Saturday, May 24, 2008

Discurso Radial del Presidente a la Nación 05/24/08

Presidente George W. Bush llama a tropas de su rancho en Crawford, Tejas, día de Thanksgiving, jueves, de noviembre el 24 de 2005.  Foto blanca de la casa de Eric Draper.forre el audio de la dirección de radio 05/24/08 por completo, transcripción del texto. (nota de los redactores: ninguna lengua española mp3 lanzó esta semana, apesadumbrada) PODCAST
Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Odeo Suscribir a nuestro canal de Podcast de Odeo o del podnova Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Podnova y recibir la dirección de radio presidencial semanal en inglés y español con informes selectos del departamento del estado. Ofreciendo transcripciones audio y con texto completo verdaderas, más fuentes contentas agregaron a menudo así que la estancia templó.

Buenos Días.

Este fin de semana del Día de Conmemoración a los Caídos, los niños no tendrán escuela, los papás estarán encendiendo las parrillas, y las familias en todo el país marcarán el comienzo no-oficial del verano. Pero al hacerlo, debemos todos recordar el verdadero propósito de este día feriado - el de honrar los sacrificios que hacen posible nuestra libertad.

El lunes yo marcaré el Día de Conmemoración a los Caídos colocando una corona en la Tumba de los Desconocidos. La tumba es el lugar final de descanso de tres valientes soldados estadounidenses que perdieron sus vidas en combate. Los nombres de estos veteranos de la Primera Guerra Mundial, la Segunda Guerra Mundial, y la Guerra de Corea, los conoce sólo Dios. Pero su valentía la conocemos todos nosotros.

A través de la historia estadounidense, esta valentía ha conservado nuestra forma de vida y nuestras libertades sagradas. Fue esta valentía que ganó nuestra independencia. Fue esta valentía que abolió la mancha de la esclavitud de nuestra Nación. Y fue esta valentía que derrotó las grandes amenazas totalitarias del siglo pasado.

Hoy los hombres y mujeres de nuestras fuerzas armadas enfrentan una nueva amenaza totalitaria a nuestra libertad. En Irak, Afganistán y otros frentes alrededor del mundo, continúan el legado orgulloso de quienes vinieron antes de ellos. Aceptan sus responsabilidades con dignidad tranquila y honor. Y algunos han hecho el sacrificio máximo en defensa de su país.

Un tal héroe fue el Sargento de Primera Clase Benjamín Sebban de la División Aérea No. 82 del Ejército. Como médico principal de su escuadrón, Ben hizo del sacrificio una forma de vida. Cuando los médicos más jóvenes aprendían cómo introducir agujas intravenosas, él ofrecía su propio brazo para práctica. Y cuando llegó el momento, Ben no hesitó en ofrecer a sus soldados colegas mucho más.

El 17 de marzo 2007 en la provincia de Diyala de Irak, Ben vio un camión lleno de explosivos precipitarse hacia su equipo de paracaidistas. Corrió a un espacio abierto para alertarlos - exponiéndose él mismo a la explosión. Ben recibió heridas graves - pero este buen médico no se preocupó por revisar sus propias lesiones. Al contrario, dedicó sus últimos momentos en esta tierra a atender y tratar a los demás. A principios de esta semana, en una ceremonia en el Fuerte Bragg, Carolina del Norte, tuve el honor de presentarle a la mamá del Sargento Sebban la Estrella de Plata que había merecido.

No hay palabras que puedan consolar a quienes han perdido un ser querido al servicio de nuestra Nación. Sólo podemos ofrecer nuestras oraciones y acompañarlos en su dolor. Lloramos por la madre que escucha la salva de 21 disparos por su hijo. Lloramos por el esposo o la esposa que recibe una bandera doblada. Lloramos por un hijo o hija pequeño(a) que sólo conoce a su papá a través de una fotografía.

Un día feriado no basta para conmemorar todos los sacrificios hechos por los hombres y mujeres estadounidenses en uniforme. Ningún grupo jamás ha hecho más para defender la libertad que los hombres y mujeres de las Fuerzas Armadas de Estados Unidos. Su valentía ha hecho más que simplemente ganar batallas. Ha hecho más que ganar guerras. Ha asegurado una forma de vida para nuestro país entero. Estos héroes y sus familias deben estar en nuestros pensamientos y nuestras oraciones todos los días. Y deben recibir nuestro agradecimiento cariñoso en toda oportunidad posible.

Este Día de Conmemoración a los Caídos, les pido a todos los estadounidenses que honren los sacrificios de aquellos que les han servido a ustedes y a nuestro país. Una manera de hacerlo es uniéndose en un momento de recuerdo que será marcado en todo nuestro país a las 3:00 pm hora local. En ese momento, los juegos de béisbol de las grandes ligas tomarán una pausa. el Desfile Nacional del Día de Conmemoración a los Caídos se detendrá. los trenes Amtrak pitarán. y los cornetas en los cementerios militares tocarán la melodía "Taps" (o Toque de Queda). Usted puede participar colocando una bandera en la tumba de un veterano. llevando a su familia a los campos de batalla donde se defendió la libertad. o rezando en silencio por todos los estadounidenses que fueron librados de la agonía de la guerra para encontrarse con su Creador. Su valentía ha conservado el país que tanto amamos.

Gracias por escuchar.

Para su publicación inmediata Oficina del Secretario de Prensa 24 de mayo de 2008

Etiquetas De Technorati: , y

Friday, May 23, 2008

Policy Talks@Google: Condoleezza Rice & David Miliband VIDEO


Remarks With Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom, David Miliband

Secretary Condoleezza Rice Remarks following a Question-and-Answer Session at Google Headquarters Mountain View, California May 22, 2008

SECRETARY RICE: I’d very much like to welcome David Miliband to this wonderful slice of the world, to Northern California, and to the Silicon Valley. We’ve had, so far, a really excellent day. We’ve been looking at places where they’re looking at ways to make energy efficiency possible. We have been here at Google, which is an extraordinary place, and both the people that we met when we were at Bloom Energy and the people that we’ve met here, I think get right to the core of why this is such an extraordinary place. It attracts the best and – best minds and the most innovative minds from all over the world, not just from all over the country. And they work here together in harmony and in beautiful circumstances and surroundings and it’s been a real joy to be here. So, David, welcome and I look forward to the rest of our program.

FOREIGN SECRETARY MILIBAND: Yeah, I’m really pleased to have the chance to say publicly, my immense gratitude to Condi Rice for sparing me the British spring and bringing me to the sunshine of Southern California for a very –

SECRETARY RICE: Northern, Northern, Northern.

FOREIGN SECRETARY MILIBAND: Northern California. I’m in Northern California, sorry. It’s Northern California for a couple of days of very hard work. We’re working extremely hard. It’s great to be here and to be able to see how the people make this part of the world so special. And we’ve had a very good session with the staff at Google, asked very, very penetrating and good questions, and it’s great to be here and great to get a chance to share some time and to understand that the motivation and the drive that does make this, as I said in here, the least cynical nation in the world.

SECRETARY RICE: Sean.

MR. MCCORMACK: We’ll take a couple questions, (inaudible). Right behind here, Sue. Thank you.

QUESTION: Madame Secretary, you were asked by a Googler, I believe they’re called – you were asked about Guantanamo Bay. When does the United States plan to close Guantanamo Bay? Defense Secretary Gates said the other day that there were some legal and other problems preventing this from happening. I mean, what is the delay? Wouldn’t this help in improving your image abroad and improving the U.S. human rights record?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, the first thing – well, certainly, I think in terms of human rights, we’ve done everything that we can to make Guantanamo a place that human rights are respected. It’s visited fairly frequently. So that, to me, is not really the issue. But the issue of Guantanamo and when it might close, the President has said he would very much like to do that. It’s a complicated matter because we have to have some way and some place to transfer people who, if let out on an unsuspecting population, might indeed commit crimes again. And we simply can’t afford that.

And so our first obligation has to be to protect the American people and, indeed, people beyond our shores from terrorists who would kill again, many of them, if they were let out without proper supervision. We were able to get British citizens back because Britain was able to take certain responsibilities about how their post release would be handled. But we’d like nothing better than to close Guantanamo. We look all the time at whether it’s possible. And when and if it’s possible, we’d like to do it.

I should mention that we’ve transferred a lot of people back to their homes and released a fair number as well.

QUESTION: And Foreign Secretary, (inaudible) Guantanamo (inaudible)? What do you (inaudible)?

FOREIGN SECRETARY MILIBAND: Well, the -- I think the position of both the British and the American governments is to close Guantanamo. We’ve made our contribution by bringing back all of the British citizens that were there, and that’s an important thing to do. And the American Government has taken that forward with other countries as well.

MR. MCCORMACK: (Inaudible), right here.

QUESTION: David (inaudible) with ABC (inaudible).

SECRETARY RICE: Yeah, hi, David. How are you?

QUESTION: Good to see you.

SECRETARY RICE: Yeah.

QUESTION: Madame Secretary, what about the situation with – in Iran right now? Are you going to be working collaboratively to try to get more surveillance and more intelligence information as to what they’re doing there?

SECRETARY RICE: Yes, thank you for the question, David. As a matter of fact, Secretary Miliband and I are a part of what we call the P-5+1, or the – Great Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China, and the United States – that forms, really, the kind of lead international coalition on trying to get Iran to stop enriching and reprocessing so that it can’t develop a nuclear weapon. These are technologies that could lead to the development of a nuclear weapon. We’ve passed three successful Security Council resolutions. The collateral effects of those Security Council resolutions include that Iran’s having more and more difficulty accessing the financial – the international financial system. Investment in Iran’s oil and gas infrastructure has gone down. Iran is paying a cost.

But of course, one of the lead elements of how we keep track on what is going on in Iran is the International Atomic Energy Agency. And one of the strongest parts of our policy has been to require Iran to be fully transparent with the IAEA, which should have the right to the full range of inspections in Iran. Because when Iran – if Iran has peaceful intent, as they say, then they should have no problem with the International Atomic Energy Agency having complete and absolute and total access. And the word that is coming out is that that is not being provided to the IAEA. So that’s really our best tool in many ways, David, for an international set of eyes on what the Iranians are doing.

FOREIGN SECRETARY MILIBAND: I think it’s important to say that the leading countries of the world are working very closely together on this. It’s a good example of Europe, the United States, but also China and Russia forging a common alliance and making very clear to the world that this is a choice for Iran. That Iran can see the outstretched hand from the wider world ready to cooperate economically and technologically and scientifically, but only if Iran plays and respects its responsibilities in the international community. And while the Iranians would like to present this as a denial of their rights, it’s no such thing. It’s an assertion that with rights come with responsibilities and that’s important for all countries.

MR. MCCORMACK: Matt, then you.

QUESTION: Madame Secretary, in response to another question that you got inside, you seemed to suggest that in the early days – in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 and the anthrax attacks that the President’s national security team did, in fact, sign off on interrogation techniques that would – could be – on certain interrogation techniques that you later decided should be less harsh after you had discussed it and looked at – while remaining committed to – obviously, to U.S. obligations or international law, as you said, but that those techniques then became less harsh as time went on. You talked about how the early – the answers to questions you got from interrogations of the early detainees were quite productive. Is that – am I correct in that?

SECRETARY RICE: Matt, first of all, I think you know that I’m not going to talk about internal deliberations at the time, only to say that a lot has happened and a lot has evolved in these years. I think Mike Hayden has spoken to this question of the evolution of their program. And I want to repeat that we do have a law now that – the Detainee Treatment Act, which, in fact, gives greater definition to the way that we should think about issues of interrogation. And as the United States did before, it’s going to continue to live up to its laws domestically, as well to its international obligations. And I think that Americans expect the President to do whatever he can within the law to protect Americans, and that’s a key obligation of the presidency.

MR. MCCORMACK: One final question.

QUESTION: Kara Tsuboi, CNETnews.com technology reporter. I want to know about your visit to Google.

SECRETARY RICE: Yeah.

QUESTION: And as a Republican, were you surprised to get an invitation to a well-known liberal camp?

SECRETARY RICE: (Laughter.) Sergey Brin –

QUESTION: (Inaudible.)

SECRETARY RICE: Sergery Brin was one of my students, you know. I’m from this area. I’m a Stanford faculty member on leave. So I think Google is not about politics. Google is about innovation and technology and about creativity of people and about what freedom permits in this great environment. And I feel very much a part of the Silicon Valley. I’ve been here – I joined the Stanford faculty in 1981, so I have been –

FOREIGN SECRETARY MILIBAND: Before you were born. (Laughter.)

SECRETARY RICE: Yeah, I didn’t want to say that, David, but – (Laughter.) So, for a lot of years this has been my natural habitat, and it’s really, truly, a remarkable place. And so it’s been great to be here at Google. It was great earlier to be at Bloom Energy. And I look forward to the day when I can be here on a more regular basis.

MR. MCCORMACK: Madame Secretary, The Stanford Daily.

SECRETARY RICE: Oh, Stanford Daily, okay, all right.

QUESTION: Theo Milonopoulos, Stanford Daily. What do you hope to do when you – you’ve said that you’re going to come back to campus, and what do you hope to do there? And also, considerable controversy erupted on campus when former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was appointed a distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution because several students and faculty objected to many of the decisions he made while serving in the Administration. How do you expect you’ll be received and how would you respond to critics that say that they may not necessarily want you back?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, first of all, I – we’ll see if people want me back. I think so. And I want to repeat, I’ve been at Stanford since 1981. I had a life before being National Security Advisor and being Secretary of State and I expect to have a life after.

But universities ought to be places in which all points of view are both represented and welcomed, because if universities are not open to views, no matter how controversial, I don’t know where the practices of the freedom of ideas will be carried out. I look forward to having an opportunity in the classroom again to discuss the dilemmas that we’ve faced, particularly since September 11th. I look forward again to doing what I used to do, which was to have decision simulations in which students get to play the roles of Secretary of State, President, National Security Advisor, and maybe get a little taste of how it’s actually not so easy to make those decisions because you’re facing a lot of dilemmas. And I look forward to doing some writing and some effort to – an opportunity to step back and reflect on what we’ve gone through.

This has been a fundamentally different period in American history and a period of great consequence. And it’s not something that you can reflect on from within it. You really have to get out of it and do so. But I was Provost at Stanford, and if there’s one thing that I defended and defended unconditionally, it was the right of the faculty to hold whatever view they had and to express it freely.

Thank you.

2008/T15-2 Released on May 23, 2008

Tags: and or