Thursday, February 17, 2011

House approves amendment to block funds for implementation of Internet regulation FCC overstepped its authority H.J.RES.37

House Energy and Commerce Committee LogoHouse sends clear message: FCC overstepped its authority, House approves amendment to block funds for implementation of Internet regulation.
WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. House of Representatives today sent a clear signal to the FCC that it overstepped its authorities granted by Congress by strongly rebuking the commission’s attempts to regulate the Internet.

The House passed an amendment, offered by Rep. Greg Walden, chair of the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, to the Continuing Resolution to prohibit the FCC from using funds to implement the controversial Internet regulations that the commission adopted in December. The amendment was crafted with leaders from the Appropriations Committee, including Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Jo Ann Emerson, and Tom Graves, to give time for Congress to permanently overturn the misguided rules.

“We all want an open and thriving Internet. That Internet exists today. Consumers can access anything they want with the click of a mouse thanks to our historical hands-off approach,” said Walden. “I am pleased that my colleagues in the House accepted my amendment to ensure the FCC does not have the funds to implement the controversial Internet regulations.”

“However, the amendment is simply a stop gap measure while we work towards passing a more permanent solution,” Rep. Walden said. “I would encourage everybody who cares about keeping the government out of the business of running the internet to cosponsor the Resolution of Disapproval, H.J.Res. 37, which would nullify the rules themselves.”

###

Bill Summary & Status 112th Congress (2011 - 2012) H.AMDT.80

Bill Summary & Status 112th Congress (2011 - 2012) H.J.RES.37

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: House Energy and Commerce Committee January 11, 2011 By Alexa Marrero, (202) 225-3641 or Sean Bonyun, (202) 225-3761 2125 Rayburn House Office Building | Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 225-2927

Tim Huelskamp Cosponsors Amendment to Defund Presidential Czars VIDEO


Congressman Huelskamp Cosponsors Amendment to Defund Presidential Czars

(WASHINGTON) – Kansas Congressman Tim Huelskamp cosponsored the “Scalise-Huelskamp” amendment to the Continuing Resolution that will defund the salaries and staff expenses of nine czars appointed by the President without Congressional consent.

“This administration has ignored the necessary role of ‘Advice and Consent’ in the hiring of more than 30 czars without the approval of Congress. It’s by far one of the most egregious examples of the Obama White House’s overreach,” Congressman Huelskamp said. “The unchecked power given to these czars shows an obvious disregard for the rule of law.”

“The policy priorities of these czars should be subject to Congressional oversight,” Congressman Huelskamp said. “I fought for government transparency when I was a state legislator, and I’ll do the same here in Washington. The President should not be allowed to manipulate our system of government when he wants it to serve his personal agenda.”

Some of the positions that will be defunded include:

* The Director of the White House Office of Health Reform;
* The Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change;
* The Special Envoy for Climate Change;
* The Special Envoy to oversee the closure of the Detention Center at Guantanamo Bay; and
* The Senior Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury assigned to the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry and Senior Counselor for Manufacturing Policy.

###

TEXT CREDIT: Congressman Tim Huelskamp Washington, DC 126 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-2715 Fax: (202) 225-5124 Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00AM-5:00PM Eastern time

VIDEO CREDIT: CongressmanHuelskamp

Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

Transcript of Governor Chris Christie’s Speech at the American Enterprise Institute
Thank you very much for the introduction and for the invitation to be here today. I came today because I really think it’s extraordinarily important for those of us who believe that our country is off on the wrong track, to begin the conversation and for New Jersey’s sake to continue the conversation about how we fix the problems that ail our states and our country in a direct and blunt way. And I fear that after watching how things have been going over the last month or two, that we’re missing a historic opportunity. And I will not be someone who will participate in silently missing that opportunity. A month ago, I gave my State of the State speech in New Jersey, and what I said during that speech was that I was not going to do the normal State of the State or State of the Union speech that you see. George Will put it better than I ever could, he said these speeches have become every politician’s attempt to stroke the erogenous zones of every constituency in their jurisdiction. They become these laundry list things that you do for your cabinet so that as they’re sitting up in the balcony, and you mention the Department of Labor, that Commissioner can sit up straight and smile, because at the time his mother is going to see him on TV. I didn’t think it was a good enough of a reason, as much as I love my Commissioner of Labor, to give a speech like that, especially during these times. During these times, as I said in that speech, it’s time to do the big things, the really big things, and I don’t think they’re will be much disagreement in this room and I don’t think there should be much disagreement across the country about what those things are - what they are for New Jersey and what they are for America. For us in New Jersey, it’s three things: it’s restoring and maintaining fiscal sanity; it’s getting our pension and health benefits under control, reformed and have the cost lowered; and it’s reforming an education system that costs too much and produces too little for our society today and for our children’s future. Now if you look at those three issues, these are not in and of themselves Democratic or Republican issues. Each governor across America is confronting the same things that I’m confronting in New Jersey: a decade or more of out of control spending in many if not most states; state taxes that have been raised to new levels; debt loads that are out of control, both for state entitlements and for just general borrowing. Every governor, Republican or Democrat, is facing this problem. If you look at it, just look at our little area of the world. You have me in New Jersey, elected in 2009 as a conservative Republican in one of the bluest states in America, and across the river you have the son of a liberal icon who is saying the exact same things that I’m saying. I defy you to look at the first six weeks of the Cuomo Administration in Albany and discern much of a difference between what Governor Andrew Cuomo is saying and what Governor Chris Christie is saying on these big issues. And it’s not because all of a sudden Governor Cuomo and I have decided that we’re members of the same party, we’re no. But we are confronted with the same problems and these problems and issues are not partisan. They are obvious and long overdue to be solved and so that’s why you see Andrew Cuomo, or for God’s sake, even Jerry Brown in California talking about reducing salaries of state workers by 8-10%. Saying the same things that Scott Walker is fighting in Wisconsin, that John Kasich is fighting in Ohio, that Rick Snyder is fighting in Michigan, that Susana Martinez is fighting in New Mexico.


Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 VIDEO

I said to the people of New Jersey when I ran for governor in 2009, that if they gave me the opportunity to be their governor, that not only would the state go on a path towards fiscal recovery, but we would also lead the nation because we would have a one year head start on everybody because of our odd election year. We would have a one year head start on a huge new class of governors that would come in the election of 2010. Now you can imagine how that was received in New Jersey. Now this was a state that during my time as a United States Attorney, was known predominantly for a few things: political corruption, “The Sopranos,” “The Real Housewives of New Jersey,” and now most regrettably “The Jersey Shore.” Not a place that thought of itself as a national leader in something that would matter for our children’s future. But I believe part of that leadership is understanding, articulating and believing in that which is special and unique about the people that you serve. And having been born in New Jersey and raised there and lived there all my life, I know that if presented with a challenge directly, without any sugar coating, that the people of New Jersey would step up to the plate and answer the call. And after 13 months now as governor, I think we have plenty of evidence that we were right in 2009.

When I came into office we confronted a $2.2 billion budget deficit for fiscal year ’10. The one that had five months left. The one that Governor Corzine told me was just fine, cruise path into the end of the fiscal year; Governor, don’t worry about it, everything is fine. $2.2 billion. My chief of staff, in my first week as governor, brought me a sheet of paper that showed me that if I did not act immediately to stop the planned spending, that New Jersey would not meet its payroll for the second pay period in March. Imagine that. The state that has the second highest per capita income in America had so over-spent, over-borrowed, and over-taxed – that it would not meet payroll in March of 2010. So we acted immediately to use the executive authority of the governorship to impound $2.2 billion in projected spending. Without the permission of the legislature. Without compromise because it was not the time for compromise. And without raising taxes on the people of the state who had had their taxes raised and fees 115 times in the eight years preceding my governorship. 115 tax and fee increases in eight years. So we impounded spending and we balanced the budget. And we turned immediately towards this fiscal year that we’re in now. And were confronted with an $11 billion budget deficit on a $29 billion budget. The highest budget deficit by percentage of any state in America. And believe me: the partisan Democrats in my state believed they had me right where they wanted me - he would have to raise taxes. And they put it right down on the table and said they wanted to increase the tax that they love the most – the income tax and specifically they called it the millionaires’ tax. Now of course this leads me to have to give you an aside about New Jersey math. See, when Democrats in New Jersey call it a millionaires’ tax, that’s for anyone who makes $400,000 or over – that’s called New Jersey math. So for businesses or individuals who have $400,000 in income or more, they wanted to raise their taxes, again, from a 9% top marginal rate to nearly 11%. And they told me that if I did not agree they would close down the government. There would be no budget in 2011 without an income tax increase. Now you know, this had happened 4 years earlier in New Jersey under Governor Corzine. They were arguing how much to raise taxes. And the Democrat controlled legislature closed down the government on the Democratic governor because they couldn’t agree on how much to raise the sales tax. And Governor Corzine very famously invited the press into his office, now my office, and there was a cot in the office. I can tell you it’s not normally there. And he said to them, “I’m going to be sleeping in this cot, right over here, until this crisis is averted.” So I knew that these were the same fellows who had been in the legislature when he was there, now threatening to do the same thing. So I decided to call them down early on and advise them that the place was under new management. And what I said to them was listen, if you guys want to pass an income tax increase, you can. That’s fine, I’m going to veto it. And if you want to close down the government because of that, that’s fine. But I want to tell you something – I’m not moving any cot into this office to sleep in here. If you close down the government I’m getting into those black SUVs with the troopers and going to the governor’s residence. I’m going to go upstairs, I’m going to open a beer, I’m going to order a pizza, I’m going to watch the Mets. And when you decide to reopen the government, give me a call and I’ll come back. But don’t think I’m sleeping on some cot. Take a look at me, you think I’m sleeping on a cot? Not happening.

So we stood up, we stood for our principles. We submitted a budget that cut real spending nine percent, year over year. Not projected growth – real spending, nine percent, every department of state government was cut. And we balanced the budget without any new or increased taxes on the people of the state of New Jersey for the first time in eight years. And the budget they called “dead on arrival without an income tax increase” was passed two days early with 99.8% of the line items exactly as they were when I submitted them back in March. With a Democratic legislature. Why? Because we stood up for what we believed in and we made it very clear that we would not compromise on our principles. We’d compromise on things that were not core principle items, but we were not going to compromise on raising taxes on the people of New Jersey. That leads us now to today. And that’s why fiscal discipline is so important. Because just because we went through that once or one and a half if you count fiscal year ‘10 - doesn’t mean we should be self congratulatory, patting ourselves on the back, and take our eye off the ball. This is a problem that took a decade to develop and it’s going to take longer than a year for us to fix it. Fiscal discipline is extraordinarily important not only for New Jersey but for America.

Now we have a whole new way of budgeting in New Jersey. We don’t assume every program will be funded any longer. We don’t assume a certain increase in every budget. The Democratic legislature will come out and say I have some $10 billion or so deficit for this year. That’s because they’re playing in the old playbook, which says that everything I did last year, of course, the next year I’d want to reverse and go right back. That is not going to happen. And it can’t happen if states are going to progress and get out of this crisis. We now have to stick to a new type of approach to budgeting - budgeting from the bottom up. Requiring as I do now of everyone one of my cabinet officers, that they come to me and not tell me what each one of their programs cost and how much they’re willing to cut it. But to say to me which one of your programs are absolutely necessary and how much do you need to fund them - this is how much money you’re getting and whatever doesn’t fit in your equation is out. We have to fund that which we really need, and to do that we have to cut that which is just what we’d like, rather than what we need.

And you’ll hear this debate going on down here now. You’ll have folks tell you that every bit of federal spending is absolutely necessary and laudatory. It’s not. And in fact some of it’s not even laudatory, let alone necessary. But we have to bring a new approach and new discipline to this. And when people say that you can’t tackle these big problems, look at what we’re doing on pensions and benefits. Pensions and benefits are the equivalent of federal entitlements at the state level. They are no different. They have no more vocal constituency at the federal level than they do at the state level. Take my word for it. I rolled out my pension and benefit reform in September on a Tuesday, and then that Friday I went to the firefighters’ convention in Wildwood, New Jersey. 7,500 firefighters at 2:00 on a Friday afternoon - I think you know what they had for lunch. And I rolled out a very specific pension and benefit reform proposal. On pensions: raise the retirement age, eliminate COLAs, increase the amount employees have to contribute to their pension every year. And roll back a nine percent increase that was given to them by a Republican governor and a Republican legislature and they had no way to pay for it. Those four reforms would take our current pension system which is underfunded by $54 billion dollars and in thirty years cut it in half to $28 billion dollars. Real reform getting us on the glide path to solvency. You can imagine how that was received by 7,500 firefighters. As I walked into the room and was introduced. I was booed lustily. I made my way up to the stage, they booed some more. I got to the microphone, they booed some more. So I said, come on you can do better than that, and they did! They did. And then I said to them - I took away the prepared notes I had for the speech – I actually took them off of the podium, crumpled them up and threw them on the ground, so they could see that I would. And I said, here’s the deal: I understand you’re angry, and I understand you’re frustrated, and I understand you feel deceived and betrayed. And the reason you feel all the things is because you have been deceived and you have been betrayed. And for twenty years, governors have come into this room and lied to you. Promised you benefits that they had no way of paying for, making promises they knew they couldn’t keep, and just hoping that they wouldn’t be the man or women left holding the bag. I understand why you feel angry and betrayed and deceived by those people. Here’s what I don’t understand. Why are you booing the first guy who came in here and told you the truth? See, there is no political advantage to me coming into that room and telling the truth. The way we used to think about politics and unfortunately the way I fear they’re thinking about politics still in Washington DC. See, the old playbook says lie, deceive, obfuscate and make it to the next election. You know, there’s a study that says by 2020, New Jersey is one of eleven states whose pension could be bankrupt. And when I told a friend of mine about that study, he said to me, well wait. By 2020, you won’t be governor. What the hell do you care? That’s the way politics has been practiced in our country for too long and practiced in New Jersey for too long. So I said to those firefighters, you may hate me now. But fifteen years from now, when you have a pension to collect because of what I did, you’ll be looking for my address on the internet so you can send me a thank you note.

Leadership, today in America, has to be about doing the big things and being courageous. That’s what it has to be about. Same thing with health benefit reform, which is an analogy to Medicaid and Medicare here in Washington. And if you think that the public workers in New Jersey hold on any less strongly to the benefits that they get through the government - teachers in New Jersey who pay nothing for their health insurance, nothing, from the day they are hired until the day they die, for full family medical coverage that costs the state of New Jersey $24,000 per family. If you don’t think they’re holding on to that tight, you’re not paying attention. The battles are similar. And here’s the problem. You can’t fix these problems if you don’t talk about them. You cannot fix these problems without talking about them. And I look at what’s happening in Washington DC right now and I’m worried. I’m worried. And I think, you know, I heard the President’s State of the Union speech, and it was two weeks after mine, and he said America was about doing the big things. Now I’m not saying he copied me. I’ve seen some writing about that, that’s not what I’m saying. But I think it’s important to note it because of what he says the big things are. He says the big things are high speed rail. The big things are high speed internet access for almost eighty percent of America or something by some date. One million electric cars on the road by some date. Ladies and gentlemen, that is the candy of American politics. Those are not the big things. Because let me guarantee you something, if we don’t fix the real big things, there are going to be no electric cars on the road. There is going to be no high speed internet access, or if there is you’re not going to be able to afford to get on it. We are not going to be able to care about the niceties of life, the investments that Washington wants to continue to make. That’s not what we need to be talking about. No one is talking about it. And now what this has become, I read, is a political strategy. The President is not talking about it because he is waiting for the Republicans to talk about it. And our new bold Republicans that we just sent to the House of Representatives aren’t talking about it because they are waiting for him to talk about it. Let me suggest to you, that my children’s future and your children’s future is more important than some political strategy. Let me suggest to you that what game is being played down here is irresponsible and it’s dangerous. We need to say these things and we need to say them out loud. When we say were cutting spending, when we say everything is on the table, when we say we mean entitlement programs, we should be specific. And let me tell you what is the truth. What’s the truth that no one is talking about? Here is the truth that no one is talking about: you’re going to have to raise the retirement age for social security. Oh I just said it and I’m still standing here! I did not vaporize into the carpeting and I said it. We have to reform Medicare because it costs too much and it is going to bankrupt us. Once again lightning did not come through the windows and strike me dead. And we have to fix Medicaid because it’s not only bankrupting the federal government, it’s bankrupting every state government. There you go. If we’re not honest about these things, on the state level about pensions and benefits and on the federal level about Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, we are on the path to ruin.

And you know now - I hear people saying - we’re going too fast, we’re going too fast. We need to slow down a little bit. I hear the same thing in New Jersey. In New Jersey, all the time the Legislature says, the legislature is a deliberative body, we need to study the governor’s proposals. You know, I never worked in Trenton before I became Governor and they do speak a different language in state capitals and in this capital. They speak different languages. So you need to get - when you become governor, and no one tells you this - but you need to get your English to Trenton dictionary. Because the language in Trenton is just much different. See, when a legislature - and I don’t care whether this is the Congress or whether this is the state legislature in New Jersey. When they say we need to study the executive’s proposal, you think because you speak English, that means they’re really going to take some time, consider it and then act. No, no. What that means in Trenton, and what I suspect it means in Washington also, is this: it means we are going to drag our feet for as long as we can until we hope it dies a natural death because God knows we don’t want our fingerprints on it for murdering it, but we also don’t have the guts to do it. That’s what ‘study’ means in government parlance. So in New Jersey they call me impatient, they call me lots of other things too. But they call me impatient among other things. Ladies and gentlemen, I think it’s time for some impatience. I think it’s time for some impatience in America. Because if you think we’re moving too slow, think about these statistics. The deficit stands at $1.6 trillion dollars, the Social Security system is going to be insolvent in 2037, and the Medicare system is expected to run out of money in 2017. So I’m impatient? Because I want them to act now. Because I want our healthcare system to be secure for the future. Because I want our retirement system to be secure for the future.

See, one of the things that the public sector unions don’t understand about my approach in New Jersey is that they think I’m attacking them. I’m attacking the leadership of the union. Because they’re greedy and they’re selfish and self-interested. The members of that union are being ill-served by the leadership of that union. And so what I say, what I’m doing, is to save your pension, to save your healthcare for the rest of your life, and yeah, you’re going to have to take a little less. That’s the way it goes, we’re in difficult times and there were promises made that couldn’t be kept. But it’s no longer time to wait. And leadership in my opinion is not about waiting. You know, I get four years as governor of New Jersey and I don’t have time to wait. And anybody who leads a government, whether it’s in another state or in America, has a defined period of time to act. And now I understand that this political strategy in Washington is all about waiting out until 2012. That’s five years away from Medicare insolvency. What’s the excuse going to be then? You know, these are hard things to do. They are hard things to do, but they’re not impossible to do and here’s what politicians fear. What politicians fear is you do these things, like say what I just said, and you’ll be vaporized into the carpet politically. That’s what they’re afraid of.

But look at what’s happened again in New Jersey and New York. I was elected with forty-nine percent of the vote, in a three way race in November of 2009. The first Republican elected to statewide office in twelve years in New Jersey, but not with a majority. Forty-nine percent of the vote, and when I started to say we were going to cut K-12 education funding by more than a billion dollars, we’re going to cut municipal aid by more than half a billion dollars, we’re going to cut every program that we can find in government and balance without raising taxes - I had everybody telling me, Governor you can’t do it. Your approval ratings will go in the toilet. People love these programs. And what I said to people was, you know what, I’m going to try an experiment here. Let’s start treating the people of New Jersey like adults. Because if you think they don’t know that we are in deep trouble, than these are not the people I knew growing up. These are tough, smart, self aware people who understand that we’ve dug ourselves a hole for more than a decade and we’re only going to get out by climbing, and climbing is hard, really hard. But it’s time to do it. And what’s happened? After thirteen months of fighting and arguing and pushing and impatience, my approval rating is at fifty-four percent. No disaster - in fact - more popular today than I was the day I was elected, and that’s in a state that is as Democratic as any state in America for a Republican governor. But if you really want to see eye-popping numbers, look across the river. At the person who was recently characterized as my soul mate –I wonder how he feels about that. Governor Andrew Cuomo - in a poll that just came out two days ago - his job approval is at seventy-seven percent. Seventy-seven percent. And all he’s talked about is cutting spending, not raising taxes, addressing entitlement programs, Medicaid, pensions, taking on public sector unions, capping school superintendent pay, the hard things. The things that people tell you will lead to political ruin, they don’t. Politicians make this mistake all the time. They run last election next time. They think that what happened before will happen again. And they don’t look around them to see that the times have changed. Our country and our states are weighed down by an albatross of irresponsibility. That we have hoisted upon ourselves as leaders, and that you as citizens have permitted us to get away with.

The last example of that is education reform and all I’ll say about this is that in my state, where we spend $17,620 per pupil per year - the highest in America, $24,000 dollars per pupil in city of Newark, $28,000 dollars in Asbury Park - and we have 104,000 students trapped in two hundred failing schools across New Jersey. And the education establishment says , don’t worry help is on the way. And the help that’s on the way is more money, more money. Well more money is not going to solve this problem until we take on the issues that are really causing the problem. And until we as Americans are willing to do that final tough thing, which is to look the teachers’ union across America in the eye and say to them, you do not represent the best the teachers have to offer, you often represent the worst. And it’s time for us to honestly say that we can separate the teachers from the union. We have great teachers in New Jersey, working hard and making a huge difference in the lives of many children, but we don’t have enough of them. And one of the reason why we don’t have enough of them is because the bad teachers who remain with lifetime tenure are crowding out opportunity for the good ones, and then when you have reductions, the last ones in are the first ones out because all that matters is seniority and not talent. And so we send a new generation of teachers, good enthusiastic teachers, away because we have built a system - as Michelle Rhee put better than I could - that cares more about the feelings of adults than it cares about the future of our children. I will not take responsibility for that approach. I will not take responsibility for leaving a generation of children behind in America. I won’t do it. And we need to speak out and say it’s time to fix that system. Tell me where else in America - well really there’s two places - left in America where there’s a profession where there is no reward for excellence and no consequence for failure. Of course we all know the first one is weathermen. It doesn’t matter, it’s going to snow six inches, it snows eighteen. Well I said it was going to snow, what’s the difference? And they’re right back on TV the next night. Unfortunately, the second one is teaching. Because the great teacher, the only reward they get is the psychic reward of knowing that they’ve done a great job for the children in their classroom. And the teacher next door, who’s a lousy teacher who doesn’t care, gets paid the same as the teacher who stays late and comes early, the same as the teacher who communicates with parents, the same as the teacher who feels it’s his or her personal responsibility to lift each child up to the next grade. That’s not what America is. America is built on rewarding excellence and having consequence for failure. So we need to deal with that issue as well, not only in every state but in America.

You know there’s a lot of talk now about partisanship and the negative angry tone in some of our political debates. And there is a time and a place for partisanship, I absolutely believe in that. And so did our founding fathers, they believed in partisanship. They believed in vigorous debate and so do I. You know, it’s the nature of our country, based on our founding, to have principal disagreements among people of good will, and I’m not disagreeing with folks just for the sake of disagreeing. And I’m not fighting for the sake of fighting. I fight for the things that matter. I save my energy for the fights of consequence. And as a result, some people say I’m too combative. Some people say I’m too much of a fighter. Well, I’ll tell you I’m fighting now because now is the time that matters most for New Jersey’s future and for America’s future. We are teetering on the edge of disaster. And I love when people talk about American exceptionalism, but American exceptionalism has to include the courage to do the right thing. It cannot just be a belief that, because we are exceptional, everything will work out ok. Part of truly being exceptional is being willing to do the difficult things, is to stop playing the political games, stop looking at the bumper pool of politics and to step up and start doing the right thing. This is the new era that we newly elected officials have inherited. Whether we like it or not, that’s the story and we have two choices: to either stand up and do the right thing, to speak the truth and speak it bluntly and directly, or to join the long parade of leaders who have come before us and failed. And maybe people won’t remember us, maybe they won’t pin the responsibility for failure on us because there’s been so much failure around us, but I did not run for this job for failure. I ran for this job for success. For success, not just for me personally and my children, but success for my state. And hopefully, to provide an example for the rest of the country that you can do the difficult things. See, it seems to me that what America is really all about is about a group of people who came from every corner of this earth because they wanted a chance for greatness. That’s what has made us the greatest country on Earth. Our calling for greatness at this time is to confront these issues, to say them out loud, and to stop playing around and to not waste another minute.

You know, the World War II generation was called ‘the greatest generation’ and they were because they put their lives on the line to protect our way of life. And they’re called the greatest generation because we judged them. We judged them in the aftermath and we found them to be great, by any objective measure. Let me guarantee you one thing: we will be judged too. We will be judged by our children and our grandchildren - that at this moment of crisis, what did we do? Did we bury our heads in the sand? Did we surround ourselves with our creature comforts and believe that just because we’re America everything’s going to be ok? Or will our children and grandchildren be able to say that at this moment of crisis, we stood up and did the hard things that made a future of greatness possible for them. Believe me, we will be judged. I know the way I want that judgment to turn out for me, and I know in the hearts and the minds of most New Jerseyans and Americans, I know how they want that judgment to turn out for them. So it’s time for us to get to work, to find our greatness again. And I believe we will find our greatness through doing the big things, the really big things that will lead America to another century of exceptionalism and not a century of settling for second best. That’s what this fight is about. If you’re willing to join me, I’m willing to join you and that’s what I came down here today to talk to you. Thank you all very much. Thank you.

# # #

TEXT CREDIT: Office of the Governor PO Box 001 Trenton, NJ 08625 609-292-6000

For Immediate Release: Date: Thursday, February 17, 2011 Contact: Michael Drewniak
Kevin Roberts 609-777-2600

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 VIDEO

UPDATE: Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT


Chris Christie American Enterprise Institute Social Security & Medicare reform 02/16/11 VIDEO

Governor Chris Christie will discuss the reform issues that will serve as the foundation for his February budget. Christie believes reductions in spending are the key to restoring fiscal health and fueling long-term growth and that Republican and Democratic leaders must be prepared to tackle the toughest issues.

VIDEO and TEXT CREDIT: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research | 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20036

Darrell Issa Oversight Committee Mission Statement VIDEO


WASHINGTON, DC – House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) today issued a video release of the Committee Mission Statement:

We exist to secure two fundamental principles. First, Americans have a right to know that the money Washington takes from them is well spent. And second, Americans deserve an efficient, effective government that works for them. Our duty on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee is to protect these rights.

Our solemn responsibility is to hold government accountable to taxpayers, because taxpayers have a right to know what they get from their government. We will work tirelessly, in partnership with citizen-watchdogs, to deliver the facts to the American people and bring genuine reform to the federal bureaucracy.

This is the mission of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

VIDEO CREDIT: oversightandreform

TEXT CREDIT: House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, DC 20515 PHONE: (202) 225-5074 FAX: (202) 225-3974

Monday, February 14, 2011

Chairman Rogers: President’s Budget Long on Rhetoric, Lean on Spending Cuts

Hal RogersHouse Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers commented on the President’s fiscal year 2012 Budget request, which was released today – one week after the annual deadline:

“I appreciate the President’s attempt to address the need for cuts in this fiscal year 2012 budget request, finally reflecting a realization that our country must reduce spending and drastically scale back our deficits and debt in order to get our economy moving again.
“However, the President’s budget appears to be long on rhetoric and lean on spending cuts. We must go much further than this anemic effort of symbolic reductions and additional spending proposed under the guise of funding “freezes” if we are truly to get our nation’s finances on a sustainable course.

“The Continuing Resolution (CR) that will be on the floor of the House this week contains the largest set of spending reductions in the history of the nation – more than $100 billion in cuts from last year’s Presidential budget request. This legislation represents a real, substantive effort that will help steer a better path for our nation’s budget and economy, starting a trend of spending reductions that will carry forward in Appropriations bills in the coming year. I would welcome the President’s engagement in and support of this historic and critical legislation, and encourage him to join us in our goal of immediately and dramatically reducing government spending.”

###

TEXT CREDIT: Committee on Appropriations H-307, The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Main Number: (202) 225-2771

IMAGE CREDIT: Congressman Hal Rogers Washington, DC Office 2406 Rayburn House Office Bldg Washington, DC 20515 T (202) 225-4601 F (202) 225-0940

Paul Ryan GOP Response to President Obama's 2012 Budget Request FULL VIDEO

Paul Ryan GOP Response to President Obama's 2012 Budget RequestPaul Ryan GOP Response to President Obama's 2012 Budget Request VIDEO House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan issued the following statement in response to the release of President Obama’s FY2012 Budget STREAMING VIDEO Running time 28:51
Paul Ryan: President Fails Leadership Test, President’s Budget Destroys Jobs with Record Taxes, Spending & Debt.

WASHINGTON – House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan issued the following statement in response to the release of President Obama’s FY2012 Budget:

“The President’s budget spends too much, taxes too much, and borrows too much – stifling job growth today and leaving our children with a diminished future. In this critical test of leadership, the President has failed to tackle the urgent fiscal and economic threats before us.”

“Failing to heed the warnings of economists and the demands of the American people, the President’s budget accelerates our country down the path to bankruptcy. Far from ‘living within its means,’ the President’s budget puts the government on track to nearly double in size since the day he took office – a direct result of his party’s reckless spending spree. His budget destroys jobs by imposing a $1.6 trillion tax hike, adding $13 trillion to the national debt and fueling uncertainty in the private sector.

“We cannot tax, spend and borrow our way to prosperity. Where the President has fallen short, Republicans will work to chart a new course – advancing a path to prosperity by cutting spending, keeping taxes low, reforming government, and rising to meet the challenges of our time.”

Key facts from President Obama’s Fiscal Year 2012 Budget:

* Spends Too Much
o $3.8 trillion in spending this year; 25.3% of GDP (highest since WWII)
o $46 trillion in spending over the decade; $8.7 trillion in new spending
* Taxes Too Much
o $1.6 trillion tax hike on families, small businesses, and job creators
o Revenues as a percent of GDP climb to 20%
* Borrows Too Much
o $1.6 trillion deficit for FY2012; a record third straight trillion dollar deficit
o Doubles and then triples debt held by the public since President took office
o $13 trillion added to the debt over the decade

VIDEO and IMAGE CREDIT: c-span.org

TEXT CREDIT: U.S. Congressman Paul Ryan Washington, DC Office 1233 Longworth House Office Bldg Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-3031 Fax: (202) 225-3393

Sunday, February 13, 2011

The House Appropriations Committee Continuing Resolution (H.R. 1) FULL TEXT

Committee on Appropriations LogoHouse Appropriations Committee Introduces CR Containing Largest Spending Cuts in History.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Appropriations Committee has introduced a Continuing Resolution (H.R. 1) to fund the federal government for the last seven months of the fiscal year while cutting spending by over $100 billion from the President’s fiscal year 2011 request. This CR legislation represents the largest single discretionary spending reduction in the history of Congress.

Chairman Hal Rogers gave the following statement on the introduction of the CR:

“This year, our nation is spending 1.5 trillion dollars more than we have, running our debt to $14 trillion. The taxpayers have told us loud and clear that this is simply unacceptable, and have demanded that we get our nation’s fiscal house in order.

“This CR responds to this call. The legislation includes the largest reduction in discretionary spending in the history of our nation – over five times larger than any other discretionary cut package ever considered by the House.

“The CR contains over $100 billion in cuts compared to the President’s request - fully meeting the spending reduction goal outlined in the Republican ‘Pledge to America’ while providing common sense exceptions for our troops and veterans. These cuts go far and wide, and will affect every community in the nation. These were hard decisions, and I know many people will not be happy with everything we’ve proposed in this package. That’s understandable and not unexpected, but I believe these reductions are necessary to show that we are serious about returning our nation to a sustainable financial path.

“The cuts in this CR are the result of difficult work by our subcommittees who have weeded out excessive, unnecessary, and wasteful spending, making tough choices to prioritize programs based on their effectiveness and benefit to the American people. My committee has taken a thoughtful look at each and every one of the programs we intend to cut, and have made determinations based on this careful analysis.

“It is my intent – and that of my Committee – that this CR legislation will be the first of many Appropriations bills this year that will significantly reduce federal spending. It is important that we complete the legislative process on this bill before March 4th -- when the current funding measure expires – to avoid a government-wide shut down and so that we can begin our regular budgetary work for this year.”

NOTE: The CR will be considered on the House floor next week.

A copy of the legislation: www.rules.house.gov/Media/file/PDF_112_1/legislativetext/2011crapprops/AppropCRFinal_xml.pdf

A summary of the bill: republicans.appropriations.house.gov/_files/SummaryFiscalYear2011ContinutingResolutionCR.doc

A list of program cuts: republicans.appropriations.house.gov/_files/ProgramCutsFY2011ContinuingResolution.pdf

Subcommittee savings tables: republicans.appropriations.house.gov/_files/FY2011CRSpendingTablesbySubcommittee.doc>

Contact: Jennifer Hing, 202-226-7007 ###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Committee on Appropriations H-307, The Capitol Washington, DC 20515 Main Number: (202) 225-2771

Armed Services Committee 2012 Budget Request for the Department of Defense

House Armed Services CommitteeFeb 16 2011 10:00 AM Rayburn House Office Building - 2118

The committee will meet to receive testimony on the fiscal year 2012 national defense authorization budget request from the Department of Defense.

Witness Panel 1

* The Honorable Robert M. Gates
Secretary of Defense
U.S. Department of Defense

* Admiral Michael G. Mullen, USN
Chairman
Joint Chiefs of Staff

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: House Armed Services Committee 2340 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 226-8980 Fax: (202) 225-0858

Committee On The Budget Meetings Hearings & Markups 02/15/11 02/16/11 LIVE VIDEO

Committee On The Budget Logo
All Committee meetings are available LIVE on the Internet; web cast links do NOT go live until approximately 10 minutes before the scheduled start time High Bandwidth | Low Bandwidth (Audio Only)

Department of the Treasury Fiscal Year 2012 Budget
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Time: 2:00pm
Location: 210 Cannon House Office Building

Witness:

The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner
Secretary
Department of the Treasury

The President's Fiscal Year 2012 Budget
Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Time:10:00am
Location: 210 Cannon House Office Building

Witness:

The Honorable Jacob J. Lew
Director
Office of Management and Budget

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Committee On The Budget U.S. House of Representatives 207 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: 202.226.7270

Education & the Workforce Committee:Investigating OSHA's Regulatory Agenda and Its Impact on Job Creation

House Committee on Education and the WorkforceSubcommittee on Workforce Protections February 15, 2011 "Investigating OSHA's Regulatory Agenda and Its Impact on Job Creation"
The hearing will begin at 10:00 a.m. in room 2175 Rayburn House Office Building.

Witness List:

Jacqueline M. Holmes, Esq.
Jones Day
On behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Washington, D.C.

Stuart Sessions
President
Environomics
On behalf of the Coalition for Workplace Safety
Washington, D.C.

The Honorable Thomas M. Sullivan, Esq.
Nelson Mullins
Washington, D.C.

Tammy Miser
Executive Director
United Support and Memorial for Workplace Fatalities
Lexington, KY

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce 2181 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Tel: 202-225-4527 Fax: 202-225-9571

A Look Ahead: Energy and Commerce Hearings on Regulations and Job Creation for Week of Feb 14

House Energy and Commerce Committee LogoWASHINGTON, DC – The House Energy and Commerce Committee, chaired by Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI),
today announced additional hearings and a markup for the week of February 14, 2011, to further explore recent federal regulations and how they affect job creation, health care access, and innovation.

On Tuesday, February 15, the full committee will vote on the Energy and Commerce Oversight Plan for the 112th Congress along with several pieces of health care legislation.

On Tuesday, February 15, the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy will hold a hearing on “Environmental Regulations, the Economy, and Jobs.” The hearing will examine how and whether federal regulatory agencies are conducting the type of economic analysis necessary for policymakers to understand how regulations affect employers’ ability to retain workers and hire new ones, and avoid unnecessary cost burdens.

On Wednesday, February 16, the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology will hold a hearing on “Network Neutrality and Internet Regulation: Warranted or More Economic Harm than Good?” The five commissioners of the Federal Communications Commission will be called to testify about the controversial network neutrality rules that put the commission in charge of how networks are managed, how technology partnerships are formed, and how the private sector invests in communications to provide new services and options to consumers.

Also on Wednesday, the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee will hold a hearing on “Health Care Issues Involving the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight.” On January 20, 2011, the committee sent a letter to the CCIIO seeking information about the office’s authority, structure, and recent decisions to grant widespread waivers of the health care law’s requirements.

On Thursday, February 17, the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade will hold a hearing on “A Review of CPSIA and CPSC Resources.” The hearing will examine the unintended consequences of recent consumer product safety laws on American job creators including small businesses and thrift stores. It will review the impact of the recent legislation on CPSC resources and its ability to protect consumers.

Also on Thursday, February 17, the Subcommittee on Health will hold a hearing to examine the “Impact of Medical Device Regulations on Jobs and Patients.” The hearing will examine the state of the medical device industry and the impact of regulations on job creation and patient access.

Markup Details
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
10:00 a.m.
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Full Committee

Hearing Details

Tuesday, February 15, 2011
1:00 p.m.
2322 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy
Hearing on “Environmental Regulations, the Economy, and Jobs”

Wednesday, February 16, 2011
9:30 a.m.
2322 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
Hearing on “Health Care Issues Involving the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight”

Wednesday, February 16, 2011
10:00 a.m.
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology
Hearing on “Network Neutrality and Internet Regulation: Warranted or More Economic Harm than Good?”

Thursday, February 17, 2011
9:30 a.m.
2123 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Health
Hearing on “Impact of Medical Device Regulation on Jobs and Patients”

Thursday, February 17, 2011
10:00 a.m.
2322 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade
Hearing on “A Review of CPSIA and CPSC Resources”

###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: House Energy and Commerce Committee January 11, 2011 By Alexa Marrero, (202) 225-3641 or Sean Bonyun, (202) 225-3761 2125 Rayburn House Office Building | Washington, DC 20515 | (202) 225-2927

Saturday, February 12, 2011

CPAC Strraw Poll Results

CPAC Strraw Poll Results: Key Points About Straw Poll, • Ballots collected from Thursday morning, through Friday afternoon • Only registrants could vote, • 50 States plus DC represented in the balloting.

Straw Poll Rep. Ron Paul (TX) wins CPAC 2011 Straw Poll, Former Gov. Mitt Romney Second.

CPAC Strraw Poll Results

CPAC Strraw Poll Results Full 14 pages of Poll Results in PDF Format.

RELATED: TEXT IMAGE and PDF CREDIT: conservative.org

Orrin Hatch Weekly Republican Address TEXT VIDEO 02/12/11


In the Weekly Republican Address, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah discusses "the agenda of trillion dollar deficits and an out of control debt" President Obama has chosen.

He says, "The President's proposal for a freeze in government spending might give the White House a nice talking point. But it is a totally inadequate solution to our nation's spending problems...if the President's new budget simply freezes his last budget, he'll stifle job growth by continuing to spend too much, tax too much, and borrow too much."

"It is beyond irresponsible to saddle the next generation of American citizens with the responsibility for paying back our debt," Sen. Hatch warns. "By itself, the President's takeover of the nation's health care system will cost $2.6 trillion. And if this new entitlement is like every entitlement before it, the price tag is just going to grow. Our total debt is over $14 trillion. At over 90 percent of the size of our economy, this is the highest level since 1950."

Sen. Hatch concludes, "Next week, a great debate will begin. The President will send his budget to Congress. And once more Americans will face a time for choosing. Do we accept a future where our children and grandchildren are left holding trillions in IOUs? Or do we get our fiscal house in order, cut spending, and reduce tax burdens on all Americans?"

FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT:
Orrin HatchGood morning. I’m Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah.

Last week, the nation, and the world, celebrated the centennial of President Ronald Reagan’s birth.

Ronald Reagan once told Americans that they faced a time for choosing. The choice then was between the constitutional liberty of free men and women, and a future of higher taxes, bigger government and less opportunity for families and businesses.
Last fall, American citizens again had a choice to make. Would they ratify the agenda of trillion-dollar deficits and an out-of-control debt that the president imposed on the nation? Or would they reaffirm constitutional principles of limited government and free enterprise unhindered by excessive taxation and burdensome regulation?

The American people made their choice in electing historic numbers of conservative Republicans to Congress and in sweeping victories at the state and local level.

Now it is a time for President Obama to choose.

Will he listen to the people, reduce the size of government, and get our spiraling spending and debt under control, or will he become the guardian of an unsustainable status quo?

Next week we will find out what choice President Obama makes, when he releases his budget.

Unfortunately, early indications are that he and his Capitol Hill allies are not taking the nation’s spending-fueled debt crisis -- the most critical challenge facing our nation today -- with the seriousness it deserves.

Our massive debt must be confronted immediately. America cannot afford to kick this can down the road any longer. And this challenge cannot be solved with higher taxes that will only result in lower economic growth and less opportunity for our children and grandchildren.

The president’s proposal for a freeze in government spending might give the White House a nice talking point. But it is a totally inadequate solution to our nation’s spending problems.

Over the past two years, the administration increased discretionary spending by 24%. If you count the so-called stimulus package, spending is up nearly 84%.

These levels cannot continue. Business as usual is unsustainable, and job creators know that higher debt today means higher taxes tomorrow.

And if the president's new budget simply freezes his last budget, he’ll stifle job growth by continuing to spend too much, tax too much, and borrow too much.

It is beyond irresponsible to saddle the next generation of American citizens with the responsibility for paying back our debt.

By itself, the president’s takeover of the nation’s healthcare system will cost $2.6 trillion. And if this new entitlement is like every entitlement before it, the price tag is just going to grow.

Our total debt is over $14 trillion. At over 90% of the size of our economy, this is the highest level since 1950.

Think about that. We are spending at a level not seen since the Second World War. By 2021, our public debt is expected to hit $22 trillion with the federal government paying nearly $1.6 trillion every year in interest payments alone on this debt. We are approaching a real crisis.

Not only does the President want to set these spending levels in stone, he’s now talking about new so-called investments -- saying it 10 times in a speech on Thursday -- which is just code for billions in new Washington spending.

This week, the vice president, advocating for massive new federal expenditures, told Americans to get a grip and get on board with this new spending spree.

With due respect to the vice president, the American people’s grip on this situation is just fine. They know we cannot afford these so-called investments that are financed with taxpayer dollars.

Decisions to reduce spending are not easy ones.

But with leadership, big things can be done. Look at what Gov. McDonnell has done in Virginia, and Gov. Christie in New Jersey. They have taken on big spending, and they are winning.

The bottom line is we are a nation working on borrowed time -- we have to make some significant changes in order to compete.

We need to reform our tax code. We need to roll back regulations that hinder businesses large and small.

We need to begin a debate about reforming Social Security and Medicare, so they will be there for our children to depend on when they retire.

We need to ratify free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama that will open markets for American innovators and spur job creation in Utah and around our country.

And we need to stop imposing unaffordable financial burdens on our states, like the ever-increasing federal expansion of Medicaid.

Yet all of these things will take presidential leadership, and so far the president and the Democrats are missing in action. Indeed, the White House is floating a proposal that could increase the cost of hiring and retaining workers.

Next week, a great debate will begin. The president will send his budget to Congress. And once more Americans will face a time for choosing. Do we accept a future where our children and grandchildren are left holding trillions in IOUs? Or do we get our fiscal house in order, cut spending, and reduce tax burdens on all Americans?

I expect that Americans will choose the course of greater freedom and more opportunity.

The question is whether the administration will choose to listen to the American people or continue our current spending crisis. Thank you for listening and God bless America.

###

VIDEO IMAGE and TEXT CREDIT: gopweeklyaddress

Friday, February 11, 2011

Sarah Palin from Twitter, Will Obama Admin exert as much pressure on Iranian govt as they just did for Egypt?

Sarah Palin from TwitterFrom twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA

Media: ask "Will Obama Admin exert as much 'constructive' pressure on Iranian govt to change & allow freedom ~ as they just did for Egypt?"

about 2 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Sarah Palin (SarahPalinUSA) on Twitter

The Week Ahead: House Committee on Homeland Security

Committee on Homeland Security Logo
Washington, D.C. (Friday, February 11, 2011) – Today, ­U.S. Rep. Peter T. King (R-NY), Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, announced the following Committee events for next week:
Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security Hearing

Rep. Candice Miller (MI), Chairman

“Securing our Borders – Operational Control and the Path Forward”

Tuesday, February 15, 2011, 10:00 a.m.
311 Cannon House Office Building

Invited witnesses include:

Chief Michael J. Fisher, Border Patrol, Department of Homeland Security
Mr. Richard M. Stana, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, Government Accountability Office

Full Committee Hearing

“The President’s FY 2012 Budget Request for the Department of Homeland Security.”

Thursday, February 17, 2011, 10:00 a.m.
311 Cannon House Office Building

Invited witnesses include:
Hon. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security

Long-term Outlook

The week of March 7, the Committee will convene the first in a series of hearings examining al Qaeda’s coordinated radicalization and recruitment of people within the American Muslim community. ###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Committee on Homeland Security U.S. House of Representatives H2-176 Ford House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Office: (202) 226-8417 Fax: (202) 226-3399 Media Inquiries Communications Director: Shane Wolfe.

Jeff Fortenberry Mubarak Resignation “the Right Decision for the Future of Egypt”

Jeff FortenberryWASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman Jeff Fortenberry today issued the following statement concerning Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's resignation from office:

"America stands for the right of the Egyptian people to realize their highest aspirations, and today's news of President Mubarak's resignation marks the most significant moment in Egypt's recent history.

"Yesterday, I was stunned by President Mubarak's decision to remain in office, as were the Egyptian people. Today, I think he made the right decision for the future of Egypt, and fortunately, there was no major escalation in violence.
I am hopeful that the Egyptian military, now in power, will follow through on recent promises to amend Egypt's constitution, implement democratic changes, investigate the acts of violence that ensued in recent weeks, and advance an orderly and peaceful transition.

"The key pillars of democracy are respect for human rights and the rule of law, and it is my hope that institutional processes that undergird these tenets will evolve to maintain peace and consolidate Egypt's historic role as an ongoing moderating force in the Middle East. Former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat laid down his life for this peace, and it is fundamental to the stability of the region.

"It is also essential that democratic reforms in Egypt are inclusive of minorities, particularly women and Christians. Although some groups, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, want to restrict their civic engagement, a just and peaceful outcome will respect the rights of democratic participation for all citizens. This is clearly the outcome that protesters are seeking to achieve."

Fortenberry, who lived near Tahrir Square in Cairo, is the Vice Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee with jurisdiction over Africa, and a member of the Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia. ###

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: fortenberry.house.gov Washington DC Office 1514 Longworth House Office Washington, DC 20515 p (202) 225-4806 f (202) 225-5686

Ileana Ros-Lehtine Comments on Mubarak Decision to Step Down

Committee on Foreign Affairs Logo(WASHINGTON) – U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, commented today on reports that Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak has stepped down. Statement by Ros-Lehtinen:
“Now that the immediate demands of the Egyptian people have been met, steps must be taken for the prompt commencement of a calm and orderly transition process towards freedom and democracy in Egypt.

“This transition must include constitutional and administrative reforms, starting with the repeal of the emergency laws. These are necessary for legitimate, democratic, internationally-recognized elections to take place with peaceful, responsible actors who will not only advance the aspirations of the Egyptian people, but will continue to enforce Egypt’s international obligations.

“The Egyptian military can continue to play a constructive role in providing for security and stability during this transformational period.

“The U.S. and our allies must focus our efforts on helping to create the necessary conditions for such a transition to take place. We must also urge the unequivocal rejection of any involvement by the Muslim Brotherhood and other extremists who may seek to exploit and hijack these events to gain power, oppress the Egyptian people, and do great harm to Egypt’s relationship with the United States, Israel, and other free nations.” #####

TEXT and IMAGE CREDIT: Press Contact: House Foreign Affairs Committee, U.S. House of Representatives. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Chairman. Brad Goehner, (202) 226-8467

RNC Chairman Priebus Statement On President Obama’s Visit To Michigan

Reince PriebusWASHINGTON – Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus released the following statement today regarding President Obama’s visit to Marquette, MI:

“Over the past few weeks, the President has spoken repeatedly of his renewed interest in spending more money and increasing the deficit. We had this same debate two years ago when the President’s stimulus plan was supposed to create much-needed jobs.
Now we are having the same conversation as unemployment remains much higher than Obama promised his last spending binge would allow. Spending hand over fist didn’t work then and it won’t work now. What the President needs to do is have a serious discussion with the American people about the fiscal peril that looms on the horizon and the need to cut spending and create a pro-growth environment in this country. It is beyond time for President Obama to start showing the necessary Presidential leadership to get our fiscal house in order.”

TEXT CREDIT: Republican National Committee 310 First Street, SE Washington, DC 20003 info@gop.com p 202.863.8500 || f 202.863.8820

IMAGE CREDIT: ReinceForRNCChair

Thursday, February 10, 2011

2011 CPAC John Boehner VIDEO FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT

John Boehner CPAC2011 CPAC John Boehner VIDEO 2011 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) STREAMING VIDEO CPAC Evening Session. Running time 13:11

Washington, DC Thursday, February 10, 2011. John Boehner addressed the evening banquet. Speaker Boehner received the John Ashbrook Award, named after the late Ohio Republican Congressman who served in the House for 21 years and was one of the founders & chairmen of the American Conservative Union.

Washington- Congressman John Boehner (R-West Chester) today addressed attendees of the Presidential Banquet at the 2011 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) after receiving the John M. Ashbrook Award. Boehner addressed the need to “liberate our economy from the shackles of debt, excessive regulation, and over-taxation” to help create new jobs. The full remarks as prepared are below:

Remarks by Congressman John Boehner (R-West Chester) FULL TEXT TRANSCRIPT
Conservative Political Action Conference
Remarks As Prepared for Delivery
February 10, 2011

"Thanks to David Keane for his leadership; congratulations to Al Cardenas, the new ACU chairman; and special thanks to Cleta Mitchell for her leadership and friendship.

"I’m honored by this recognition – but as with the office I hold, this isn’t about me.

"I wouldn’t be Speaker of the House if Americans last year had not stood up and reasserted control over their government. And many of the people in this room helped lead that uprising. So. . .I should be thanking you.

"Our new majority is intent on honoring the commitment we made to the American people.

"We pledged we would listen, and we pledged we would do things differently if given the opportunity to run the House.

"We pledged we would focus on stopping the job-crushing spending binge in Washington.

"We pledged we would focus on jobs and spending, and stopping the Washington regulatory assault that has led to massive uncertainty in the private sector.

"We’re going to keep our word.

"I’m a former small businessman. Ran a small business, met a payroll, created jobs.

"I’ve seen first-hand how government makes it harder for small businesses to create jobs and make ends meet.

"Excessive government regulation crushes jobs.

"This is why our majority will pass a resolution to inventory and review federal agency rules and regulations that may be making it harder create jobs and grow the economy.

"This is why we’re going to pass Geoff Davis’ REINS Act, which requires congressional approval for any new regulation with an economic impact of more than $100 million.

"Excessive government SPENDING crushes jobs, too.

"By printing and borrowing all this money, the government is creating uncertainty, and crowding private capital out of the market.

“Every tax dollar the government takes is a dollar that Americans are unable to invest in their families, their businesses, and our economy.

"The American people fundamentally get this. When are the politicians in this town going to figure it out?

"I want to read you a couple of quotes, which (giving credit where credit is due), I got from a great column by a gentleman named Jay Hartz, which I encourage you all to read. The quotes:

‘Unions [and their liberal allies]. . .want more welfare, which would push up the deficit. They also want a national health program, which would push up the deficit borrowing. . .This waste of investment hurts all Americans, but it hurts [workers] most of all.

‘Liberal economic theorists argue that a large budget deficit will stimulate the economy and produce jobs. In reality, however, large deficits destroy jobs.’

"These comments could have come from me, or Eric Cantor, or Mitch McConnell on any given day right now.

"But they were actually uttered nearly 40 years ago, by the late great Congressman from my state of Ohio, John Ashbrook.

"He was directing his comments not just at the Left, but also at some in his own party who had begun to subscribe to the Left’s way of thinking.

"A generation ago, John Ashbrook was taking on the establishment of his party, urging Republicans to reject the idea that we can borrow and spend our way back to prosperity.

"The party ultimately heard John Ashbrook’s call. The result was the presidency of Ronald Reagan. . .a new approach to governing. . .and the largest peacetime economic expansion in our history.

"Ashbrook – and Reagan – understood the American economy doesn’t run on government spending. It runs on freedom.

"A generation later, we’re experiencing a similar realignment. And today it’s the tea party movement calling us to our senses.

"Courtesy of President Obama, Americans have witnessed the grand failure of the notion that massive spending and borrowing by government will jumpstart private-sector job creation.

“A trillion dollars in wasteful ‘stimulus’ spending left Americans asking: Mr. President, where are the jobs?

"And now President Obama is asking us to raise the national debt ceiling – without any commitment to cutting spending at the same time.

"Instead of offering a budget that ends the spending binge, the administration is preparing to offer a budget that will destroy jobs by spending too much, taxing too much, and borrowing too much.

"With all due respect, this isn’t “winning the future.” It’s spending the future.

"What we need is a path to prosperity – one that unleashes the greatness of our people and the awesome potential of the American economy, by getting government out of the way.

"Americans see that the spending binge in Washington is hurting job creation – not helping it. They’re calling on their leaders to stop the job-crushing spending binge and cut spending.

"Based on his State of the Union address and his budget, it looks like the president still isn’t listening.

“But we are. We’ve gotten the message.

"The American people have directed us to cut spending. We will. And there’s no limit to the amount we’re willing to cut to help get our economy moving again.

"Let me be very clear about this: we are going to exceed our Pledge to America. We are going to cut $100 billion in discretionary spending next week.

"Write it down. $100 billion in discretionary spending. "And we aren’t going to stop there.

"Once we’re done with the CR, we’re going to cut mandatory spending.

"And this isn’t just about how much we spend, but how we spend it.

"Every committee has been tasked with doing real oversight.

"And you’re going to see us fight to end taxpayer funding for abortion once and for all.

"The other side says our spending cut plan, drafted by Paul Ryan, will cause ‘pain and suffering.’ Baloney.

"What will truly cause pain and suffering is the status quo – doing nothing – leaving the spending process on autopilot and squandering our nation's future.

"Our majority will not stand for that.

"Our goal is to liberate our economy from the shackles of debt, excessive regulation, and over-taxation.

"As I told my colleagues – this isn’t about us. It’s about the American people. Our job is to follow their will, as we said we would.

"There’s another nice thing about an open process: it means Democrats can offer their amendments, too.

"If they’re good ideas, the House can incorporate them.

"And if they’re bad ideas, the House can defeat them.

"Either way, both sides will have a chance to make an argument and the best ideas will win.

"That’s how it should be. I don’t think anyone in this room is afraid of the battle of ideas. I’m not.

"Our last majority lost its way when it focused more on winning the vote than winning the argument.

"That’s how things like earmarks became a problem. That’s why spending kept growing.

"Let me be clear: we will not make the same mistake this time. Not on my watch.

"When I spoke at CPAC last year, I said a new Republican majority would take on earmarks. Well, that was one of the first things we did. We banned them.

"I said we would post all bills online at least 72 hours before a vote and that we’d install cameras in the powerful Rules Committee. We did both.

"I said that while others mock the Tea Party and call them names, we would listen to them, stand with them, and walk among them. And that’s exactly what we’re doing.

"But as we work to keep our Pledge, I’m going to need your support every step along the way.

“Remember: we only have a majority in one half of one branch of government.

"Right now, Washington is still a Democrat-run town.

"To really make an impact going forward, we need to keep the momentum going. We need the American people to stay engaged in this fight.

“The federal government is as big as it is today, touching all areas of life, because the Left is determined.

"Determined to spend more. Determined to tax more. And determined to keep growing the size of Washington.

"We need to be equally determined to stop them.

"We need to be equally determined to build the smaller, less costly, more accountable government that the American people want and deserve.

"I know I am. And I know you are. And I look forward to continuing to work with you on this journey.

"So thank you again for this honor.

"Thank you for all that you’ve done for our conservative cause, all that you’re doing, and all that I know you will do in the year ahead.

"God bless." #####

VIDEO and IMAGE CREDIT: c-span.org

TEXT CREDIT: John Boehner - 8th District of Ohio Washington, D.C. Office 1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-6205 (202) 225-0704 fax