Wednesday, January 09, 2008

President Bush and Prime Minister Olmert VIDEO

President Bush and Prime Minister Olmert

President George W. Bush listens as Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel commends him Wednesday, Jan 9, 2008, during their joint press availability in Mr. Olmert’s Jerusalem office. White House photo by Chris Greenberg
President Bush and Prime Minister Olmert Participate in Joint Press Availability (37:17) Prime Minister's Residence Jerusalem Middle East Trip 6:36 P.M. (Local) GALLERY

PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: Good evening. I am proud and delighted to welcome President Bush to the Prime Minister's home in Jerusalem. We spent more than two and a half hours talking privately and with the delegations, and this was a very interesting and I think very important meeting, Mr. President.
I think your visit is timely and is very important to encourage the process that you and Secretary Rice helped start in Annapolis a few weeks ago, and that we, both sides, I believe, are very seriously trying to move forward with now, in order to realize the vision of a two-state solution, a Palestinian state for the Palestinian people and the state of Israel, the homeland of the Jewish people and the Jewish state.

I want to thank you, this opportunity, for the friendship and the support for the security of the state of Israel that you have manifested for a long period of time, throughout your tenure as President of the United States of America. This last year you decided to increase the annual support for the state of Israel for an overall package of $30 billion, which is remarkable and important and is very helpful for the future of the state of Israel.

We discussed regional issues and the bilateral relations between Israel and America and, naturally, of course, the progress that we envisage for the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. And I hope, Mr. President, that you felt through these talks that the Israeli team is absolutely committed to carry on these negotiations in a very serious manner, to deal with all the core issues that we need to deal in order to bring about an agreement that will have to be implemented, subject, of course, to the implementation of the road map, as we agreed with the Palestinians and as you have announced in Annapolis in the international meeting. That was a very important and encouraging meeting, with the participation of so many countries coming from the region and from all parts of the world.

We are dealing with serious security problems. Only today the terrorists were shooting many Qassam rockets on the southern part of Israel, and mortar shells, and a few of the rockets landed inside the city of Sderot. This is a serious problem. Israel does not tolerate and will not tolerate the continuation of these vicious attacks on uninvolved and innocent civilians living in our cities. And we made it clear to everyone that we'll take all the necessary measures in order to reach out for those who are responsible for these attacks, and we will not hesitate to take all the necessary measures in order to stop them.

There will be no peace unless terror is stopped, and terror will have to be stopped everywhere. We made it clear to the Palestinians; they know it, and they understand that Gaza must be a part of the package, and that as long as there will be terror from Gaza it will be very, very hard to reach any peaceful understanding between us and the Palestinians.

Mr. President, I want to thank you for your visit, for your efforts, for your friendship, for the power that you used for good causes for this region and for the world. Welcome.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Mr. Prime Minister, thank you. I view this as an historic moment. It's a historic opportunity, Mr. Prime Minister, first of all, to work together to deal with the security of Israel and the Palestinian people -- matter of fact, the security of people who just simply want to live in peace.

We're in conflict with radicals and extremists who are willing to murder innocent people to achieve a dark vision. And this is an historic opportunity for the world to fight that -- to fight those terrorists. It's an historic opportunity to spread freedom as a great alternative to their ideology, as a society based upon human rights and human dignity, a society in which every man, woman and child is free. And it's a historic opportunity to work for peace. And I want to thank you for being a partner in peace.

I believe that two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side-by-side in peace is in the best interests of America and the world. I believe it's in the long-term security interests of Israel, and I know, to provide a more hopeful society for the Palestinians. And that's why I articulated this vision early in my presidency. And that's why I'm so pleased to have -- to watch two leaders, you and President Abbas, work hard to achieve that vision.

It's in the interests of all of us that that vision come to be. I'm under no illusions, it's going to be hard work. I fully understand that there's going to be some painful political compromises. I fully understand that there's going to be some tough negotiations. And the role of the United States is to help in those negotiations.

It's essential that people understand America cannot dictate the terms of what a state will look like. The only way to have lasting peace, the only way for an agreement to mean anything, is for the two parties to come together and make the difficult choices. But we'll help, and we want to help. If it looks like there needs to be a little pressure, Mr. Prime Minister, you know me well enough to know I'll be more than willing to provide it. I will say the same thing to President Abbas tomorrow, as well.

I come -- you know, people in America say, well, do you really think these guys are serious? We've heard a lot of rhetoric in the past, a lot of grand proclamations. I wouldn't be standing here if I did not believe that you, Mr. Prime Minister, and President Abbas and your negotiators were serious. It is my considered judgment that people now understand the stakes and the opportunity. And our job, Mr. Prime Minister, help you seize that opportunity.

In the rest of my trip I will be talking about the opportunity for Middle Eastern peace, and remind people in the neighborhood that if they truly want to see two states living side by side in peace, they have an obligation, Arab leaders have an obligation to recognize Israel's important contribution to peace and stability in the Middle East, and to encourage and support the Palestinians as they make tough choices. I'm an optimistic people -- people say, do you think it's possible during your presidency, and the answer is, I'm very hopeful and will work hard to that end.

We also talked about Iran. Iran is a threat to world peace. There was a recent intelligence report that came out that I think sent the signal to some that said perhaps the United States does not view an Iran with a nuclear weapon as serious -- as a serious problem. And I want to remind people, Mr. Prime Minister, what I said at the press conference when I discussed that National Intelligence Estimate. I said then that Iran was a threat, Iran is a threat, and Iran will be a threat if the international community does not come together and prevent that nation from the development of the know-how to build a nuclear weapon. A country which once had a secret program can easily restart a secret program. A country which can enrich for civilian purposes can easily transfer that knowledge to a military program. A country which has made statements that it's made about the security of our friend, Israel, is a country that needs to be taken seriously. And the international community must understand with clarity the threat that Iran provides to world peace.

And we will continue to work with European countries, Russia and China, as well as nations in this neighborhood, to make it abundantly clear that -- the threat that Iran poses for world peace.

So we've had a very constructive dialogue, and I'm not surprised. This isn't the first time we've had a chance to visit. Every time we've had I've come away impressed by your steadfast desire to not only protect your people, but to implement a vision that will lead to peace in the long-term. Thanks for having me.

Q Mr. President -- -- (inaudible) -- Iran and Israel's finding about Iran are completely different than the NIE report. Given the duration and the unpopularity of the war in Iraq, thee is a fear, a concern in Israel that your administration will not take the necessary action against Iran.

And the question for Prime Minister Olmert: Did you perhaps present to Mr. Bush positions that run counter to those of the Americans, and perhaps you are concerned that what he said now actually indicates that his hands are tied when it comes to Iran.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Let me remind you what the NIE actually said. It said that as far as the intelligence community could tell, at one time the Iranians had a military -- covert military program that was suspended in 2003 because of international pressure. My attitude is that a non-transparent country, a country which has yet to disclose what it was up to, can easily restart a program. The fact that they suspended the program is heartening in that the international community's response had worked. The fact that they had one is discouraging because they could restart it.

Secondly, there are three aspects to a weapons program. One is the capacity to have -- enrich so that you can have the materials necessary to make a bomb. They're claiming they're enriching for civilian purposes. I believe that knowledge gained for civilian purposes could be transferred for military purposes. Therefore, our efforts are to stop them from enriching.

Secondly, the knowledge of how to convert any materials into a bomb. We don't know whether they have that knowledge or not. However, for the sake of peace, we ought to assume they do, and therefore, rally the world to convince other that they're a threat. Third, they've got missiles in which they can use to deliver the bomb. So no matter how you might have interpreted the NIE, I interpreted it to mean you better take the Iranians' threat seriously.

Secondly, I have always told the American people that I believe it's incumbent upon the American President to solve problems diplomatically. And that's exactly what we're in the process of doing. I believe that pressure -- economic pressure, financial sanctions -- will cause the people inside of Iran to have to make a considered judgment about whether or not it makes sense for them to continue to enrich or face world isolation. The country is paying an economic price for its intransigence and its unwillingness to tell the truth.

The Iranian people -- we have no qualm with Iranian people. I'm sure Israel doesn't either. It's people with a proud history and a great tradition. But they are being misled by their government. The actions of their government are causing there to be isolation and economic stagnation. People went into office saying, we promise you this and we promise you this economic benefit, but they're simply not being delivered. And so we'll continue to keep the pressure on the Iranians, and I believe we can solve this problem diplomatically.

PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: (As translated.) We had a very thorough discussion, which, of course, also covered the Iranian subject, as President Bush said. And we discussed all aspects of this issue, and of course, it goes without saying that we shared with one another what we know and what we -- what the Americans know when it comes to this topic. And without my sharing with you right now all the details, of course, despite the natural curiosity, which I appreciate, I believe that what has just been said now by the President of the United States is particularly important. The President of the largest power in the world, the most important power in the world, is standing right here, and he has said in no uncertain terms that Iran was a threat and remains a threat.

And the fact that it has certain technological capacities is a fact. And through this, it is capable of realizing that potential and creating nuclear weapons. And considering the nature of the government there and the type of threats that they are voicing, one cannot possibly disregard that power, and we must do everything possible to thwart them.

Of course, the United States will decide for itself just what steps to take. I can only say one thing, namely, my impression based on this conversation, as well as previous talks that we had -- and we talk quite frequently, apart from the face- to-face meetings -- my impression is that we have here a leader who is exceptionally determined, exceptionally loyal to the principles in which he believes. He has proven this throughout his term in office in his preparedness to take exceptional measures in order to defend the principles in which he believes, and in his deep commitment to the security of the state of Israel.

Inasmuch as I could sum up all of these impressions this evening, I would say that I certainly am encouraged and reinforced, having heard the position of the United States under the leadership of George Bush, particularly on this subject.

MS. PERINO: Anne Gearan of the Associated Press, please.

Q Mr. President, are you disappointed that the Israelis and the Palestinians haven't made more specific progress since Annapolis, and is it maybe time for you to apply some of that direct pressure you referred to earlier?

And for the Prime Minister, did you offer any new assurances to the President, or do you plan to, that Israel will stop disputed settlement and construction activity?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Step one of any complicated process that is going to require a lot of hard work and serious dialogue, is whether the mind-set is right. It's one thing for somebody to say to the President, sure, we're for a two state -- just to make the President feel okay. That's not the case here. The fundamental questions that I was seeking at Annapolis and on my return trip is the understanding about the power of what a vision will do for peace.

You know, one of the concerns I had was that -- whether it be the unprovoked rocket attacks or the issues of settlement, that the leaders would be so bogged down in the moment that they would lose sight of the potential for a historic agreement. And I've come away with the belief that while those issues are important, and certainly create consternation amongst the respective constituencies, that both leaders are determined to make the hard choices necessary.

Now, implicit in your question is whether or not the President should butt in and actually dictate the end result of the agreement. In my judgment, that would cause there to be a non-lasting agreement. In my judgment, the only way for there to be a vision that means something is for the parties to seriously negotiate that vision. If you're asking me, am I nudging them forward -- well, my trip was a pretty significant nudge, because yesterday they had a meeting -- and by the way, the atmosphere in America was, nothing is going to happen, see, that these issues are too big on the ground; therefore, you two can't get together and come up with any agreements. You just heard the man talk about their desire to deal with core issues, which I guess for the uneducated on the issue, that means dealing with the issues like territory and right of return and Jerusalem. Those are tough issues -- the issue of Israeli security. And they're going to sit down at the table and discuss those issues in seriousness.

I've been briefed today from the Israeli perspective of those discussions. Tomorrow I'll be briefed by the Palestinians about their interpretation.

There's three tracks going on, by the way, during this process. One is the vision track. Let me make sure everybody understands, in our delegation, the goal. The goal is for there to be a clear vision of what a state would look like, so that, for example, reasonable Palestinian leadership can say, here's your choice: You can have the vision of Hamas, which is dangerous and will lead to war and violence, or you can have the vision of a state, which should be hopeful.

The second track is to help both parties deal with road map issues. Settlements is a road map issue; security is a road map issue, in a certain limited sense. Third issue is to help the Palestinians, one, organize their security forces so that they can better assure their own people, and equally importantly, better assure Israel that they can deal with the extremists in their midst. That's what General Dayton is doing here, for example. Or, an economic track. Listen, the best way to make sure that the Palestinians realize there's a hopeful future in which it's in their interests to live at peace with Israel is for them to realize that they've got an economy in which they can make a living. And Tony Blair is helpful on that. And so is America.

And so you're watching three tracks parallel each other. And the one, of course, you're asking about is whether or not the leadership has got the willingness and the desire and the drive to design a state, compatible to both sides, and my answer is, yes, I think they will.

PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: I hope that I don't disappoint anyone, certainly not the President, because we talked at length, if I will say that the President didn't ask for me to make any commitments other than the ones that Israel made already with regard to the peace process and as I addressed, pointed out on many different occasions, including in Annapolis, which, was, as I said, a very important event. The commitment of Israel is absolutely to carry on in this process in order to realize the vision of two states living side by side, as I said before.

Now, there are many issues; settlement is one of the issues. We made clear our position. And I know that sometimes not everyone is happy with this position, but we are very sincere. We were never trying to conceal any of these facts from anyone, starting with President Bush and Secretary Rice, and of course, our Palestinian partners.

They know that there is a moratorium on new settlements and the new expropriation of land in the Territories. And they also know, and we have made it clear that Jerusalem, as far as we are concerned, is not in the same status. And they know that the population centers are not in the same status. And there might be things that will happen in the population centers or in Jerusalem which they may not be in love with, but we will discuss them and we will not hide them. We are not going to build any new settlements or expropriate land in the Territories. We made it clear and we will stand by our commitment. And we will fulfill all our commitments as part of the road map because this is an essential part for any progress that will have to take place in the future.

But there are some aspects only just realized which one can't ignore, and everyone knows that certain things in Jerusalem are not in the same tactical level as they are in other parts of the Territories which are outside the city of Jerusalem. And so it's true about some population centers. So there was nothing that happened that was not known in advance to all our partners in this process. We made clear our positions; we made clear exactly what we can do, what we can't do, what we want to do and what we will not be able to do. And I think that they all know it and they, at least even when sometimes they disagree with us, they at least respect our sincerity and openness about these issues.

Q Mr. President, regarding the issues of rockets and settlements that you mentioned before, what should, what could Israel do regarding the ever-growing threat from Gaza? And regarding the settlements, did you get any new assurances from the Prime Minister regarding the removal of illegal outposts? Do you believe that this time it will be implemented? Do you care about it?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yes.

Q Mr. Prime Minister, are you concerned that the core issues are going to be affected? Because a member of Knesset, Mrs. Lieberman, is going to withdraw from the coalition.

PRESIDENT BUSH: As to the rockets, my first question is going to be to President Abbas, what do you intend to do about them? Because ultimately, in order for there to be the existence of a state, there has to be a firm commitment by a Palestinian government to deal with extremists and terrorists who might be willing to use Palestinian Territory as a launching pad into Israel. So I'll be asking that question tomorrow. And what can we do to help you?

I believe that he knows it's not in his interests to have people launching rockets from a part of the Territory into Israel. Matter of fact, maybe the Prime Minister can comment on this in a while, in a second, but at least he's told me that he fully recognizes in order for there to be a state, he cannot be a safe haven for terrorists that want to destroy Israel. You can't expect the Israelis, and I certainly don't, to accept a state on their border which would become a launching pad for terrorist activities. That's why the vision of a democracy is an important vision.

How Israel deals with the rocket attacks I would hope is done in a way that not only protects herself, but worries about innocent life. And I'm convinced the Prime Minister does. He understands he has an obligation to protect Israel. He also understands that he's got to be circumspect and reasonable about how he does it, so that innocent people don't suffer. He just gave you the answer on the settlements.

In terms of outposts, yes, they ought to go. Look, I mean, we've been talking about it for four years. The agreement was, get rid of outposts, illegal outposts, and they ought to go. And --

PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: (As translated) -- earlier, and I say once again -- I think it's important to repeat this -- Israel has commitments and the Palestinians have commitments. We must abide by our commitments, and we shall do so. I do not want to use this as an excuse, as a pretext, and therefore I say, we demand of the Palestinians that they uphold all of their commitments.

And some have not been upheld, not a single one; particularly the most important things that have to do with terrorism, that have to do with the security of the state of Israel -- not only in Gaza. The fact that we, over the past year, have had fewer casualties from terrorism than in any year of the recent years previously is not because the Palestinians have made fewer attempts, but because we have been more successful, in a very sophisticated and courageous way, of our general security service and our ideas in preventing these terrorist acts.

I'm not using this as a pretext. I'm saying we must uphold our commitment. I believe that the President has said this fairly and appropriately. We have made commitments; we should uphold them, and we shall. But let us present a balanced picture. By the same token, we will not refrain from demanding and insisting that the Palestinians abide by all of their commitments. And their commitments when it comes to terrorism are the central key, the pivot to bringing this negotiation process to a successful conclusion. And I hope it will happen this year, as all of us hope.

I very much, sincerely, hope that all of those in the coalition will remain in the coalition as full partners, and I would certainly not like to have a political crisis. I don't think that anyone who is responsible -- has a responsibility such as I have would like to see any kind of an undermining of the stability of this government. It is a stable government, a government that has been operating in many different directions, with very impressive achievements, which the party of Avigdor Lieberman, Yisrael Beytenu, is part of this effort, part of these achievements; whether it's in the economic field or the political one, or when it comes to security, or the deterrence ability of the state of Israel.

And everyone knows that this government has had some very impressive achievements on its record over the past year. And Lieberman's party was certainly a partner in this process, and I'd like them to stay part of the process. I think that the gap between us is smaller than it appears, and I will do everything within my power to ensure that the coalition remains stable. The state of Israel must be part of a serious peace process. We cannot forego this; we cannot obscure it; we must not delay it. It would be wrong to delay it.

Let me say something in Hebrew -- since I know that the President does not speak Hebrew, I'll say it in Hebrew, because, after all, you know, you're not supposed to praise people in their presence, so I'll say it in Hebrew. Well, then, what I'd like to say is, thank God I can conduct political negotiations with George Bush at my side as one of my partners. Thank God we can conduct political negotiations when the largest and most important power in the world, and the most important for us, is headed by such an important friend of Israel.

We have no interest in delaying matters. We don't want to procrastinate with the negotiations, lest changes for the worse take place on the Palestinian front. And we certainly don't want to delay the negotiation process when we have such political assistance, assistance with respect to our security, too, when it comes to the most important power in the world, being led by a person who is so deeply committed to the security of the state of Israel, and to realizing the vision of two states; a person who is fair, who does not hide his viewpoints, who speaks openly about his will to establish a Palestinian state alongside Israel, a state that will be secure not at the expense of the interests of the state of Israel.

I believe that any responsible political leader in the state of Israel will understand that this is a moment that must not be missed. This is an opportunity that must not be passed up. We must do everything we can -- okay, we can have occasional internal arguments. The President has said that some very difficult decisions must be made. He is right, but I am not afraid of difficult decisions. I am willing to contend with difficult decisions. I am willing to make decisions that will entail painful compromises, so long as they enable us to reach the goal that we have dreamt of for so long, to ensure ourselves of security, and to give the Palestinians the state of their own that will be vibrant, democratic, open, and living in peace alongside Israel.

At the head of our negotiating team is the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister. She bears a very heavy responsibility. We work in full cooperation, and I am convinced that she will wisely succeed, together with Abu Allah, head of the Palestinian team, in navigating through these negotiations in such a manner that the vital interests of the state of Israel are served well on the basis of a deep understanding.

PRESIDENT BUSH: The interpreter got it right. (Laughter.)

PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: Thank you, Mr. President.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yes, Toby.

Q Mr. President, what is the United States prepared -- what action is the United States prepared to take if there is another confrontation with Iranian ships in the Strait of Hormuz? Your National Security Advisor this morning spoke about consequences if there was a repeat.

And, Mr. Prime Minister, why is there no three-way meeting scheduled on this trip?

PRESIDENT BUSH: The National Security Advisor was making it abundantly clear that all options are on the table to protect our assets.

She's referring to, Mr. Prime Minister, the fact that our ships were moving along very peacefully off the Iranian border in territorial water -- international waters, and Iranian boats came out and were very provocative. And it was a dangerous gesture on their part. We have made it clear publicly, and they know our position, and that is, there will be serious consequences if they attack our ships, pure and simple. And my advice to them is, don't do it.

Q Why is there no three-way meeting on this trip?

PRIME MINISTER OLMERT: We had a three-way meeting in the United States just a month ago. We are starting now a serious process directly with the Palestinians. The President met with the Israeli delegation and with me today. He will meet tomorrow with President Mahmoud Abbas, and I'm sure that all the necessary information will be provided and all the curiosity of the President will be satisfied. And ideally, this is a very good and comfortable -- (inaudible.)

I don't rule out, by the way, trilateral meetings. Maybe in the future we'll have trilateral meetings. We are not against it. We just found out at this time in life, considering what we have achieved already and what we are about to start now in a serious manner, that it was not essential in order to fulfill the desires that we all share, which is to move forward in this process between us and the Palestinians.

I can reassure you, and perhaps through you, many of your people in America, that we think -- and I'm sure that the Palestinians think -- that the visit of the President is very, very helpful to the process that we are engaged in, and that it contributes -- and it will contribute a lot to the stability and the very comfortable environment within which we will conduct our negotiations.

And, therefore, I again want to take this opportunity, Mr. President -- now you don't even get -- (laughter) -- to thank you very much; really to thank you for your friendship and your support and the courage that you inspire in all of us to carry on with our obligations. It's not easy. You know, sometimes it's not easy, but when I look at you, and I know what you have to take upon your shoulders and how you do it, the manner in which you do it, the courage that you have, the determination that you have, and your loyalty to the principles that you believe in -- it makes all of us feel that we can also -- in trying to match you, which we can, we can move forward. Thank you very much.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Thank you, sir.

END 7:17 P.M. (Local) For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary January 9, 2008

Technorati Tags: and or and or Admiral Details Iranian Challenge to U.S. Ships VIDEO and New York City Fire Command Truck and Solar cells of the future

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Mitt Romney New Web Ad, "Twists" VIDEO


From Romney For President - Boston, MA – Today, Romney for President launched its newest web ad, "Twists." In 2000, Senator John McCain personally attacked George Bush's integrity by comparing him to President Clinton. Today, Senator McCain is once again personally attacking his opponent, but this time it's Governor Romney. The truth is that Senator McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts and supported last year's amnesty bill. That's straight talk for being in Washington too long and that's leadership our country cannot afford.

Transcript For "Twists" (WEB:30):

ANNOUNCER: "Remember? Last time John McCain attacked President Bush's integrity."

JOHN MCCAIN: "His ad twists the truth like Clinton. We're all pretty tired of that."

ANNOUNCER: "Comparing Bush to Clinton? He was wrong then, and he's wrong about Mitt Romney now.

"The truth? 'McCain is not as conservative as Romney.'

"'He voted against the Bush tax cuts.'

"On immigration, McCain supported this year's amnesty bill.

"Higher taxes, amnesty for illegals.

"That's straight talk for being in Washington too long."

GOVERNOR MITT ROMNEY: "I'm Mitt Romney and I approve this message."

Technorati Tags: and or Admiral Details Iranian Challenge to U.S. Ships VIDEO and New York City Fire Command Truck and Solar cells of the future

John McCain Web Ad: "Leadership" VIDEO


From John McCain 2008 - Web Ad: "Leadership" John McCain for President :30 Web Ad "Leadership" January 4, 2008 Contact: Press Office 703-650-5550

Transcript: ANNCR: Mitt Romney compares himself to John McCain and their public service and says, "I've actually been leading".

Mitt Romney leading?

He'd rather call lawyers.

Romney: "You sit down with your attorneys and tell you what you have to do ...

"Uh, you know, we're gonna let the lawyers sort out…"

ANNCR: And bureaucrats.

Romney: Well if we want someone with foreign policy experience, we can simply go to the State Department."

ANNCR: When it comes to leadership, John McCain doesn't have to call anyone.

JSM: I'm John McCain and I approve this message.

Technorati Tags: or Admiral Details Iranian Challenge to U.S. Ships VIDEO and New York City Fire Command Truck and Solar cells of the future

Ron Paul new television ad "Troops" VIDEO


From: Ron Paul 2008 - ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – Republican presidential candidate and Texas Congressman Ron Paul has released a new television advertisement set to run in New Hampshire through the January 8 primary, highlighting the fact that he has received more support from active and retired military than any other candidate.

“Congressman Paul honors our troops and has long been a praised as staunch advocate for veterans’ issues,” said Ron Paul 2008 spokesman Jesse Benton. “Dr. Paul wants to bring the troops home from Iraq and ensure that we never again send out brave soldiers to war unless doing so is necessary for our defense.”

The following is a transcript of the 30 second advertisement:

Narrator: A proud military veteran who served our nation, Ron Paul salutes and supports our troops to protect and defend our freedom.

But who do the troops support? Ron Paul.

The record shows…

[Active duty military and veterans are supporting Ron Paul.]

They’re standing up for him.

[“More donations from current military…and retired military…than any other candidate.” -Houston Chronicle, October 18, 2007]

Our troops have spoken, and Ron Paul is the choice for their next commander-in-chief.

[Ron Paul is supported by more active duty and retired military retirees than any other candidate to be the next commander in chief.—FEC Quarterly Reports]

Ron Paul: I’m Ron Paul, and I approve this message. ###

Technorati Tags: or Admiral Details Iranian Challenge to U.S. Ships VIDEO and New York City Fire Command Truck and Solar cells of the future

Rudy Giuliani Florida TV Ad, “Liderazgo” VIDEO


From: JoinRudy2008 - The Rudy Giuliani Presidential Committee today announced the launch of a new television ad entitled “Liderazgo.” The ad begins airing in Florida today.

Transcript for “Liderazgo”:

Voice Over: “El Presidente Reagan depositó su confianza en él para combatir el crimen. Nueva York lo eligió su alcalde cuando esa ciudad se veía perdida. Rudy Giuliani. Redujo el crimen.”

Chyron: “Redujo el crimen”

Voice Over: “Rebajó los impuestos.”

Chyron: “Rebajó los impuestos”

Voice Over: “Creó nuevos empleos y recortó la burocracia.”

Chyron: “Creó nuevos empleos”

Chyron: “Recortó la burocracia”

Voice Over: “Se pudo en Nueva York y se puede en Washington. Rudy Giuliani: Experiencia, Resultado, Liderazgo.”

Mayor Giuliani: “Soy Rudy Giuliani y apruebo este mensaje.”

English Translation:

Voice Over: “President Reagan trusted him to combat crime. New York elected him mayor when the city seemed doomed (lost). Rudy Giuliani. He cut down on crime.”

Chyron: “He cut down on crime”

Voice Over: “He lowered taxes.”

Chyron: “He lowered taxes”

Voice Over: “He created new jobs and slashed bureaucracy.”

Chyron: “He created new jobs”

Chyron: “Slashed bureaucracy”

Voice Over: “It was done in New York. It can be done in Washington. Rudy Giuliani: Experience, Results, Leadership.”

Mayor Giuliani: “I’m Rudy Giuliani and I approved this message.”

Technorati Tags: or Admiral Details Iranian Challenge to U.S. Ships VIDEO and New York City Fire Command Truck and Solar cells of the future

Monday, January 07, 2008

Admiral Details Iranian Challenge to U.S. Ships VIDEO

By Jim Garamone American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Jan. 7, 2008 – The commander of the U.S. 5th Fleet in the Middle East today called the behavior of Iranian Revolutionary Guard boats that buzzed three U.S. Navy vessels in the Strait of Hormuz yesterday “unduly provocative."
Navy Vice Adm. Kevin J. Cosgriff, who also commands U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, briefed Pentagon reporters via video teleconference from his headquarters in Manama, Bahrain.

He said the USS Port Royal, USS Hopper, USS Ingraham were inbound to the Persian Gulf via the Strait of Hormuz yesterday morning. The ships were in the midst of a routine transit in the early daylight hours, the admiral said. Five Iranian Revolutionary Guard high-speed craft came from the north and approached the U.S. ships.

“The five boats approached the U.S. formation on its starboard bow in international waters slightly inside the Gulf from the apex of the strait,” Cosgriff said.

The Iranian boats broke into two groups and went on both sides of the U.S. formation. “The groups maneuvered aggressively in the direction of the U.S. ships,” Cosgriff said.

U.S. captains called on the radio and sounded the ships’ horns to warn the Iranians off, he said. “The (U.S.) ships received a radio call that was threatening to our ships to the effect that they were closing our ships and that the U.S. ships would explode,” Cosgriff said.

Subsequently, U.S. sailors observed two of the Iranian boats dropping objects in the water generally in the path of the USS Ingraham. “These objects were white box-like objects that floated,” the admiral said. “Obviously the Ingraham passed by safely.”

The boats maneuvered close astern, and after 30 minutes they returned in the direction from which they came, back toward Iranian territorial waters. The Iranian boats approached within 500 yards of the U.S. ships, the admiral said.

“It was transit passage in international waters incidental to a routing inbound transit of the Strait of Hormuz,” Cosgriff said. “The U.S. ships were clearly marked. It was daylight, (with) decent visibility.

“The behavior of the Iranian ships was unnecessary,” he continued, “without due regard to safety of navigation and unduly provocative in the aggregate of their maneuvers, the radio call and the dropping of objects in the water.”

The admiral praised the U.S. ships’ crews, saying they stepped through procedures carefully, with good discipline and with due regard for all the factors. “I was very proud of their performance and the training they received,” Cosgriff said.

Related Sites: Technorati Tags: and or and or Republican Debate Manchester, New Hampshire 01/05/08 VIDEO and Johannes Kepler and Faster X-ray interferometers due to single-photon interference

Sunday, January 06, 2008

Republican Debate Manchester, New Hampshire 01/05/08 VIDEO


ABC, WMUR-TV and Facebook jointly hosted back-to-back Republican and Democratic debates from Saint Anselm College three days before the first-in-the-nation primary on Tuesday. The Republican debate included Rudy Giuliani, Mike Huckabee, John McCain, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Fred Thompson. Charles Gibson moderated. Candidates were allowed to participate if they meet one of three criteria, "place first through fourth in Iowa, poll 5 percent or higher in one of the last four major New Hampshire surveys, or poll 5 percent or higher in one of the last four major national surveys." Thus, ABC News eliminated Republican Duncan Hunter.

ABC said the rules were quite inclusive, and that none of the candidates objected ahead of time. "In previous debates where the stage was more crowded you had to make sure all of the candidates got equal time," said David Chalian, ABC News political director. "Here you will have more time to go in depth on the issues." FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

PREVIOUS DEBATES:Technorati Tags: and or and or and or or or and or Mike Huckabee Iowa Caucus Victory Speech VIDEO and Broad-banded Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus) and UCLA-industry partnership to develop, commercialize new nanotechnology

YouTube breeding ground for anti-vaccination views

YouTube LogoTORONTO, CDA. – As cold and flu season hits this year amid growing debate over the necessity of vaccinations, University of Toronto researchers have uncovered widespread misinformation in related videos on YouTube.
In the first-ever study of its kind, U of T researchers Dr. Kumanan Wilson and Dr. Jennifer Keelan analyzed 153 videos about vaccination and immunization on YouTube, a popular online video-sharing site. Researchers found that more than half of the videos portrayed childhood, HPV, flu and other vaccinations negatively or ambiguously. Of those videos, a staggering 45 per cent contained messages that contradict the 2006 Canadian Immunization Guide, which provides national guidelines for immunization practices. The Canadian recommendations are similar to guidelines from the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“YouTube is increasingly a resource people consult for health information, including vaccination,” says first author Keelan, an assistant professor in U of T’s Department of Public Health Sciences. “Our study shows that a significant amount of immunization content on YouTube contradicts the best scientific evidence at large. From a public health perspective, this is very concerning.”

The research team also found that videos skeptical of vaccinations – many of them highly provocative and powerful – received more views and better ratings by YouTube users than those videos that portray immunizations in a positive light.

“Health care professionals need to be aware that individuals critical of immunization are using YouTube to communicate their viewpoints and that patients may be obtaining information from these videos” says Wilson, senior author and an associate professor with U of T’s Department of Medicine. “YouTube users also need to be aware of this, so they can filter information from the site accordingly.”

“The findings also indicate that public health officials should consider how to effectively communicate their viewpoints through Internet video portals,” Wilson says. ###

For more information on the study, published in the December 5 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association, please contact:

Kumanan Wilson, senior author: 416-340-3662 (office) or 647-504-7054 (cell)

Jennifer Keelan, first author: (011) 86 135-2146-1374 (cell)

Contact: April Kemick april.kemick@utoronto.ca 416-978-5949 University of Toronto

Technorati Tags: and or and or Mike Huckabee Iowa Caucus Victory Speech VIDEO and Broad-banded Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus) and UCLA-industry partnership to develop, commercialize new nanotechnology

Saturday, January 05, 2008

Freedom Calendar 01/05/08 - 01/12/08

January 5, 1903, President Theodore Roosevelt nominates African-American physician William D. Crum as Collector of Customs, over racist objections from Senate Democrats.

January 6, 1874, African-American U.S. Rep. Robert B. Elliott (R-SC) delivers eloquent hour-long speech supporting Republicans’ civil rights bill.

January 7, 1922, Death of Republican Jonah Kalanianaole, native Hawaiian who served as Delegate in U.S. Congress for 19 years.

January 8, 1867, Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

January 9, 1890, Death of abolitionist and U.S. Rep. William Kelley (R-PA), outspoken advocate of equality for African-Americans.

January 10, 1878, U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduces Susan B. Anthony amendment for women’s suffrage; Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it 4 times before election of Republican House and Senate guaranteed its approval in 1919.

January 11, 2001, Republican Elaine Chao, first Asian-American woman to hold a cabinet position, nominated as U.S. Secretary of Labor.

January 12, 1956, Jewish Republican Simon Sobeloff, who as U.S. Solicitor General argued President Eisenhower’s position against segregation in Brown v. Board of Education, appointed to U.S. Court of Appeals 13

I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free; and that the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.”

Abraham Lincoln, 16th President of the United States

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and or and or or and or or Mike Huckabee Iowa Caucus Victory Speech VIDEO and Broad-banded Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus) and UCLA-industry partnership to develop, commercialize new nanotechnology

Presidential Podcast 01/05/08

Presidential Podcast Logo
Presidential Podcast 01/05/08 en Español. Subscribe to the Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Subscribe to Our Podcast feed or online Click here to Subscribe to Our Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Channel with Podnova podnova Podcast Channel and receive the weekly Presidential Radio Address in English and Spanish with select State Department Briefings. Featuring full audio and text transcripts, More content Sources added often so stay tuned. In Focus: Middle East

Technorati Tags: and or and or Mike Huckabee Iowa Caucus Victory Speech VIDEO and Broad-banded Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus) and UCLA-industry partnership to develop, commercialize new nanotechnology

Bush radio address 01/05/08 full audio, text transcript

President George W. Bush calls troops from his ranch in Crawford, Texas, Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, Nov. 24, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper.bush radio address 01/05/08 full audio, text transcript. President's Radio Address en Español. In Focus: Middle East
Subscribe to the Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Subscribe to Our Podcast feed or online Click here to Subscribe to Republican National Convention Blog's PODCAST with podnova podnova Podcast Channel and receive the weekly Presidential Radio Address in English and Spanish with select State Department Briefings. Featuring real audio and full text transcripts, More content Sources added often so stay tuned.

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. On Tuesday, I will board Air Force One and depart for a trip to the Middle East. This is a region of great strategic importance to the United States, and I'm looking forward to my visit.

My first stops will be in the Holy Land, where I'll meet with Israeli Prime Minister Olmert and Palestinian President Abbas. I will encourage both leaders to move forward with the peace negotiations they began last November in Annapolis. This is difficult work. It will require tough decisions on complex questions. But I am optimistic about the prospects. And I will make clear that America is deeply committed to helping both parties realize the historic vision we share: two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security.

During the second part of my trip, I will visit five of America's key allies in the Arab world: Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. I will thank the leaders of these countries for their friendship. I will urge them to strongly support negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians. I will discuss the importance of countering the aggressive ambitions of Iran. And I will assure them that America's commitment to the security of our friends in the region is strong and enduring.

I know it is not always obvious why events in the nations of the Middle East should matter to the American people. But in the 21st century, developments there have a direct impact on our lives here. As we saw on September the 11th, 2001, dangers that arise on the other side of the world can bring death and destruction to our own streets. Since then, extremists have assassinated democratic leaders from Afghanistan to Lebanon to Pakistan. They have murdered innocent people from Saudi Arabia to Jordan and Iraq. They are seeking new weapons and new operatives, so they can attack America again, overthrow governments in the Middle East, and impose their hateful vision on millions.

On my trip, I will consult closely with our partners in the war against these extremists. I will reaffirm our pledge to use every necessary tool of intelligence, law enforcement, diplomacy, finance, and military power to bring our common enemies to justice. The terrorists and extremists will not let down their guard, and we must not let down ours.

At its core, the battle unfolding in the Middle East is more than a clash of arms. It is an ideological struggle. On one side are the forces of terror and death. On the other are tens of millions of ordinary people who want a free and peaceful life for their children. The future of the Middle East depends on the outcome of this struggle, and so does the security of the United States. We know that societies growing in tolerance and hope are less likely to become sources of radicalism and violence. So America will stay engaged in the region. We will support democrats and reformers from Beirut and Baghdad to Damascus and Tehran. We will stand with all those working to build a future of liberty and justice and peace.

Prevailing in this struggle will not be easy, but we know from history that it can be done. After World War II, many said that advancing freedom in Europe and East Asia would be impossible. Yet America invested the time and resources to help nations make the transition from dictatorship to democracy. There were trying moments along the way, and progress did not arrive overnight. But with patience and resolve, we have seen an extraordinary return on our investment -- vital regions of the world that live in stability and prosperity and peace with America.

I believe a similar transformation can take place in the Middle East. At this decisive moment in their history, the people of the Middle East can have confidence in the power of liberty to overcome tyranny and terror. And all who step forward in freedom's cause can count on a friend in the United States. I look forward to sharing this message in the region.

Thank you for listening. END

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary January 5, 2008

Technorati Tags: and or and or Mike Huckabee Iowa Caucus Victory Speech VIDEO and Broad-banded Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus) and UCLA-industry partnership to develop, commercialize new nanotechnology

Discurso Radial del Presidente a la Nación 01/05/08

Presidente George W. Bush llama a tropas de su rancho en Crawford, Tejas, día de Thanksgiving, jueves, de noviembre el 24 de 2005.  Foto blanca de la casa de Eric Draper.forre el audio de la dirección de radio 12/29/07 por completo, transcripción del texto. (nota de los redactores: ninguna lengua española mp3 lanzó esta semana, apesadumbrada) PODCAST
Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Odeo Suscribir a nuestro canal de Podcast de Odeo o del podnova Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Podnova y recibir la dirección de radio presidencial semanal en inglés y español con informes selectos del departamento del estado. Ofreciendo transcripciones audio y con texto completo verdaderas, más fuentes contentas agregaron a menudo así que la estancia templó.

Buenos Días.

El martes me embarcaré en el avión presidencial, Fuerza Aérea Uno, y saldré de viaje al Medio Oriente. Esta es una región de gran importancia estratégica para los Estados Unidos, y estoy anticipando mi visita con mucho interés.

Mis primeras escalas serán en la Tierra Santa donde me reuniré con el Primer Ministro Olmert de Israel y el Presidente Abbas de Palestina. Instaré a ambos líderes a seguir adelante con las negociaciones por la paz que comenzaron en Anápolis en noviembre pasado. Esta es una labor difícil. Exigirá decisiones duras sobre cuestiones complejas. Pero yo me siento optimista en cuanto a las posibilidades. Y dejaré en claro que Estados Unidos está profundamente comprometido a ayudar a ambas partes a realizar la visión histórica que compartimos – dos estados democráticos, Israel y Palestina, viviendo lado a lado en paz y con seguridad.

Durante la segunda parte de mi viaje, visitaré cinco de los aliados claves de Estados Unidos en el mundo árabe – Kuwait, Bahrein, los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Arabia Saudita y Egipto. Agradeceré a los líderes de estos países por su amistad. Les instaré a dar fuerte apoyo a las negociaciones entre los israelíes y los palestinos. Discutiré la importancia de contrarrestar las ambiciones agresivas de Irán. Y les aseguraré que el compromiso de Estados Unidos a la seguridad de nuestros amigos de la región es fuerte y duradero.

Yo sé que no siempre es obvio porqué los eventos en las naciones del Medio Oriente deben importarle al pueblo estadounidense. Pero en el siglo 21, los acontecimientos allí tienen un impacto directo sobre nuestras vidas aquí. Como vimos el 11 de Septiembre del 2001, los peligros que surgen al otro lado del mundo pueden traer la muerte y la destrucción a nuestras propias calles. Desde entonces, extremistas han asesinado líderes democráticos desde Afganistán a Líbano a Pakistán. Han asesinado a gente inocente desde Arabia Saudita hasta Jordania e Irak. Y están buscando nuevas armas y nuevos operativos para poder atacar nuevamente a Estados Unidos… derrocar gobiernos en el Medio Oriente… e imponer su odiosa visión sobre millones de personas.

En mi viaje, consultaré muy de cerca con nuestros aliados en la guerra contra estos extremistas. Reafirmaré nuestro compromiso de usar toda herramienta necesaria de inteligencia, orden público, diplomacia, finanzas y poder militar para enjuiciar a nuestros enemigos comunes. Los terroristas y extremistas no bajarán su guardia – y nosotros no debemos bajar la nuestra.

En su esencia, la batalla que se desenvuelve en el Medio Oriente es más que un conflicto de armas. Es una lucha ideológica. De un lado están las fuerzas del terror y de la muerte. Del otro están decenas de millones de personas ordinarias que desean una vida libre y pacífica para sus hijos. El futuro del Medio Oriente depende del desenlace de esta lucha – y también la seguridad de Estados Unidos. Sabemos que las sociedades donde aumentan la tolerancia y la esperanza son menos probables de tornarse fuentes de radicalismo y violencia. Por lo tanto, Estados Unidos mantendrá su compromiso en la región. Apoyaremos a demócratas y reformadores desde Beirut y Bagdad hasta Damasco y Teherán. Apoyaremos a todos los que se esfuerzan por construir un futuro de libertad y justicia y paz.

No será fácil prevalecer en esta lucha, pero la historia nos muestra que puede lograrse. Después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial muchos dijeron que sería imposible implantar la libertad en Europa y Asia Oriental. Sin embargo, Estados Unidos invirtió tiempo y recursos para ayudar a las naciones en la transición de dictadura a democracia. En el camino hubo momentos difíciles, y el progreso no llegó de la noche a la mañana. Pero, con paciencia y resolución hemos visto un rendimiento extraordinario sobre nuestra inversión – regiones vitales del mundo que viven con estabilidad, prosperidad y en paz con los Estados Unidos.

Yo considero que una transformación similar puede acontecer en el Medio Oriente. En este momento decisivo de su historia, la gente del Medio Oriente puede tener confianza en el poder de la libertad para vencer la tiranía y el terror. Y todos los que se unen a la causa de la libertad pueden contar con los Estados Unidos como un amigo. Tengo mucho interés en compartir este mensaje en la región.

Gracias por escuchar.

Para su publicación inmediata Oficina del Secretario de Prensa 5 de enero de 2008

Etiquetas De Technorati: , y or Mike Huckabee Iowa Caucus Victory Speech VIDEO and Broad-banded Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus) and UCLA-industry partnership to develop, commercialize new nanotechnology

Friday, January 04, 2008

Mike Huckabee Iowa Caucus Victory Speech VIDEO

Mike Huckabee (R) Iowa Caucus Victory Speech - FULL STREAMING VIDEO Republican presidential candidate Mick Huckabee (R) delivers his victory speech after winning the Iowa Republican Caucus. 1/3/2008: WASHINGTON, DC: 11 min.

MIKE HUCKABEE: Thank you, Iowa.

Thank you. Thank you very much.

You know, I wasn't sure that I would ever be able to love a state as much as I love my home state of Arkansas.

But tonight, I love Iowa a whole lot.

Over the past several months, my family and I have had the marvelous joy and privilege of getting to know many of you. And it's been an incredible honor.

I was thinking last night that some of the friendships that we've forged here in the last several months are friendships that will last a lifetime.

And we didn't know how this was going to turn out tonight. But I knew one thing: I would be forever grateful to the people that I met, the ones who voted for me, even the ones who didn't, who still treated me with respect and who gave me their attention, who have allowed me to come often, not just into their communities, but into their homes, not once, but time and time again.

And a few of them, I even convinced to vote for me tonight and that's really remarkable.

I want to say how much I appreciate my wife, Janet.

She was a wonderful first lady of Arkansas.

And I think she'll be a wonderful first lady for the United States of America.

We also want to say thanks. Our three children are with us tonight.

I would like them to come and just be a part of this tonight. They have all been so much involved. Our oldest son, John Mark, our son, David, his wife, Lauren, our daughter, Sarah, who has literally lived in Iowa for the past two and a half months.

And I told her if she stayed much longer, she'll have to get her an Iowa driver's license and probably start paying even more taxes up here.

And I say thanks to all of them for joining with us in this effort, because a family goes through it, not just the candidate. But tonight is a celebration for everybody on our team, so many of you who have traveled from all across America to be here.

I'm amazed, but I'm encouraged, because tonight what we have seen is a new day in American politics. A new day is needed in American politics, just like a new day is needed in American government. And tonight it starts here in Iowa.

But it doesn't end here. It goes all the way through the other states and ends at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue one year from now.

I think we've learned three very important things through this victory tonight. The first thing we've learned is that people really are more important than the purse, and what a great lesson for America to learn. Most of the pundits believe that when you're outspent at least 15 to 1, it's simply impossible to overcome that mountain of money and somehow garner the level of support that's necessary to win an election.

Well, tonight we proved that American politics still is in the hands of ordinary folks like you and across this country who believe that it wasn't about who raised the most money but who raised the greatest hopes, dreams and aspirations for our children and their future.

But that choice for a change doesn't end just saying, "Let's change things."

Change can be for the better. It could be for the worse.

Americans are looking for a change. But what they want is a change that starts with a challenge to those of us who were given this sacred trust of office so that we recognize that what our challenge is to bring this country back together, to make Americans, once again, more proud to be Americans than just to be Democrats or Republicans.

To be more concerned about being going up instead of just going to the left or to the right.

And while we have deep convictions that we'll stand by and not waiver on, or compromise -- those convictions are what brought us to this room tonight. But we carry those convictions not so that we can somehow push back the others, but so we can bring along the others and bring this country to its greatest days ever.

Because I'm still one who believes that the greatest generation doesn't have to be the ones behind us. The greatest generation can be those who have yet to even be born.

And that's what we are going to...

And, ladies and gentlemen, we've learned something else tonight, and that is that this election is not about me. It's about we.

And I don't say that lightly. I'm the person whose name gets on the signs, who occasionally gets the attention in some...

... of the few ads that came out here and there.

But the election is not about me. And the country is not just about me.

What is happening tonight in Iowa is going to start really a prairie fire of new hope and zeal. And it's already happening across this nation because it is about we; we the people.

We saw it tonight. We've seen it in other states. And we're going to continue to see it because this country yearns and is hungry for leadership that recognizes that when one is elected to public office, one is not elected to be a part of the ruling class; he's elected to be a part of the serving class. Because we the people are the ruling class of America.

G.K. Chesterton once said that a true soldier fights not because he hates those who are in front of him, but because he loves those who are behind him. Ladies and gentlemen, I recognize that running for office, it's not hating those who are in front of us. It's loving those who are behind us.

It's recognizing that behind us are great patriots dating back to the beginning of this wonderful country, when 56 brave men put their signatures on a document that started forth the greatest experiment in government in the history of mankind, and gave birth to the idea that all of us are created equal, and we have been given by our creator inalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And these who signed that document, who gave birth to this dream, were the beginnings of those throughout our history who have continued, with great sacrifice, extraordinary valor, to pass on to us that liberty and the quest for something better than the generation before them had.

I stand here tonight the result of parents who made incredible sacrifices as part of a great generation, who went through a Depression and a world war and said our kids won't have to go through these things. And every sacrifice they made were to lift us on their shoulders and give us a better America than they ever could have envisioned. And they were successful in doing that.

Now, ladies and gentlemen, for the same reason that our founding fathers and those before us saw what was behind us and gave it their best, I ask you to join me across Iowa and the rest of America to look out there in front of us and not to hate those, but to look behind us and to love them so much that we will do whatever it takes to make America a better country, to give our kids a better future, to give this world a better leader.

And we join together tonight for that purpose. God help you and thank you for all you've done. I'm so grateful for the support, the incredible work that you've done. And now we've got a long journey ahead of us.

I wish it were all over tonight, and we could just celebrate the whole thing. But unfortunately, if this were a marathon, we've only run half of it. But we've run it well.

And now it's on from here to New Hampshire, and then to the rest of the country. But I'll always be wanting to come back to this place and say, wherever it ends -- and we know where that's going to be -- it started here in Iowa.

Thank you and God bless you, every one of you. Thank you tonight. Thank you.
Technorati Tags: or President and Mrs. Bush Wish Americans, Troops Happy New Year and Short-horned Lizard (Phrynosoma douglassii) and 'the right glasses' for observing mystery behavior in electrons

Hey Technorati My Authority is not getting updated! Blogroll 01/04/08

JOIN HERE: Hey Technorati My Authority is not getting updated! Blogroll

Please Welcome new member Smooth Stone
Smooth Stone, laketrees, Southern Sass on Crime, Smashed Frog, This Eclectic Life, Gentle and Compassionate, Faultline USA, Webtalks, The Augmented Reality, Divorced Dads Matter, Popular Fiction, Republican National Convention Blog NYC 2004, Love and Terrorism, Hi3B附設Blog, Anil Gupte's Video Blog, A Billion Monkeys Can’t Be Wrong, Threat Assessment and Management, The Preachers Wife, Amberwood Ambrosia, TIBET DZI BEADS, A Yoga Coffee Outlook, broadstuff, buensancho, Pilates & Reiki In Paradise Blog, Lines from a Floating Life, Getting Out of Debt

Technorati Tags: and or and or President and Mrs. Bush Wish Americans, Troops Happy New Year and Short-horned Lizard (Phrynosoma douglassii) and 'the right glasses' for observing mystery behavior in electrons

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Looking for Resolution in Kenya VIDEO

Daily Press Briefing Sean McCormack, SpokesmanDaily Press Briefing. Sean McCormack, Spokesman. FULL STREAMING VIDEO. Washington, DC. January 3, 2008, 12:52 p.m. EDT. PODCAST OF THIS ARTICLE
MR. MCCORMACK: Good afternoon, everybody. I don't have any opening statements, so we can get right to your questions. Whoever wants to start, the field is open.

QUESTION: And we're okay?

MR. MCCORMACK: Not that open, Goyal. (Laughter.) Yes, go ahead, Goyal.

QUESTION: Happy new year.

MR. MCCORMACK: Happy new year to you.

QUESTION: Yes, sir. My question is that as far as so much has been written and said from here and from around the globe about the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto --

MR. MCCORMACK: Right.

QUESTION: -- which was also known or called as the (inaudible) of India. My question is now that she had really -- I understand according to many reports and many Pakistanis here and in Pakistan, that she had the blessings from this building, from the Administration as far as going back to help and run the democratically elected government in Pakistan.

How come -- I mean, as for security, now so many questions are being raised that she was not provided security despite her call even here that she really needed security after her -- the first attack on her. And now President -- General Musharraf had said yesterday that there were no security lapse and she was provided all the security needed. So where are we heading now as far as this investigation is going on and --

MR. MCCORMACK: Is there a question in here?

QUESTION: Yes, sir.

MR. MCCORMACK: Okay. Look, first of all, we all have mourned the loss of Benazir Bhutto. She talked eloquently about her reasons for wanting to go back to Pakistan. She spoke very eloquently about wanting to serve her country and to build up the democratic institutions within her country. Ultimately, decisions about security are going to have to be made by the individual most affected by it and the people around them. They are going to make their own decisions. Occasionally if asked, we provide our best advice. But it is not -- it is not for us to make those kinds of decisions for individuals who are foreign government officials or former government officials.

As far as the investigation, it is ongoing. President Musharraf has talked about the fact that he has asked for outside technical assistance. We think that's a good outcome. It's important for the Pakistani people to understand exactly what happened and who was responsible, to get to the bottom of that if it is at all possible. And we fully support President Musharraf in that goal. And he's chosen to take the route of seeking outside assistance in order to achieve that goal. It's a wise course that he's taken in the best interests of Pakistan and the Pakistani people. We'll see how that investigation plays out. I'm not going to try to jump in and handicap what the results of the investigation may be. I think from our perspective, for our purposes, it's best to let the investigation unfold and see what it brings.

QUESTION: Sean, just a quick follow-up, please. She met Secretary and Secretary really had good relations with her and I'm sure she had blessing from the Secretary. I have seen the statement from the Secretary also about her assassination. But how is Secretary taking this personally? How does she feel really personally because of the relations between the two ladies -- (inaudible) two ladies?

MR. MCCORMACK: Goyal, I haven't talked to her about it. I think Secretary Rice spoke about how she felt about it and the day after Benazir Bhutto's assassination. Like I said, we all mourn the passing of Benazir Bhutto. Now it's important to try to determine what happened so that that chapter of Pakistan's history can be closed and that the Pakistani people can move to build on what had been some progress in terms of building momentum for political reform in Pakistan.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MR. MCCORMACK: Libby.

QUESTION: Kenya?

MR. MCCORMACK: Mm-hmm.

QUESTION: (Inaudible) leader said he's going to hold a rally tomorrow in Nairobi. Can you bring us up to date on U.S. efforts to bring about some sort of reconciliation and --

MR. MCCORMACK: Sure.

QUESTION: -- what your position is on holding another massive rally tomorrow given the state of affairs?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, look, ultimately, the political leaders in Kenya are going to have to decide what is best for their own country. One of the things that was really extraordinary, pointed out to Secretary Rice by our Ambassador this morning, she had a phone call with him, was that the major -- two of the major Kenyan dailies had the same headline: Save Our Beloved Country. And that is directed at the political leaders of Kenya who currently are the key players in this political crisis that is ongoing, that has led to unfortunate loss of life and quite a bit of violence. And that sort of plea from civil society as reported by these newspapers was also echoed on radio and TV.

So there's really a groundswell coming from the grassroots in Kenya, calling upon these political leaders to do what is best on behalf of their country, on behalf of the Kenyan people, and that is a sentiment that we fully support. And that has been the Secretary's consistent message both prior to the elections as well as after the elections to both President Kibaki as well as Mr. Odinga. She conveyed those -- that message separately in a phone call yesterday to Mr. Odinga and this morning to President Kibaki. She urged them to take steps to try to reconcile the political situation and to reconcile the political differences that exist between them. We've talked about the fact that we believe that there were irregularities surrounding the election, but we are where we are at this point in time.

So what needs to happen is that these political leaders need to come up with a political agreement that's mutually acceptable, that resolves the political crisis. They need to do this within the confines of Kenyan law, Kenyan institutions, Kenyan constitution. So ultimately, any solution that brings about an end to the political crisis and the violence is going to have to be made in Kenya. This is going to have to be something that the Kenyans resolve for themselves.

Now what we as well as others in the international community can do is to try to encourage them to open up those lines of communication and ultimately come to a political agreement. They haven't gotten to that point yet. And the Secretary also spoke with Mr. Solana from the EU this morning. That was certainly a point of agreement that they need to -- the two political leaders in Kenya need to get to the task of political reconciliation and coming up with a political agreement. We're not going to try to dictate what that political agreement is. We can work to try to help them with ideas regarding their thinking and to try to create some space so that they can open these lines of communication.

As part of that effort, Secretary Rice has asked Assistant Secretary Jendayi Frazer to travel to Kenya and to meet with both of those -- both of the political leaders as well as others in Kenyan civil society to see what ideas they might generate in order to find a way out of this political crisis.

So that's a little update of where we are. Ambassador Ranneberger is going to follow up with President Kibaki as well as others in Kenyan civil society, Mr. Odinga, about the Secretary's phone calls that she has had over the past two days with them to see what might be done to get them to start talking; that's the first step and then to arrive at some political agreement.

QUESTION: Is Secretary Frazer's trip designed to try to -- I mean, does the Secretary think that her visit will enable the two sides to come together more easily?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, you know, what you can do at this point is really meet with each side, see where they are, take an assessment of where they stand and not serve as a mediator, but maybe as a way -- her presence there could be a way to encourage them to get together. And it's also certainly a way that we can more directly try to encourage them to get together and open up that dialogue. The Secretary's phone calls are one way, certainly public statements are another way, but Secretary Rice decided this morning that it was important to send Jendayi out to Kenya to try to bring that message directly to the leaders.

QUESTION: Has she already left or what's her itinerary?

MR. MCCORMACK: No, she'll be leaving today, this afternoon sometime.

QUESTION: And how long is she going to be in the country for? Do you know?

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't have a schedule.

QUESTION: Is it open-ended?

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't think it's open-ended. It will probably be a relatively short trip, but, you know, she -- if she's able to help them make some progress, I think she's going to make an assessment of how long her presence there is needed. It's a positive force and I'm sure she'll consult with Secretary Rice on that and see how long she needs to stay out there. But at this point, I think it's planned to be a relatively short trip.

Anything else on Kenya? Yes, sir.

QUESTION: Do you know if President Gul is coming to Washington next week? And he also had breakfast with Secretary Rice on Tuesday. Do you have anything on that -- what's the agenda of this trip?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, there are a lot of different things to talk about. We'll be talking about U.S.-Turkey bilateral relations, how to build on those. Turkey is a good friend and ally and a NATO ally. It's where they'll be talking about the various aspects of our bilateral relationship, also going to be talking about a lot of issues in Turkey's neighborhood. They'll be talking about Iraq. I expect that Iran will be a topic of conversation. So that's just -- that's a quick read of what you might expect. And as we get closer to the meeting which will occur next week, then we'll try to get you a little bit more detail about what they're going to be discussing.

QUESTION: Can you confirm the time or the day of their meeting?

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't have the exact time, but we'll try to get that for you.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MR. MCCORMACK: Sure.

QUESTION: Tuesday or Thursday.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah. Well, he's going to -- President Gul is going to be meeting with President Bush on Tuesday.

QUESTION: Tuesday, yes.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah, that's correct.

QUESTION: Separately with Rice or --

MR. MCCORMACK: Typically, what happens is there's a meeting that the Secretary might have with a foreign head of state prior to that head of state's meeting with President Bush.

QUESTION: Does she plan on meeting with members of civil society as well or just the two parties?

MR. MCCORMACK: I would expect that she would meet with others in Kenyan civil society as well.

Yeah, Nina.

QUESTION: Do you have an opinion on this blogger in Saudi that's being detained?

MR. MCCORMACK: Thanks for asking the question. We have raised this with the Saudi Government.

QUESTION: You have.

MR. MCCORMACK: And our understanding is that he's being questioned. I've seen some public comments from the Saudi officials. And our message to the Saudi Government was pretty clear. It's what you heard me talk a little bit about yesterday and that is that the United States stands for freedom of expression. It's an important element of any thriving society. It's a cornerstone of any democratic society. And wherever people are seeking to express themselves via the internet or via other means, whether that's in Saudi Arabia or elsewhere around the world, we stand for that freedom of expression and that was our message to the Saudi Government.

QUESTION: At what level was this message conveyed?

MR. MCCORMACK: It was conveyed back here in Washington at a relatively senior level.

QUESTION: Ambassador level or beyond that?

MR. MCCORMACK: I'll just -- let's just say at a senior level back here in Washington.

QUESTION: What response?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, I'll let the Saudis speak for themselves.

QUESTION: A relatively senior level, not the most senior level.

MR. MCCORMACK: Not the most senior level here at the Department, no.

QUESTION: Well, can we assume that would be an Assistant Secretary of State or someone of that ilk -- Deputy Assistant Secretary?

MR. MCCORMACK: In that range, yes.

QUESTION: Was there a reminder given that President Bush is on his way to Riyadh in about ten days?

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't believe that was part of the conversation. I think everybody's aware of that.

QUESTION: Well, I mean, I would assume you guys would hope that this could be -- he'd be released before Bush arrives.

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, they -- it's within the privy of the powers of the Saudi officials to address the situation.

QUESTION: Different topic?

MR. MCCORMACK: (Inaudible) all yours.

QUESTION: The afternoon meeting between Secretary Rice and her Libyan counterpart --

MR. MCCORMACK: Right.

QUESTION: -- some families of Pan Am 103 victims have expressed regret about Secretary Rice having this meeting before the compensation has been completed by the Libyan Government. What's your response to that?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, look, I understand the sentiment from the families, absolutely. We understand where they're coming from. It's an ongoing -- beyond the emotional issues involved, there's an ongoing legal issue and we would like to see that resolved. And I know that the Libyan Government is working with the families as well as representatives of the families for these various compensation claims to work out a solution.

I would just note that this is not the first time the Secretary has met with the Libyan Foreign Minister on American soil. She's met twice before at the UN General -- in the context of the UN General Assembly up in New York, so it is not the first time that she has met with him. And she's going to take the opportunity to do a few things. One, talk about the state of U.S.-Libyan relations. They have over the past several years improved, gotten better, as we have made progress in practical ways on the various outstanding issues involved in the U.S.-Libyan relationship. There's still work to be done. And in that regard she will talk to the foreign minister about these outstanding compensation claims, urge the Libyan Government to resolve those outstanding claims.

She's also going to talk about the importance of instituting reforms within Libya so that Libyan citizens enjoy the basic human rights that we urge all states to accord their citizens. We believe these are basic fundamental rights that are inherent to each individual around the globe. So she'll talk about those issues. She's also going to talk about issues on the international agenda because Libya now sits on the UN Security Council. The Security Council is going to have to grapple with a number of very important fundamental issues in the coming year and she wants to talk to the Foreign Minister about where the United States stands on those issues and, of course, urge the Libyan Government to work very closely with us on the Security Council so that the Security Council can fulfill its mission to enhance peace and stability around the globe.

QUESTION: One family member I spoke to also said that she regrets that the group of families have not been able to meet with Secretary Rice, that they've made a number of requests and those requests has not been granted. Why is that?

MR. MCCORMACK: I know they have met with a number of different U.S. officials, so we have reached out to the families and we have stayed in close contact with them as well as their representatives. There are a lot of requests that come in to meet with the Secretary, take a look at each one of those very closely and certainly past decisions don't necessarily bear on decisions that may be made in the future. But at this point, we thought it was appropriate that other officials met with the family -- the families.

Yeah, David.

QUESTION: Will she raise individual cases? Human Rights Watch put out a statement --

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah.

QUESTION: Raising the cases of two Guantanamo detainees who were returned to Libya and apparently they have not reported on their condition and also at least three people who could be described as dissidents, who have disappeared, will she raise individual --

MR. MCCORMACK: Let me see. Let's let the meeting take place. We'll try to give you a readout in some form; that's via e-mail or some other form or fashion about what happened during the meeting and what she talked about and if she raised any specific cases. I know that she asked for some information about specific cases prior to the meeting. I don't know if -- we'll see if she raises them.

Yeah.

QUESTION: Can I ask you what you know about this human rights agreement that's being signed?

MR. MCCORMACK: Oh, that's right, we promised. We have to get you some more information on that. I don't have that available with me right now.

QUESTION: I was under the impression it's not a human rights agreement.

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, there's a --

QUESTION: Science and technology --

MR. MCCORMACK: -- there's an agreement that's being signed. Let's get you some more information.

QUESTION: Is it a human rights agreement?

MR. MCCORMACK: We'll give you some more information after the briefing.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MR. MCCORMACK: Thank you.

(The briefing was concluded at 1:10 p.m.)

DPB # 2 Released on January 3, 2008

Technorati Tags: and or and or or President and Mrs. Bush Wish Americans, Troops Happy New Year and Short-horned Lizard (Phrynosoma douglassii) and 'the right glasses' for observing mystery behavior in electrons

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Mitt Romney Huckabee Norris "Attack Ad" Roundhouse Kick VIDEO


From Romney For President - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE.CONTACT: Kevin Madden (857) 288-6390

Boston, MA – Today, Romney for President launched its newest web ad, "Roundhouse Kick." Governor Mike Huckabee and Chuck Norris may be campaigning together but they don't see eye to eye on fighting crime. Norris believes in giving a presidential pardon to "no one, ever." Governor Huckabee granted 1,033 pardons and commutations, including 12 convicted murderers. The Texas Ranger can subdue criminals with just his icy stare. Now only if he could convince Governor Huckabee it was wrong to grant more clemencies than the previous three governors combined.

Transcript For "Roundhouse Kick" (WEB:30):

ANNOUNCER: "Two good men, both into fitness. Both love Chuck Norris.

"But where do they stand on crime?

"Chuck Norris: 'give a presidential pardon to no one, ever.'

"Norris subdues criminals with just an icy stare.

"And Mike Huckabee? He granted 1,033 pardons and commutations, including 12 convicted murderers.

"Huckabee granted more clemencies than the previous three governors combined.

"Chuck Norris, Mike Huckabee. Now who deserves the roundhouse kick?"

Technorati Tags: or President and Mrs. Bush Wish Americans, Troops Happy New Year and Short-horned Lizard (Phrynosoma douglassii) and 'the right glasses' for observing mystery behavior in electrons

John McCain Mitt Romney" Attack Ad" Experience VIDEO


From John McCain 2008 - For Immediate Release. January 1, 2008 Contact: Press Office
703-650-5550

New Web Ad, "Experience"

Transcript for "Experience" (:30-Web)

ANNCR: "Mitt Romney says the next president doesn't need foreign policy experience.

"John McCain for president."

JOHN MCCAIN: "I'm John McCain and I approve this message."

ARLINGTON, VA -- U.S. Senator John McCain's presidential campaign today launched a new web video, entitled "Experience," contrasting Governor Mitt Romney and John McCain's experience on the issues of foreign policy and national security. The web ad will appear on targeted news and information websites in key states.

Former U.S. Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger and former CIA Director R. James Woolsey issued the following statement:

"We couldn't disagree more with Governor Romney's recent suggestion that foreign policy experience really doesn't matter when it comes to evaluating who should be our next president and commander in chief. America is at war. Our military forces are engaged in Iraq, in Afghanistan and elsewhere against a determined, vicious enemy. We are facing serious challenges, in a nuclear-armed Pakistan, in Latin America with the rise of Hugo Chavez, and in other corners of the globe.

In such dangerous times, John McCain has the necessary experience and judgment to strengthen our national security and lead our nation and allies. He has had extensive contact with foreign leaders and military officials. John McCain has been on the ground in many of the world's hot spots, including several trips to Iraq and Afghanistan, and also the tribal areas of Waziristan. As an ex-Navy pilot and POW, he understands first-hand how political decisions in Washington impact those serving in our Armed Forces.

On Iraq, John McCain's experience and judgment served him well. For years, despite public opinion, he called for a surge of forces and a new strategy in Iraq to prevail against our enemies -- a strategy that is now succeeding. In contrast, Governor Romney, with no national security experience, was a follower on Iraq, while John McCain showed strong leadership and vision."

Technorati Tags: or President and Mrs. Bush Wish Americans, Troops Happy New Year and Short-horned Lizard (Phrynosoma douglassii) and 'the right glasses' for observing mystery behavior in electrons

Tuesday, January 01, 2008

President and Mrs. Bush Wish Americans, Troops Happy New Year

Barney Bush accompanies President George W. Bush and Laura Bush upon their arrival to the White House from Crawford, Texas. White House photo by Joyce Naltchayan

Barney Bush accompanies President George W. Bush and Laura Bush upon their arrival to the White House from Crawford, Texas. White House photo by Joyce Naltchayan
Texas State Technical College Waco, Texas. RSS Feed White House News. 10:35 A.M. CST

THE PRESIDENT: Laura and I wish our fellow Americans a happy and healthy 2008. I particularly want to say something to our troops and their families: This country respects you, we admire you and we wish you a great 2008, as well.

We've just come off the ranch; had a good rest and good New Year's with some friends. And I'm looking forward to getting back to Washington to work on policies to keep this country safe and to keep this country prosperous.
I just wanted to stop by and wish everybody a happy 2008. Thank you.

MRS. BUSH: Happy New Year, everybody.

END 10:36 A.M. CST For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary January 1, 2008

Technorati Tags: and or and or or Fred Thompson New TV Ad "Substance" VIDEO and American Staffordshire Terrier and Nanoscale details of photolithography process