Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Blackwater USA

Blackwater USA From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

blackwaterusa logo © All rights reserved Blackwater USABlackwater USA is a private military company, security firm and mercenary company, [1][2][3][4][5] founded in 1997 by Erik Prince and Al Clark. It is based in the U.S. state of North Carolina, where it operates a tactical training facility that it claims is the world's largest.
The company trains more than 40,000 people a year, from all the military services and a variety of other agencies. The company markets itself as being "The most comprehensive professional military, law enforcement, security, peacekeeping, and stability operations company in the world".

Blackwater is currently the biggest of the US State Department's three private security contractors.[6] At least 90% of its revenue comes from government contracts, two-thirds of which are no-bid contracts.[7] Operatives of Blackwater Security Consulting have raised significant controversy both through casualties suffered[8] and inflicted by their employees.[9]

Corporate structure: Blackwater USA consists of nine business units: Blackwater Training Center Blackwater Training Center offers tactics and weapons training to military, government, and law enforcement agencies. See facilities below. Blackwater Training Center also offers several open-enrollment courses periodically throughout the year, from hand to hand combat (executive course) to precision rifle marksmanship. They also offer courses in tactical and off road driving.[10]

Blackwater Target Systems: This division provides and maintains target range steel targets and a "shoothouse" system.[11]

Blackwater Security Consulting: Blackwater Security Consulting (BSC) was formed in 2001, and based in Moyock, North Carolina. BSC is one of 177 private security firms employed during the Iraq War to guard officials and installations, train Iraq's new Army and Police, and provide other support for Coalition Forces.[12]

Blackwater Security Consulting is well equipped and known to use:
  • MD-530F "Little Bird" helicopters, organized into Quick Response Force (QRF) teams.
  • Sikorsky S-92 helicopters are known to be used based on Blackwater USA's careers page.
  • AB 412 utility helicopters in use in Iraq.
  • BAE RG-31 Mamba armored vehicles, purchased from the British Army are known to be used to transport personnel along Route Irish[13]
  • Force Protection Industries Cougar H[14]
  • Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano — Blackwater is in the process of purchasing one of these aircraft for pilot training in the US.[13]
Blackwater prides itself on the fact that no one guarded by Blackwater has ever suffered a fatality or serious injury. However, according to a New York Times report on Blackwater Security in Iraq, "among the rank and file of security contractors, Blackwater guards are regularly ridiculed as cowboys who are relentlessly and pointlessly aggressive, carry excessive weaponry and do not appear to have top-of-the-line training."[15] 122 of its armed personnel in Iraq have been dismissed from their positions by Blackwater since its contract to protect US diplomats began nearly three years ago. These firings were most frequently for incidents related to weapons use.[16]

Blackwater K-9: Training canines to work in patrol capacities as war dogs, explosives and drug detection, and various other roles for military and law enforcement duties.[16a]

Blackwater Airships, LLC: Blackwater Airships LLC was established in January 2006 to build a remotely piloted airship vehicle (RPAV).[17]

Blackwater Armored Vehicle: Blackwater recently introduced its own armored personnel carrier, the Grizzly APC.[18]

Blackwater Maritime: Blackwater Maritime Security Services offers tactical training for maritime force protection units. In the past it has trained Greek security forces for the 2004 Olympics, Azerbaijan Naval Sea Commandos, and Afghanistan’s Ministry of Interior.[19] Blackwater's facilities include a manmade lake, with stacked containers simulating the hull and deck of a ship for maritime assaults. Blackwater received a contract to train United States Navy sailors following the incident on the USS Cole. [20]

Raven Development Group: In 1999, the Raven Development Group was established to design and build Blackwater USA's training facility in North Carolina.

Aviation Worldwide Services (Presidential Airways and STI Aviation)
Aircraft maintenance and tactical transportation. Presidential Airways holds a Secret Facility Clearance from the U.S. Department of Defense.[21] It operates several CASA 212 aircraft in addition to a Boeing 767.[22] [23]

Blackwater has won a S-70A modification/upgrade program for the UAE Special Operations Command that include Mounts for Machine Guns, Heads Up Display, Secure Communications and FLIR systems EO-IR sensor with Vectr mission system

Greystone Limited: A private security service, Greystone is registered in Barbados, and employs third country nationals for offshore security work.

Personnel: Blackwater's owner and founder is Erik Prince, a former Navy SEAL. Prince’s father, Edgar Prince, who died in 1995, was a wealthy businessman who created the lighted car visor, among other things. Erik Prince attended the Naval Academy, graduated from Hillsdale College, and was an intern in George H.W. Bush's White House. Prince has contributed $200,000 to the Republican National Committee since 1998, and also has supported the candidacies of conservatives such as President George W. Bush and Senator Tom Coburn.[24] He also serves as a board member of Christian Freedom International, a nonprofit group that provides Bibles, food and other help to Christians in countries where they face persecution.

Blackwater's president, Gary Jackson, is also a former Navy SEAL.

Cofer Black, the company's current vice chairman, and national security advisor for Mitt Romney, was the Bush administration's top counter terrorism official when 9/11 occurred. In 2002, he famously stated: "There was before 9/11 and after 9/11. After 9/11, the gloves come off." Blackwater has become home to a significant number of former senior CIA and Pentagon officials. Robert Richer became the firm's Vice President of Intelligence immediately after he resigned his position as Associate Deputy Director of Operations in fall 2005. He is formerly the head of the CIA's Near East Division.[25]

Facilities: Blackwater's training facility, located on 7,000 acres in North Carolina, comprises several ranges, indoor, outdoor, urban reproductions, a man-made lake, and a driving track in Camden and Currituck counties. It is one of the largest firearms training facilities in the world. Company literature claims that the company runs "the largest privately owned firearms training facility in the world."

In November 2006 Blackwater USA announced it recently acquired an 80-acre (30 ha) facility 150 miles (240 km) west of Chicago, in Mount Carroll, Illinois to be called Blackwater North. That facility has been operational since April, 2007 and serves law enforcement agencies throughout the midwest.

Blackwater is also trying to open a facility in California for military and law enforcement training,[26][27] in Potrero, San Diego County.[28] [29]

History: Blackwater USA was formed in 1997 to provide training support to military and law enforcement organizations. In 2002 Blackwater Security Consulting (BSC) was formed. It was one of several private security firms employed following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. BSC is one of over 60 private security firms employed during the Iraq War to guard officials and installations, train Iraq's new army and police, and provide other support for occupation forces.[30] Blackwater was also hired during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina by the Department of Homeland Security, as well as by private clients, including communications, petrochemical and insurance companies.[31] In each case, Blackwater received a no-bid contract. Overall, the company has received over a billion dollars in government contracts.[32]

Iraq involvement: In 2003, Blackwater landed its first truly high-profile contract: guarding civilian Administrator L. Paul Bremer in Iraq, at the cost of $21 million for 11 months. Since June 2004, Blackwater has been paid more than $320 million out of a $1 billion, five-year State Department budget for the Worldwide Personal Protective Service, which protects U.S. officials and some foreign officials in conflict zones.[33] In 2006, Blackwater won the remunerative contract to protect the U.S. embassy in Iraq, which is the largest American embassy in the world. It is estimated by the Pentagon and company representatives that there are 20,000 to 30,000 armed security contractors working in Iraq, and some estimates are as much as 100,000, though no official figures exist.[34][35] Of the State Department's dependence on private contractors like Blackwater for security purposes, U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, told the U.S. Senate: "There is simply no way at all that the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security could ever have enough full-time personnel to staff the security function in Iraq. There is no alternative except through contracts."[36]

For work in Iraq, Blackwater has drawn contractors from their international pool of professionals, a database containing "21,000 former Special Forces troops, soldiers, and retired law enforcement agents," overall.[37] For instance, Gary Jackson, the firm's president, has confirmed that Bosnians, Filipinos, and Chileans, "have been hired for tasks ranging from airport security to protecting Paul Bremer, the head of the Coalition Provisional Authority."

Between 2005 and September 2007 Blackwater security staff was involved in 195 shooting incidents, in 163 of those cases Blackwater personnel fired first. 25 members of staff have been sacked for violations of Blackwaters drug and alcohol policy and 28 more for weapons related incidents. [38]

Fallujah mission: On March 31, 2004, Iraqi insurgents in Fallujah attacked a convoy containing four American private military contractors from Blackwater USA who were conducting delivery for food caterers ESS.[39] The four armed contractors Scott Helvenston, Jerko Zovko, Wesley Batalona and Michael Teague, were attacked and killed with grenades and small arms fire. Their bodies were hung over a bridge crossing the Euphrates.[8] In the fall of 2007, a congressional report found that Blackwater intentionally "delayed and impeded" investigations into the contractors' deaths.[40]

Shortly after the incident, blogger Markos Moulitsas infamously stated "I feel nothing over the death of merceneries [sic]. They aren't in Iraq because of orders, or because they are there trying to help the people make Iraq a better place. They are there to wage war for profit. Screw them." [41]

Later incidents: In April 2004, a few days after the Fallujah bridge hanging, a small team of Blackwater employees, along with a fire team of U.S. Marines, held off over four hundred insurgents outside the Coalition Provisional Authority Headquarters in Al Najaf, Iraq, waiting for U.S. troops to arrive. Due to details of the situation, U.S. commanders would not risk inserting additional troops. The Headquarters was surrounded and it was the last area in the city that remained in Coalition control. During the siege, as supplies and ammunition ran low, an all volunteer team of Blackwater contractors 70 miles away flew on a rescue mission to the compound to resupply, maintain Coalition control, and bring an injured U.S. Marine back to safety outside of the city. The mission was considered a huge success.[42][43][44]

In April 2005 six Blackwater independent contractors were killed in Iraq when their Mi-8 helicopter was shot down. Also killed were three Bulgarian crewmembers and two Fijian gunners. Initial reports indicate the helicopter was shot down by rocket propelled grenades.

On January 23, 2007, five Blackwater contractors were killed in Iraq when their Hughes H-6 helicopter was shot down. The incident happened in Baghdad, Haifa Street. The crash site was secured by a Personal Security Detail Platoon, callsign "Jester" from 1/26 Infantry, 1st Infantry Division. Three Iraqi insurgent groups claimed responsibility for shooting down the helicopter, however, this has not been confirmed by the US.[45] A US defense official has confirmed that four of the five killed were shot execution style in the back of the head, but did not know whether the four had survived the crash.[46] Robert Young Pelton broke the full details of the crash on his site. Pelton also met and flew with the Little Bird pilots.

On August 12, 2007, an MSNBC report noted the largely unaccountable and unsupervised nature of security contractor activities, and the high number of casual or indiscriminate civilian killings attributed to them. According to the State Department, on December 24, 2006, a drunken Blackwater employee shot and killed a body guard who was protecting the Iraqi vice president. The US State Department was aware of the incident and recommended that a $250,000 payment be made to the victim's family. Blackwater claimed that such a payment would be "too large" and would encourage other Iraqis to "try to get killed". They offered to pay out $15,000, which the State Department agreed to. The Blackwater employee was fired but no criminal charges were brought against him.[48] In late May 2007, Blackwater contractors, "opened fire on the streets of Baghdad twice in two days... and one of the incidents provoked a standoff between the security contractors and Iraqi Interior Ministry commandos, U.S. and Iraqi officials said."[34] And on May 30, 2007, Blackwater employees shot an Iraqi civilian deemed to have been "driving too close" to a State Department convoy being escorted by Blackwater contractors.[49][34] Other private security contractors, such as Aegis Defence Services have also been accused of similar actions.[50] However, "Doug Brooks, the president of the International Peace Operations Association, a trade group representing Blackwater and other military contractors, said that in his view, military law would not apply to Blackwater employees working for the State Department."[51]

Baghdad shooting controversy: On September 17, 2007, Blackwater's license to operate in Iraq was revoked, resulting from a highly contentious incident that occurred the previous day during which eleven Iraqis were killed.[9] The fatalities occurred while a Blackwater Private Security Detail (PSD) was escorting a convoy of US State Department vehicles en route to a meeting in western Baghdad with United States Agency for International Development officials. As of October 2007, several American and Iraqi investigations are being conducted on the incident.

Legal status: The legal status of Blackwater and other security firms in Iraq is a subject of contention. Two days before he left Iraq, L. Paul Bremer signed "Order 17"[52] giving all Americans associated with the CPA and the American government immunity from Iraqi law.[53] A July 2007 report from the American Congressional Research Service indicates that the Iraqi government still has no authority over private security firms contracted by the U.S. government.[54]

On September 23, 2007, the Iraqi government said that it expects to refer criminal charges to its courts in connection with a shooting involving Blackwater guards. [5]

Litigation: Blackwater is currently being sued by the families of the four contractors killed in Fallujah in March, 2004. The families say they are not suing for financial damages, but rather for the details of their sons' and husbands' deaths. They claim that Blackwater has refused to supply these details, and that in its "zeal to exploit this unexpected market for private security men, showed a callous disregard for the safety of its employees."[55] Four family members testified in front of the House Government Reform Committee on February 7, 2007. They asked that Blackwater be held accountable for future negligence of employees' lives, and that Federal legislation be drawn up to govern contracts between the Department of Defense and the defense contractor.[56] Blackwater has counter-sued the lawyer representing the empty estates of the deceased for $10 million on the grounds that the lawsuit was contractually prohibited from ever being filed.[57]

On April 19, 2006, The Nation magazine published an article titled, "Blood Is Thicker Than Blackwater," concerning the lawsuit against Blackwater brought by some of the families of the four deceased employees.[58] The article discussed the removal of the word "armoured" from already-signed contracts, and other allegations of wrongdoing.

According to an Army report, in November 2004, a Blackwater plane, "in violation of numerous government regulations and contract requirements," crashed into a mountainside, killing all six aboard.[59] The families of the three soldiers killed — Lt. Col. Michael McMahon, Chief Warrant Officer Travis Grogan and Spec. Harley Miller — filed a wrongful death suit against Blackwater, alleging negligence. However, Presidential Airways, a division of Blackwater, questioned the hastiness of the Army's report, stating that it "contains numerous errors, misstatements, and unfounded assumptions."[59]

Post-Katrina involvement: Blackwater USA was employed to assist the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts on the Gulf Coast. According to a company press release, it provided airlift, security, and logistics and transportation services, as well as humanitarian support. It was reported that the company also acted as law enforcement in the disaster stricken areas, such as securing neighborhoods and "confronting criminals".[60]

Blackwater moved about 200 personnel into the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, most of whom (164 employees) were working under a contract with the Department of Homeland Security to protect government facilities,[61] but the company held contracts with private clients as well.

Overall, Blackwater had a "visible, and financially lucrative, presence in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina as the use of the company contractors cost U.S. taxpayers $240,000 a day."[62] There has been much dispute surrounding governmental contracts in post-Katrina New Orleans, especially no-bid contracts such as the one Blackwater was awarded. Blackwater's heavily-armored presence in the city was also the subject of much confusion and criticism.[63]

Other employments: Blackwater USA is one of five companies picked by the Department of Defense Counter-Narcoterrorism Technology Program Office in a a five-year contract for equipment, material and services in support of counter-narcoterrorism activities. The contract is worth up to $15 billion. The other companies picked are Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Arinc Inc.[64]

Blackwater USA has also been contracted by various foreign governments. In 2005, it worked to train the Naval Sea Commando regiment of Azerbaijan, enhancing their interdiction capabilities on the Caspian Sea.[65]

Controversy and criticism: In March 2006, Cofer Black, vice chairman of Blackwater USA, allegedly suggested at an international conference in Amman, Jordan, that the company is ready to move towards providing security professionals up to brigade size for humanitarian efforts and low intensity conflicts. Critics have suggested this may be going too far in putting political decisions in the hands of privately owned corporations.[66] The company denies this was ever said.[67]

Critics consider that Blackwater's self-description as a private military company is a euphemism for mercenary activities.[21] Under international law, Americans working for Blackwater are not considered mercenaries while assisting the U.S. military, since the 1977 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Convention specifically declares that nationals of a state involved in a conflict are not considered mercenaries while fighting in that conflict.[68] However Jeremy Scahill reports that Chilean nationals, mostly former soldiers, whose country of origin does not participate in and actually opposes the occupation of Iraq, work for Blackwater in that country, thus meeting the operational and most restrictive definition of a "mercenary."[69] Approximately six hundred former Chilean soldiers are currently hired by the USA to carry on military assignments, most of them motivated by the relatively high salaries.[70]

Author Chris Hedges wrote about the establishment of mercenary armies, citing Blackwater USA as an example of such a force, asserting their existence as a threat to democracy, and a step towards the creation of a modern day Praetorian Guard in a June 3, 2007 article in the Philadelphia Inquirer.[71] The reference to a Praetorian Guard reflects critic Ben Van Heuvelen's observations about very close ties between Blackwater and the Bush administration, which he alleged had helped Blackwater to cover up other killings by paying off families of victims.[72]

Arms smuggling: On September 22nd, 2007, Federal prosecutors announced an investigation into whether Blackwater employees illegally smuggled weapons into Iraq, that were later possibly transferred to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), a Kurdish nationalist group designated a terrorist organization by the US, NATO and the EU.[73][74][75] The United States government is presently investigating Blackwater for these alleged crimes.[76]

Blackwater in fiction: The fictional company Ravenwood Security in the CBS drama series Jericho is said to be modelled after Blackwater USA.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article, Blackwater USA

blackwaterusa logo © All rights reserved

*image blackwater_logo.jpg fair use. This work is copyrighted and unlicensed. However, it is believed that the use of this work in the article Blackwater USA is fair use.

Because this is a logo of an organization and is protected by copyright and/or trademark. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images on the English-language blogspot, hosted on servers in the United States by blogspot.com, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on blogspot or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. Certain commercial use of this image may also be trademark infringement.

Fair use rationale for blackwater_logo.jpg
  • To illustrate the object in question
  • Low quality, web resolution;
  • Serves to identify the logo of the organization in question;
  • Does not infringe on the owner's ability to make a profit.
  • A logo by very nature is promotional
  • Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the subject of this article and how the event depicted was historically significant to the general public.
Technorati tags: and or and or and White House Press Briefing by Dana Perino 10/01/07 VIDEO PODCAST and Houston Astrodome and Physicists pin down atomic spin for spintronics

Linkfest Haven, the Blogger's OasisTrackposted to Outside the Beltway, Blog at MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson's Website,
Rosemary's Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, Big Dog's Weblog, Jeanette's Celebrity Corner, Adam's Blog, Right Truth, The Populist, Shadowscope, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Cat, Nuke's, Allie is Wired, third world county, Faultline USA, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, The Yankee Sailor, Gone Hollywood, and Wake Up America, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Trackback URL: http://haloscan.com/tb/sookietex/4475153548057938795

21 Trackbacks to this Post

Rhymes With Right: This Is How It Is Supposed To Work. One can argue whether or not there should be a moratorium on carrying out death sentences by lethal injection pending a Supreme Court decision. However, there is unquestionably only one way for this to happen under the laws and constitution of the State of Texas. Tracked: 10/03/07 04:26 AM

Rhymes With Right: A Cartoon Worth A Thousand Words. Well, at least she won't shove it down our throats... Tracked: 10/03/07 04:44 AM

Potpourri of Military Good News (for a change) Excerpt: I posted these yesterday, which means I am late to the gate. I still have about 10-15 more articles to post. I would, however, like you take a look at these in the time being: Troops in Afghanistan Hold 9/11 Memorial Ceremony. Weblog: Rosemary's Thoughts Tracked: 10.03.07 - 6:01 am

"Dark Stain on America’s Image; Pillow Fights are" “Besides having an army for hire, brave kids who are paid to fight so that most Americans are not personally touched by war, we have the real mercenaries.” DeMediacratic Nation trackbacked 10/03/07 8:30 am

Big Dogs Weblog Says: Congress Should Worry About Its Own Punctuality A terrorism drill will be conducted as Congress has required since 2000 and this drill is raising questions about our preparedness especially since the after action report (AAR) from the 2005 drill has not been made public. The lawmakers are concerned… 10/03/07 8:51 am

"Veteran Cuts Down Mexican Flag"
Ms. ZH sent me this link from Channel 4 KRNV: This afternoon we received a call from a viewer who said a business near downtown Reno was flying a Mexican flag above an American flag… which is in fact illegal. This, after photos and comments a... CommonSenseAmerica trackbacked 10/03/07 9:06 am

Chuck Adkins » Open Thread and Open Trackback Wednesday Says: I probably won’t be posting much today, Me and dad have to go grocery shopping. So, it’s open thread and Open Trackback Time! Discuss what you wish… Enjoy… Tracked 10/03/07 11:14 am

Rhymes With Right: Paper Of Wreckage Trashes Limbaugh. At one time, the New York Times was known as the paper of record for any significant event. Its coverage of the current brouhaha over Rush Limbaugh makes it clear just how far its standards have descended. Tracked: 10/03/07 06:01 PM

Israel - The Safest Place in the world for the Bah Excerpt: Where in the whole world can one find a place where the people are not racists nor bigots, where they do not persecute you for your religion, where all religions are, in fact, tolerated? Why Israel, of course. Weblog: planck's constant Tracked: 10.03.07 - 6:33 pm

Formal end to the war near... Excerpt: There is a formal end to the war very near. No not that war, the 1950-1953 Korean War. Fooled ya! The leaders of North and South Korea will end their summit on Thursday with a pledge to seek talks with Weblog: Right Truth Tracked: 10.03.07 - 8:53 pm

Videos, videos and more videos Excerpt: That should keep you busy for a while. lol. Enjoy, cry, get angry, feel proud. That’s how war is…I think… Weblog: Rosemary's Thoughts Tracked: 10.04.07 - 12:15 am

Korean leaders sign peace pledge Excerpt: Kim Jong Il and Roh Moo-hyun signed a joint statement Thursday that pledges to begin work on a permanent peace agreement that would replace the cease-fire accord signed at the end of the Korean war. Technically North and South Korea... Weblog: Shadowscope Tracked: 10.04.07 - 1:31 am

Stageleft:. Life on the [lower] left side » Blog Archive » Awh, They’re Not Best Buddies Anymore Says: The British Prime Minister announced a withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the White House announced they’re not best buddies any more, and started crapping on their performance - all we’re missing now are the threats of consequences. October 4th, 2007 at 10:11 am

Chuck Adkins » Thursday Open Thread and Open Trackback Says: It’s an Open thread and Open Trackback Posting Discuss what thou wilt. 10/04/07 11:40 am

Right Voices » Blog Archive » Linkfest:Poll: 27% of Republicans Would Vote for Pro-Life Third Party Instead of Giuliani Says: In response to this article in the NYT’s by James Dobson, I wanted to link to this Rasmussen Reports poll. Keep in mind that “a survey conducted earlier this month found that 72% of Republicans think Giuliani is at least Somewhat Likely to win the White House Tracked 10/04/07 2:00 pm

Stageleft:. Life on the [lower] left side Says: Desmond ‘the anti-Semite’ Tutu University of St. Thomas banns Desmond Tutu from speaking for making comments that “some people judged to be anti-Semitic and against Israeli policy”, and who is this someone you ask….. Tracked: 10/04/07 2:10 pm

Quote Of The Day Stuck On Stupid Says: (About the Democrats’ attack on Rush Limbaugh and the phony “Phony Soldiers” brouhaha) Tracked: 10/04/07 2:30 pm

CommonSenseAmerica Says: Is Illegal Immigration A Sin? I guess that depends on whether or not you believe in the Words of the Bible.Though liberals will smear us and leftists will hate us, there are Biblical reasons illegal immigration does not sit well with conservative Christians.Romans 13:1-7 (NKJV): Tracked: 10/04/07 3:10 pm

christian conservatives republicans SpitBallWars: Thoughts About Everything Says: Republicans Threaten to Leave Christian Conservatives, There’s been much discussion about a recent meeting where Christian Conservatives are making contigency plans for a possible Conservative third party Tracked: 10/04/07 3:24 pm

Turkey Rolls Back Women's Rights Excerpt: The good news is women's groups are actually taking notice and protesting Turkey's descent into Taliban-like Sharia law. The bad news is the womens groups of the Western world don't seem to notice or care.Women's groups in Turkey have condemned Weblog: The Amboy Times Tracked: 10.04.07 - 4:42 pm

Conservative Cat Says: In Which I Find My Intelligence Insulted by Left-Wing SCHIP Spam I get this in my inbox. President Bush just rejected children’s health care. If we can get 2/3 of Congress to stand up to President Bush, we can overturn his veto on the State Children’s Health Insurance Program — a… Tracked: 10/04/07 5:46 pm

Monday, October 01, 2007

White House Press Briefing by Dana Perino 10/01/07 VIDEO PODCAST

Dana M. Perino, Vidcap from White House BriefingPress Briefing by Dana Perino, FULL STREAMING VIDEO, PODCAST OF THIS ARTICLE White House Conference Center Briefing Room, Dana M. Perino Biography, 12:53 P.M. EDT.

MS. PERINO: Good afternoon. I have a statement on Burma, before taking your questions.
The President and Mrs. Bush remain concerned about the reports of violence and intimidation that continue to come out of Burma. The United States is pleased that U.N. Special Envoy Gambari was able to see Aung San Suu Kyi. Mr. Gambari remains in Burma in order to see the top junta leader, Than Shwe. We think it is important that they meet and that a process of national reconciliation can begin.

The United States is committed to working with countries around the world and especially those in the region to move Burma to a peaceful transition to democracy. President Bush had a good meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang last week. And today Jim Jeffrey, the Deputy National Security Advisor, will meet with Chinese Ambassador Zhou to the United States to further these discussions.

I think it's important to note comments made on Friday night by Chinese Premier Wen. He said that China is very much concerned with the situation and hopes that all parties show restraint, resume stability through peaceful means as soon as possible, promote domestic reconciliation and achieve democracy and development. The Chinese Premier said that China will continue to work with the international community to actively facilitate the proper solution to the problem.

I'll take your questions.

Q Do you have any reason to believe that junta leaders will meet with the U.N. Envoy?

MS. PERINO: I don't have any reason to believe one way or the other. We -- he is there waiting to meet with him and as soon as we have an update, we'll provide it.

Q And the protests, themselves, seem to have been stilled. What do you make of that?

MS. PERINO: Well, unfortunately, intimidation and force can chill peaceful demonstrations. And reports about very innocent people being thrown into detention, where they could be held for years without any representation or charges, is distressing; and we understand that some of the monasteries have been sealed. Now, obviously, this has, again, a chilling effect on protestors, but we would ask that everyone show restraint and allow those who want to express themselves to be able to do so in Burma.

Helen.

Q How can the President justify spending billions for a war and denying child health care sanctions in this country, where the needs are there?

MS. PERINO: Well, there are obviously very [sic] two different issues. The President is for the expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program. He wants to extend it by 20 percent for the next five years. There are those in Congress who want to expand it even further. And what we see -- we see that as a step towards more government-controlled health care. That is a policy difference that the President has.

Q That doesn't meet -- I mean, you're projecting into a future, you're worried about socialized medicine. But what about the needs today for kids?

MS. PERINO: That's exactly what we want to do, is to try to focus the program back to its original intent -- which was passed by Republicans in 1997 and signed into law by Bill Clinton -- which was to take care of children from poor families that did not qualify for Medicaid, but still needed some help in being covered for insurance.

That's what the S-CHIP program has been. Unfortunately, over the last several years, states have increased the number of people that get the insurance that are well above 200 percent of the poverty level, which is the line that they're supposed to be at. And this program, in fact, eliminates the requirement that 95 percent of the funds go to children who are eligible at 200 percent of poverty level. We'd like to see the neediest children taken care of first, and that's where the policy difference is.

Q And you're saying that you will be taking care of all of the neediest children -- child health care?

MS. PERINO: We believe our funding proposal is sufficient to cover the kids we expect to be covered by S-CHIP in the next five years.

Q Democrats argue that most of the benefits under their version of the bill will still go to the neediest children, the people in the lower, I think, half of the income span.

MS. PERINO: Well, what I can tell you is that we would like to see the requirement that S-CHIP go to the children who need it the most. And they took out, explicitly took out a requirement that said that 95 percent of those children have to be taken care of first. We think that that is where we should be focusing these dollars, not towards children who have families that have higher incomes.

Now, admittedly, there are some families that -- you know, at $60,000 might still have trouble in meeting those-- meeting the payments. But we believe that ensuring that employers continue to provide health care to those families is very critical to ensuring that we have a competitive private market system. We don't want to move people from private health insurance on to government-controlled insurance, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates would be about 2.1 million people would move off of private insurance onto government-controlled insurance.

Q Is this more about avoiding incursions into the private insurance market?

MS. PERINO: Not -- the main principle that the President stands on is that the neediest children should be taken care of first, and over the years that has not been the case. We estimate there are 750,000 children who could be covered by the State Health -- Child's Health Insurance Program who currently aren't on the program. Whereas many other families above the 200 percent of poverty level and up to 400 percent of the poverty level are being covered by it, including some adults.

Now the legislation and the President would like to see adults taken off of this program. If adults needs this type of care, we would encourage them to look into the Medicaid program, where they can get taken care of with insurance in that program.

Q Democrats say you're taking medical care away from children.

MS. PERINO: Well, I strongly disagree. And I would be surprised if the children who are outside today protesting knew that the President is actually in favor of expanding S-CHIP. And the principle he stands on is that the neediest should be taken care of first. And I believe that other -- the children who are protesting today as part of that demonstration would agree that the neediest children should be taken care of first.

Q Where does the President get his numbers?

MS. PERINO: Through his Office of Management and Budget.

Q But he stands by them --

MS. PERINO: Yes.

Q Dana, the administration has made a real point of saying a lot of weapons in Iraq, or a significant amount, have come from Iran. And critics have suggested that those weapons could have been stockpiled in Iraq earlier, could have been captured by Saddam -- they don't necessarily come from the Iranian government. How do you know that these are new weapons? I mean, this is an argument that the Pentagon has cited --

MS. PERINO: I would refer you to the Department -- yes, I would refer you to the Department of Defense, who has the information, and also our intelligence agencies that have information, and Department of Defense officials, including Secretary Gates and General Pace have made public comments as well as General Bergner and General Petraeus. They know that the weapons -- some of these weapons are coming from Iran, and I would just have to refer you to them.

Q Dana, can I follow on that?

MS. PERINO: Follow on that? Okay.

Q Yes, follow on that. This weekend the New Yorker magazine came out with an article claiming that this summer the President, or at least the White House in general, asked the Joint Chiefs to redraw plans to attack Iran. Is that true?

MS. PERINO: Look, you know, I'm glad you brought it up. Every two months or so, Sy Hersh writes an article in The New Yorker magazine, and CNN provides him a forum in which to talk about his article and all the anonymous sources that are quoted in it.

Q So the President --

MS. PERINO: The President has said that he believes that there is a diplomatic solution that we can use to solve the Iranian problem. And that's why we're working with our allies to get there.

Q That's what he said before we went to Iraq, too.

Q But what's the -- can you answer actually on the substance of whether or not the White House asked -- I mean, if it's not true, then you can say Sy Hersh is wrong and CNN was wrong to air it. You could say that, but --

MS. PERINO: We don't discuss such things, Ed.

Q -- what about the substance of whether we --

MS. PERINO: We don't discuss such things. What we have said and what we are working towards is a diplomatic solution in Iran. What the President has also said is that as a President, as a Commander-in-Chief -- and any Commander-in-Chief -- would not take any option off the table. But the option that we are pursuing right now is diplomacy.

Q But the article very specifically said that this summer in a video conference -- secure video conference with Ambassador Crocker, the President said that he was thinking about "hitting Iran" and also --

MS. PERINO: I'm not going to comment on -- one, I don't know. I wouldn't have been at any -- at that type of a meeting. I don't know. I'm not going to comment on any possible -- any possible scenario that an anonymous source, you know, continues to feed into Sy Hersh. I'm just not going the do it.

Q Why should anybody believe that the President wants diplomatic solutions? He said that before going into Iraq.

MS. PERINO: The President sought a diplomatic solution in Iraq and Saddam Hussein defied the U.N. Security Council 17 times.

Q Some of the history we've learned since suggests otherwise.

MS. PERINO: That the President didn't -- that Saddam Hussein defied 17 U.N. Security Council resolutions?

Q No, that the President was intent on going to war in Iraq in any case.

MS. PERINO: No, the President pursued a diplomatic option. He went to the U.N. Security Council, and then we proceeded.

Q Did he consult -- would he tell Congress before attacking Iran -- before he attacks Iran?

MS. PERINO: Helen, we are pursuing a diplomatic solution with Iran.

Q I'm asking you does he feel committed to ask Congress for permission?

MS. PERINO: We are pursuing a diplomatic solution in Iran.

Q Dana, do you have any reaction to Putin's announcement that he could become Prime Minister?

MS. PERINO: We saw the reports, and this is ultimately a matter for the people of Russia to decide. We will be paying very close attention to the upcoming elections in Russia and we urge them to conduct them in a manner that is free, fair and democratic. Beyond that, I don't have any additional comment. We just saw the reports.

Olivier.

Q Dana, a couple on Burma/Myanmar.

MS. PERINO: Burma. (Laughter.)

Q I appreciate that it's official U.S. policy. You've talked a lot about Chinese -- outreach to the Chinese, and not so much about outreach to, say, India or Russia. Is there some kind of outreach going on regarding India and Russia?

MS. PERINO: Well, I know that Secretary Rice, up at the United Nations, talked with all the countries in the region. I don't have a specific readout on the India and Russia discussions. I do know about the Chinese meeting with --

Q So that hasn't risen to the presidential level yet?

MS. PERINO: It's possible that the President has been briefed on it. I don't know, but can we get back to you on it?

Q I'm sorry, I mean outreach, is the President calling, picking up the phone?

MS. PERINO: Not that I'm aware of.

Q Okay. And another one is, at the APEC summit, the President invited all the ASEAN countries to Texas, including Burma. Has that been rescinded?

MS. PERINO: No, we did not -- we did not say who would all be invited.

Q You did.

Q Actually, you did. And I have it --

MS. PERINO: Did we say --

Q Oh, yes.

MS. PERINO: I thought that we said that we would be -- I thought we were non-committal.

Q No. Believe me, at the time, it was surprising enough that so much --

MS. PERINO: Now I'm remembering. You're refreshing my memory. I don't know. And that meeting is way in the future.

April.

Q Dana, since you brought up the protest by the little kids out in front and the little red wagons, do you think, by any chance, that this would be considered political theater, as the White House has called some things in the past "political theater," this time to have the nation's littlest children, littlest people outside, trying to send the President a message with something that they use to go to the playground?

MS. PERINO: I don't know. The Democratic leadership is going to have to square that with themselves. I don't know. Maybe they got a pass out of school today to be able to come down. But I do believe that those children would have -- would agree with the President that the neediest children should be taken care of first. It's unfortunate if there's any misinformation being given to children. The President wants to expand this program and he wants to make sure that the states have what they need to provide for those children who don't qualify for Medicaid but still would qualify under the S-CHIP program.

Q Do you think that the message is getting out more so that this quibble over children versus the fact of what he's trying to do? I mean, it seems like it's over money; the bottom-line, it's more so about money.

MS. PERINO: The President's position is one that he stands on -- on his -- on principle. And it isn't always the easiest thing to do, to stand on principle. And oftentimes Republicans find themselves in a position, standing on a principle that isn't popular in the newspapers and out in the public. But they can't worry about that.

Now, what the President wants to do is make sure that we are providing federal dollars to a program whose original intent was to take care of a segment of the population who right now, frankly, is not being well-served by this program. When 750,000 children, who could be covered under this program, aren't being taken care of, there's a problem there, and that's the one of the problems -- that's the one that the President is trying to fix.

Ann.

Q Following on that, why is the President facing so much opposition on this? Why were there overwhelming majorities in the House and Senate who disagree with him on this veto, and why does public opinion think that expansion of this program should --

MS. PERINO: Well, I don't know about public opinion. And the President doesn't make decisions about --

Q -- on public opinion.

MS. PERINO: The President doesn't make decisions based on those public opinion polls. And I think that it's incumbent upon us, and I appreciate this forum, to be able to explain what the President's position -- is to reach out to the children who need it most. And there are many who aren't being taken care of right now. And that's where he is focused on.

Q Why couldn't he -- why can't he convince more of even his own party of that --

MS. PERINO: Well, I think if you look at the House vote, it was very strong on the Republican side of things. And what we want to do is have the bill come over here. We don't have it yet; as soon as we do, we'll let you know when the President vetoes it. And then the President wants to sit down, and we are hopeful that the members of Congress want to sit down, to try to find common ground and reach an agreement.

Q Does that mean a compromise on the President's part, in terms of dollar amounts?

MS. PERINO: We'll let you know. We'll let you know. I won't negotiate from here.

Paula.

Q I just need clarification -- a couple of things that you've said. One of them is the 2.1 million CBO estimated number that are switching over, or that you predict will switch over. If that's the case, why does the health care industry support this bill, if they're going to end up losing coverage by some of their --

MS. PERINO: You'll have to ask them why they support the bill. I don't know.

Q All right. And secondly, is this CBO estimate, is this those that would go to CHIP and Medicaid, or just CHIP?

MS. PERINO: I think it's CHIP, but we'll double-check it for you and let you know.

Q And may I ask one question on global warming?

MS. PERINO: Anybody else on S-CHIP? Okay, global warming it is. Go ahead. (Laughter.)

Q Sure you want to take this? Okay.

MS. PERINO: I really want to be on that show. Go ahead, Paula.

Q Okay. I know the White House is making it clear that they feel technology is the answer for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and that Kyoto is an unreasonable, unrealistic goal. However, there are notable scientists, including NASA scientist Jim Hansen, who have said that you can meet this goal not by, you know, closing down coal-fired plants, as you said last week, but by putting a moratorium on new coal-fired plants until you have the technology, in about 10 years, to capture and store this stuff, combined with some kind of C02 cap --

MS. PERINO: Are you the spokesperson? (Laughter.)

Q No, it's a question.

MS. PERINO: Look, there's a lot of different ways that you can reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We have a variety of different programs, some of which were borne out of the research that Dr. Jim Hansen performed at NASA, including the methane to markets program. There's a lot of different ways that you can get there, including a 35 billion gallon replacement of traditional gasoline with alternative fuels. That's part of the new technology push. Clean coal is critically important, as are many other pieces like lithium ion batteries.

So we're working towards lots of different ways to get to the solution, and we brought together the major emitting economies so that we could all work together on a post-Kyoto framework.

Q Do you have a position on carbon tax? I understand that --

MS. PERINO: Carbon taxes?

Q Yes. Just, you know, sector by sector taxing carbon emissions from plants --

MS. PERINO: It's something that is in the mix and it is talked about, but it's nothing we think that we need to do at the moment. We think clean coal is a way to go.

Bret.

Q The President then obviously every time he speaks rails on Congress for not getting the spending bills to the White House, getting through Congress. Democrats are now out asking, is there a different standard being applied, in that Republican Congress did not pass very many bills on time or the President's budget on time.

MS. PERINO: Well, we -- look, certainly the Republicans were further along than where the Democrats are today and the continuing resolution is the President thinks not the best way to fund the government. He'd like to see those appropriations bills get done. And I understand that right now there's -- I think that the Senate will move to DOD appropriations today and then CJS appropriations after that. And so they're slowly but surely maybe going to make their way here. But there's not a lot of time left before the end of the year.

Q And then off-the-wall question. The President today said -- (laughter) -- he called Admiral Mullen -- I'm characterizing it before I start. (Laughter.) Admiral Mullen, he called him humble, well-grounded, filled with common sense -- not exactly what one thinks about when they think of Hollywood values. Can we assume that this means the President does not support Fred Thompson?

MS. PERINO: No. (Laughter.) I don't know how you're drawing that connection.

Les, go ahead.

Q Thank you, Dana. Two questions. State Senator Randy Brogdon of Oklahoma told a public meeting in Tulsa that the mafia -- "The NAFTA super-highway stopped" -- (laughter) -- "The NAFTA super-highway stops here at the border with Oklahoma." And my question: What will the federal government do to overcome the pockets of resistance, such as this to NAFTA transportation project?

MS. PERINO: I don't even know where to begin. (Laughter.) Obviously the President is a supporter of NAFTA. Can we do your second question quickly?

Q Sure.

MS. PERINO: Thanks.

Q In The Washington Times, House members Chabot, Berkley, and Rohrabacher write about Beijing's 2005 anti-secession law which codifies Taiwan as part of the People's Republic of China, which these members of Congress say, "might legitimize Beijing's use of force against Taiwan." And my question: Since they also wrote of what they term the longstanding commitment to assist Taiwan's defense, does the White House believe theirs is an accurate statement of our obligation?

MS. PERINO: The President's position on Taiwan and the one China policy is well-known.

Roger.

Q Dana, I was just wondering, was the President informed about Putin's announcement at all, and do you know if he had any sort of reaction at all?

MS. PERINO: Roger, I don't know. I know that I checked in with the National Security Council beforehand to know that we were aware of the reports, but I don't know if the President had, but I'll check for you.

Keith.

Q Dana, why is it that there are so many children that haven't been included in the S-CHIP program? It's an administration-run program --

MS. PERINO: Well, no, actually it's run by the states and it's federally matched by the federal government.

Q Okay.

MS. PERINO: But you might ask the states why they haven't been able to do that.

Q Well, should the administration have requested more money sooner to provide the states -- I mean, that's the solution now is --

MS. PERINO: One of the things that we did is we provided the states with flexibility early on and unfortunately the flexibility meant mission creep and allowed some children who weren't supposed to be on the program and adults to be added to the program. We want to get the program back to its original intent.

Q How did those 750,000 children slip through the cracks, that you know that number -- is supposed to be fact -- that are not on?

MS. PERINO: Well, again this is a program that is administered by the states and they need to reach out to those families and make sure that they know that the service is available, the program is available to them, and make sure that they know that they can take advantage of it and get their children enrolled.

Q Thank you.

END 1:15 P.M. EDT. For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, October 1, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and , or and Satellite images corroborate human rights abuses in Burma and Giant Squid (Architeuthis sp.) and DNA Based Assembly of Nano Particles