislation and similar legislation by Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) that House Democrats passed last December.

“Officially, the Congressional Budget Office expects the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to cost taxpayers $380 billion,” said Chairman Price. “Unofficially, Democrats promised the companies an infinite bailout, forcing taxpayers to choke down all $1.6 trillion of their combined debt if necessary. At this point, that $1.6 trillion debt may as well be issued in U.S. Treasury bonds.

“The largest taxpayer bailout did not go to Bear Stearns, AIG, or Goldman Sachs; it went to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But those are the two government-created entities President Obama will likely not mention in his speech on Wall Street tomorrow because the Democrats’ notion of financial reform ignores them completely.

“The Democrats’ plans are bad enough by perpetuating and codifying Washington’s bailout mentality. They are made even worse because Democrats just do not care to acknowledge the huge role Fannie and Freddie’s reckless decisions played in the financial meltdown. This intentional omission is a sure way to guarantee more bailouts in the future.

“House Republicans introduced a better solution last year that protects consumers and ends the bailouts for everyone, including Fannie and Freddie. The too-big-to-fail guarantee that allowed their irresponsible decisions to tank our economy must come to an end.” ###

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4.21.2010

Daily Show Jon Stewart Bernie Goldberg Fox News VIDEO

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart

April 20, 2010: Bernie Goldberg Fires Back Jon apologizes for criticizing Bernie Goldberg and Fox News, but it's only because they're a terrible, cynical, disingenuous news organization

Republican Leadership Press Conference April 21, 2010 TEXT PODCAST VIDEO



MP3 download for PODCAST

Participants:
- Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH)
- Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA)
- Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence
(R-IN)
- Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL)
- Rep. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV)
- Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)

TEXT TRANSCRIPT: Conference Chairman Mike Pence

Good morning, all. We just completed the meeting of the House Republican Conference. The American people are tired of runaway federal spending, borrowing and bailouts. The legislation being considered by the Senate, which passed the House, is nothing but a permanent bailout and House Republicans are determined to oppose it. Last week, some Democrats said there wasn’t a permanent bailout in this bill. Other Democrats, by the end of the week, said there was a permanent bailout fund in the bill. This may be one of those instances where the left hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing.

The truth is, the American people are not deceived here. They see that what’s being passed under the cloak of financial services reform is nothing more than making permanent the Wall Street bailouts that passed, some year and a half ago, in the form of the TARP. House Republicans are determined to bring about financial services reform that begins with ending the era of bailouts through bankruptcy code reform and others, and protecting consumers without putting taxpayers on a permanent hook for financial institutions who act in a financially irresponsible way.

Republican Whip Eric Cantor

Good morning. America is at a crossroads and the people across this country realize that decisions that are being made by this majority in Congress, as well as in the administration, are taking us down a path at that cross roads to an America we don’t recognize.

The transformational change that this majority and administration have been about have manifested themselves in bills such as the stimulus bill, the health care bill, the proposed cap and trade bill, and now what we see yet another bill – the reg reform bill. What all these bills have in common is this notion that somehow we need to expand Washington’s reach and at the same time, engage in rhetoric and discussion that aims to tear down the wage creators from trying to help the wage earners. It just doesn’t make sense.

The president is going to Wall Street tomorrow and I know all of us are going to be listening to hear if he’s actually going to try and address problems rather than affect an ideological agenda of transformational change. I personally want to hear the president speak about doing something about Fannie and Freddie and the systemic risk that they cause. We’ve heard nothing about it and all of us know they’ve had a lot to do with why we’re in the shape that we’re in, from an economic standpoint, in the first place. So, I’d say to the president, ‘Instead of engaging in hyperbole about Wall Street, and the typical populist rhetoric that we’ve been about, let’s start trying to focus on the problems and fix them.

Rep. Cynthia Lummis

It is main street banks all over this country that are providing the credit to get America going again, to get small businesses hiring and entrepreneurs back in business, yet this bill focuses on Wall Street. This bill focuses on bailouts. This bill is a job killer.

Rep. Spencer Bachus

There are three things in the bill that are different. There are a lot of things that are alike. We both address derivatives, more transparency, we all close gaps in the regulation. But the three differences are this: the first difference is they have a command and control regime, just like in health care, just like in cap and trade. They would make decisions for the American people and for businesses that those people make for themselves. The government would manage what traditionally in this country the family, or the business, or the individual would manage.

The second big difference: they would continue to manage the permanent bailout authority long after the American people have rejected bailouts. They’re arguing among themselves as Mr. Pence said. Do we have a before-the-fact bailout fund or an after-the-fact bailout fund, or no bailout fund at all? But the one thing they do, they give the FDIC a trillion dollar authority to bailout creditors and counterparties just like they did in AIG.

The third difference, a very important difference that even Democratic economists across the nation said you have to have in the bill, you have to reform Fannie and Freddie. You have to have a resolution of that. If you don’t, you’ll have another $127 billion or $300 billion bailout of them. They have an unlimited line of credit drawn on the American people. Thank you.

Rep. Shelley Moore Capito

To end the perpetual bailout and ‘too big to fail’ part of this regulatory reform bill, we as Republicans had very substantial ideas about an enhanced bankruptcy. Let’s separate the taxpayer from the institutions that have engaged in risky behavior, that are putting people’s retirement plans across this country at risk. And let’s put them, if they are beginning to fail or if they are failing, they should go into bankruptcy like every other institution in this country, or every other corporation who has serious financial problems. We had an enhanced bankruptcy, we think it makes sense, not only from a government standpoint, but on main street. It makes good sense because it creates that separation between the taxpayer. It ends too big to fail. It ends the bailout mentality that the Democrats are perpetuating in this bill.

Republican Leader John Boehner

The American people continue to ask the question, ‘where are the jobs?’ All they see out of Washington is this job-killing agenda by the Democrats here that is only making matters worse for American families and small businesses – and this bailout bill is no exception. It will bail out Wall Street at the expense of small banks and small businesses all over the country. The President says that he wants to clean up Wall Street, but when you look at this bill, what he actually does is protect them from ever having a financial problem. Because there is, in fact, a permanent bailout fund here.

Even if they take the $50 billion fund out of the Senate bill, when you look at the authority given to the FDIC and the Treasury, they’ve got the ability to go in and bailout anybody they deem in need of it, or anyone who’s systemically at risk.

But this idea of institutionalizing ‘too big to fail’ will in fact hurt all kinds of businesses around the country. Because as an investor, if you look at one of these big firms that can’t possibly go out of business because they are ‘too big to fail,’ why not invest there? It’s going to be the safest investment in the world and it’s going to have an implicit government guarantee, just like Fannie and Freddie again. This is a bad bill and Republicans are going to stand with the American people, who are standing on their tip-toes yelling, ‘stop!’

GOP.gov - The Website of Republicans in Congress

Ethics Investigation Must Answer: What Did Democratic Leaders Know? When Did They Know? What Did They Do to Protect Staff and Interns?

House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) issued the following statement on the House Ethics Committee’s decision to start a formal investigation regarding how allegations against former Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) were handled by Members of Congress and staff outside his office, including top House Democratic Leaders:

“The American people have the right to expect their elected leaders to adhere to the highest possible standards of ethical conduct. Members of Congress, especially Leaders, have clear responsibilities when it comes to protecting Congressional employees and interns from harassment and abuse. I hope this investigation will establish, in a timely fashion, whether the Democratic leadership lived up to those standards in the case involving Congressman Massa and his employees.

“News reports indicate that Congressman Massa’s pattern of troubling behavior continued long after Democratic Leaders first became aware of his conduct. Speaker Pelosi’s staff has acknowledged they knew about problems in Mr. Massa’s office back in the fall of 2009, and House Majority Leader Hoyer’s office was contacted at least several days before the allegations were publicly known.

“We need answers to serious questions: what did Democratic Leaders know about former Rep. Massa’s conduct? When did they know? What did they do to protect the staff and interns who were being subjected to harassment by their boss?”

Washington, Apr 21 - Office of the House Republican Leader H-204 The Capitol || Washington, DC 20515 || p. (202) 225-4000 || f. (202) 225-5117|| Click here to email the Republican Leader

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Sen. Burr Introduces Bill to Increase Employment of Military Spouses

Tax incentive encourages greater opportunity for employers, employees

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) introduced the Military Spouse Employment Act, legislation that will encourage employers to hire qualified military spouses by expanding the Workforce Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) to include military families.

“Military spouses are among our nation’s most valuable assets,” Senator Burr said. “These men and women are already sacrificing for our country, and we can’t let the hard facts of military life like relocations get in the way of their career and financial support for their families. By encouraging employers to hire military spouses, this tax incentive results in big returns with just a small investment.”

The Senator introduced this bill in light of recent studies that show that military spouses traditionally earn less income and have higher unemployment rates than their civilian counterparts due to frequent relocations. Using the WOTC would allow an employer to claim a tax credit of 40% of the first $6,000 in wages paid during the worker's first year of employment.

This legislation has the support of the Military Coalition, an alliance representing 5.5 million members in 35 organizations including AMVETS, Veterans of Foreign Wars, and the Military Officers Association of America. Representative John Carter (R-TX) introduced the House version of the bill (H.R. 4764) in March 2010.

Gov. Schwarzenegger Announces Introduction of Legislation to Support Student Civil Rights

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today announced the introduction of SB 955, legislation authored by Senator Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar) that would provide local school districts the flexibility to ensure that all California students have access to the high-quality teachers and education they deserve. The Governor also announced his support for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)/Public Council lawsuit against the Los Angeles Unified School District’s (LAUSD) teacher layoff practices that are disproportionally hurting low-income and minority schools; a problem this legislation would help solve.

“It is unacceptable that school districts cannot determine their staffing based on the needs of students, and that is exactly why I am introducing this legislation and supporting the ACLU lawsuit. SB 955 will help ensure that classrooms are filled with effective teachers by giving school districts the flexibility to make staffing decisions based on ability, not just seniority,” said Governor Schwarzenegger. “I call on the legislators, both Democrat and Republican, to join me in standing up for the civil rights of all California students by supporting this important legislation.”

Decades of research shows that teacher effectiveness is the single most important school-based factor determining student achievement. However, current state law does not provide the flexibility to local school districts to consider anything but seniority in determining teacher layoffs. The effectiveness and excellence of teachers, as well as the needs of schools to keep great teachers, are not allowed to be considered. SB 955 will ensure that the most effective teachers can stay in the classroom by providing significant new program flexibilities for school districts to manage their staffing and resources based on student needs including:

* Seniority Provisions: This would allow schools to layoff, assign, reassign, transfer and rehire teachers and administrators based on effectiveness and subject matter needs, without regard to seniority.
* Flexible Layoff Notification Period Provisions: This would allow schools until the end of the school year to notify teachers of potential layoffs, meaning schools can wait to make staffing decisions until their budgets are finalized – avoiding unfair disruptions to students, teachers and families.
* Streamlined Dismissal Process Provisions: This would allow districts to limit the Commission on Professional Competence (CPC) to only an Administrative Law Judge, and eliminate the binding authority of the current CPC, giving Local Education Agency governing boards final decision-making authority on teacher dismissals. Specifically, this proposal would:
o Eliminate the current prohibition on presentation of evidence to the CPC related to matters that occurred more than four years prior to the filing of the notice of teacher dismissal.
o Eliminate the requirement that teachers placed on administrative leave be paid until formally charged.
* Personnel Management Flexibility Provisions: This would allow schools to offer substitute service to teachers on the basis of subject matter needs, without regard to seniority, and eliminate provisions requiring schools to pay substitutes the former rate paid to them when they were permanently employed.

Governor Schwarzenegger has made improving California’s education system a top priority of his Administration. Most recently, on January 7, 2010, he signed historic education reform legislation to empower parents to have a true voice in making choices for their children, embrace accountability and to transform under-performing schools. To read more about the Governor’s education reform proposals, click here for PDF.

The Governor discussed his support for the ACLU/Public Council lawsuit at Edwin Markham Middle School in Watts. The school serves higher than average percentages of low-income students, students of color and English learners, and has been traditionally plagued by high levels of teacher turnover. Last year, Markham gave layoff notices to half of its teaching staff as a result of current state law that only considers seniority in determining teacher layoffs. This year, Markham expects to layoff even more educators – further harming students access to quality education.

04/20/2010 GAAS:240:10 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

McKeon, Turner & Armed Services Committee Republicans Draw Attention to New Report on Iran’s Military

Washington, D.C.—U.S. House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (R-Calif.), Armed Forces Strategic Forces Subcommittee Ranking Member Mike Turner (R-Ohio), and Republican members on the committee today called attention to elements included in and certain information excluded from the Department of Defense’s Military Power Report on Iran. The report, which was mandated in last year’s National Defense Authorization Act, is designed to provide Congress and the Administration with an assessment of the Iranian regime’s current and future military strategy.

Rep. McKeon: “The Pentagon’s new report confirms Iran’s efforts to support and cultivate terrorist surrogates throughout the Middle East to attack American citizens and interests. The rogue regime has re-armed Hezbollah and provides the terrorist group hundreds of millions of dollars a year. The assessment also makes it perfectly clear that Iran has gone to great lengths to protect and hide its nuclear infrastructure. Nearly as troubling, Iran is developing anti-access, aerial-denial capabilities with its investments in mobile coastal defense cruise missiles, rockets launchers, coastal artillery and ballistic missiles.”

“Unfortunately, the report failed to include information that is critical to truly assessing Iran’s military capability and future intentions. The Department of Defense failed to provide adequate information on the funding provided to each branch of Iran’s military, the Revolutionary Guards-Quds Force or the country’s special operations forces. Additionally, the report lacked specific information about Iran’s regional strategy and military doctrine—and failed to provide a sufficient assessment of Iran’s conventional or unconventional capabilities.”

“In addition to my concerns about what is not included in the report, I’m bothered by the Administration’s attempts to downplay Iran’s militant ideology in the report. I question the Department’s assessment that the goal of the Iranian strategy is ‘the survival of the regime’ and its ‘ideological goals have taken a back seat to pragmatic considerations.’ This flies in the face of the regime’s efforts to export the Ayatollah’s radical religious vision beyond Iran’s borders.”

Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio): “Despite the Administration’s insistence last September that the long-range missile threat was slower to develop, the Administration’s own report confirms that Iran could develop and test an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of reaching the U.S. by 2015. Therefore, I remain gravely concerned that Administration’s Phased Adaptive Approach is not designed to protect our homeland until 2020. I will look to include specific initiatives in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011to address Iran’s development of missile capabilities and to ensure the U.S. homeland and our Allies are adequately protected before the threat develops.”

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.): “The report released yesterday highlighting Iran’s ability to reach the United States with a long range ballistic missile confirms what we already know – that Iran will stop at nothing to demonstrate its military capability. Whether it is funding insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan, Hezbollah in Lebanon, or Hamas in Gaza, or continuing to develop nuclear capabilities, Iran has been and continues to be the largest state sponsor of terrorism and a threat to the entire civilized world. And yet, this Administration continues to believe that diplomacy is the answer. Now, based on reports from Secretary Gates, we are in a situation in which we are unprepared to deal with their military advances. It seems clear to me that the time for diplomacy is over. We need to enforce sanctions that have teeth such as prohibiting refined petroleum from being imported into the country.”

Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.): “Recently released information on Iran’s military is a stark reminder of the military and nuclear realities in the region. The Department of Defense’s report confirms many concerns including Iran’s efforts to hide nuclear infrastructure, their support of terrorist surrogates, and the terrifying investment in a missile that could hit the United States by 2015. Now is the time for the Administration and Congress to put forward an effective strategy to deal with Iran. Additionally, it is imperative that we work vigilantly with our allies and partners around the world to ensure any measures dissuade Iran from continuing to go down this dangerous road.”

Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.): "I am deeply concerned that the DOD's Military Power Report on Iran leaves conspicuously absent several key factors, including the radical ideology that motivates Iran's leaders and its military, which should impact the United States' response to the increasingly belligerent and aggressive Iranian regime. Ignoring key facts about Iran's conventional and unconventional military strategy could have disastrous implications for our foreign policy toward Iran, the world's greatest state sponsor of terrorism and, I believe, the greatest threat to freedom and security we face today. The last remaining window we have to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear power and transferring that knowledge to terrorists all over the world is rapidly closing. I urge the Administration to adopt every possible sense of urgency when addressing the Iranian threat."

Rep. Bill Shuster (R-Pa.): “The Iranian regime has done nothing to prove itself as anything but a threat to the United States and our allies in the Middle East and Europe. The Administration is doing a disservice to our military by failing to produce a candid report on the military strength of the Iranian regime,” said Congressman Bill Shuster. “I am particularly concerned that the Administration’s report omits significant information about their development and deployment of active denial systems that could defeat our inventory of short and long range missile systems. This is critical information that will have a important impact on the security posture of our interests in the Persian Gulf and that of our allies. This omission must be corrected.”

Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.): “The report confirms what most intelligent observers of world events already know: Iran poses an increasing threat to regional and global stability. The report offers substantive analysis of Iran’s attempt to protect and hide its nuclear infrastructure, its growing ballistic missile force, and its continued efforts to export radicalism and terrorism abroad. However, it fails to offer a comprehensive strategy to deal with that imminent threat. We cannot continue to deal with Iran’s growing threat on the fly. We must develop a long term approach on how we will stop Iran from threatening global peace and assist Iranian dissidents in their desire for regime change.”

Rep. John Fleming, M.D. (R-La.): “While I’m glad the Pentagon undertook this assessment, I personally didn’t need a report to confirm that the Iranian threat is real and credible. Bottom line is Iran and its extremist regime pose a significant danger to the United States and our allies, particularly Israel. I can only hope that the Democratic majority doesn’t shortchange the Department of Defense again this year on key investments in ballistic missile defense, which are essential to countering the growing threat of a nuclear armed Iran. President Obama and his national security team should heed this warning and get serious about Iran.”

Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.): “We need more specific intelligence about Iran’s true military capabilities. We cannot underestimate, as this report does, the militant ideology of Iran’s leaders or their desire to do us harm.”

McKeon and Turner indicated that they will look to include specific initiatives in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 to force the Administration to develop a comprehensive, long-term strategy to deal with Iran’s nuclear ambitions and military build-up. The House Armed Services Committee is expected to consider the annual defense policy bill in May. ###

Press Release: April 20, 2010

Israel’s Independence Day a Reason to Celebrate

Washington, Apr 20 - Republican Study Committee Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) issued the following statement as the Israeli people celebrate their Independence Day.

“Israel’s Independence Day is an occasion to celebrate for every American who values our strong alliance with the leading democracy in the Middle East,” said Chairman Price. “The Israeli people’s journey to preserve their independence as a Jewish state has been and remains a difficult one. Unfortunately, the chill placed on U.S.-Israeli relations by the Obama administration makes that journey even more challenging. Along with a strong majority of the United States Congress, I remain steadfastly committed to ensuring the mutual security of our two nations.

“The American people have no greater friend or ally than Israel. That Israel has received such a cool reception by this current administration while the tyrannical Iranian regime gets ever closer to possessing a nuclear weapon is reckless and irresponsible. The obvious pursuit by Ahmadinejad and company poses a clear threat to the United States, to Israel, and to stability in the region. I call on President Obama on this special day of recognition for Israel to embrace the freedom loving people of Israel and correct the wayward international course of his administration.” ###

Congressman Tom Price is Chairman of the Republican Study Committee (RSC). FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4.20.2010

America’s Commitment To Israel Must Not Waver

Washington, DC - U.S. Congressman Mike Pence, Chairman of the House Republican Conference, made the following statement as the nation of Israel began its annual Independence Day celebration:

"Sixty-two years ago the state of Israel declared its independence. Today, as Israelis celebrate their Independence Day, I congratulate our most cherished ally for prevailing against long odds.

"Israel lives under the threatening shadow of a neighbor that has vowed to ‘wipe Israel off the map.' But, despite trials and travails throughout its history, Israel remains a beacon of democracy in the Middle East.

"Israel's Independence Day should also serve as a reminder of America's commitment to preserve and protect Israel. The United States stands firm as Israel's closest friend.

"In recent days the White House has given a cold shoulder to Israel. This should not be. It is the responsibility of President Obama and the Congress to ensure that our commitment to Israel does not waver, and that we focus on imposing crippling sanctions against Iran to halt its growing threat against our friend." ###

For Additional Information Contact Matt Lloyd or Mary Vought at (202) 226-9000 or matt.lloyd@mail.house.gov

Ros-Lehtinen: Shouldn’t Human Rights Reports Focus on Human Rights Abusers?

(WASHINGTON) – U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, commented today on the release of the 2009 Annual Report of the Organization of American States’ (OAS) Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), which reviews the status of human rights in nations of the Western Hemisphere. Statement by Ros-Lehtinen:

“The most surprising aspect of this human rights report was not the mention of violations of human rights and civil liberties by the Cuban and Venezuelan regimes.

“Instead, what was startling was the OAS’s inexplicable and deeply alarming decision to present Colombia and Honduras – both free democracies with a strong commitment to human rights – as worse than the Cuban tyranny and the Chavez dictatorship.

“Shouldn’t human rights reports focus on real human rights abusers?

“By smearing Colombia and Honduras while minimizing the actions of real abusers in Cuba and Venezuela, the OAS is continuing its biased assault against true democracies in the region and moving further away from its mission and founding charter.

“When will the OAS wake up and stand up for the democratic principles upon which the organization was founded? When will it call a tyranny a tyranny and a democracy a democracy? When will it stand on the side of the people of the region, rather than with their oppressors?

“This report proves once again that it falls to the U.S. and other responsible nations to stand up for freedom and democracy in the Hemisphere. The OAS is derelict in its duties.” ######

House Foreign Affairs Committee U.S. House of Representatives Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Ranking Republican

For Immediate Release April 19, 2010 Contact: Brad Goehner, (202) 226-8467 Alex Cruz, (202) 225-8200

The Toxic VAT - The Senate votes against the tax, 85-13.

“Bipartisanship has broken out in the Senate, not that the media bothered to notice. Last week John McCain introduced a resolution stating that ‘It is the sense of the Senate that the Value Added Tax is a massive tax increase that will cripple families on fixed income and only further push back America's economic recovery.’ The resolution passed 85 to 13.”

The Wall Street Journal – Opinion The Toxic VAT

Press Releases: United States Senator John McCain Press Office April 20, 2010 United States Senate, 241 Russell Senate Ofc. Bldg. Washington, DC 20510, Main: (202) 224-2235, Fax: (202) 228-2862

Monday, April 19, 2010

Ways and Means Republicans Seek Documents from UnitedHealth Group as Part of Congressional Oversight Investigation

Washington D.C- Ways and Means Republicans today sent a letter to UnitedHealth Group (United) inquiring as to its financial relationship with AARP in regard to the marketing of Medicare Medigap and Medicare Advantage policies. United-AARP insurance plans cover more Medicare beneficiaries than any other insurer, and in 2008 AARP received $652,701,000 from insurance companies with 63 percent ($411,201,630) coming from United. The letter was signed by Ways and Means Ranking Member Dave Camp (R-MI), Health Subcommittee Ranking Member Wally Herger (R-CA), and Reps. Ginny Brown-Waite (R-FL) and Dave Reichert (R-WA).

In the letter, the Members requested details of the United-AARP financial relationship in the interest of taxpayers who fund the Medicare program and the millions of seniors who rely on Medicare Advantage and Medigap policies. While AARP has previously denied informal requests for documents on this topic, the Republicans noted that United has a long history of turning over contractual and proprietary information similar to what has been requested in order for Congress to fulfill oversight duties.

CAMP: “I urge United to comply with our Congressional investigation so we may conduct the necessary oversight to ensure taxpayers and seniors are being served well. There are hundreds of millions of dollars at stake and the well being of not only the Medicare program but the nation’s seniors who rely on it for medical care.”

HERGER: “The special-interest deals that helped grease the passage of the recent health care legislation served as a reminder that we need far more transparency in Washington. Our goal here is simple - to take an honest look at the relationship between AARP and the health insurance industry and ensure that AARP is acting as an appropriate advocate for seniors.”

BROWN-WAITE: “It is very apparent to me that AARP is more concerned about their bottom line than the well being of their membership. I represent more Medicare recipients than any Member of Congress—these questions need to be asked and it’s my responsibility to ask them.”

REICHERT: “Seniors deserve a straight answer from United and AARP on their financial relationship. Is there a financial benefit to AARP as the government takes over health care in America? They owe an answer to seniors: those losing their benefits and those paying more in additional fees and taxes. There’s a lot at stake for America’s seniors and their future health care benefits. I urge United and AARP to be transparent and honest in this inquiry.” ###

Press Releases Monday, April 19, 2010 Jim Billimoria or Sage Eastman (202) 226-4774

Sen. Inhofe Confident Cap-and-Trade National Energy Tax Won't Pass

Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), top Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is confident that the new effort to pass a national cap-and-trade energy tax will not pass the Senate this year.

"I know we can beat it," Inhofe told Fox News' Stuart Varney. "This is another cap-and-trade. We went through the McCain-Lieberman bill of '03, the McCain-Lieberman of '05, the Warner-Lieberman of '08, the Waxman bill... I can assure you, I don't think they have more than 25 votes on the Democrats' side, and if you throw Lindsey Graham in there that would be 26 votes."

As reported on HUMAN EVENTS Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have been working in secret for months to construct another run at the national energy tax.

Lieberman sparked uproar when he said recently that Reid would manage bill without a formal introduction to sidestep the committee process.

"That doesn't sound like the regular order to me," Agriculture Committee Chair Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) quipped. "We'll certainly weigh in. And I think where there's an opportunity, whether it's to have hearings or to have a say, we'll do it."

"I'd be surprised if it bypassed Finance," Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee chaired by Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.).

Democrats who've been basing their careers on the "green" anthropogenic global warming scam are not going to let this major piece of legislation move quietly -- without grabbing some of the glory in their own committees of jurisdiction.

The date for the unveiling of the new cap and trade national energy tax is April 26. Congressional Quarterly reports "Aides said the date for the bill's release should be solid, because celebrities are expected to attend the event." Ahem.

Inhofe also remarked on plans for Obamacare in a Senate run by Republicans.

"I know the Tea Party people because I've talked to several of their large groups," Inhofe said. "They don't want to pass the largest tax increase in the history of America, they've already had to swallow this government run health care which we'll become a majority and we'll reverse that and turn that thing around. ###

U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works :: Minority Page By Connie Hair Posted: 04/19/2010 ET Posted by Matt Dempsey Matt_Dempsey@epw.senate.gov