Friday, June 01, 2007

Press Gaggle by Dana Perino and Dan Bartlett

Press Gaggle by Dana Perino and Dan Bartlett, White House Conference Center Briefing Room, 9:56 A.M. EDT.

Dana M. Perino, Vidcap from White House Briefing MS. PERINO: We've brought a special guest with us today. Let me start off with acknowledging our good friend and colleague, Steve Holland. Today is his last day at the White House after 16 years. While covering President Bush, he's seen much of the world, and a lot of Crawford.
A couple of points -- he was with the President -- the press corps that was stranded in Florida on September 11, 2001. I'm sure you'll never forget that. You covered the President's trip to New York to see the Twin Towers destruction later that week. He went on the two secret trips to Baghdad that the President has taken. He also went to Kabul. I think I speak on behalf of all of us when we say that you are our most favorite colleague here in the press briefing room, and we are going to miss you greatly. We look forward to seeing all the great things that you're going to do. (Applause.)
Let me run through today's schedule quickly, and then we'll go to the next item on our agenda. The President taped the radio address today. The topic is a recap of the initiatives announced this week, as we head into the trip to Europe next week for the G8. At 8:00 a.m. he had his normal briefings.Dan Bartlett, Counselor to the President briefing at the Washington Foreign Press Center Briefing on the President George W. Bush's State of the Union Message.
At 10:10 a.m. this morning the President will have a meeting with the Homeland Security Council on hurricane readiness for this year. That will be in the Situation Room, and we will do a photo release. In addition to that, Administrator Paulison, from FEMA, who will be there for that briefing, will go to the stakeout afterwards. That meeting starts at 10:10 a.m., so right after that. We'll try to give you an overhead announcement in case you want to grab him there at the stakeout.

At 1:20 p.m., the President is going to make remarks at a briefing on comprehensive immigration reform. That is in EEOB 350. It is pool for cameras, but open to correspondents. Secretary Gutierrez and Secretary Chertoff, as well as leaders of the business, Hispanic, agriculture, conservative, immigration rights and think tank communities will be there for that.

And at 2:55 p.m. today the President will have policy time on the G8. I'm not going to do a week ahead at today's gaggle, because you know what the week ahead is, and a detailed schedule will be coming out later today. And remember that you have the briefing today, on camera briefing at 12:30 p.m. is with Steve Hadley, the National Security Advisor, who will go over the trip with you.

Q He departs Monday?

MS. PERINO: Monday, 7:00 a.m -- 7:00 a.m. or 7:15 a.m.

Q Does he have a weekend schedule?

MS. PERINO: He'll just be here at the White House.

Q Dana, on the immigration thing this afternoon, the President you said, makes remarks. Do you know how long they'll be? And then does he just disappear afterwards, and then there's a briefing after that, or what?

MS. PERINO: I think that's all correct, but I can't -- let's take that from the top. There will be this meeting, the Secretaries will be there. I think that when the press will come in, you'll see a little bit of that meeting, you'll hear from the President, and then I think the President departs.

Q Is he going to make a statement on his departure Monday? And is he trying to soften his global image before he goes in terms of --

MS. PERINO: I don't think there are plans for him to make a statement upon departure on Monday. I'll let you know. I think we've had a very great week this week in announcing initiatives that the President has been building on over his time here at the White House. And --

Q He seems to be making a 180 degree turn on the global climate.

MS. PERINO: I think that -- it was certainly a shift, but I would call it a shift into higher gear. And so I will come back at the end and talk to you a little bit more about that.

As you can see today, over here on the side, we have brought a very special guest with us to the briefing room, to the gaggle, Assistant to the President and Counselor Dan Bartlett. I'm going to turn the podium over to him in a few minutes. I just want to say a couple of words about him myself, about what he means to the White House staff, especially the communications and the press offices.

His title is Counselor to the President, but he's been much more than that. He's been a counselor to all of us, he's been a good friend. He really helps make it feel like a family atmosphere there in the White House. His door is always open. He's the very best part of my day, every day, and I mean Saturday and Sunday included in that. He's always available to us, by phone or BlackBerry, and always patient when we have to call him at all hours. And to Allyson, I apologize for all the interruptions over the years. I thank her for her patience. Very excited for the boys, that they're going to be able to have more time with their father.

Q Are you the "goodbye girl" today?

MS. PERINO: Well, we are toasting Dan. All of us, I think, will be able to get a nice organized party organized for him. He'll be leaving around July 4th. And so I'll turn it over to him to say a few words and answer your questions about his departure. And then if there's more at the end, I'll take them.

Q Is he leaving because Steve is leaving?

MS. PERINO: He didn't want him to go alone. (Laughter.)

MR. BARTLETT: They say it happens in threes. It's Steve Holland, Dan Bartlett, Tony Blair. We're all kind of -- (laughter.) Solidarity.

No, it's -- today is obviously a very emotional and difficult day, of mixed emotions, really. I've served this President, both as President and as governor of Texas now -- October will be -- would have been my 14th year.

I've -- in many different respects, have obviously experienced a lot working for this man and serving our country, but I've also become a husband and a father. And I've had competing families. And unfortunately, the Bush family has prevailed too many times, and it's high time for the Bartlett family to finally prevail. And it is with three young children, at this point, with about 600 days left in the administration, I felt that this was an appropriate time, since I was not going to be able to complete the eight-year term, to give the opportunity for the President, the Chief of Staff, to recruit other good, well-qualified people to come in and help this President accomplish a lot of important work on behalf of the American people.

So it is -- it was a decision I made, and when I talked to the President about it a couple weeks ago, he was incredibly gracious. He has created, as much as possible in the White House, a family-friendly work environment. But he, more than anyone, understands the constraints it puts on a family. And he knew I wouldn't have walked in that day and had that conversation with him if the gig wasn't really up. And he was disappointed, obviously, because we've traveled a long road together, but at the same time, I leave knowing that there's an incredibly experienced and gifted staff around this President, and a clear path forward for this administration and this President to accomplish more things on behalf of the American people.

Like I said, it's a -- it's been a long road, and it's been an incredibly exhilarating experience, fun. I can say honestly that the man I met almost 15 years ago is still the same person I know today, and it's what I admire the most about him. And I will miss him and my colleagues. They have -- any individual success I may have had is the direct result of the staff around me, both the communications staff, the press office, speech writing, the people behind the scenes that make the trains run and make those of us on the front lines look better. I couldn't do it without them, and it's been an enormous privilege. I say that to some of the previous members of the staff -- Ari Fleischer, who I talked to this morning, Scott McClellan, Nicole Wallace, Tucker Eskew, Karen Hughes, all the people who I have such a debt of gratitude towards.

And with that, if you have any questions, I'm happy to take them.

Q Does this mark the start of an exodus of White House officials?

MR. BARTLETT: I wouldn't look at that way. I'd look at it as we enter a period with, like I said, 600 days left, where those who have to make the personal calculation, like I have, to determine whether they can serve out the term, as to whether they can or not. And if they decide that they can't serve out the full eight years, or four years, whatever their increment may be, I think it's a bit of an obligation to give the President and the Chief of Staff an opportunity to, like I said, to recruit other people who could come in and make their mark on behalf of this President.

So I can't predict future decisions, but I would say it wouldn't be uncommon. And if you look at previous administrations, this is one of those last natural reflection points where people are going to probably be making that decision over the course of the summer.

Q Did you take into consideration at all in your decision the status the administration is in right now, the difficulties with Congress and the issues? Was that any bearing on your thinking?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, one thing I've learned working in the White House for as long as I have is that you can never pick a moment -- it's kind of like when maybe some of my fellow male colleagues who are struggling for that right moment to pop the question. You've just got to do it. You can't predict -- you can't say there's a perfect moment or not. You just -- you can try to plan it, you can try to do this, but in the end, you've got to go with your gut and your instinct. And my instinct told me this was the right time.

We've accomplished a lot. There are -- obviously, any time you work in the most powerful office in the world, there are going to be challenges, there are going to -- there's going to be work left undone. But there are a lot of, obviously, plenty of capable people who are going to help the President accomplish those challenges.

Q It's not escaping the Titanic?

MR. BARTLETT: Oh, come on. I've been through every tough political battle this President has engaged in. I've relished the fight. I've been honored to be at his side, and they -- but I leave knowing that there is an enormously capable team there to fill whatever void I may leave, and make sure that we keep pursuing the President's goals.

Q Did you think about staying for the whole term?

MR. BARTLETT: You obviously -- you have a hope. I think when I got here, nobody thinks you're going to serve eight years when we first came here. You kind of take it year by year, and then it became six months by six months, and then it became month by month. And it's just a -- like I said, you can't predict how your personal life is going to change with -- I thought my life was crazy with twin boys, now twin boys plus a four month -- four-and-a-half month old. It makes my day job seem easy.

And so circumstances change. And everybody would like to be able to say in a perfect world that you could serve out the term. But I think there's a reason why the average stay in a West Wing job is a lot less that what I actually put in, and it's because it's an enormous strain on the personal life of those who work here.

Q What are the accomplishments you think have been achieved? And what is the naming in the way of goals for this administration in short time?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, I think that -- I won't spend a lot of time on it but the things that stick out to me is that this President has been somebody who's done in office what he said he would do. On the domestic front, he's helped lead an economic recovery that many people didn't think was possible after the attacks and recession that we faced as we came into office; the fundamental reforming of our public schools; the tax relief we passed, as I was talking about; other very important domestic reforms, the actions we've taken on providing energy security.

And then obviously on the foreign policy front, the response we -- this President led in responding to the attacks on our country, the efforts we have made to help lift people out of tyranny, are things that I personally will be very proud of playing a part in, and I know the President will. And there's obviously a lot of work to be done in the remaining time in this President's office. We're in the middle of a very important debate on immigration reform. There is more conversations and legislation being proposed on energy. There are -- and then obviously the hard but necessary work that's going on in the war on terror, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan.

So I'm proud of the accomplishments, the small role that I played in helping the President make those accomplishments a reality I'll take pride in, and I know that there's an incredibly capable team here to help take him across the finish line.

Ken.

Q Dan, a couple of structural things. When is your last day here?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, those things I've always been -- are a bit fluid, but my goal is right around the 4th of July holiday is what I'm targeting.

Q Where are you going? Are you going to stay --

MR. BARTLETT: I don't know yet. I haven't ruled anything out. I'll be obviously --

Q Back to Rockwall?

MR. BARTLETT: I can rule that out. (Laughter.)

Q Rockwall gives its thanks.

MR. BARTLETT: I'm sure they do. But the -- it's very difficult inside jobs like this to truly understand what opportunities are there on the outside. I will be taking some time during this transition and then shortly thereafter to see what type of opportunities are there for me, that obviously the experiences I've had working at the highest level of government will hopefully give me an opportunity to do some interesting things post-life. I'll be out there being a strong advocate for this President, and look forward to getting some rest.

Q One more thing. Are you disappointed that upon prolonged exposure to this President, the nation does not seem to share your admiration and respect for him?

MR. BARTLETT: I don't know if that's true, Ken. I think what you see in the sense of the current consternation and controversy is more wrapped around certain issues, and obviously the biggest issue being Iraq. And it brings out a lot of emotions in people, as does an issue like immigration.

But I think those who -- even some of the President's harshest critics, and I've seen them in person when they've talked to the President -- I think there's a personal amount of respect for him, they understand that this a person who is making decisions based on what he thinks is right for this country. I think it's one of those things -- one of those traits about him that actually earned his reelection was the fact that whatever you may think about his positions, you know that he's leading with the basis of doing what he thinks is right for the country. And that doesn't mean that people aren't going to disagree, and obviously there's disagreement about some of the policies he's pursued. But, you know, as I start entering this reflection period, it will be something that people will look back upon, and when the dust settles, I think there will be a more reflective assessment of this presidency and the person.

Q Do you think he'd get reelected again if the Constitution was different?

MR. BARTLETT: I think he would join me and say, thankfully we don't have to go through another presidential campaign. I've -- he's hung up those spurs, and so have I. And that's a good thing.

Q With your departure, a number of the original Texas team are now gone. How does that affect the President, not having people who he has a long, long personal history with in those close quarters making decisions and doing all that?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, I think all of us are still in his orbit and will still be a part of the family. And he stays in communication with those who have left the White House proper. But at the same time, he has developed strong, close, personal relationships with people who are from here, and people who have been working for this President for some time. Josh Bolten obviously comes to mind, Steve Hadley, others who were -- in the early days were great interpreters for us Texans who came up here, and showed us the ways of Washington.

And it's really the continuity of this White House as a great testament to the management style of this President, but also some of the people he surrounded himself with -- Andy Card. I'd be remiss if I didn't comment on him, an incredible friend he was to me and the leadership that he provided, in which he, knowing the management style the President liked, giving the type of breathing space for us rambunctious Texans to have, to maintain our relationship with the President, I think was a very important decision by Andy Card.

But I think there's -- the President is, like I said, he's advised by a lot of very smart, capable people, and we'll always be in the circle of friends.

Q Was burnout a factor in your decision to leave, after six-and-a-half years?

MR. BARTLETT: People tell you you don't really know how tired you are until after you leave, and that probably will be the case. I'm so used to it, I don't even know what burnout means. Like I said, it's the sleepless nights at home right now that are probably more difficult on me than at the office. I don't really chalk it up to that, it's really more just a personal decision in which you have to -- at some point you're confronted with conflicting priorities, and I think -- an extraordinary amount of credit to my family, both my wife and obviously both of our sides of the family, to put up with everything we've gone through. When we traveled last summer for vacation, I had a White House communication unit in tow to set up a secure video conference so I could do conference calls throughout the day. I think that was kind of a -- it was an obvious --

Q Do you think that might have been the tipping point? (Laughter.)

MR. BARTLETT: It's moments like that where it kind of crystalizes for you. It's more about that type of conflicting priority, that I just had to make the right decision for.

Q What characteristics does your successor need, and what can he or she do to hold off lame duck status for the President?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, the good thing about working for this President is that he's very transparent, you know what he wants to do, and you don't have to guess where his views are, and what he wants to accomplish. And there's such a great team already here, that the person who comes in -- obviously we will be looking for somebody who has an enormous amount of experience and expertise, and with my primary responsibility being in the area of communications, to help advise the President on communications strategy. In general, the role of a counselor is to hopefully try to provide a broader strategic advisory role, and I'm sure we'll be able to find somebody to fill those shoes.

Q Tell us what your hours have been like. When do you come in? When do you leave? And then you get caught up in things over the weekend, don't you?

MR. BARTLETT: Yes, it's -- I usually get to the office between 6:15 a.m. and 6:30 a.m. Since I've had my kids, I've tried to leave the office before 8:00 p.m., and I try to at least see my -- see the kids at least once or twice a week before they go to bed.

But what most people will tell you here, it's not as much the actual hours you're in the office. It's more about, you're never be able to turn it off, whether it's the BlackBerry calling, or the matching of stories, or the -- when certain newspapers put their Sunday edition up at 3:00 p.m. on Saturday afternoons, and there goes your evening. It is working with the duty officers and those things. All those things kind of come with it, but more importantly than any of that is you're never able to turn it off. There's never -- as I said, when you travel for vacation, it's -- you bring your work in tow.

And my wife was commenting the other day that she -- that she said, I'm probably one of the few people in America who wakes up to the tapping of a BlackBerry in bed where I'm trying -- I'm already responding to things as I literally have not even put my feet on the floor.

Q Romantic, no?

MR. BARTLETT: Yes. It's --

Q I'm surprised you had --

MR. BARTLETT: Yes, yes, yes. Thanks, Bill. (Laughter.)

Q You said the President has changed a lot in years you've served him?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, the core elements of him haven't changed as a person, which I found to be quite inspiring; that the things that have made him tick as a person are really the same things. I've called them the three "f"s: faith, family, and friends. And they've always stayed true to him. He's obviously changed in the job, and nobody could serve in the position that he's had and gone through the experiences he has, particularly after 9/11, and not changed as a person. It deeply affected him personally and professionally. And, obviously, that's why the policies that he's pursued have been what they are.

So I've seen him obviously start as a rookie candidate out on the hustings and the small counties of Texas in 1993. There were some pretty rough moments he will acknowledge I'm sure, himself.

Q You went hunting once.

MR. BARTLETT: Yes, I remember that. Ken was there, as was I, in my famous --

Q I believe there's video of it.

Q He shot an endangered bird, or something --

MR. BARTLETT: That was my first experience in crisis communications since I was in charge of that event. (Laughter.)

Q Are you going to write a book?

MR. BARTLETT: I don't plan to. I've had enough headaches dealing with books.

Q Is he, and are you going to help?

MR. BARTLETT: You know, I wouldn't doubt it someday that he writes a book. And I'll help if he wants. He hasn't asked me to.

Q What about the library?

MR. BARTLETT: I have no formal role envisioned. Any help that I could provide informally to Don Evans and those other folks who are helping lead that effort, I'll obviously offer my services. But nothing formal.

Q Dan, do you want to talk about your own kind of progression, because you started out as, I guess, just his main only press aide. Now here you are, counselor, I guess one of the five closest people the President, if not three, right?

MR. BARTLETT: I started in a policy role back during the first campaign, and helped him develop his platform in which he ran for governor. I then worked in the policy office in the governor's office for two legislative sessions. So my communications experience kind of started more as a policy person and transitioned as I began working closer with Karen Hughes. And then I was issues director on his reelection campaign for governor, and that's really where the transitions kind of started toward doing -- putting a foot more in the communications world and it continued to evolve.

And like I said, I've got -- I give an enormous amount of gratitude to people who put me in positions in order to give me the chance to have an enormous amount of responsibility for somebody of a relatively young age, and that started, obviously, with -- I worked for Karl Rove before the campaign started, then worked for a guy named Vance McMahan, who was the policy director for then-Governor Bush. And then Karen Hughes, who put an enormous amount of trust in me.

But most importantly, the President. I could probably say with sincerity that for the first four years I worked for him, he probably didn't know my age. And because he's never one to say, how old are you, I'm not going to say. He just asked me questions, and if I knew the answer, he had confidence in me; if he didn't, he'd throw me to the side. And I kind of gained his trust early on. And as many of you know, and some of you who covered the 2000 campaign or others, I, for good or ill, became the keeper of the record. And I never thought that National Guard story would ever go away. (Laughter.) And obviously I developed at a very young age, in a very entry-level position, kind of a unique relationship with the candidate at the time and throughout the years because of my portfolio, handling a lot of his personal issues -- his business career, his military career, his life.

And so I know a lot of the people who are in his life. I know a lot of the people in his background. And by knowing so much about him, I've only grown in respect for him.

But it's -- I think it does say something about his management style that somebody at my young age can ascend to this position. And it's based on the fact that he's more worried about not my pedigree or how many degrees I have on the wall, but more about whether he trusts my judgment or not. And he's given me chances all along the way to prove myself wrong. And somehow I've avoided screwing up too bad. So it's been a remarkable experience.

Q Dan, I had heard that the President, not too long ago, had referred to you as "Barty, my eight-year man." Is that right? (Laughter.)

MR. BARTLETT: I don't know about eight-year. I mean, he's -- there was a period where obviously he's -- you would expect those up here who came up here with him would hopefully stay to the finish. But at the same time, he also knows the demands of a family. And he particularly knew the demands of having twins. And we commiserate over that at times.

But at the same time, he couldn't have been more gracious. I kind of went in there --

Q But it wasn't a surprise, though, right?

MR. BARTLETT: I don't -- I kind of wear my feelings on my sleeve. When I came in there to talk to him about it, he kind of broke the ice. He knew -- he said, I know you've been grinding on this; don't worry, I know you wouldn't come in here unless it was that time.

So, look, he's a pretty astute person, and we spend a lot of time together, so it's hard to hide those types of decisions as you wrangle with them. And like I said, he's been an enormous amount of -- I have an enormous amount of gratitude to him for the trust he's placed in me. He -- we have a lot of things in common, so -- Texas sports and commiserate over the Texas Rangers and things like that, so we know how to take the daily grind off our minds by talking about things back in Texas.

So it's been a -- like I said, it's been a great ride.

Q We all know that the President will be in Kennebunkport around the 4th of July. Will you be there with him?

MR. BARTLETT: I don't know yet. That's a good question. I don't know.

Q Because if not, then when will you say the final goodbye?

MR. BARTLETT: We'll make sure you know. But I'll be at the G8. We'll be on the trip -- and for the first bilateral I know you'll be interested in. And we'll go from there.

Q Did he try to talk you out of it, Dan?

MR. BARTLETT: Look, he said he was disappointed. He knows -- look, I've been on -- I've dealt with a lot of people's departure, I've dealt with a lot of -- we just know each other too well that it's not one of those things where -- I wouldn't even go to him if he didn't know that it was time. And so it's -- it doesn't quite work that way, in a sense. And like I said, he knew the type of struggle I was having with the decision. So that's kind of how it works.

Jim.

Q Have you -- how do you think this will affect the internal dynamic? Because haven't sort of served at -- you can be a counterbalance sometimes to this strong personality internally, or a counterbalance in terms of that strong personality. You're pretty tight-knit -- the inner circle is fairly tight-knit and seems to play off of itself in interesting ways. Do you think that your departure will very much affect the decision making process internally?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, I think the fact you say we're close-knit demonstrates that we're a family, and it's not a matter of counter-balancing as it is complements -- we complement each other well; we have a diverse set of advisors who bring different perspectives to the table. And obviously, when we announce a replacement, that person will be able to provide that type of complement, as well.

So I think that -- like I said, from a personality standpoint, obviously in the role I played and the roles some of the other high-profile people in the White House play, there's -- a culture builds up around those personalities. But I've seen, as other people have left, I could never imagine a West Wing being operated without Andy Card roaming the halls, and it just had us -- the way the White House -- the presidency is bigger than the people, and that's not only the President, but it's the staff, as well. And we are expendable. And it is -- that's the nature of the job. I will miss what I do. I will miss my colleagues most. But the demands of the job require them to march on, and they will.

Q Thanks, Dan. On Iraq, which you mentioned is probably the most significant issue of the President's tenure, how do you -- looking back, how do you feel like you've done, how do you feel like the President has done and the White House has done on communicating with the American people on that issue? Are there any moments or things that you wish you had done differently in communicating on that issue?

MR. BARTLETT: Well, I think there will be plenty of time down the road to reflect upon the decisions, as far as whether things could have been done differently or not. And I'm not going to look back right now. I'm just going to -- I'm going to look forward.

I will say, though, that there have been some enormous challenges when it comes to communications, that the differences between this war and, for example, the only real comparison a lot of people had was the '91 Gulf War. I was involved in the decisions to do embedding, and those things, which I think was a radical departure from how wars were covered previously. Torie Clarke really gets a lot of credit for that, but I helped her. We worked together on those concepts.

But I think it will be a challenge, not just for this President going forward, but for future Presidents because of the changing nature of not only the news cycle here in the Western media, but also satellite TV, Arab TV. We learned that very early on during the Afghanistan conflict when the Taliban was -- you know, you're not only dealing with this time zone, you have to deal with multiple time zones. And our government has tried to adapt and restructure ourselves to adapt to the -- that type of ideological warfare that takes place every day, and the propaganda warfare, the stuff that is being put out by the enemy. And it's a challenge.

And as the President has constantly talked about, our enemy is not only playing the tactics of violence, but they play in the tactics of propaganda, and it will be an enormous challenge for future presidencies, as well as this President.

So we try to adapt, and I think we have in a lot of different ways successfully. Are there things we can continue to do better? Absolutely. For example, the demands that have been put on our system, for example, with YouTube and those things for our soldiers -- I mean, these are all just very complex issues that, just as the media is struggling with this transition at times, so is government. But in this case, it has serious consequences because it's literally a matter of life and death when it comes to this war.

So we try to do what's right. We try to do it in an open, fair way. We try to err on the side of more access. We try to explain in as clear terms possible the stakes in which this -- why we're conducting this fight.

I remember vividly being summoned up -- me, Karen Hughes and Ari Fleischer being summoned up to the residence of the White House the Sunday after 9/11, in which the President warned us then that communicating this war was going to be very difficult because of the asymmetrical aspect of this war, that the further we got away from 9/11 the harder it was going to be to accomplish our communications goals.

So he was aware of it then, and his example of that was we had prepared for that day -- the next day to be -- him just to do a routine executive order on terror financing, the first terror financing. And he says, you don't understand, this is the first strike in the war on terror; we've got to make more out of this to explain to the American people the different nature of this war. It's very much just as much financial as it is kinetic military. And we did -- some of us who were here -- we did a Rose Garden event that next morning, at his request, to really highlight the fact that this was going to be unique in nature.

So I'm proud of the accomplishments we made. Like I said, there will be plenty of time to pick over some of the decisions I helped make and determine whether they were done right or wrong. I'm sure there are plenty that are right, and plenty that are wrong.

Q A follow-up to that -- you just said the President asked you to think ahead in terms of explaining to the American people the complexities of this new war. What about explaining the same thing to the world public?

MR. BARTLETT: Absolutely --

Q Was it prioritized correctly in your opinion? And in terms of --

MR. BARTLETT: The issue of multiple audiences is one of the most vexing challenges for communications now, and that we have to be constantly understanding and cognizant of the fact that there are multiple audiences, and different things mean different people [sic]. The President, for example, has talked about regretting using the word "crusade," for example, or "bring it on," those things while he was speaking to one specific audience -- "bring it on," showing that he had confidence in the U.S. military to do the job, that it could send a different signal to others, to the enemy.

So those are the type of things you -- that sometimes you've got to learn through experience. And nobody is perfect in those respects. I think we've gotten better at speaking to multiple audiences.

Q Overall, are you satisfied with the results --

MR. BARTLETT: We can continue to do better --

Q -- for the world?

MR. BARTLETT: No, we're never satisfied. I think we've made a lot of progress. Big government doesn't turn on a dime. We, unfortunately, have found that out in many different cases. So we're working on it, we've gotten better, but there's obviously a lot more work to do.

A couple more -- great. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

Q Good luck.

MR. BARTLETT: Thank you.

MS. PERINO: Are we done? Are we done?

Q No.

MS. PERINO: Okay.

Q Why is Bartlett really leaving? (Laughter.)

MS. PERINO: We'll wait until he leaves. (Laughter.)

Q Last year, the Secret Service and the White House signed a memorandum of understanding designating visitor records as presidential, and there's a newly disclosed move that makes visitor records at the Vice President's mansion secret. Why is the White House intent on keeping this information confidential?

MS. PERINO: Well, I'm not well versed on it. I'm aware that there's a matter that's in litigation, and we'll see if we can get back to you later today. I'll have Tony get back to you. *

Q Is there something that --

MS. PERINO: We'll get back to you. I just don't know enough.

Q Is there a successor --

MS. PERINO: There will be. Josh Bolten yesterday said that they have a few folks that they're talking to that they have in mind. But they're not ready to announce anybody yet. But they said that there will be somebody in place prior to Dan leaving so that there could be some overlap between the two.

Q When you say "they're talking to," really it's the President talking to, right? Ultimately, it's just his decision on who he --

MS. PERINO: I already -- I'm not intimately involved in the search. I don't know if the President has met with anybody yet. When there is a decision and something is announced, we'll go back and do the tick-tock for you.

Q Is it someone within the administration already, or outside?

MS. PERINO: I don't know, and yesterday he didn't say.

Q Is there any chance of structural change, or he's going to plug somebody into that slot?

MS. PERINO: I think it's just too early to tell. Again, this is not news that all of us have had for a long time, some of us just overnight. So we don't know a lot more than that. And I don't think Josh Bolten, Chief of Staff, is prepared to say anything beyond what he said this morning. So as there are updates -- I would not expect anything before we get back from the G8 --

Q He's going to G8?

MS. PERINO: Dan? Yes, Dan is going to the G8, right.

John.

Q Is the President planning to say anything new, or emphasize anything new during the immigration speech today?

MS. PERINO: I don't believe so, and I think that his remarks will just be more off the cuff. So I don't think that there's anything planned to be new. But we'll see how that goes at 1:20 p.m.

Q Do you know if there will be a list of the people in attendance?

MS. PERINO: I think so. I think so. Let me see if we can get it for you.

Q When Dan talked about the 600-day mark being an important decision making time, and although he said there's not going to be an exodus, is that sort of -- is there any kind of framework that Josh Bolten has for staffers, in terms of, we need you to commit for this much more time?

MS. PERINO: No, he hasn't said that, and I think that -- one of the things I heard Josh say yesterday was that it's really everyone's individual decision and everyone has their unique set of circumstances. Thankfully, I don't have three children under the age of four; I just have a dog. Those things are a little bit different.

Q Troublesome dog. (Laughter.)

MS. PERINO: Yes, troublesome. Troublesome husband. (Laughter.) The dog is fine. (Laughter.)

Q It's all about priorities, isn't it?

MS. PERINO: Hear, hear. So, no. And I think that there's some people -- there's a lot of new faces at the White House over the past year. And people that have, I think, joined in the last year have a different perspective on it than somebody who has been there as long as Dan has.

Q Thank you.

END 10:35 A.M. EDT

*Quote by White House Deputy Press Secretary Tony Fratto:

“I can't comment on a case in litigation, and I can't speak to the decisions made by other administrations. It is important that the President be able to receive candid advice from his staff and other members of the Administration. To ensure that he receives candid advice, it is essential as a general matter that the advice remains confidential.”

For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, June 1, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or

President's Statement on Resignation of Dan Bartlett

Dan Bartlett, Counselor to the President briefing at the Washington Foreign Press Center Briefing on the President George W. Bush's State of the Union Message.STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT and Biography

Laura and I will miss Dan Bartlett very much. Dan has been a true counselor to the President. His contribution has been immeasurable. I value his judgment and I treasure his friendship.
Since coming to work for me fourteen years ago as I prepared to run for Governor, Dan has become a husband and a father. I understand his decision to make his young family his first priority. His most important job is to be a loving husband and father of three young sons. We wish him all the best. # # #

For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, June 1, 2007

Dan Bartlett serves President George W. Bush as Counselor to the President. In this capacity, Bartlett is responsible for all aspects of President Bush's strategic communications planning and the formulation of policy and implementation of the President's agenda. He also oversees the White House Press Office and the Offices of Communications, Media Affairs, and Speechwriting.

Prior to that, he was Assistant to the President for Communications and White House Communications Director. Before being named Communications Director, he was Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy to then Counselor to the President, Karen Hughes.

Before joining the Bush Administration, Dan Bartlett served as a senior spokesman and Director of Rapid Response for the Bush for President campaign in Austin, Texas. He has served President Bush since 1993, working on both successful campaigns for Governor of Texas.

From 1994 to 1998, Bartlett worked in the Governor's Office as Deputy to the Policy Director. During the 1998 re-election campaign, he served as Issues Director. Before joining President Bush, Mr. Bartlett worked for Karl Rove and Company, an Austin-based political consulting firm. He has served the President for over ten years.

Daniel Joseph Bartlett (born January 6, 1971), He earned his bachelors degree in political science from the University of Texas at Austin. Bartlett married Allyson Elizabeth Sikes (born 1975) in 2000, and the two have three sons. The Bartletts reside in Chevy Chase, Maryland.

Technorati Tags: and or and and or

Thursday, May 31, 2007

State Department Daily Press Briefing, 05/31/07 (VIDEO, PODCAST)

Daily Press Briefing, Tom Casey, Deputy Spokesman, FULL STREAMING VIDEO file is windows media format, running time is 17:58, PODCAST of Briefing mp3 format for download. Washington, DC, May 31, 2007, 12:35 p.m. EST. Streaming Audio of briefing mp3 in m3u format for online listening.

MR. CASEY: Good afternoon, everyone. I don't have statements or formal announcements. But I do want to note that it probably doesn't matter anyway because it must be the end of the world since this is George Gedda's last briefing after more than 30 years of covering the State Department, a record that shall probably not be matched or beaten anytime soon.
And George, in your honor, since you're heard a lot of phrases from this building over time, I just want to say that the United States and the State Department deplore, condemn, are deeply troubled by, are extremely saddened, regret, and are extremely concerned about the fact that you will no longer be here with us. And with that, if you have any real questions, I'd be happy to take them or we can just say thank you and move on to champagne.

MR. GEDDA: Let's see --

MR. CASEY: (Laughter.) Or if you wish to have a rebuttal.

MR. GEDDA: I want you to know that it strains credulity for you folks to describe the last 175 diplomatic meetings as being fruitful and useful. They couldn't possibly have all been fruitful and useful.

MR. CASEY: You forgot productive. (Laughter.)

MR. GEDDA: Productive. What is your response to that?

MR. CASEY: Well, George, I think as a great former spokesman once said on his last day at the podium, all the relationships are special, all the meetings are unique and all our allies are valuable. And I think we'll stick with that. (Laughter.)

Anybody else?

QUESTION: (Inaudible?)

MR. CASEY: There could be. Go ahead, Matt.

QUESTION: I have no questions.

MR. CASEY: You could, you can't.

QUESTION: I have no questions. I would like to say something at the very end about George, though.

MR. CASEY: All right. We may be getting there.

QUESTION: I have a couple of questions.

MR. CASEY: Okay. Arshad, thank you for --

QUESTION: Leave it to Reuters to --

MR. CASEY: -- breaking this, yeah. Well, you know, these guys are always working hard over at Reuters, I don't know.

QUESTION: I've got to do something assuage my grief at George's departure, so I will work instead.

MR. CASEY: We'll help you work through the grieving process, yes.

QUESTION: One -- do you have any more information about the two Iraqi nationals that work at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad who apparently have gone missing? Do you have any idea what has happened to them?

MR. CASEY: Well, nothing that I'm in a position to share with you right now, Arshad. We, again, can confirm that we have two of our local Iraqi national employees in the Embassy in Baghdad that are missing. We do have concerns about their welfare. The Embassy is working along with Iraqi security forces and coalition forces as well to be able to try and determine their whereabouts and be able to figure out exactly what's happened. But because this is an ongoing investigation, I think we'll just have to leave it for that for now.

QUESTION: Then one other one on Iran. Former Congressman Lee Hamilton at a news conference this morning regarding the case of Dr. Haleh Esfandiari said that he hopes the U.S. Government will raise her case in any future discussions that it has with the Iranian Government. Do you plan to do so, and if not, why not?

MR. CASEY: Well, certainly what we do plan on doing is continuing to work through the Swiss to be able to try and get consular access to her. And again, we call on the Iranian Government to let her and the other Americans that they're holding go free. I mean, these are people that don't pose a threat or a challenge to the regime. They're there on family business; they're on personal matters; they're conducting research -- they've been doing so for a long time -- and it's simply absurd to be charging them with espionage or other kinds of activities that are supposedly a threat or a challenge to the Iranian Government.

In terms of how we go about discussing this, again, I think what we've said and where I expect we will continue to be is that we believe the proper channel for this is through our diplomatic representatives in Tehran, meaning the Swiss in this case. I'm not trying to preclude this coming up in other fora, but at least with specific reference to the conversation that Ambassador Crocker had with his Iranian counterpart in Baghdad, those meetings were focused exclusively on Iraqi issues. And we've said that we would expect any kind of follow-on meetings, although there's none planned at this moment, will focus on that as well. But, you know, I'm not trying to preclude that someone might find an opportunity in some other forum to be able to raise these cases. I just can't give you any specifics that would indicate that'll happen at this point.

QUESTION: I understand, but can you, for the benefit or ordinary people, explain why you are -- you do not wish to raise a matter like this in what are your extremely rare direct, bilateral face-to-face contacts with the Iranians? Why would you not raise such a case? I know you have a reason, but what is it?

MR. CASEY: Well, again, in the case of the one instance that we can talk about, we stuck specifically to Iraq because we don't wish this to be a forum for the Iranians, for example, to try and engage in discussions of their nuclear program. We've made it quite clear that the international community has a specific mechanism for that, and that's through the P-5+1, and that those conversations can take place once Iran has met the criteria laid out by the international community.

We have a diplomatic representation in Tehran that's designed to make clear and be able to handle our diplomatic relations such as they are with the Iranian Government. We don't wish to provide the Iranian Government with a forum to be able to bring in extraneous issues or otherwise cloud the waters or make it more difficult for us to deal with the kinds of issues like their nuclear program, like the problems that we have with them related to terrorism, like the issues that stem out of the hostage crisis, which is partly the reason why we don't have diplomatic relations with them in the first place.

I will make it clear though, Arshad, that I don't think there's any doubt in our minds that the Iranian Government has a very clear and direct understanding of what our views are on these cases. We've stated it publicly. We've stated it in formal diplomatic channels through the Swiss. And we will continue to make sure that these issues are known.

What I can tell you though is I expect that a very specific and limited forum focused on Iraq is likely to stay focused on Iraq.

Nina.

QUESTION: Same issue, specifically the bank accounts that were frozen, Esfandiari's bank accounts at Citibank. Apparently, her husband received a letter yesterday saying that they were being frozen because she was no longer considered a resident of the U.S. and she was an Iranian
-- now resident in Iran and she was subject to sanctions. Are you doing anything to help with this issue, to amend this?

MR. CASEY: I really don't have any information I can share with you on it. I'm sure we will do whatever we can to clear up any questions that people have. But she's an American citizen and I'm not aware that there's any sanctions or regulations that would apply to American citizens other than --

QUESTION: Her accounts have been frozen though and her salary --

MR. CASEY: I can't confirm that for you. You'd have to check with banking officials and with Department of Treasury.

QUESTION: The State Department has no -- played no role whatsoever in seeking to unfreeze those accounts?

MR. CASEY: My understanding is we've had some communications about that, but I can't really go any further than that.

QUESTION: Communications with whom?

MR. CASEY: With family members of an American citizen about financial issues.

David.

QUESTION: Do you have any comment on the situation in Thailand, the banning of the (inaudible) party?

MR. CASEY: Yeah, we've looked into this a little bit. Frankly, I think this really is a matter for the constitutional tribunal and the Thai people to work out. I'd note that the leaders of political parties from across the spectrum, including the one affected here, have been calling for calm in wake of the tribunal's decision and asking that it be respected.

The Thai interim authorities, from our point of view, really need to remain focused on the most important task at hand here, which is building consensus on a new constitution and doing that so that we can pave the way for democratic elections before the year's end, which is what they've committed themselves to do. It is essential for the Thai Government to go forward with that and to be able to restore fully civil liberties there.

But in terms of the decision made, this is one that is really for the tribunal to decide and we'll leave it up to them and to the Thai people to make any -- or draw any further conclusions about it.

QUESTION: Why isn't it appropriate to criticize the dissolution of a party that I guess won the last election?

MR. CASEY: Well, this is -- the tribunal and the laws that were governing this decision were established before the interim government came into effect. At this point, our understanding is that the tribunal proceeded in accordance with Thai law and, again, the reaction that we've seen from the Thai political parties themselves is to call on their followers to respect this decision. So at this point, I think we'll leave it with the tribunal and with the legal process in Thailand and Thailand's political leaders.

David.

QUESTION: Could you bring us up to date on the Kosovo goings-on up at the UN? There are reports that there's a new draft resolution which seems to imply that there might be concessions to try to get the Russians on board.

MR. CASEY: Well, I understand -- I'm not sure if it's happened yet, but I understand there was a new draft of a resolution on Kosovo that was going to be circulated today. I think this reflects the consensus that is generally shared that now is the time to move forward with a debate on that resolution, and to ultimately resolve this issue in accordance with the basic outlines of the Ahtisaari plan. We do think that it is time to be able to bring this to a conclusion. Obviously there are a lot of different opinions about this subject, including differences that have been raised by the Russians and by others with this. And so I certainly expect there'll be a healthy debate and discussion on it. But we think we are at a point now where we've got a resolution that reflects the Ahtisaari plan and is something that we are in a position now to be able to put forward, and we'll see how the debate goes. I wouldn't try and predict for you, from the fact that this was being circulated today, a timetable for when a resolution might actually be voted upon. And obviously I'm sure there'll be a number of comments that we'll get on this from different member-states and different Security Council members. So I wouldn't either try and tell you that this is necessarily going to be the version that gets put in the blue.

QUESTION: Well, do you think it is a resolution that will not be vetoed by anybody?

MR. CASEY: Well, what we would like to see is a resolution supported by everyone because we think it is important that we do get a strong resolution that reflects the Ahtisaari plan, that allows for this initially supervised independence for Kosovo as he's called for. It is something that we believe is essential for the stability of the region, and ultimately for the people in Serbia as well as Kosovars as well as others in the region to be able to meet their own objectives for involvement more closely and deeply in Euro-Atlantic institutions, from the EU to NATO to other organizations as well.

Let's go in the back here.

QUESTION: On the issue of American citizens detained in Iran, do you have any exact number that is confirmed? Some reports say there are more than five people.

MR. CASEY: Well, again, we've talked about that in the past. We have the three citizens that we've publicly talked about. We also have a missing American who is, as far as we know, is still in Iran, which is the case of Mr. Levinson. I have seen, and I think we've seen, some scattered reporting that indicates there may be others that are out there; I'm not ruling that out. But at this point, I'm not aware of any others.

Yes.

QUESTION: On U.S. base realignment in Japan, since the middle of this month, Japanese Government has just started the initial phase of the environmental survey. Are you concerned about the pace of this going on since that was the thing that was agreed on last year's 2+2 agreement?

MR. CASEY: Well, I haven't gotten an update on the progress on that. Certainly we want to see base realignment move forward. We think this is an important issue for us. But I think my friends at the Pentagon would be in a better position to tell you whether the timing of this review has had any impact on their planning for the overall move. Certainly we're committed to working with the Government of Japan to be able to resolve any outstanding issues that are there and be able to allow us to go forward with realignment, which I think is in the best interest of -- and defensive needs of both the United States and Japan and the security of the broader region.

Yeah, Charlie.

QUESTION: Any comments of the -- on the votes pending in Congress next week? The resolution's calling for the embassy to be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

MR. CASEY: I don't have anything -- I wasn't aware that things were pending, but I think our views on that are well known and there is no change in U.S. policy on it.

Charlie.

QUESTION: Oh, just -- I won't say, "Thank you" yet --

MR. CASEY: Not yet.

QUESTION: -- a few other people may have something to say, but as someone who -- preparing to end the briefing, and he usually says "Thank you" first, I'd just like to say thanks to George for being a great mentor to myself and I'm sure many others. I'm not quite sure what we're going to do without the instant memory bank that we've all gotten used to going to.

But, Matt.

QUESTION: Yeah, I just wonder if I can say something as George's AP partner today. Right here is the -- you know, today really is truly the end of an era, not only in the State Department briefing room and in the bullpen, but also for the AP. And for me personally, for the last eight years, with a small interruption there, you've really been a tremendous mentor/friend/competitor and now finally a colleague. You've been really a font of institutional knowledge, as Charlie said, of the Department, of U.S. foreign policy, and I think that you're going to -- your departure will leave a lot of us missing something, not just at the AP but also among the entire press corps. So I'd just like to say, George, thank you, congratulations, enjoy retirement, and Godspeed.

MR. GEDDA: I very much appreciate the kind words from both Matt and Charlie, and I guess there are obviously some things that I will miss and obviously the companionship of colleagues. And the AP has succeeded in keeping me busy enough so that there were not enough conversations with these fine people out here, you know to talk about just how things are going. I have for the most part been stuck at that computer wishing I had more free time to get to know some of these people better. And I also want to say I admire the work of my colleagues. It's a very high-caliber group and I will miss you folks. But on the whole, I am looking forward to a new day and I will be heading out in about a week for other pastures. And I want to thank you, Tom, and Sean for all of your hard work. It's not easy facing this crowd every day and you have shown great patience and wisdom and skill in carrying out your duties. And I want to thank Gonzo and all the folks in the press office for the kindnesses and hard work that they have shown over the years -- more than 30, to be exact.

MR. CASEY: Now, I didn't want to get into specifics, George, because, you know, none of us want to be dated. Well, George, I'm going to raise a glass of water to you here and we'll raise a glass to you later, but thank you. Thank all of you. And, Charlie, can I get a thank you?

QUESTION: Thank you.

(Applause, cheers and a standing ovation.)

(The briefing was concluded at 12:53 p.m.)

DPB # 97 Released on May 31, 2007

Daily Press Briefing, Tom Casey, Deputy Spokesman, Washington, DC. May 31, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and , or and

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (XDR TB) PODCAST

Emergence of Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis - PODCAST. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) outbreaks have been reported in South Africa, and strains have been identified on 6 continents. Dr. Peter Cegielski, team leader for drug-resistant TB with the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination at CDC, comments on a multinational team's report on this emerging global public health threat.

M. tuberculosis bacteria  CDC/Ronald W. SmithwickHere we see Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a sputum smear is stained using fluorescent acid-fast stain.
M. tuberculosis is an acid-fast bacterium (AFB), and is therefore, undetectable when stained using a Gram stain technique.
However, using this method, the M. tuberculosis bacteria glow yellow under ultraviolet light microscopy.
Photomicrograph of a sputum sample containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis. M. tuberculosis bacteria can attack any part of the body, but usually the lungs causing Tuberculosis. It is spread when infected individuals cough or sneeze, releasing microdroplets into the air that contain the bacteria, which others then inhale.M. tuberculosis bacteria. CDC
CDC, A photomicrograph of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria from a sputum specimen, and viewed with Ziehl-Neelsen stain.Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) is a relatively rare type of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). It is resistant to almost all drugs used to treat TB, including the two best first-line drugs: isoniazid and rifampin. XDR TB is also resistant to the best second-line medications: fluoroquinolones and at least one of three injectable drugs (i.e., amikacin, kanamycin, or capreomycin).
Because XDR TB is resistant to the most powerful first-line and second-line drugs, patients are left with treatment options that are much less effective and often have worse treatment outcomes.

XDR TB is of special concern for persons with HIV infection or other conditions that can weaken the immune system. These persons are more likely to develop TB disease once they are infected, and also have a higher risk of death once they develop TB disease.

The risk of acquiring XDR TB in the United States appears to be relatively low. However, it is important to acknowledge the ease at which TB can spread. As long as XDR TB exists, the United States is at risk and must address the threat. Morbidity rate 70%

Investigation of U.S. Traveler with Extensively Drug–Resistant Tuberculosis (XDR TB) Fact Sheets Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports (MMWRs) Technorati Tags: and or and and or

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

President Ronald Reagan The Moscow Summit 05/29/88

President Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev in Red Square during the Moscow Summit. 5/31/88. Courtesy Ronald Reagan LibraryOn January 15, 1988, President Ronald Reagan directed the Secretary of Defense to establish the On-Site Inspection Agency (OSIA). Its mission was to carry out the on-site inspection and escort responsibilities of the United States under the provisions of the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty.

Signed on December 8, 1987, by President Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev, the INF Treaty enjoined the two countries to eliminate all ground-launched missiles (approximately 2,700 missiles) with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers.
National teams of inspectors would monitor and report on the elimination of these missile systems and other significant provisions of the treaty. The INF Treaty was ratified by the U.S. Senate and the USSR's Supreme Soviet in the spring of 1988, and the instruments of ratification were exchanged at the Reagan-Gorbachev Moscow Summit of June 1, 1988.C47449-17, President Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev signing the INF treaty ratification at the Grand Kremlin palace during the Moscow Summit. 6/1/88. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library
C47276-4A, President Reagan and Nancy Reagan greeting Moscow citizens on Arbat Street during the Moscow Summit.5/29/88. Courtesy Ronald Reagan LibraryExactly 30 days later the first phase of the treaty began. On-site inspections were a major component of this and all subsequent phases of the treaty. They had immediate significance, both as a barometer for measuring adherence to the treaty and as a precedent for entering into future arms control treaties and agreements.
In negotiating arms control treaties with the Soviet Union, the United States had proposed on-site inspections as a part of treaty verification for more than 30 years. However, until the late 1980s few treaties or agreements had included the provision.C47450-20, President Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev shake hands after signing the INF Treaty ratification in the Grand Kremlin Palace during the Moscow Summit. 6/1/88. Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library
One, the Stockholm Document of September 1986, was a multilateral arms control agreement signed by the United States, the Soviet Union, and 33 European nations.

It went into effect on January 1, 1987, and permitted on-site challenge inspections by small, four-person teams of military officers of large-scale, scheduled military exercises. If a military force of more than 17,000 took part in an exercise, the participating states had to provide notification 42 days in advance and issue an invitation to all of the signatories to send an on-site inspection team to observe the exercise.

There was no right of refusal. However, the agreement limited nations that were not members of the same alliance (i.e., NATO or the Warsaw Pact) to a single challenge inspection each per year. This provision limited the number of inspections. In 1987, the first full year of the Stockholm Document, there were only five on-site challenge inspections. The United States conducted a single on-site inspection under the agreement in l987. On-Site Inspections Under the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty

Speak the Truth about Democratic Erosion in Russia. Just weeks before assuming her responsibilities as National Security Adviser in 2000, Condoleezza Rice wrote about the deleterious consequences of not speaking honestly about Russia’s internal problems: “The United States should not be faulted for trying to help. But, as the Russian reformer Grigori Yavlinsky has said, the United States should have ‘told the truth’ about what was happening [inside his country].”

She then attacked “the ‘happy talk’ in which the Clinton administration engaged.” Dr. Rice’s message is even truer today. The aim of speaking the truth is not to lecture Putin or try to persuade him to change his ways, but rather to demonstrate solidarity with Russian human rights and democracy activists.

Direct personal engagement of Russian democratic activists also matters. When Ronald Reagan traveled to the Soviet Union in May 1988, he discussed arms control and regional conflicts with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. Yet, Reagan did not let his friendship and cooperation with Gorbachev overshadowed his other agenda while in town – human rights. Speaking in Helsinki the day before entering the Soviet Union for the first time, Reagan proclaimed that “There is no true international security without respect for human rights…

The greatest creative and moral force in this world, the greatest hope for survival and success, for peace and happiness, is human freedom.” During his stay in the Soviet capital, Reagan echoed this theme in action and words many times, whether in his speech to students at Moscow State University or in a luncheon with nearly a hundred human rights activists at the American ambassador’s residence. Reagan did not simply show up for a photo op with these enemies of the Soviet dictatorship.

He ordered that the ambassador’s finest silverware and linens be used to accord these human rights activists the same respect that he showed for his Soviet counterpart. American officials must again adopt a similar strategy of using meetings with Russian democratic and human rights activists to help elevate attention to their cause and help prevent these brave people from further harassment from the Russian government. Russia: Rebuilding the Iron Curtain

Text Credits :

house.gov: Generally speaking, works created by U.S. Government employees are not eligible for copyright protection in the United States. See Circular 1 "COPYRIGHT BASICS" from the U.S. Copyright Office.

1. DTRALink is provided as a public service by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Corporate Communication.

2. Information presented on DTRALink is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested.

IMAGES FROM THE REAGAN LIBRARY ARCHIVES (Selected by the Reagan Library Audiovisual Staff)

These photographs were selected through a combination of criteria: popularity, historical significance and composition. No scanned image has been cropped but please note that the on-screen color and quality may vary from an actual print. The over 600 selected images represented here are only a small portion of the over 1.5 million photographs available. All the photographs are in the public domain and may be credited "Courtesy Ronald Reagan Library."

Technorati Tags: and or and and or

Monday, May 28, 2007

2008 GOP Straw Poll Campaign 2008 Zeitgeist

Campaign 2008 Zeitgeist as Posted and un-edited. Updated 24/7. This series will spotlight the republican candidates in real time and we hope with an unbiased view. The parameters are the widest possible to return the most meaningful results. The experiment is ment to capture the Zeitgeist and therefor the true nature of the race. Let the games begin.

John McCain Zeitgeist || Mike Huckabee Zeitgeist || Tom Tancredo Zeitgeist || Rudy Giuliani Zeitgeist || Fred Thompson Zeitgeist || Mitt Romney Zeitgeist || Ron Paul Zeitgeist || Newt Gingrich Zeitgeist

2008 GOP Straw Poll, Campaign 2008 Zeitgeist




Technorati Tags: and or or and or and or and or or and or

Sunday, May 27, 2007

String Theory and Technorati Forum Edicate

Chapter 1 Technorati wacks Blogrolling, the rest of us are just Collateral Damage
Chapter 2 Hey Technorati My Authority is not getting updated! Blogroll
Chapter 3 String Theory and Technorati Forum Edicate

Space Telescope (HST), Spitzer Space Telescope (SST), Spacecraft: Chandra X-ray Telescope, Hubble Space Telescope, Spitzer Space Telescope (SST)
NASA's Hubble, Chandra and Spitzer space telescopes shows a giant jet of particles that has been shot out from the vicinity of a type of supermassive black hole called a quasar. The jet is enormous, stretching across more than 100,000 light-years of space -- a size comparable to our own Milky Way galaxy!
’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
As our journey begins we must abandon all that is known and familiar and used M-theory to explain a number of previously observed dualities. until now The multiverse proposed by Many-worlds interpretation had a shared time parameter. In most formulations, all the constituent universes are structurally identical to each other and though they have the same physical laws and values for the fundamental constants, they may exist in different states.

The constituent universes were furthermore thought to be non-communicating, in the sense that no information could pass between them. The state of the entire multiverse is related to the states of the constituent universes by quantum superposition, and is described by a single universal wavefunction. Lets surf our first 11th dimension wave to the Technorati help forum.

Administrator ryansking asks, Could you please give use some examples of links that aren't showing up? they are adduced and the thread is closed with no futher comment from admin.

Branes have collided much like those that may have been responsible for the Big Bang and are of the whole observable universe being one of many extended 4 dimensional branes in an 11 dimensional spacetime.

Posters are repeatedly told by Admin. "Thanks for using the support forum! Technorati Support" and then when no answer is forthcoming, and the thread grows long, "Please submit a support ticket from our Support Contact Form with your blog URL and a few examples of links that should be showing up in results but aren't. This will help us to research the issue further." So we see that although branes similar to that representing our universe can co-exist in the M-theory, their physical laws could differ from our own, as could their number of dimensions.

We now have observable proof of the hypothetical set of multiple possible universes (including our universe) that together comprise all of physical reality and the different universes within a multiverse are called parallel universes are a reality. We also learn that the structure of the multiverse, the nature of each universe within it and the relationship between the various constituent universes, depend on the specific multiverse hypothesis considered.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought—
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
By Lewis Caroll
Add to Technorati Favorites fav me and leave your fav link or Technorati user name in a comment and i'll fav you back.

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or

Saturday, May 26, 2007

Freedom Calendar 05/26/07 - 06/02/07

May 26, 2001, African-American Claude Allen, nominated by President George W. Bush, is confirmed as U.S. Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services.

May 27, 1987, Vietnamese-American cadet Hoang Nhu Tran, former boat person, graduates as valedictorian from U.S. Air Force Academy; nominated by U.S. Senator Bill Armstrong (R-CO).

May 28, 1930, Birth of U.S. Rep. Patricia Saiki (R-HI), first Asian-American to lead a federal agency; appointed head of U.S. Small Business Administration by President George H. W. Bush.

May 29, 1902, Virginia Democrats implement new state constitution, condemned by Republicans as illegal, reducing African-American voter registration by 86%.

Memorial Day, May 30, 1854, Democrat President Franklin Pierce signs Democrats’ Kansas-Nebraska Act, expanding slavery into U.S. territories; opponents unite to form the Republican Party.

May 31, 1870, President U.S. Grant signs Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving any American’s civil rights.

June 1, 1963, Democrat Governor George Wallace announces defiance of court order issued by Republican federal judge Frank Johnson to integrate University of Alabama.

June 2, 1924, Republican President Calvin Coolidge signs bill passed by Republican Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native Americans.

"Our nation’s long journey towards civil rights for all our citizens—once a source of discord, now a source of pride—must continue with no backsliding or slowing down. We must and shall see that those basic laws that guarantee equal rights are preserved and, when necessary, strengthened. Our concern for equal rights for women is firm and unshakable.”

Ronald Reagan, 40th President of the United States

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or and or and or or and or or and or

Presidential Podcast 05/26/07

Presidential Podcast 05/26/07
Presidential Podcast 05/26/07 en Español. In Focus: Defense, Subscribe to the Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Subscribe to Our Podcast feed or online Click here to Subscribe to Our Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Channel with Podnova podnova Podcast Channel and receive the weekly Presidential Radio Address in English and Spanish with select State Department Briefings. Featuring full audio and text transcripts, More content Sources added often so stay tuned.

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or

Bush radio address 05/26/07 full audio, text transcript

President George W. Bush calls troops from his ranch in Crawford, Texas, Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, Nov. 24, 2005. White House photo by Eric Draper.bush radio address 05/26/07 full audio, text transcript. President's Radio Address en Español. In Focus: Veterans
Subscribe to the Republican National Convention Blog Podcast Subscribe to Our Podcast feed or online Click here to Subscribe to Republican National Convention Blog's PODCAST with podnova podnova Podcast Channel and receive the weekly Presidential Radio Address in English and Spanish with select State Department Briefings. Featuring real audio and full text transcripts, More content Sources added often so stay tuned.

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This Memorial Day weekend, Americans honor those who have given their lives in service to our Nation. As we pay tribute to the brave men and women who died for our freedom, we also honor those who are defending our liberties around the world today.

On Wednesday, I met with some of the courageous young men and women who will soon take their place in the defense of our Nation: the graduating class of the United States Coast Guard Academy. Since its inception, the Coast Guard has patrolled and protected America's shores. And in this time of war, the Coast Guard has assumed new responsibilities to defend our Nation against terrorist infiltration and help stop new attacks. I was proud to stand with the Class of 2007 and thank them for their bold decision to wear the uniform.

The men and women of the Coast Guard are fighting alongside soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines who have also volunteered to protect America. We live in freedom because patriots such as these are willing to serve, and many have given their lives in defense of our Nation. On Monday, I will lay a wreath at Arlington National Cemetery to honor those who have made the ultimate sacrifice in their country's cause.
One of those who gave his life was Sergeant David Christoff, Jr., of Rossford, Ohio. The day after the attacks of September the 11th, David walked into a recruiting station to become a United States Marine. Asked why he made the decision to serve, David said: "I don't want my brother and sister to live in fear." David eventually deployed to Iraq, where he fought street by street in the battle of Fallujah and earned a Purple Heart for wounds suffered in action.

While on leave back home, David learned his company was headed for combat in Afghanistan. But he knew there was also a job to finish in Iraq. So he asked to be reassigned to a unit headed for Iraq, and last May he died in Anbar province where the Marines are taking the fight to al Qaeda. When his family received his belongings, his mother and his father each found a letter from David. He asked that they pray for his fellow Marines and all those still serving overseas.

On Memorial Day, our Nation honors Sergeant Christoff's final request. We pray for our men and women serving in harm's way. We pray for their safe return. And we pray for their families and loved ones, who also serve our country with their support and sacrifice.

On Memorial Day, we rededicate ourselves to freedom's cause. In Iraq and Afghanistan, millions have shown their desire to be free. We are determined to help them secure their liberty. Our troops are helping them build democracies that respect the rights of their people, uphold the rule of law, and fight extremists alongside America in the war on terror. With the valor and determination of our men and women in uniform, I am confident that we will succeed and leave a world that is safer and more peaceful for our children and grandchildren.

On Memorial Day, we also pay tribute to Americans from every generation who have given their lives for our freedom. From Valley Forge to Vietnam, from Kuwait to Kandahar, from Berlin to Baghdad, brave men and women have given up their own futures so that others might have a future of freedom. Because of their sacrifice, millions here and around the world enjoy the blessings of liberty. And wherever these patriots rest, we offer them the respect and gratitude of our Nation.

Thank you for listening.

END For Immediate Release, Office of the Press Secretary, May 26, 2007

Technorati Tags: and or and or and or

Discurso Radial del Presidente a la Nación 05/26/07

Presidente George W. Bush llama a tropas de su rancho en Crawford, Tejas, día de Thanksgiving, jueves, de noviembre el 24 de 2005.  Foto blanca de la casa de Eric Draper.forre el audio de la dirección de radio 05/26/07 por completo, transcripción del texto. (nota de los redactores: ninguna lengua española mp3 lanzó esta semana, apesadumbrada) PODCAST
Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Odeo Suscribir a nuestro canal de Podcast de Odeo o del podnova Chascar aquí para suscribir a nuestro canal republicano de Blog Podcast de la convención nacional con Podnova y recibir la dirección de radio presidencial semanal en inglés y español con informes selectos del departamento del estado. Ofreciendo transcripciones audio y con texto completo verdaderas, más fuentes contentas agregaron a menudo así que la estancia templó.

Buenos Días. Este fin de semana del Día de Conmemoración de los Caídos, los estadounidenses honramos aquellos que dieron sus vidas en el servicio de nuestra Nación. Al rendir tributo a los valientes hombres y mujeres que murieron por nuestra libertad, también honramos aquellos que hoy en día están defendiendo nuestras libertades en todas partes del mundo.

El miércoles estuve con algunos de los valientes hombres y mujeres jóvenes quienes pronto tomarán su lugar en defensa de nuestra Nación - la clase que se graduó de la Academia de Guardacostas de Estados Unidos. Desde su fundación los Guardacostas han patrullado y protegido las costas de Estados Unidos. Y en estos tiempos de guerra, los Guardacostas han asumido nuevas responsabilidades para defender a nuestro país contra la infiltración terrorista y ayudar a detener nuevos ataques. Me sent orgulloso de estar junto a los miembros de la Clase del 2007 y agradecerles por su valiente decisión de llevar el uniforme.

Los hombres y mujeres de los Guardacostas están luchando al lado de soldados, marineros, aviadores e Infantes de Marina quienes también se alistaron como voluntarios para proteger a Estados Unidos. Vivimos con libertad ya que patriotas tales como estos están dispuestos a servir - y muchos han dado la vida en defensa de nuestra Nación. El lunes colocar una corona en el Cementerio Nacional de Arlington para honrar a aquellos que hicieron el sacrificio máximo por la causa de su país.

Uno de aquellos que dio su vida fue el Sargento David Christoff, Jr., de Rossford, Ohio. El día después de los ataques del 11 de septiembre, David entró a una oficina de reclutamiento para convertirse en Infante de Marina. Cuando le preguntaron porqué había tomado la decisión de servir, David dijo: "No quiero que mi hermano y mi hermana vivan con miedo". David eventualmente fue destacado a Irak, donde luchó calle a calle en la batalla de Fallujah y mereció la condecoración "Corazón Púrpura" por las heridas que recibió en acción.

Estando de vacaciones en casa, David supo que su compañía salía para combate en Afganistán. Pero él sabía que quedaba un trabajo por terminar en Irak. Por lo tanto pidió ser reasignado a una unidad con destino a Irak - y en mayo pasado murió en la provincia de Anbar donde los Infantes de Marina están librando la lucha contra al Qaeda. Cuando su familia recibió sus pertenencias, su madre y su padre ambos encontraron una carta de David.

Les pedía que rezaran por sus compañeros Infantes de Marina y por todos que aún están sirviendo en el extranjero.

En el Día de Conmemoración de los Caídos nuestra Nación honra el último pedido del Sargento Christoff. Rezamos por nuestros hombres y mujeres que sirven en situaciones peligrosas. Rezamos por que regresen a salvo. Y rezamos por sus familias y seres queridos - que también sirven a nuestro país con su apoyo y sacrificio.

En el Día de Conmemoración de los Caídos, nos dedicamos una vez más a la causa de la libertad. En Irak y Afganistán, millones han mostrado su deseo de ser libres. Nosotros estamos resueltos a ayudarlos a obtener su libertad. Nuestras tropas los están ayudando a crear democracias que respeten los derechos de sus pueblos, mantengan el imperio de la ley y luchen contra extremistas junto a Estados Unidos en la guerra contra el terror. Con el valor y la resolución de nuestros hombres y mujeres en uniforme, yo confío que lograremos el éxito - y dejaremos un mundo más seguro y más pacífico para nuestros hijos y nuestros nietos.

En el Día de Conmemoración de los Caídos, también rendimos tributo a estadounidenses de todas las generaciones que dieron sus vidas por nuestra libertad. Desde Valley Forge hasta Vietnam, desde Kuwait a Kandahar, desde Berlin a Bagdad, hombres y mujeres valientes han entregado sus propios futuros a fin de que otros pudieran tener un futuro de libertad. Gracias a su sacrificio, millones aquí y en todo el mundo disfrutan de las bendiciones de la libertad - y dondequiera que descansen estos patriotas, les ofrecemos el respeto y la gratitud de nuestra Nación.

Gracias por escuchar.

### Para su publicación inmediata, Oficina del Secretario de Prensa, 26 de mayo de 2007

Etiquetas De Technorati: , y or and or

Friday, May 25, 2007

Zogby Poll: Partisanship Out, Competence In For Next President VIDEO

Americans now value leadership and unity more than ideology; Poll shows rebirth of the “political center”, FULL STREAMING VIDEO



Technorati Tags: and or and , or and , or , and , or and